GE books NZ$332,139 tax gain as consumer lender's annual profit more than doubles

GE books NZ$332,139 tax gain as consumer lender's annual profit more than doubles

By Gareth Vaughan

GE Finance and Insurance Group, which trades as GE Money offering personal loans, debt consolidation loans, car loans, credit cards and insurance, saw its annual profit more than double last year as a fall in expenses outweighed a drop in revenue.

Meanwhile a related company, GE Capital New Zealand Funding, booked a NZ$332,139 tax gain last year due to the utilisation of group tax losses.

GE's profit after tax surged to NZ$65.4 million in 2010 from NZ$28.5 million in 2009 according to statements filed to the Companies Office.  This came despite a NZ$56.6 million, or 16%, fall in operating revenue to NZ$286.9 million as total expenses, including a NZ$20 million fall in finance costs, were slashed by NZ$112.4 million, or 37%, to NZ$190.9 million.

GE Money describes itself as a profile lender, meaning the interest rates it charges customers vary from person to person based on the likes of credit checks, income and assets. Its personal loans start from NZ$3,000 with no set upper limit. The company says on a NZ$10,000 two-year loan the interest rate charged could vary from 17.5% to 34.15% and on a NZ$15,000 loan over the same time period, 15.25% to 32.5%.

On its personal loans and debt consolidation loans GE Money also charges a NZ$275 establishment fee, which is a once only fee for establishing an account. There's also a NZ$10 early termination fee if the loan is paid in full before the end of the loan term, NZ$1.50 placement handling fee charged for each payment other than by mail or direct debit, and NZ$35 late payment fee, which applies if the customer doesn't make the whole of the minimum payment by the due date.

GE Capital New Zealand Funding was the entity used for the group's commercial paper programme, which hasn't bee utilised since mid-2009. It booked a NZ$332,139 tax gain last year, which a GE spokesman said was due to the utilisation of tax losses from another GE entity, which were used to offset tax paid by GE Capital New Zealand Funding in 2008 and 2009.

GE Capital New Zealand Funding has a NZ$500 million loan from its parent General Electric Capital Corporation of which NZ$498.2 million was undrawn at December 31, 2010. It's a five-year committed revolving credit facility that's automatically extended for successive five-year terms. Interest on the loan is calculated using the bank bill rate plus a margin.

Meanwhile, of GE Finance and Insurance Group's annual revenue, interest income fell NZ$35.3 million, or 16%, to NZ$189.5 million from NZ$224.8 million, and fee income and commission received fell NZ$5.5 million, or 8%, to NZ$64.1 million. from NZ$69.7 million. Receivable impairments, net of recoveries, fell NZ$63.5 million, or 58%, to NZ$46.2 million from NZ$109.7 million. GE Finance and Insurance paid tax of NZ$30.62 million in 2010, up from NZ$11.74 million the previous year.

The company's loans and receivables fell NZ$162.9 million, or 12%, to NZ$1.227 billion from NZ$1.390 billion. GE's provision for impairment fell NZ$15 million, or 25%, to NZ$45.9 million from NZ$61 million.

GE Finance and Insurance Group, whose ultimate parent company is US conglomerate General Electric Company, expects the February 22 Christchurch earthquake to cost it NZ$4.6 million through unrecoverable loans and says it will recognise this in its 2011 financial results.

This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers this morning. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

it is time that someone from asked some hard questions of auditors, trustees and the like. GE has made a killing over the last 12 months. trustees and auditors have decimated many finance companies taking investors hard earned money with them. I do not believe for a moment that all of the failures were the result of bad decisions,  incompetent management, corrupt practices or dodgy lending. It just doesn't stack up. GE have proven that the sector is a proverbial gold mine. something smells very very wrong to me and I'm sure it does to readers as well. I remember when Provincial went in 2006 and the receiver stated within one week of appointment that PWC would recover close to 100%. They got 93%, after a quick fire wind down. PF should never have been tipped by its Trustee. what is going on? Why has the likes of been so quiet on the Auditor front? C&M at 0% recovered for investors must leave the Auditor shaking in their collective boots. Its time someone was tested by the Courts. Why the silence? Has NZICA done a back room deal? Or are auditors / receivers collectively incompetent?

 Its time someone was tested by the Courts. Why the silence? 

Courts are just fear vehicles - bought and paid for stooges of the Crown.

The court is where games are played sometimes with a racquet...its all about balancing the books. Thats why in the racquet known as court it usually has a financial bend to it...

The judge is nothing more than a referee on the bench, latin for bank, representing the bankers and their owners... 

It should be reasonably obvious by now...but I guess not...


GE are the classic 'fairweather friend'. Pulled out of NZ a few years back when things got a bit tough, now back in the thick of it now there's cash to be made. 

Wouldn't use this company, even if I had the need.