sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

BusinessDesk: Telecom beats critics with early release of Reynolds’ pay details

BusinessDesk: Telecom beats critics with early release of Reynolds’ pay details

Telecom Corp. chief executive Paul Reynolds was paid $5.2 million in the year ended June 30, more than 100 times the average wage, according to figures released by New Zealand’s biggest phone company today.

Reynolds’ total remuneration jumped about 74% from the previous year, when Telecom had to contend with the costs and PR fallout of the outages on its XT network.

The former BT executive, who helped oversee a similar operational separation at the U.K. phone company, will leave Telecom by June 30, 2013, the company said last month. It expects to split its business into separate retail and network entities by the end of November.

Chairman Wayne Boyd, who is also departing the company, said Reynolds’ pay in the latest year reflects the fact that he has met short and long-term objectives.

“Telecom has experienced a very strong year, including reaching agreement with the Crown for partnership on both ultra-fast broadband and the rural broadband initiative, at the same time as delivering a strong operational performance,” Boyd said.

“It is the view of the board the Dr Reynolds has more than achieved the objectives that were set for him and his team at the start of the financial year, and this is reflected in his remuneration for the period,” Boyd said.

Reynolds has received a total of $16.3 million in remuneration since he started in September 2007, including cash, shares and special payments, Telecom said.
In that time shares of Telecom have shed 44%.They rose 0.2% to $2.48 on the NZX today.

The company is rated a ‘hold’ based on the consensus of nine analyst recommendations compiled by Reuters.

The phone company won the lion’s share of the government’s broadband rollout after proposing structural separation in a bid to shed the heavy regulatory burden of operating a copper-line network monopoly, and win tax-payer funding to build a nationwide fibre network.

That bid was successful, and Chorus won $929 million of the $1.35 billion on offer from the government to roll-out an ultra-fast broadband network. Chorus expects it will have to spend $470 million and $670 million of its own money over the next eight years on construction.

Once the split is complete, New Telecom will be the bigger of the two companies, with adjusted pro-forma earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of $1.125 billion on $5.1 billion of sales in the 12 months ended June 30, while Chorus made $676 million on $1.1 billion of revenue.

BusinessDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

5 Comments

 Fantastic – this morning on another sunny/ warm day, walking on the Kaikoura beach we discovered about 10 Hector dolphins peacefully cruising in front of us for 15 minutes and 400m farther out, hundred’s of Dusky dolphins enjoying them selves - jumping and somersaulting.

 ..and I was sitting on a log of driftwood and thought, why are people enjoy hooking beautiful fish – why not hooking two legged, greedy, corrupt capitalistic wall- street swine’s destroying our planet and our societies - daily ?

 Looking into current developments on many fronts – the world will never recover again, simply because among the powerful in societies ethic and moral requirements and standards don’t prevail.

Up
0

Worth every cent. Telecom is a totally different company than it was under Teresa Gattung. They would never won the UFB contract they did under the new regime. Reynolds must take most of the credit for that.

Up
0

I hook you too - Ptolemy !

Up
0

Nice to know he has contributed 100 times more to telecom and to society than any telecom worker on the average wage. 

Up
0

Don't begrudge the sum, but KPI's set by the Board must be extremely lame……or weighted heavily towards goals less important. How do you ignore and reward such an appalling share price performance? Something sadly lacking.

Up
0