Transport Minister Gerry Brownlee says Govt decided not to proceed with new Clifford Bay terminal; will instead upgrade Picton

Transport Minister Gerry Brownlee says Govt decided not to proceed with new Clifford Bay terminal; will instead upgrade Picton

Transport Minister Gerry Brownlee has announced the Government has decided not to go ahead with a new ferry terminal at Clifford Bay in Marlborough after a study found it was not commercially viable. 

The Government now supported an upgrade of the Picton terminal, which would remain as the only southern terminal for the Inter-Islander ferries.

“We have been delivered a thorough and robust report which clearly shows Clifford Bay is not commercially viable as a fully privately funded project, and the level of investment required at Picton over the next decade to extend its life would be substantially less than previously estimated,” Brownlee said.

He later told a news conference a Clifford Bay terminal would have cost NZ$530 million in today's money to build by 2022.

"This left a gap the Government would have been required to fill to induce private sector investment in the construction and operation of the terminal," Brownlee said.

The study found Picton’s facilities were not expected to fail or become constrained due to asset age or condition, or growth in freight volumes, over the next 30 years. 

It also found the level of investment required at Picton by Port Marlborough over the next decade to extend its life and adapt its facilities was approximately half the cost estimated in 2012. 

Brownlee said it was concluded a number of significant financial risks would exist in the development and early operating phase of a ferry terminal at Clifford Bay.

“While it was expected these would be manageable, mitigation and management cost would have fallen to the Government," he said.

“In the end, the government cost, remaining risks, and the lack of a compelling constraint at Picton have led us to decide the Clifford Bay option should be set aside at this time,” he said.

“I hope this announcement will provide some planning certainty for Marlborough communities.”

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

4 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

So there's public money for private farmer water schemes but not for a vital piece of infrastructure for the entire nation? I'm not keen on Big government but some things are just so important and monopolistic that it has to be - this was one of them.
Ergophobia

At least one of the 'remaining risks' for a Clifford Bay terminal is the fact that the recent Seddon earthquake sequence had some epicentres practically right under the site.....
 
The Picton residual option is certainly the most scenic, and now that the fast ferries have stopped, the spectre of the Sounds being adversely affected has receded.
 
For the uninitiated, the FF's had four 10,000 horse engines, each driving a jet propulsion unit.  Bill Hamilton would've had conniptions at the thought.  The jets emitted a tubular column of water strong enough, upon reaching shore, to throw football-sized rocks onto bach owners' front lawns.  Lord knows what that did to the sea floor...a classic negative externality in economic terms.

With Cliford Bay could we not have the Fast Ferries back?  As they are running through open ocean only.

Once again it is salutory to compare the costs of projects under consideration with the $3.8B value for which they sold Meridian.  $530M for essentially one wharf, a terminal building and a bit of road compared to $3.8B for 7 hydro power stations, dams, tunnels, canals and associated roading, plus about 6 wind farms and all their associated infrastructure.  The incompetence or whatever else is going on with our polititians and public servants is mind boggling.