sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Patrick Watson sees a silver lining in the pandemic for workers because Covid-19 is choking off foreign competition meaning they face less competition and can demand higher wages

Patrick Watson sees a silver lining in the pandemic for workers because Covid-19 is choking off foreign competition meaning they face less competition and can demand higher wages

By Patrick Watson*

“Either/or” thinking is one of the great scourges of our time. We want to think every dilemma has a quick answer. This is rarely so.

The impulse is understandable. Deluged with often conflicting information, we wish everything could be easy. If Condition X causes Problem Y, then stopping X will prevent Y. See, it’s simple.

This often happens in economics. A few months ago, we were being told the US “labor shortage” had one simple explanation: Certain people didn’t want to work because COVID-enhanced unemployment benefits paid them to stay home.

If that’s the explanation, the simple solution is to cut those benefits. Governors in many states did so, starting back in May.

Data since then shows little effect on employment. Employers in those same states still can’t find workers.

Were the extra benefits (which have now expired nationwide) part of the explanation? Probably. But thinking they were the only explanation led to policy choices that didn’t solve the problem and may have caused others, like less consumer spending by the people who depended on those benefits.

Whatever the causes, it is certainly true that US employers have more open jobs than job applicants who might fill them. We can point to many causes but it looks increasingly like a permanent change.

There’s another reason you may not have considered, too.

Source: pxfuel.

Wage arbitrage

Remember “globalization?” It was a top business buzzword in the early 2000s. China’s entry into the World Trade Organization marked a period of international trade, easy travel, technology sharing, and economic integration. It was the earlier NAFTA agreement on steroids, applied worldwide.

Globalization certainly helped GDP growth, corporate profits, and stock prices. It was also good for consumers. Prices fell on all manner of imported goods, distributed at big box stores like Walmart and Home Depot.

All this had a darker side, though.

One reason those goods became cheaper is their production moved overseas, where US companies could find less expensive labor and governments often didn’t enforce Western-style labor standards. In economics lingo, we call this “wage arbitrage.” Companies sought the lowest-cost labor, wherever it might be. Politicians encouraged this, thinking (or perhaps rationalizing) US workers would find better jobs at higher pay.

It didn’t work out that way. Many US factory workers lost their jobs, leading to social problems, opioid addiction, political populism, and eventually Donald Trump.

These problems were apparent at the time. It was also apparent globalization wouldn’t last forever. In 2016 I wrote a guest column for John Mauldin about game-changing technology developments. Then two years later I described how Trump’s trade policies were forcing businesses to adapt.

Then came the pandemic.

Source: Wikimedia.

Global hiring pool

With COVID-19 spreading, international business travel became difficult or even impossible last year. Meetings moved online, but that’s an imperfect substitute. If you’re an American CEO considering whether to buy a factory in Asia, you want to go see it yourself, or at least send a trusted representative.

Deals kept happening. Progress slowed but it didn’t stop. Nonetheless, the slowing is still a big problem. And it doesn’t seem likely to end soon.

The entire globe is now a complex web of entry restrictions, mandatory quarantines, vaccination requirements, and medical screening. And even if you can get where you want to go, returning home may be another problem.

Global commerce hasn’t stopped. Far from it; ports are clogged with more container ships than ever, bringing goods to feed our new spending patterns. But production of many goods is starting to shift. The finely balanced supply chains need predictability above all else. That’s a lot easier if you don’t have to import goods or components.

So how does this connect to the labor shortage? Well, think about the labor supply.

If you are a globally minded American CEO, globalization expanded your hiring pool beyond US borders. In fact, you probably hired as few Americans as possible. You depended on lower-paid foreigners who would never set foot in the US. That’s not so easy anymore.

From CEO level, the shrinking labor supply isn’t just about American workers. It’s also about losing access to lower-cost foreign labor, too.

Source: pxfuel.

Locked in

This is good news for many American workers. With the pandemic choking off the foreign talent pool, they face less competition and can demand higher wages.

This doesn’t seem likely to end soon. The virus isn’t going away until most of the world gets either infected or vaccinated, which will take several more years.

Big companies have to plan ahead. The decisions they make now will lock them into certain directions for years to come. The changes we’re seeing now won’t be easily or quickly reversed.

Where all this will lead is unclear. But it’s already bringing big adjustments, and will probably bring more.

*Patrick Watson is senior economic analyst at Mauldin Economics. This article is from a regular Mauldin Economics series called Connecting the Dots.  It first appeared here, and is used by with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


I suppose one would have to start treating your employees like human beings. Shudder the thought.


...while steadily replacing them with robots.


Whatever the causes...

Fewer workers per consumer? [link] We can stave off the effects by exploiting labour from low income countries.


Good article. Always worth remembering that our standard of living is sustained by exploiting the natural and human resources in poorer countries. This may have been worked for us over the last 50 years (ethics aside), but it will not suit the next 50 years as tensions build over limited resources and weather / pandemics etc continue to disrupt international trade and relations.

We need an industrial strategy that focuses on how we become less dependent on resources overseas - a de-globalisation strategy if you will. 


I don't think any of the employers in Tauranga got the memo, its pretty much all $20 to $25 an hour down here still.


"With the pandemic choking off the foreign talent pool, they face less competition and can demand higher wages."

This literally means businesses are paying more for less on employees.


The elephant in the room is that as soon as labour costs exceed capital costs, the employment disappears completely.

Examples are myriad already:

- the massive touchscreens at McDonalds vs paying a teenager $20 an hour to ask you if you want fries with that.

- one guy driving round a Rav4 with a number plate recognition camera vs a team of parking wardens

- self-service checkouts with one floating assistant vs operators on every till

- a visit to Webjet vs a travel agent

- automatic tolling vs a team of toll booth operators

- online banking vs tellers

- stock picking robots vs people running round a warehouse


Thus far the cost comparison has only come out unfavourably for low skilled positions, but with technology advances in AI and robotics expect that to start encroaching on more complex jobs, e.g.

- Self driving buses/trains/cars/trucks/planes vs drivers/pilots

- Online conveyancing vs lawyers

- Face recognition/tracking software vs police on the beat

- Pretty much every facet of skilled manufacturing


Any boost in wages is as short lived as it takes for technology to lower the cost of automation below that of the human labour pool.




cheez hope those workers did'nt take out a 800k mortgage to buy a million dollar house then.


Not to worry as Aunty Jacinda will keep NZ shutdown from the world.

Is it,  as is aware of the fragile health system and trying to cover up.


Crikey. So Trump was right (again). Flooding the country with unskilled workers lowers wages...Yep. Adam Smith 101.


Well Trumpy would know. His outfit undoubtedly employed plenty of illegals.