sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Chinese tightening and property taxes loom; Australia's housing affordability squeeze; America's property tax death spiral; Jon Stewart does The Bernank; Dilberts

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Chinese tightening and property taxes loom; Australia's housing affordability squeeze; America's property tax death spiral; Jon Stewart does The Bernank; Dilberts
<br />

Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 11 pm, brought to you in association with New Zealand Mint for your reading pleasure. My apologies for the appalling lateness. It's been a heck of a day.

I welcome your additions and comments below, or please send suggestions for Friday's Top 10 at 10 via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop any surplus suggestions I get into the comment stream

1. One to watch - The Chinese are likely to hike official interest rates this weekend and bring forward the release of inflation data.

They are having to work very hard to push the inflation genie back in the bottle.

Also, some big cities in China are looking at trialling new property taxes to try to cool down their housing market.

All this is worrying a few Chinese stock investors.

Also worth watching very closely is an apparently large selloff in US Treasuries, the biggest in more than two years.

Is this the beginning of the end of that bubble?

Here's the detail from Bloomberg on the fear about a Chinese tightening and slowdown.

“Investors will be very cautious before this weekend pending the announcement of November inflation and a possible interest-rate hike,” said Li Jun, a strategist at Central China Securities Co. in Shanghai. “Uncertainty is about to peak and this may drag the market down.”  

2. Ooh ahh Cantonaaaa ... aaaah... not this time - The November 7 bank revolt in Europe was a flop, BBC reports. It turns out Man United's Eric Cantona didn't even pull his own money out of the bank and his wife had done advertisements for a bank. Ooo aaah? More like Oh dear.

Cantona had gone online to call for customers to empty their accounts on Tuesday in a "revolution" against a "corrupt, criminal" banking system.

But he himself failed to turn up at a bank where he had promised to withdraw "more than 1,500 euros". EU financial leaders have described the protest as irresponsible.  

3. Did we see this here? - In America the cheapest homes rose the most in price during the property bubble, and therefore fell the fastest when the easy credit was withdrawn, Barry Ritholz argues here. HT John

“During the great housing bubble boom, it was the least expensive homes whose prices went up the most. And now it is those homes that are suffering the most.

“That is where the most creative lending was,” said David Blitzer, the chairman of the index committee at Standard & Poor’s, arguing that the lax lending standards played a significant role in the inflation of prices.”

Of course, “Lending” is just another word for credit. This is consistent with what you would expect from a credit bubble. The higher end homes — often purchased for cash, or with a very substantial down payment — appreciated the least in percentage terms.  

4. Container ship go slow - Trying to work out what is happening with global trade is never easy, but it's sometimes worth looking at how fast container ships are travelling. When they start sailing slow that can say something about the state of global trade, The Australian reports. One to watch. HT Hugh via email.

NINETY per cent of the container ships heading to Northern Europe from Asia have been forced to slow to the speed of a "fresh breeze". A sudden slump in demand has caused the slowdown. Analysts said the ships had been ordered on to "extra-slow steaming" as a way of saving money and stretching out the work they have.

The average speed of container ships has been cut from 25 to 17 knots, which, according to the Beaufort scale, equates to a fresh breeze. Demand for imported goods from Asia has fallen, leaving shipping firms with significant excess capacity.

The purchasers of the cargo are usually happy with this arrangement as it postpones the arrival of goods they are struggling to sell. The situation in the shipping market has deteriorated so sharply that companies are expected to start idling vessels within weeks.  

5. No wonder the bubble is bursting - The Real Estate Institute of Australia has reported housing affordability there recorded its worst deterioration in a decade during the September quarter. HT Hugh via email. Check out the quote. You see the way his lip wobbles and the bead of sweat appears on his forehead.

David Airey, president of the REIA, says the results from the Deposit Power Housing Affordability report show the proportion of income required to meet loan repayments increased by 5.8 percentage points to 34.8%.

"These are quite alarming figures," he says. "It's quite an alarming state in the market... we could get to a place where people say they are starting to think about selling their properties."  

6. The property death spiral - We all know about the deflationary debt spiral. That's where a fall in prices and wages makes the debt picture worse in terms of incomes. A fall in asset prices makes debt bigger in that it wipes out equity and leaves less leeway for further problems.

Now there's another twist.

In America local governments raise a lot of their money through taxes on property values in a blunt sort of way (unlike rates in New Zealand which seem to adjust with property values...) In America a fall in property values simply reduces tax revenues. That's driving many local governments into bankruptcy. It's another aspect of the global debt spiral.

What's required is debt restructuring. ie banks and their shareholders and bondholders need to revalue their assets lower and clear the decks so we can all start again. In ye olden times it was called a debt jubilee.

 Here's Bloomberg with the story of how US state governments are suffering.

One aspect is the number of appeals over property valuations and rates.

Can people do the same here?

A fiscal flood that threatens to swamp local government budgets across the U.S. overflows from file cabinets in the office of Patty Halm, chair of the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The backlog of cases from taxpayers seeking to lower property-tax bills of more than $100,000 shot up to 14,236 this year from an annual average of about 6,000 during the past decade.

“We’re just getting swamped,” said Halm, 54, who was appointed in 2003.

“We’re constantly buying new file cabinets to hold all the cases. We even have six surplus file cabinets in the courtroom.”

U.S. home prices are 30 percent below their peak of April 2006, according to the seasonally adjusted S&P/Case-Shiller index of property values in 20 cities. They may drop 10 percent more, Greg Lippmann, a founder of New York-based LibreMax Capital LLC. Meanwhile, the Moody’s/REAL Commercial Property Price Index of U.S. commercial property is 43 percent below its October 2007 peak.

“If we look into the future, assessments will have to reflect the market value, and two years out, property-tax receipts will have to be coming down,” Michael Pagano, dean of the College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said in a telephone interview. “If the appeals are largely successful, they will generate a lot more appeals.”  

7. Stress test failures - Unlike America's banking stress tests, which rebuilt market confidence, the result of Europe's banking stress tests has been less than inspiring, Bloomberg reports.

The failure of the EU tests to restore confidence in the region’s banks was underscored last month when Ireland directed its two biggest lenders, both of which passed the exams, to raise additional capital. Since the results were disclosed on July 23, the cost of insuring the senior debt of 110 European banks against default rose 113 basis points, or 1.13 percentage points, while credit-default swaps on 34 of the largest U.S. banks are unchanged, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Now, amid a widening European debt crisis, regulators from 27 nations are searching for ways to improve the tests, which will be repeated next year. That won’t be easy as long as national leaders and central banks remain unwilling to cede bank oversight to a central authority, said Nicolas Veron, a senior fellow at Bruegel, a Brussels-based economics research group.

“Financial nationalism prevented the tests from being credible or really useful,” said Veron, who’s also a visiting fellow at the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics. “Nations view the bank tests as a competitive game among countries and not as a way to ensure the common good of European financial stability.”

8. America is next, say the Chinese - The Economic Times reports a key Chinese official saying that America's fiscal position is the next one to look at. The Chinese, understandably are intensely aware, of the risks of a collapse in the value of all those US Treasury bonds they have bought over the years. HT Gertraud via email.

Li Daokui, an academic member of the central bank's monetary policy committee, said that U.S. bond prices and the dollar would fall when the European economic situation stabilised.

"For now, market attention is still on Europe and for the coming 6-12 months, it will not shift to the United States," Li said, when asked about U.S. President Barack Obama's plan to extend tax cuts for all Americans.

"But we should be clear in our minds that the fiscal situation in the United States is much worse than in Europe. In one or two years, when the European debt situation stabilises, attention of financial markets will definitely shift to the United States. At that time, U.S. Treasury bonds and the dollar will experience considerable declines."

9. Zombies and the Bush tax cuts - Jon Stewart does his thing on Barack Obama's backdown on tax cuts for the rich. This is the best explanation of what happened I've seen yet. And I laughed a lot too.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Supercuts
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> The Daily Show on Facebook

10. Totally hilarious video about the Fed and QE II from Jon Stewart.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
The Big Bank Theory
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> The Daily Show on Facebook

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

35 Comments

Should Ireland have defaulted like Iceland. The Guardian thinks maybe...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/dec/08/iceland-and-irelands-for…

Contrast the downbeat Irish finance minister Brian Lenihan, as he pushed through the €85bn rescue package, with his opposite number, Steingrímur J Sigfússon. An upbeat Sigfússon issued a notice saying negotiations over the debts of Icesave, the savings bank that went bust with billions of pounds of British and Dutch savers' cash, were nearing a conclusion. Sources close to the Icesave talks said the 5.5% interest rate demanded by the Dutch and British earlier in the year, and rejected in the referendum, would probably be revised down to less than 2.8%.

Sigfússon's Icesave talks follow an aggressive policy of rejected responsibility for the accumulated liabilities of the three "New Viking" banks – Landsbanki, Glitnir and Kaupthing.

Icelanders believed the huge overhang of claims for repayment would overwhelm the country's capacity to maintain a decent, albeit much reduced, living standard and repay debt at the same time. The country's response was to let its currency plunge by more than 80% in value and impose capital controls preventing foreigners from taking cash out of the country.

Bondholders in the three banks were told they would need to wait for their money and in all likelihood would be forced to accept a small fraction of their original investment.

By contrast, Lenihan, the Irish finance minister, has accepted paying up to 7% interest on new loans from the EU and Britain. He has argued that the deal will profit Ireland in the longer term because remaining inside the eurozone offers greater hope of growth than staying outside. He rejects critics who say leaving the euro would allow the country to in effect devalue and therefore boost exports and tourism and follow Iceland out of recession.

Up
0

Hi Bernard

 

 Here are the two sites I told you about yesterday in Christchurch. 1. http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com  This is a wonderful site on the European situation.  I wrote a post in the Guardian and asked who were these Bondholders that were able to bring down countries.  After a number of posts telling me how ignorant I was, a very kind person suggested this site which had a whole article on who they actually were - in detail.   2. I liked this "you tube video thing".  Simple but very good.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5N6i0DuYpc
Up
0

Great stuff

Nice to catch up with you.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

And here's Jim Rogers talking at Reuters about how no currency union in history has ever worked.

http://blogs.reuters.com/chrystia-freeland/2010/12/07/video-jim-rogers-…

HT John via email.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Here's the shape of things to come.

Big new American tariffs on Chinese steel pipe exports.

http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&sid=a9_ppGalFcD8

The U.S. International Trade Commission in October upheld tariffs of 63 percent and higher on steel products from Tianjin and other producers, finding that U.S. steelmakers are harmed by subsidies the Chinese companies receive and by unfair pricing.

“While we say, ‘Let the markets work,’ China is building up these national champions,” says Alan Price, a Washington lawyer who has represented U.S.-based steelmakers in trade cases.

This battle over the government’s backing for its exporters marks a further deterioration in Chinese-American relations, already strained by charges and countercharges of currency manipulation.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

And here's Ambrose on the big selloff in US Treasuries

The bond rout raises concerns that the US authorities may be losing control over events.

Stephen Lewis, from Monument Securities, said the bond rout is a sign that Washington can no longer take global markets for granted. "We have reached the limits of tolerance for budget deficits. There is a feeling around the world that nobody in Washington is paying any attention to the implications of what they are doing, but there is a very real risk that this will backfire if it causes mortgage rates to keep going up," he said.

"At the same time we've seen a loss of confidence in Fed strategy. There is a feeling that the Fed doesn't care about inflation – in fact, wants more of it – and that is certainly not in the interest of bondholders," he said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8190059/Global-bond-rout-d…

Up
0

Should NZ have a bank levy like the one just announced in Britain?

http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=416976&NewsAreaID=2…

Following two periods of consultation since June, the final legislation contains changes to the rate of the levy. The rate for 2011 will be 0.05 per cent, rather than 0.04 percent, and it will rise to 0.075 per cent from 2012, instead of the 0.07 per cent announced in June.

These changes, along with the introduction of an allowance, rather than a threshold, for those liabilities to which the levy applies, will generate around £21/2 billion of annual revenues. This is in line with the Budget estimates.

The levy is intended to encourage banks to move to less risky funding profiles, and the £21/2 billion is a fair contribution in respect of the risks the banking system poses to the wider economy, while ensuring that the industry remains competitive. The levy will take effect from 1 January 2011 and will be permanent.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

The banking sector has an incredibly cushy ride. They provide a service on which GST is not charged. It is charged on bread of course. Interest is sacred, bread is profane.

Their product, interest, is deductible as a current expense against income. It is a capital cost chargeable against capital gain, not current expense, since it derives from the owner's decision to fund their business with debt rather than equity.

A turnover tax is an excellent idea. I know lets call it the Very Very Small and Special Rate of GST for the Banks.

Oh, no, you've got me started.

 

 

Up
0

You're a bigger fan of bubbles than my 5 year old is , Bernard ..... Meebee we should have a poll or a bet as to which of the three you often cite ( China property bubble / Australia property bubble / or NZ property bubble ) actually comes true ........ Or which one pops first .

Warren & Tarquain have been on the blower , getcha self down to the salon , for a fresh boof . ........... Very Raggedy Ann , old bean !

Up
0

Thanks Gummy. I'll ask for a "fresh boof"

Any suggestions people?

Short back and sides? Buzz cut? Number 1?

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

The fresh Boof.........I think you meant.........short backslide...

Maybe a..... razor cut punk.... spike for unsuspecting bubbles..........nah nope not you..!

The Alarmist...also known as the Don King

The Economist...you get the wife to cut it...it looks like shite...but at least you never paid 4 it.

The Bi Polar.....you get the back of your head shaved completely and draw a happy face on it.

The Trump........rent a squirrel of a relaxed disposition.....apply with uhu.

The Doomsday Doo.... cut of your choice....dye it red...add horns....sharpen the foo.

Up
0

Bernard - forget the hair, just get a decent hat:

http://www.amazon.com/Che-Beret-Faux-Hair-Adult/dp/B003JA6714/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1291947473&sr=8-6

Perhaps if Tribeless was around he'd be advising just stick your finger in a power socket to make what you have appropriately anisotropic:

http://coromandal.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/kim-jong-il-team-america1.jpg

I enjoyed your talk yesterday, I think it went down really well. Plus, am impressed that you managed to get 10 at 10 out yesterday  - it was a long day! Have a good weekend, chill.

Cheers, Les.

www.mea.org.nz

Up
0

6am near enough and one of those cnbc 'I can scream louder than you' discussions on the housing collapse was all about rising rates being likely to encourage people to borrow and buy a property before the rates went higher.........there was no way this could have been orchestrated in advance............is there?

Up
0

Listen to Jon Stewart feels quite homely – except we are lucky enough and don’t have to print money.

Up
0

No Walter...we have to borrow the printed money.....hmmmmm.

Up
0

Is there a Government Guarantee on the quality of those newly printed $US 100 we'll be spending ? ............. Hope the ink's dry .

Up
0

Sure is Gummy...just you remember to burn the crook ones and send back all the good stuff to Timmy the Rat. He's counting on you!

Up
0

D'ya notice the change in vernacular : In days of yore the $US was respected , as was referred to as " minted " ................ Now we wipe our arses on an extra $US 600 billion of 'em , and hope the inks dry after they're " printed " .

Up
0

not sure if this has already been posted...!

"Any fairytale notions that we are living in a nation built on the rule of law and of the global economy being based on free market principles has now been exposed as just that, a fairytale. This moment is equivalent to everyone in Vatican City being told, by the Pope, that God is dead."

 http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article24837.html

Up
0

Thats why the Chinese are buying gold.Because soon the world will be awash with American dollars.Their are only so many Chevys you can buy. 

Up
0

#6 - Property Taxes/Rates in New Zealand

The situation facing America in terms of local government revenue decreases can't happen here.  Yes, one can object to a property rating valuation here but even if a large percentage of homeowners did such in an attempt to reduce their rates bill - it doesn't mean the Local Authority would suffer a revenue decline.

The reason being the way NZ Local Authorities set their budgets and subsequent revenue collection.  It's very clever and deflation proof.

They decide the total amount of money (revenue) they need through the Annual Plan process - and then apportion that amount amongst all ratepayers.  Some of that apportionment is via fixed charges (regardless of valuation), some is via capital and/or land values.  But regardless of the method of apportionment - the total amount collected will be whatever budget they determine is needed.

If your property valuation decreases at a higher percentage than the average decrease in your council region - then you might see a decrease.  But if your decrease is the roughly the same or the average of all decreases - then you will pay the same proportion of all costs.

Indeed, if the local authority decides it needs more money next year than it did this year - and if all properties were valued at a 30% decline in rateable value - your rates would increase in accordance with the council's increased budget requirement (despite your decrease in rateable value).

In effect, New Zealand Local Authorities do not have to cut their cloth to suit their income - because they set their income requirements first, and then apportion the total amount set across all the district/regions ratepayers.

Up
0

Having been on a local authority, I'd say that it's not 'clever and deflation-proof', it was just a way to pay whay had to be paid.

There was a side debate in my day, as to who paid what share, this was the line-charge / uniform charge thing.

The problem for local authorities, as for Govt, as for health and educ delivery, is the one of sequential increase of next-cost.

You can only avoid that by stopping growing, indeed now, past peak, even that wouldn't do it in relative terms.

It should come as no surprise - we all lived beyond our means in all regards - in debt as taxpayers, ratepayers and mortgage-holders - triply leveraged when the means to repay got curtailed.

What we took as 'status quo', was in fact, not.

Folk don't wanna know, though

Up
0

Isn't that the whole point though - we need to plan for decline, i.e. "stopping growing" isn't even enough.

I'm not syaing the way the local authorities in the States are doing it is necessarily good though - in that they just keep going into deficit, like central governments, which is stupid.  Not forgetting that LAs in the US also fund, through property taxes, local law enforcement and education. 

In New Zealand however, we have a perfect system/opportunity for local authorities to plan for budget cuts/reductions in a rational, forward looking manner.  The first thing I'd do if a Councillor is totally wipe the Economic Development budget line item and all other policy/strategy work that is largely driven from central government - such as climate change - or that the private sector is doing anyway (such as tourism promotion).  Then attack the CEO pay rates with the next review of the CEs salary.  There are many community minded business people who would competently do those jobs with more commitment for less than half the wages currently paid to their local CE.

We are only $4m people - it's ridiculous how local government bureaucracy has grown.

Up
0

Kate - ignoring old Johhny-one-note here - yes, we have to ditch the 'economic development', but we also have to do what private enterprise (and currently politicians) fail to do through having too-short forward vision, and only long-view governance will do that.

Sustainable infrastructure, or at least, rendering the existing as sustainable as we can, has to be the overarching goal.

That governance will make or break communities (they're the only important thing) and history is littered with good vs bad, when the shit has hit the fan.

Obviously  wages/salaries will dwindle in this, as in all spheres, but nobody has acknowledged that.

Yet.

Many who urge it of Local Govt, somehow thing the same won't apply to them.....

Up
0

Couldn't agree more on sustainable infrastructure - which means more PT/cyclists and fewer cars - a present debate that this Government is woefully inadequate on.

By the time they get it - their won't be enough tax collected from petrol levies to fund the right kind of infrastructure replacements/upgrades.

Up
0

"Isn't that the whole point though - we need to plan for decline, i.e. "stopping growing" isn't even enough."

 

I recently came up with a plan for energy use in our household.  The idea is to put in place infrastructure (insulation, efficiency improvements and alternative energy as well as lifestyle change) to ensure that year on year our energy usage decreases.  Every year, less energy...  I doubt at the end of the day it will be enough, but I like to think when the rolling blackouts hit (like in Cuba) that we won't notice it as much as we might do now.  Of course the big quake (I'm in Christchurch) was a good 'trial run' to making do with less.

 

Up
0

Come on Bernard, you should know this! The council comes up with a value it needs for that year (basically whatever they think they can get away with), and then proportions that cost against the value of properties so that the rich pay more. If all house went down in value by the same amount, the value of your house as a proportion of the rest will still be the same, so you will still pay the same amount.

Up
0

Jimbo - no the rich don't necessarily pay more - they just pay proportionately the same, and indeed these days with the greater use of fixed charges, user pay (i.e. water metering) and UAGCs (universal annual general charges - is the acronym, I believe) - the trend is definitely toward the lower value properties paying a greater proportion over time.

Up
0

Wellington is not actually much worse than that average percentage you suggest - as the attached chart shows - 52% of rates are paid by the non-commercial sector (i.e. residential/rural) and 48% of rates are paid by the commercial/industrial sector.

http://www.wellington.govt.nz/plans/annualreport/0910/pdfs/06finoverview.pdf 

I don't know whether the proerty value ratio you suggest is correct but I believe the smaller proportion of rates revenue from residential has something to do with the boundary lines drawn around the District - the city being a pretty small part of the residential (workforce) catchment area.

If you were to look at the breakdown in say Kapiti or either of the two Hutt Councils - you would likely see greater than 80% of the rates revenue coming from residential and rural, as opposed to commercial and industrial.  But that's just a guess.

Up
0

So agree in support of itemised rates demands.  Kapiti does this to a degree (well they did when we lived there a few years ago) and its great as I suspect 99% of the population only read one document coming out of their Local Council - that being their rates demand.

Itemisation is a great way to educate the population on Council expenditure.

I participated in a most interesting collaborative working group in the more recent Labour Government's Local Government Review.  Hence I had to study up on how it all works... it was an extremely useful learning curve.  I agree with the comments on depreciation - a serious injustice/problem which needs a much greater focus from central government.  And also agree wholeheartedly on the Auditor General's ineffective role in terms of LTCCP and other accountability documents coming out of Local Government.  We explored the idea of mandating commercial benchmarking methods in LAs - but on analysis it looked as though it would simply become yet another onerous lot of reporting administration that would take another army of new recruits to contend with.

In reality - I've come to the conclusion that what LG needs are CEs committed to reducing the size of their governance/businesses - and they need to be personable enough to carry their communities with them in that endeavour. 

Up
0

I wasn't working for the Labour Party during the review - rather the reference is simply to identify the party in Government at the time of the review (i.e. a couple of years ago). 

I agree, in Greymouth as in Christchurch - there were, in my opinion, too many ministers crawling around the whole time and indeed both tragedies became a political pork barrel for encumbent politicians.

Up
0

New necessary infrastructure only make sense when they are manufactured locally as much as possible and not imported from overseas.

Otherwise we can’t afford it and are sooner or later forced to cut even more on our standard of living

Consumption is out production is top !

Up
0

"The situation facing America ... can't happen here."

People have been saying that ever since the American property bubble imploded. Those people are still wrong.

Up
0

Not wrt decreased LG tax take that is - but wrt property value depreciation, that's a whole different matter.  Indeed our bubble was even more inflated than the US - so of course the 30%+ depreciation in real terms that they've seen in many areas is (IMHO) almost a certainty here.

Up
0

4.  There has been a push for years to slow container ships down because of the energy savings....so I wonder if this piece is just guess work....

Its interesting that its now considered viable to slow down for "economic reasons", but that actually makes no huge sense....you pay $4000 per container no matter what and due to the way the conditions of shipping are worded there is usually no arrival date anyway....I suppose you save on holding stock in a warehouse...

Its not all savings, wages are per day in USD so if it tales 40 days to ship instead of 30....the saving on fuel isnt as big as you think.

The other possibility of course is oil and hence fuel oil is getting more expensive and its traded in USD....so the slowdown maybe purely to save on fuel and not for any other significant reason....

regards

Up
0