
Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 11 am in association with NZ Mint.
I'll pop the extras into the comment stream. See all previous Top 10s here.
I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.
Some cracking cartoons in today's Top 10. Have you noticed lately I've been covering my ears...
1. The Invasion of the Zombie Banks - Economics professor Tyler Cowen writes at The New York Times about the fundamental problem inside the European Sovereign Debt crisis.
Fear that Greece, Ireland and Portugal will eventualy be forced to leave the euro is emptying their banks in a series of silent bank runs that is creating an ultimately fatal negative feedback look.
It's today's chilling must read.
Cowen's description of Zombie banks roaming the Irish, Greek and Portugese economies is frankly frightening.
Their only way out is to exit the Euro.
This European mess is so far from fixed. It's not funny.
Here's a taste.
IS a euro held in an Irish bank in Dublin, or in a Portuguese bank in Lisbon, as sound and secure as a euro in a German bank in Berlin? That apparently simple question holds the key to understanding why the euro zone may splinter and bring a new financial crisis.
In Ireland, there has been a “silent bank run” on financial institutions for much of the last year. In February, for instance, Irish private sector deposits dropped at an annual rate of 9.8 percent. That’s largely because some depositors doubt the commitment of the Irish government to the euro. They fear that they will wake up one morning to frozen bank accounts, followed by the conversion of their euro deposits into a lesser-valued new Irish currency. Pre-emptively, the depositors send their money outside Ireland, where it still represents safe euros or perhaps sterling, accessible by bank transfers and A.T.M. cards.
This flight of capital reflects a centuries-old economic principle known as Gresham’s Law, sometimes expressed casually as “bad money drives out good money.” In this context, if two assets — euros inside and outside Ireland — are not equal in value in the eyes of the marketplace, sooner or later the legally fixed price parity will fall apart.
If enough depositors fear frozen accounts, the banks will be emptied out, and they also will require additional government bailouts, on top of the bailouts for the bad real estate loans. The banks come to resemble empty shells, conduits for public aid but shrinking and unprofitable as businesses — and, to a large extent, that is already the case in Ireland. Portugal is moving in this same direction, toward being a land inhabited by zombie banks.
2. It's happening already - The India Times reports the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) agreed quietly last week at a conference in Brazil to use their own currencies instead of the US dollar when lending to each other. Step by step, the US dollar's hegemony is being dismantled.
The agreement, the first-of-its-kind, was signed at the 3rd BRICS summit here attended by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, China's Hu Jintao, Brazil's Dilma Rousseff, Russia's Dmitry Medvedev and South Africa's Jacob Zuma.
"Our designated banks have signed a framework agreement on financial cooperation which envisages grant of credit in local currencies and cooperation in capital markets and other financial services," Manmohan Singh told reporters at a news conference with other BRICS leaders.
But the agreement is confined to credit and not trade. BRICS economies hold 40 percent of the world's currency reserves, the majority of which is still in US dollars.
3. Capitalism is failing the middle class - Chrystia Freeland writes at Reuters about how the version of capitalism we have now where multinationals roam the planet looking for lower cost options to deliver higher profits for shareholders and bonuses for a global elite of executives is killing the middle class, and ultimately the economies in which they are based.
Sound familiar?
Global capitalism isn’t working for the American middle class. That isn’t a headline from the left-leaning Huffington Post, or a comment on Glenn Beck’s right-wing populist blackboard. It is, instead, the conclusion of a rigorous analysis bearing the imprimatur of the U.S. establishment: the paper’s lead author is Michael Spence, recipient of the Nobel Prize in economic sciences, and it was published by the Council on Foreign Relations.
Spence and his co-author, Sandile Hlatshwayo, examined the changes in the structure of the U.S. economy, particularly employment trends, over the past 20 years. They found that value added per U.S. worker increased sharply during that period – 21 per cent for the economy as a whole, and 44 per cent in the “tradable” sector, which is geek-speak for those businesses integrated into the global economy. But even as productivity soared, wages and job opportunities stagnated.
The take-away is this: Globalization is making U.S. companies more productive, but the benefits are mostly being enjoyed by the C-suite. The middle class, meanwhile, is struggling to find work, and many of the jobs available are poorly paid.
Here’s how Spence and Hlatshwayo put it: “The most educated, who work in the highly compensated jobs of the tradable and non-tradable sectors, have high and rising incomes and interesting and challenging employment opportunities, domestically and abroad. Many of the middle-income group, however, are seeing employment options narrow and incomes stagnate.”
It may not be today, and it may not be tomorrow, but it is going to happen. Crazy weather and horrifying natural disasters have played havoc with agricultural production in many areas of the globe over the past couple of years.
Meanwhile, the price of oil has begun to skyrocket. The entire global economy is predicated on the ability to use massive amounts of inexpensive oil to cheaply produce food and other goods and transport them over vast distances. Without cheap oil the whole game changes.
Topsoil is being depleted at a staggering rate and key aquifers all over the world are being drained at an alarming pace. Global food prices are already at an all-time high and they continue to move up aggressively. So what is going to happen to our world when hundreds of millions more people cannot afford to feed themselves?
5. Four global risks - PIMCO CEO Mohamed El Irian writes at Project Syndicate about four global risks to the economic recovery.
They are the shocks to both supply and demand from the North African unrest and Japanese earthquake; the European Sovereign Debt Crisis; the continued fall in US house prices and America's ugly fiscal position, which could destory the US dollar as the reserve currency.
Remember El Irian is the CEO of the world's biggest bond fund, which has hundreds of analysts and more than US$1 trillion in investments at stake. Not a nutter with no research.
Here's El Irian:
The longer the US postpones the day of reckoning, the greater the risk to the dollar’s global standing as the world’s main reserve currency, and to the attractiveness of US government bonds as the true “risk-free” financial benchmark.
The world has changed its supplier of global public goods in the past. The last time it happened, after World War II, an energized US replaced a devastated Britain. By contrast, there is no country today that is able and willing to step in should the US fail to get its act together.
These four risks are material and consequential, and each is growing in importance. Fortunately, none of them is yet transformational for the global economy, and together they do not yet constitute a disruptive critical mass. But this is not to say that the global economy is in a safe zone. On the contrary, it is caught in a duel between healing and disruptive influences, in which it can ill afford any further intensification of the latter.
6. A tax who's time has come - Ha Joon Chang and Duncan Green write at The Guardian that The Robin Hood or Tobin Tax (Financial Transactions Tax (FTT) is a tax who's time has come. Fair enough.
They also make some good points about capital controls.
Of course, the FTT alone will not achieve much in terms of stabilising our financial system. It needs to be implemented as a part of a comprehensive package.
First, countries that cannot issue "hard currencies" should be allowed to use capital controls. The significant change of position by the IMF in this regard following the 2008 crisis is encouraging, but capital controls should be seen as normal policy tools – rather than a measure of last resort, as the IMF still suggests.
7. An education bubble - Peter Thiel, the tech investor behind Facebook, Paypal, Xero and Pacific Fibre, has picked a bubble in higher education. He picked the bubble in tech stocks in 2000 and the housing bubble in 2006, so he's got a good track record.
Here's what he says via TechCrunch:
“A true bubble is when something is overvalued and intensely believed,” he says. “Education may be the only thing people still believe in in the United States. To question education is really dangerous. It is the absolute taboo. It’s like telling the world there’s no Santa Claus.”
Like the housing bubble, the education bubble is about security and insurance against the future. Both whisper a seductive promise into the ears of worried Americans: Do this and you will be safe. The excesses of both were always excused by a core national belief that no matter what happens in the world, these were the best investments you could make. Housing prices would always go up, and you will always make more money if you are college educated.
Like any good bubble, this belief– while rooted in truth– gets pushed to unhealthy levels. Thiel talks about consumption masquerading as investment during the housing bubble, as people would take out speculative interest-only loans to get a bigger house with a pool and tell themselves they were being frugal and saving for retirement. Similarly, the idea that attending Harvard is all about learning? Yeah. No one pays a quarter of a million dollars just to read Chaucer. The implicit promise is that you work hard to get there, and then you are set for life. It can lead to an unhealthy sense of entitlement. “It’s what you’ve been told all your life, and it’s how schools rationalize a quarter of a million dollars in debt,” Thiel says.
8. The problem with globalisation - David Wessel writes at WSJ.com about the problem at the heart of the US economy. Large corporates are sacking locals, increasing profits and employing more overseas. And not paying tax at home.
And then everyone wonders why US consumers aren't spending so much, but the debt remains....
U.S. multinational corporations, the big brand-name companies that employ a fifth of all American workers, have been hiring abroad while cutting back at home, sharpening the debate over globalization's effect on the U.S. economy.
The companies cut their work forces in the U.S. by 2.9 million during the 2000s while increasing employment overseas by 2.4 million, new data from the U.S. Commerce Department show. That's a big switch from the 1990s, when they added jobs everywhere: 4.4 million in the U.S. and 2.7 million abroad.
In all, U.S. multinationals employed 21.1 million people at home in 2009 and 10.3 million elsewhere, including increasing numbers of higher-skilled foreign workers.
The trend highlights the growing importance of other economies, particularly in rapidly growing Asia, to big U.S. businesses such as General Electric Co., Caterpillar Inc., MicrosoftCorp. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
9. What hasn't someone been imprisoned? - Anderson Cooper at CNN talks to Carl Levin and Matt Taibbi about why no one at Goldman Sachs had been prosecuted.
It's good to see this going mainstream.
10. Totally weird video from Spike Jonze with hip hop dancer Lil Buck and cellist Yo Yo Ma playing Emile Saint Saens' "The Swan".
Strangely compelling.
45 Comments
This from a reader via facebook:
"This mess is now completely uncontrollable, its a simple as that. The global economy is so out of balance that now it's a battle for the dribs and drabs that fall from the two biggest economies tables and even the legs on their tables are constantly wobbling (lengthining and shortening all the time). Face it guys, it's a total cock up. And don't forget this has all been done quite deliberately behind closed doors by the world banking community in an attempt to turn all of humanity into their industries slaves. (Once people are financially ruined, they are not your slaves anymore)
"The system won't collapse totally because the bankers and their rich allies will try to trade between themselves bypassing and ignoring the huge social problems that they have created but sooner or later, the systems swings will become uncontrollable, and then then it will collapse and the people will come for you. (Thats if Chinas army and navy don't come calling first) When a system is fecked to the core as this one is, only deeply scared men insist that it is not. There is no recovery when half the world is out of work, just a slow descent into Chaos."
........ Oh geez , spare me this diatribe ....... A single tear rolls down my check , as the fiddler plays a sad refrain !
Buck up , dude !!!! ......... As crunted as the capitalist system is at times , it is always light-years ahead of the alternatives ....... ask any Russian or Chinese whose memory wasn't blitzed out by state propaganda / drug experiments / internment .
........ The very FaceBook which you utilise didn't exist a decade ago ....... Only a thriving capitalism can provide the innovation and the production which makes our lives so totally brilliant today .........
......This is the best that mankind has ever had .........These are the Golden Years .
lol...capitalist system?...lmao...we have never practiced real capitalism!
Oh hang on, some of us get to take on the risk bit with an illusion of freedom and voting for the same plonkers over and over but the underlying agenda never changes...
The Western world practice is based on *National Socialism* circa 1930's Germany and Italy or as Mussolini coined way back then corporatism. The business model is the military industrial complex you need the War on something or anything of everything to fuel that beast...its underlying premise needs to be fear based. Fear of those over there fear of plagues fear of reds in the bed fear of this and that...its a obvious scam...
lol...quick Key said this and Goofy said that - just more magic tricks and rabbits out of a hat called - obfusication!
In to todays language the deal is global fascism whoops globalist corporatism. China is a in your face example of the NAZI state in action...in the West and down here in NZ its just a more subtle version... and you can vote for your local gaulieter who's more clueless than the guy before him...
lol...Capitalism... good one Gummy nice joke!
The guys and gals who run the world; those you dont see on TV; must enjoy watching the serfs slaves and peasents run around and have a good laugh at the cocktail parties in the castle of obfusication.
You are right , it is amazing what has been achieved in western democracies by the marketplace , in spite of government interference & blundering .
..... NZ has seldom strayed far from crony-capitalism . And yet our standard of living has grown . Possibly we have piggy-backed upon the hard work of less egalitarian countries , such as the USA .
............. It may look shagged at the moment , particularly with purveyors of gloom such as Hickey having a field-day , but capitalism will come to the fore yet again . The spirit of mankind cannot be contained .
Patience , dear heart !
Its amazing things have survived as long as this.
Aye Gummy at surface level standard of living is higher but I wonder about the quality?
Some carbon credits any one? Some thing from nothing...
Cue Bono?
lol
Thanks .
........ I have this niggly naggly feeling that manic depressives are attracted to credit markets ( cash / bonds / mortgages / etc . ) ,......
... and that optimists gravitate towards stockmarkets , the love of creation / deals / and innovation .
This would explain the incredibly wide gulf of view-point between Hickey and his gloomy band of Hickettes ; and the likes of the Gummster & your good-self .
Gosh Bernard. He really thinks we are stuffed.
From a "Boom Economy" 10 years ago straight into a “Broom Economy” – before it gets ugly.
It seems authorities/ policy makers/ politicians are not realising how much money (trillions) needs to go into cleaning up the mess coming from different sectors. Nations/ companies are increasingly under more financial/ operational stress, have made mistakes in decision making (e.g. Gulf of Mexico/ Fukushima) and will even make bigger mistake in the future with catastrophic results for the environment and humans.
Furthermore we aren’t prepared for climate change and mother earth flexing a bit muscle.
We are running out of money, because there are too many idiots in power positions.
re "Supply-Side Economics" cartoon.
Buy a Bigger boat = trickle down effect. They should be building more boats!!!
And with some minor alterations to the above comment we have NZ circa 2011.
If you like #9 you might like this too:
http://asianinvasion2006.blogspot.com/2011/04/taxpayers-fund-scf-nationalisation-dog.html#links "And this is where the bailout liability falls. SCF was welfare for the South Island. It was a disgrace and there needs to be a full inquiry without the white out as to what happened and how complicit Treasury and Bill English's office were in proceedings.John Key says "I like Allan Hubbard". I ask why? And why is it that the Prime Minister can publicly back a guy by saying he likes him when right now the public enemy number 1 is Mark Hotchin and Hanover. Neither person, individual or corporate has cost the taxpayer a cent.
In the meantime Allan Hubbard, Lachie McLeod, Treasury and Bill English are still walking the streets with their reputations fully in tact for this billion dollar clusterfuck while their investors got their money back because they were the chosen ones.
Why am I aggrieved? Easy to explain. I am a capitalist and a proponent of the free market.
Bailing out a failed business that was deemed "too big to fail" gives capitalism and the free market a bad name. Let it fail for heavens sake!!! The pinkos have every reason to question why when this middle and upper class white man's business failed the taxpayer bailed it out. I join them at the other end of the spectrum in asking why?
Bill English and Treasury are a disgrace, something has happened to give SCF this "golden child" status. Questions need to be asked. The white outs in these documents need to be examined. Labour's front bench need to be putting the hits in every day to Karori English, smashing him up, OIA'ing things that were not caught here.
SCF should never have been in the scheme to start with, it clearly committed multiple breaches which it muffed its way out of based on the maxim it was "too big to fail" through assurances from buy-an-auditor."
Following on your argument , Les , why is AMI treated as a golden child too ? ........ They cheated the system , under-cut their rivals to gain market share , and now boast their own version of a government quarantee , for a mere $ 15 million fee ........... The tax-payer is potentially on the hook for $ 1000 million .
Cheated implies a consious decision to do or not do something......now I could accept in-competent...
regards
AMI cheated their clients by not giving them full insurance protection .
AMI cheated their competitors by the under-funding , thereby taking market share under false pretenses .
AMI has cheated the tax-payer , to provide up to a $ billion guarantee for a measly $ 15 million outlay .
Again, cheated implies knowingly defrauded the clients....now I find it rich that you can caim GS isnt on the one hand but AMI is.....that's laughable...
Cheat your competitors by under-cutting them? thats a new one on me.
Its not cheating the Govn if the Govn knowingly steps in and is prepared to cover the loss if necessary....if its an open book exchange and no deception by AMI, it isnt cheating.
regards
Incompetent or cheats it makes no difference, a govermnet guarantee is just wrong. If the conpany can not meet its financial responsiblities then it should be put into liqudation. It the government then feels it has a responsibilty to make up any shortfall it can do so after the liquidators have divested the assets.
Roger - Ask Bernard. Google his article on this, it made sense.
Do you think your cheating/defamation accusation is a little strong?
AMI is likely to cost the taxpayer zip and those 'investing' in it (it's clients) did so without being aware of any trading/investment advantages created by moral hazards driven by the government gurantee.
Les : I am seething mad with AMI and with the National Government . Bill English ought to have told CEO Bumfart that if the company required tax-payer help , the government would nationalize the firm , and immediately sack the whole board of directors .
........... All my family and friend have insurance with AMI . Gummy never has . And when I ask them why they chose AMI for their insurance , I get the same answer 100 % , ........ AMI is cheaper !
Why are they cheaper , Les ? ......... Because they didn't fully cover their clients by purchasing enough re-insurance .
.........What other conclusion is there , but that AMI are cheats ! ......... And the finance minister may need to pick the pockets of innocent tax-payers across New Zealand anywhere from zero , up to one billion dollars , to bail out these cheats .
You make some good points Roger, however, I need more convincing that they were "cheats" in the same way that others seem to have advantaged themselves with similar schemes. Besides things are going slow enough in ChCh it seems, we probably don't need much more sand in the cogs before we start going backwards, see:
Confidence seems to be eroding by the day.
Cheers, Les.
...... onto a different tack , Les , the chap who lives next door to Mummy Bear works for a small building company , and they're champing at the bit to re-build or to fix something ....... They've been ham-strung by the CCC and Fletchers since the September 4 first 'quake .
If new projects or subdivisions open up elsewhere in Canterbury , they'll forgo fixing Christchurch .
....... They're just one of many small firms , being frustrated and thwarted by the bureaucrats and the associated busy-body prats .
Indeed, hence CERA and note Lianne Dalziel's comment supporting the idea.
Re. building projects, maybe they should pick some low hanging fruit, like Hugh has been advocating, start building new sub-divisions out west. Because it seems bluming obvious some out east are going to have to get written off.
Saw a great letter in The Press this morning by a group of people in Prebbleton who had seen the plight of folk out east with new liquefaction reports after the Sat M5.329 (like everyone I'm getting more accurate with my guesses) and were making the observation that remediating land out east is probably going to be futile, so pay people out, let em' move on - maybe to new subs out west. While people are deliberating in the CBD, maybe things could be happening out west. But now wait for those to cry out who know such direction will likely be the beginning of less restricted supply dynamics (per Hugh) and hence see further risk to the capital gains driven spec/PI model.
Cheers, Les.
Well put GBH at 11.07, some people are in a race for space as to who can out-gloom the next.
Sensationalism seems to be what some people feed off these days. The reality in NZ is that we have a pretty sound situation as our exports have never been higher than since 1950's.
Went to a breakfast yesterday and Cameron Bagrie, probably the best economic commentator around in NZ was the speaker, he painted a very realistic picture of where we are at and the likely outcomes. Was he spinning a sensationalist line? Hardly. Was he spinning an all is well line? Hardly. In esssence it takes 7 years for readjustments to work through so we have a few more years yet of of 'grumpy growth.' Pity his talk was off the record (so he could talk without someone in the media latching on to some comment and sensationalising it), as should be standard reading for everyone.
I realise we will get the inevitable half-wits who will simply blog saying Bagrie is a bank economist and he knows nothing (the inference of course they know everything) , but we can take those with a grain of salt.
Over the years , Cameron Bagrie's and Tony Alexander's comments have been roundly derided , and shouted down here , by Bernard's gloomster brigade ........
........ Yet " money-in-the-bank " , who has the better record of getting forecasts right , the aforementioned bank economists , or our resident high priest of doom & gloom , Hickey ?
Simple, BH....it isnt over until the fat lady sings...all that we can say at present is, it hasnt blown up yet, or when it does blow up if its going to be a fizzle of a dirty nuclear bomb, or the 47megatonne monster russia once dropped...
regards
It is your poor understanding of things economic which have us laughing Westminster and spitting the dummy with the F word just goes to show how little you care to discover of your own serious shortcomings.
If yiu cannot appreciate the risks, I would be fine with that if as a tax payer I didnt have to cover for such stupidity.
Unfortunately thats not the case.
regards
I read an interesting prediction from Tony Alexander a couple of years back, published in the Herald.
He said that running a persistent current account deficity will inevitably lead to hyperinflation, just with the proviso that he couldn't pin point the time, just the certainty.
Is the US any different.
Muzza,
Cameron's a good guy and very reasonable.
But read this
and tell me that more of the same policies and a bit of patience will turn around New Zealand.
cheers
Bernard
Kicking the can down the road some more....uh no......
regards
Steven, many thanks for spotting. I've fixed that now. cheers
Bernard
Hi Bernard, I liked your reasons for El Irian being "not a nutter with no research".
By this standard, what is interest.co.nz then?!
Your landlord
Quite right that we don't have as many employees or funds under management as Pimco.
But we now have 10 people analysing New Zealand data and events.
Here's a sample of the stuff we do.
http://www.interest.co.nz/charts
And we now have 3 years and thousands of news/opinion articles under our belt.
We're trying.
cheers
Bernard
And good on you too.
Often don't agree with your opinion pieces, but love to debate them!
When you look at the breadth of sites/blogs and their massive differences in research, analysis, results and predictions....you have to wonder just why they vary.....In some ways its easier by determining what the writer's angle is, if he or she has one. If the writer is highly political, probably best avoided, there is no place in economics for politics...If in favour of property and/or gold as thats what they are selling (or a book about it), well same caveat. The best ppl are probably the ones with no politcial axe to grind and dont need to make or ensure a living at an aspect of it......choose carefully....
regards
Re: #7 - How many NZ graduates have large student loans but are working in jobs not related to thier degrees? However it seems the majority of graduates now avoid paying back their student loans by buggering off overseas.
Jeez Bernard, you're on rare form today. I don't think you could go to the pub and enjoy a beer without whipping out a chart and depressing everyone with the problems facing global grain supplies ;)
I've seen an interesting meme tweeted around the place today ..... What would YOUR industry look like after a 10 year regulatory holiday? (ht to tom...)
I can think of a four letter word beginning with f.
regards
Will civil actions takeout the corruption even if the Govn(s) dont?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8461720…
regards
Bernard,
Couple of points ; Bagrie is all for the new normal and not the old consumer driven normal, so he didn't suggest no changes in policy. He referred to the book Tipping Point which examined successful enterprises looking to see what the tipping point was... and there was no one point, but the accumulation of many things. So the Key government is bringing in a progression of stepped changes, which over time will have an effect, but it takes time. Those with immediate simplistic 'solutions' are simpletons (My words, not Bagrie)
And also, Cameron Bagrie is not a Tony Alexander
Off topic as usual sorry - ignore this. Just want this archived to refer back to it in 12 months.
BUY GOLD!!!! (currently US$1500oz.)
Bye.
Listening to the new president of America for 16 minutes only, has many scary elements and thinking of his leadership into the future is even worse.
Fifty things you need to know......
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article27651.html
Somewhere in the midst of the 50 you might see Bollard playing at being independent but really just doing what he was told to do by English who in turn is, to be honest, only following orders that reach him from the big aussie banks.....and they in turn get their instructions from guess whom...yes it's the one and only...the mighty ZIRP himself...Ben Bernanke.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.