sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Bearer bonds 'discovered' on Mindanao; Negative equity in Australia; A Great Australian bond run; Kodak, maker of 1st digital camera, goes bankrupt; Dilbert

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Bearer bonds 'discovered' on Mindanao; Negative equity in Australia; A Great Australian bond run; Kodak, maker of 1st digital camera, goes bankrupt; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 7 pm in association with NZ Mint.

I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email tobernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop the extras into the comment stream. See all previous Top 10s here.

The SOPA GIF is hilarious at #9.

1. A cracking read - Bloomberg reports on how a Filippino social worker apparently discovered US$25 billion worth of bearer bonds and gold coins dated from 1934 buried in a chest deep in the jungle.

The plot thickens from there.

Some amazing counterfeiting work has been done.

The moral of the story is this.

Be very careful when someone tells you they have discovered billions of dollars worth of bearer bonds...

In the jungle...

Here's Bloomberg's Craig Copetas:

Jose Cojuangco contacted Bloomberg News last month. “There’s $50 billion in U.S. Treasury bearer bonds we’d like you to take a look at,” he said. “Would you mind?”

Cojuangco said he still wanted to believe the bonds were real. After all, they came from Mindanao, an island regularly ravaged by typhoons and inhabited by the demon horse Tikbalang, the vampire Aswang and armed insurgents who have made kidnapping an industry. As Quiwa says, it’s a place where there’s nothing extraordinary about a tropical rain forest chieftain trying to figure out U.S. Treasury bond coupon yields.

2. Negative equity in Australia - News.com.au reports that the number of Australian homes that are worth less than the mortgages on them has risen to 4.9% from 3.7% in the last year after a fall in house prices.

Thousands of homes are sitting on the market - and Melbourne is the worst offender. However, Melbourne has held up better than Sydney and most capitals in terms of negative equity, the RP Data report says. Victoria's Mallee and Ovens and Murray districts were among the worst, with 9.8 per cent of properties in negative equity.

3. The Great Australian bond run - FTAlphaville points to a blog by (Great name) Bond Vigilantes showing how more than 80% of Australian government bonds are owned by foreign investors, making Australia vulnerable to an attack from bond vigilantes if people ever stopped believing the Australian story.

The chart says it all. It (in part) explains the strength in the Australian dollar.

4. The final countdown - PFP Wealth Management's Tim Price writes here at Business Insider that he is less than convinced by the bulls confident that Europe (or the Western world for that matter) has solved its problems.

It may be a new year, but we are beset by the same problems that have been recurring since the crisis began. In most cases, those problems have worsened. One of the few improvements has been in the recapitalisation of Anglo-Saxon banks, but continental European banks seem acutely vulnerable to the potential outcome of a disorderly sovereign default.

Euro zone politicians and policy makers have had plenty of time to come to terms with the continent’s problems, and continue to show no willingness to grasp admittedly difficult nettles. It is symptomatic of the balkanisid and adversarial nature of politics in the euro zone (a unified body that exists in theory but barely in fact) that Christian Noyer, chairman of the French central bank, anticipated France’s credit downgrade by suggesting that Britain should be downgraded first.

As the Hildebrand scandal also revealed, most of Europe’s central bankers are not fit to sweep the streets. And still time is running out. Readers of a certain age will recall a late 1980s “big hair” rock anthem called “The Final Countdown.” It was released by essentially a one-hit wonder band. Its name was Europe.

5. How private equity went off the rails - The political debates in America are turning to Mitt Romney's role as head of private equity shop Bain Capital and how he doesn't pay much tax.

William Cohan has written a tough piece attacking Romney and Bain at the Washington Post over reneging on deals.

In a return of serve, former investment banking lawyer John Carney writes a fascinating piece here explaining how investment banks and private equity firms and banks used to work to assess the risk in deals. In the process he explains a lot about what went wrong from 2005 to 2007 in the world of debt-funded private equity deals.

We had a few of those here in New Zealand, including the likes of Yellow Pages, MediaWorks, Metropolitan Glass, Independent Liquor and EnviroWaste.

Here's Carney at CNBC with the inside scoop:

Things really went off the rails between 2005 and 2007, when private equity firms and bank lenders stopped trying to renegotiate deals once the diligence process was underway. Credit was flowing out of banks at such a frantic pace, keeping up with the mania in M&A activity, that this system of shifting power and ongoing negotiations broke down. The result was astronomical acquisition prices funded by nearly covenant free—and largely diligence free—loans.

6. Europe's zombie banks - Delusional Economics over at Macrobusiness.com.au does a really nice job of explaining how many of Europe's banks are now stuck in a Zombie state and are in thrall to the LTRO carry trade keeping themselves and their governments afloat (but not lending to real people and businesses).

Delusional explains how the Italian banks were able to get their hands on so much ECB money and why they are beholden to their government to reinvest the money in Italian bonds.

The Italian Treasury offered guarantees for bonds issued by banks to give them access to ECB liquidity, in a move to lower funding costs. These bonds will stay on the banks’ books until their expiration, according to a ruling announced by Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti earlier in December.

In the lead up to the 3-year LTRO the Italian banks created billions of euros worth of bonds and got their government to rubber stamp them. These bonds were never actually issued to the market,  they were simply tossed over to the ECB as collateral to get a 1% loan. So how much did the Italian banks get ?

“It’s a 116 billion euros,” one senior banking source told Reuters. Two other sources confirmed that amount. The Italian figure includes 40.4 billion euros of state-backed bank bonds which were used as collateral for the loans.

So now the Italian banks have an additional 40.4 billion euros with which to purchase government paper, created from nowhere, and backstopped by the very sovereign that would later be the recipient the loan. The ECB’s mandate says that they can’t fund sovereigns directly, but it appears it is fine as long as there is a commercial bank acting as an intermediary and taking their “carry trade” cut. That technical point aside, what this shows is that banks now have a way to re-capitalise independent of the state of their other assets and liabilities.

For Italy, with its private sector in relatively good shape, its banking system may be able to weather the storm. In this particular case this operation is probably more about re-capitalising the banks after their exposures to other periphery nations and about funneling money to the government. However, what you will note is that the banking system can now profit independent of its loan book. So why would it bother taking the risk of lending? In an environment of increased capital requirements and a slowing economy it is far more likely that banks will use this additional capital as a buffer as they shrink down their asset base. In short, more consumption of fresh brains.

7. The evolution of American debt - Salon has a good interview with the author of what looks like a fascinating book on the history of American debt.

I need to get out more.

I know. I know.

Here's a sample:

In the US today, debt is ubiquitous. Whether it’s paying back thousands of dollars in student loans, using your Visa card for a pack of gum when you’re out of cash, or taking out a mortgage on a first home, it’s been woven into our financial system so tightly, that even when we suffer the sometimes cruel and unusual detriments of borrowing, we have little to no realistic impetus to stop. But it wasn’t always this way. In fact before the 20th century, debt was a taboo, feared, shameful, and kept in the shadows. So what events and institutions brought debt from its meager beginnings to its central role in American life?

In his new book, “Borrow: The American Way of Debt,” Cornell professor Louis Hyman writes, in essence, a biography of American debt. He traces debt through American history: from the late 19th century, when unpaid dues meant public ignominy, to the 1920s, when the auto industry changed the face of borrowing to the mortgage fallouts that led the Great Depression to the invention of the credit card as we now know it, all the way to the current shambles of our national economic livelihood.

8. Finally it has happened - The company that invented the digital camera, Kodak, has filed for bankruptcy, MarketWatch reports.

And here's a good 2005 article from SeattlePI about Kodak's first digital camera made in 1975.

9. Totally irrelevant GIF on SOPA - It's worth a click. Some cats get blasted by a flamethrower.

10. Totally irrelevant and unfunny but very insightful piece from Clay Shirky on SOPA.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

30 Comments

This interesting article charts potential courses for NZ as the energy challenge unfolds.

 

New Zealand’s geographic isolation will be a major factor in its experience of energy descent. A relatively small market at the far end of the energy supply chain, New Zealand is particularly vulnerable to both reduced supplies and high energy prices — one of the easiest customers to drop in favour of larger, closer and more lucrative markets. A market-driven energy decline could be both unexpected and abrupt.

A serious danger is that New Zealand will increase its foreign debt to maintain energy and other vital supplies. The ensuing debt slavery would quickly erode the nation’s autonomy and accelerate the depletion of its natural resources. New Zealand’s natural endowments may attract imperial powers willing to use both economic and military advantages to secure its resources for their own use. This “disaster” path to a steady-state economy will enrich a few in the short term but devastate New Zealand’s land, impoverish its people and ensure a bleak future for generations to come. Unless it is challenged, the current growth-oriented political mindset, influenced as it is by wealthy vested interests, will see this course vigorously pursued.

http://fleeingvesuvius.org/2012/01/11/will-new-zealand-be-the-first-developed-country-to-evolve-a-steady-state-economy/

Up
0

The only way to maintain a steady-state economy, is to maintain a steady-state supply of energy.

 

Which we're about to sell off into private hands - except the odds are that things are so terrible by then, that it doesn't happen.

 

Hey, OMG - we agree on something. But it begs the question: why so much outpouring about climate change? Even if it were a total crock, the moves need to address it are the same as what are needed to gEt to a steady-state 'economy'. Why not just nudge it along?

 

For anyone who grasps what you've posted above, to spend effort/time knocking CC, well I can only presume they're doing it for reward.

 

:)

Up
0

Hey, OMG - we agree on something. But it begs the question: why so much outpouring about climate change? Even if it were a total crock, the moves need to address it are the same as what are needed to gEt to a steady-state 'economy'. Why not just nudge it along ?

PDK, good to see some doubt has been sown. That's the scientific method at work. Right now it's you tossing in the global warming canard. Are you saying a broken economy should be pouring billions into the pockets of fraudsters in the ridiculous attempt to control the climate?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/01/19/global-temps-in-a-crash-as-agw-proponents-crash-the-economy/ 

Isn't it the act of a responsible citizen to ask for proof that CO2 is leading to thermogeddon? Anyone who asks gets abused!

We are on the same page on energy. I discovered peak oil 11 years ago when I became doubtful about the "hydrogen" economy. Plenty of true believers of course but it was all B/S

Cheers 

Up
0

OMG- agreed re hydrogen.

Also agreed re the ETS not going to do the trick.

But sorry, the best science says theres a greater than even chance of CC being driven by us, and given the lead-times to rectify, there is no choice. You have to act in a precautionary manner.

If you don't, then it's just a matter of time before something beats you. It's russian roulette, physics-wise.

Up
0

I remember reading an article on this that put the expected time of oil shortages in New Zealand for this exact reason in the 2014-2015 area.  Part of the concern is that other oil consumer countries are making long term deals with oil supplier countries to provide reliable sources of oil (South Korea is one such country, with many years of 'guaranteed' supply).  New Zealand on the other hand has to rely on what's available at the moment on the 'open market'.  This will be the first pool of oil to dry up (pun?).

Of course with the actions of the UN against Iran that 2014-2015 expected time may happen sooner rather than later.

 

Up
0

NZ has massive nat resources, if present imported energy isnt avail we are in as good or better position than any other nation

Up
0

goNZ - the big questions are can we handle our resources properly ? It seems to me financially, technologically and operationally we are not prepared to deal with major operations. How reliable are foreign companies and what are the consequences when we have a major accident ?

 

Under many more questions – are such operations profitable under decreasing world production ?

Up
0

You guys are so out of touch. The US has discovered 200-300 years supply of natural gas in the last five years. There is far more energy reserves than anyone realised.

Having said that, we are already in a state of debt servitude (one step away from debt slavery), largely because we missed the gravy train of the worldwide mining boom. I think the pendulum has swung too far in the "lets all be poor together" direction. A bit more mining would have been a good thing. There is such a thing as too little mining, just as there is a problem with too much.

Up
0

Rog - hmmm - somebody's out of touch.

I'd suggest that anyone who quotes 'x years supply' without quantifying 'at what rate', is likely to be the candidate.

Brownlee parroted the same nonsense re Southland coal/lignite.

It was always expected that gas would increase towards the end of the run, and also that it wouldn't be enough to hold station.

http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/data_publications/crude_oil_natural_gas_reserves/cr.html

http://www.peakoil.net/uhdsg/

Note the widening bar in the latter. More, but not outpacing depletion.

oh - and a ps:   if you're pinning your creation of wealth on mining, then its finite. Worse, it maxes out not the day it ends (a common misunderstanding particularly amongst the '200 years supply' folks) but at peak supply, typically half-way through, quantitively, but earlier than that qualitatively.

Up
0

Well said , Roger . And the natural gas is so cheap at the moment , compared to oil ..... the Yanks have an incredible supply of gas ......

 

...... we'll witness that real soon , it's presidential election year .......

Up
0

GBH - at the moment?

How far-seeing of you.

http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/09/discovering-limits-to-growth/#more-309

"But mostly, the model supported the common-sense notion that combining a growth paradigm with finite resources and a delay mechanism, overshoot is an expected response. After overshoot comes a decline".

Your world really starts from the assumption that you can/will  'get rich', doesn't it? All else has to fit that, or be ignored.

Don't know that I could do that, myself.

Up
0

..... lots of natural gas ...... the USA has mega trillion cubic feet of the stuff ....... amazing ! They're so lucky over there . So much good clean & green nat-gas ..... a supply exceeding two centuries useage , meebee 300 years , even ......

 

Rogie's on the money , there .....

Up
0

You might consider spending some of your massive wealth on an ear-cleansing job.

You don't seem to be hearing too good. What part of the point I made to RW, didn't you understand?

Up
0

200 to 300 years is " far-seeing " enough for Gummy ..... I'm good with that ......

Up
0

I asked him 'at what rate'.

Can you not understand?

If you use it up quicker, it goes quicker.

If you substitute it for something else, it goes quicker.

Is it's EROEI declining? You bet it is.

If you're good with that, you're capable of self-delusion.

Which Ive suspected for a long time.

http://www.naturalgas.org/business/supply.asp

"When combined with EIA’s latest estimate of proved gas reserves, the Potential Gas Committee says total available future supply is 2,170 Tcf, which would equal about 100 years of supply.  Americans consume an average of 22 Tcf of natural gas per year.  The Potential Gas Committee has estimated rising domestic supply in each of its past few reports"

DUH!.

Up
0

....... if the USA uses up all of it's natural gas resource in 200 years , instead of 300 years ..... I won't be too put out ...... hang around here , and we'll see who's proven correct  ( me , it'll be me ... Ha ! ) .....

Up
0

Ah yes, the thing is you see that I used to think like that. I too believed resources were finite. Everyone my age did. They also believed the world would run out of oil in the next couple of years.

Eventually I realised that the oil had not run out as I had expected. I don't know  whether through human ingenuity or for some other reason but it just kept not running out. This has gone on for so many years that I just can't go on expecting oil to run out in two years time, I'm exhausted.

That said, oil may or may not enter a sudden decline at any moment, but I'm not planning on it any more. The intellectual model is compelling, but the evidence, ah the evidence, has not supported it as yet.

Anyway, how can a chap quote Lawrence and believe in finite oil as a problem at the same time?.

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did."
T E LAWRENCE, aka Lawrence of Arabia, Seven Pillars of Wisdom.

Up
0

Rog - the folk who cried wolf early, didn't do their homework. Hubbert himself, always called if for around 2000, Prof Deffeyes very staunchly, from a long way out, called it for 'Thanksgiving Day, 2005', and nailed it. I first came across it in 1975, but by '83, could have told you that it was going to be between 2000 and 2010. By 1986, I was an elected Local Body councillor, and somewhere in the Hocken, there will be a record of my pointing out it would happen withion those dates.

 

I think most folk seem to have trouble with time-lines.

 

Anyway, if you liked Lawrence, here's the poem I chant when I'm off sailing/adventuring (used it in my latest column too). It's Kipling, so British, similar era, but straight......

http://www.thelongtrail.org/longtrail.html

You have heard the beat of the off-shore wind,
    And the thresh of the deep-sea rain;
    You have heard the song -- how long! how long?
    Pull out on the trail again!

go well.....

Up
0

hello Mr Massive Wealth  -  I see Barry has caved into enviro fundies .  United States President Barack Obama yesterday rejected plans for an oil pipeline through the heart of the United States, ruling there was not enough time for a fair review before a looming deadline forced on him by Republicans.

His move did not kill the project but could delay a tough choice for him until after the November elections.

The pipeline has become the very symbol of job creation for Republicans, but Obama says the environment and public safety must still be weighed too.

 

 

 

Up
0

Canada has decided to sell the oil to China instead, because the USA is too. "complicated".

Up
0

getting a bit ratty there PDK  - feeling outnumbered ?

Up
0

.... he's getting a tadge agitated ..... which surprises me , 'cos the PDK-baiters par excellence , David B & Phil Best haven't been around for days .......

 

....... those guys are great !

Up
0

Will Greece put “collective action clauses” (CAC) in place? Without getting too detailed, many Greek bonds were issued under language known as “universal consent”, which means that all creditors have to agree to changes to maturity, interest or principal. A CAC allows the issuer to obtain a plurality of support from bondholders for changes to the bond indenture, and then impose them on any holdout creditors. There’s nothing wrong with CACs, except for the fact that applying them retroactively changes the rules of the game, and makes a mockery of the quaint notion of contract law. As we explained in Appendix C in our 2012 Outlook, contract law protections for investors in sovereign debt are very weak. Don’t like retroactive CACs? Go sue in an Athens court; good luck to you.

......... and that is how you deal with hold out hedgefunds.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/sliding-greek-bond-reality-challenges-debt-deal-hopium

Up
0

"If deficits don't matter, why do we have to pay taxes?"

Up
0

Baltic dry shipping continues to fall.  A leading indicator, or just a good time to buy a freighter?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/01/19/f-business-evans-baltic.html

Up
0

Skudiv - link that to AJ's bit about refineries, and you've got tanking activity.

One wonders whether the share-market lemmings and their algorithms are on the same planet.

Up
0

It's been a while since fundamentals actually mattered with regard to stocks and futures.  Nothing is priced correctly IMO, which is why the funds are having a tuff time breaking even.

Up
0

Kodak gone ! As long as the big western, industrial nations don’t compete in the manufacturing sector with China, then it is all lost. Manufacturing/ production is widely interconnected with R & D, science and other important sectors of economies.

Massive unemployment and the loss of “brain capital” are only a few of the consequences also.

Up
0

RE 6

Here's what i wrote on macro on Dec 15.

"Right, here is what might be happening:

Behind the scenes of the recent summit a deal was done.

The ECB will lend unlimited amounts to a select list of Euro banks who must on lend the money to their governments. So the three biggest German banks have unlimited funds to buy German bonds, the three biggest French banks have unlimited funds to buy French bonds, and so on for each Euro country. Any collateral will do, promissory notes from dead Uncle Herbert included.

Thus the solvency and future profitability of the chosen few is assured (Europe is all about insider deals behind closed doors – they are not like us).

How does this work out? The favoured banks sell down their foreign assets but buy more of their own government bonds on the guaranteed carry trade this gives them. So the chosen Italian banks borrow at 1% and on lend at 6.5%. Nice if you can get it, but there is a catch.

Yes there is always a catch. This is the perfect mechanism to set up a sytem of Euro dissolution (which the Bundesbank demand – do not be fooled by the rhetoric).

Is there a secret agreement that these loans from the ECB will automatically redenominate into local currency should the Euro dissolve?"

 

The point everyone seems to overlook is that the Bundesbank hate the Euro. They feel, with some justification, that the French stole the DeutschMark off them as the price of unification. Whilst the Euro has helped Germany pillage the rest of Europe by giving them an undervalued currency and thus supercharging their exports, the Bundesbank see that has gone about as far as it can and so they want their currency back.

That aside, the whole concept of the Euro as the gold standard of currency, as a way to take away the "exorbitant privilege" the US enjoys by virtue of being the world reserve currency, is fundamantally flawed. If your currency devalues more slowly than everyone elses then you must reduce wages every year in order to compete. If you fail to do this then sooner or later your manufacturing days are over.

Up
0

Yeh, these are the Ponzi Bonds I've been ranting about.  Combined with LTRO, next one is comming up soon, and it could be a big one.  Could be the plan to exit Euro stage right, I doubt it though, the budesbank does not matter, the stakes are high, and the game is more centralisation and control.  I'm planning for any worst case scenario, physical assets with cashflow, and some PM's.

Up
0