Patrick Watson probes the impact on the economy from people sharing more personal information and expecting others to do the same

Patrick Watson probes the impact on the economy from people sharing more personal information and expecting others to do the same

By Patrick Watson*

The funny thing about breakthrough technologies is that we rarely see the break. They tend to sneak up on us. Every now and then, something revolutionary comes out of nowhere, like the iPhone in 2007, but it still took a few more years to take off.

The other thing that changes slowly is us. Technology modifies our attitudes and beliefs so gradually that we don’t realize it’s happening, but the changes are real and usually permanent.

Just a few decades ago, it was unthinkable to share the kind of personal images and information many of us routinely show to strangers today. Internet access and social media have radically changed our attitudes about privacy.

This evolution has economic and investment consequences that we’re not always aware of.


Photo: Getty Images

Eyes in the sky

Aside from the now-ubiquitous mapping services, satellite imagery helps businesses from farms to shipping companies run more efficiently.

The photos got even more useful when Google Earth began offering 3D versions that made it possible to assess topography.

Almost everyone, however, is still missing the fourth dimension: time.

Most publicly available satellite images are weeks or months old, sometimes even years. That means there’s a lot of untapped potential. Being able to see live satellite images of some faraway location would certainly be useful - though technically it’s hard because low-orbiting satellites can’t hover over one spot like a drone or helicopter.

The latest idea: deploying large numbers of small, inexpensive satellites. Get enough of them up there, and one will always be in range.

Last week, a Bellevue, Washington startup called EarthNow announced plans to deliver real-time satellite video of almost anywhere on the planet.

EarthNow is not someone’s garage idea. Its investors include Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Japan’s Softbank Group, and European aircraft maker Airbus. Raising capital won’t be a problem.

The company’s website lists some possible applications:

  • Catch illegal fishing ships in the act
  • Watch hurricanes and typhoons as they evolve
  • Detect forest fires the moment they start
  • Watch volcanoes the instant they start to erupt
  • Assist the media in telling stories from around the world
  • Track large whales as they migrate
  • Help “smart cities” become more efficient
  • Assess the health of crops on demand
  • Observe conflict zones and respond immediately when crises arise
  • Instantly create “living” 3D models of a town or city, even in remote locations
  • See your home as the astronauts see it - a stunning blue marble in space

All very nice, but there’s a dark side to this too.


Photo: Getty Images

Au naturel

Real-time satellite imagery of the whole planet means all of us will be on camera any time we step outside. That’s kind of chilling.

Yes, it’s already possible to locate people via their smartphones, but you can stop that by ditching the phone. The satellite, on the other hand, will still see you or your car wherever you may go.

This will have benefits. For example, police could solve crimes by simply rewinding video to track everyone at a crime scene. However, a more malicious government could use it to silence dissidents or journalists.

For EarthNow, your lost privacy will be a revenue opportunity. Its press release says, “Initially, EarthNow will offer commercial video and intelligent vision services to a range of government and enterprise customers.”

They’re also careful to say their video will cover almost anywhere on Earth. You can bet the US government will redact sensitive places. The Pentagon won’t let anyone reveal whatever the heck it’s doing at Area 51.

The rest of us will get less consideration. If you like au naturel sunbathing, you can still do it - but more than just the sun may be watching you.


Photo: Getty Images

We don’t mind

Combine this new snooping technology with the ones we already face, such as Facebook’s data gathering, and having any semblance of privacy is getting harder.

I think this won’t change, because most people don’t mind.

Intentionally or not, we’ve decided the benefits we get from sharing our personal lives outweigh the costs. We like…

  • Staying connected with friends and making new ones online
  • Having our phones direct us to restaurants whose menus match our tastes
  • Getting custom movie recommendations based on our viewing history

These little conveniences are slowly embedding themselves in daily life. Millions of people now have Amazon Echo and other audio devices in their homes. The little boxes don’t listen all the time… but we’re being prepared for the day when they will.

And we haven’t even talked about non-satellite video. Security cameras are now common in public places and increasingly in homes. Have we seriously considered whether their benefits justify making everyone an involuntary video star? No. It’s just happening.

I think we’re now beyond such debates. The genie is out of the bottle and not going back in. The trend will keep rolling, whether you like it or not.


Photo: Getty Images

Paying the price

So, as time goes on, our lives will be increasingly open to everyone. We will share more personal info and expect others to do the same. Everyone will watch everyone else. What does that do to the economy?

For one, the same trend affects businesses. They’re already having a hard time protecting intellectual property. As John Mauldin wrote last weekend, some companies voluntarily give their valued secrets to the Chinese government, which gives them access to the Chinese market in return.

That’s the corporate equivalent of the deal web users make with Google. Give up your info and get something back without spending any cash. It will keep happening.

Another consequence of using data as a currency: these transactions have value that may not show up in GDP, but it’s not as negligible as you may think.

It also suggests one way to at least slow down this process: stop demanding free stuff. If you really value something, buy it with cash. If the seller won’t take cash, then maybe you don’t need it.

But that will be a temporary solution. The reality is that our concepts of privacy and modesty have changed radically and will change even more. Companies that admit this reality will probably be better investments.

You may not like what they do, but they’ll make money doing it. Pay attention.

--------------------------------------------------------------

*Patrick Watson is senior economic analyst at Mauldin Economics. This article is from a regular Mauldin Economics series called Connecting the DotsIt first appeared here and is used by interest.co.nz with permission.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

The government should legislate so that:

1) the user data belongs to the user
2) the buyer has to pay
3) The buyer cannot pass on the info without the user consent and further payment
4) There has to be a real time website showing the user who has their data at all times.

What goes up in the Cloud, doesn't stay there. It gets dispersed in droplets and deluges.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

We already give it up in ways most can't, or won't, envisage. I suspect most don't think through the consequence. If you stepped into a Police investigation you would see pretty quickly the amount of data you give away about yourself, and a lot that is collected without informed consent. Every electronic transaction. Every time you go to the bank or service station you are recorded. All your services, electricity, water, internet, the records can all be obtained.

I read the short headline as "Privacy, is dying."
Thanks Interest for that little memento mori.

Not sure that people don't mind or would not mind if they were more aware of how comprehensive this could be become. I certainly mind, but what can I do about it?
Maybe the tinfoil hat brigade are on to something.

I really dislike the way the views and opinions of the visible social media class are held up as what everyone or even a majority believe. Even if it is a majority, surely the rights of a persecuted minority (i.e. people who aren't exhibitionists or narcissists) should be respected. If the fraying democracies can't put a stop to this sort of intrusion, fingers crossed the Chinese or Russians see it as a threat, and plonk the satellite out of the sky. Fingers crossed.

All this time with people taking the mickey out of me, but my tin foil hat wasn't such a bad investment afterall. I just have to paint it camo now.