sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

A ‘COVID tsunami’ is sweeping a COVID-naïve China, causing widespread fear and illness. After this storm passes he foresees a more questioning, less biddable middle class. The Chinese government will have to adapt, reports David Mahon

Public Policy / opinion
A ‘COVID tsunami’ is sweeping a COVID-naïve China, causing widespread fear and illness. After this storm passes he foresees a more questioning, less biddable middle class. The Chinese government will have to adapt, reports David Mahon
Beijing airport, empty at sunset
Beijing airport, empty at sunset

By David Mahon*

December 24, 2022

On December 20th, I landed back in Beijing from London on a packed Air China flight. We were the only plane taxiing across the apron, and none were taking off or landing. After disembarking and being COVID tested, we were led through an almost empty international terminal where the walls and floors were bleached from repeated disinfecting. The formerly shiny cathedral styled Terminal 3 looked faded and scarred. It was dark before we were loaded onto buses and driven slowly, headlights flashing, into suburban Beijing.

The man next to me had a severe cough, often barking like a seal and removing his mask to better gasp for air. The bus was otherwise eerily quiet. Perhaps we were all thinking the same thing, ‘What will our quarantine facilities be like? Will we be driven deep into the countryside to some featureless hotel, or be taken to one of the new quarantine centres?’ Forty minutes later we turned into a cluster of buildings surrounded by thickets of high-rise apartments, some with lightened windows and others, dark monoliths against the darker night.

We were still in the city, yet despite my 38 years in Beijing, I had no idea where. We sat on the bus surrounded by people in hazmat suits in the last of a series of seemingly pointless delays. I could now sense the restlessness of the passengers, who having arrived at their destination at last, were still exasperatingly confined to the bus. Our minders exchanged papers, walked away, returned, marked clipboards and then walked away again. Some just stamped and shuffled in the bitter, sub-zero cold beside our luggage arrayed like tombstones in the dim light.

We were at last processed all over again in the lobby of one of the towers and given slips of paper with room numbers on them, a bag of COVID self-testing kits, and allowed to go to the lift banks in groups of four. We were met on our floors and led to our rooms. Some people were visibly irritated but still surprisingly patient, given they were all jetlagged and struggling with luggage, and some clearly nervous at the prospect of being confined for the next five days in one room. With COVID travel requirements being relaxed daily all over China, we were perhaps the last cohort about to be quarantined.

Confinement (a day later)

Our rooms are small but clean, and despite mine facing north, reasonably light due to the floor to ceiling window on one side and a glass door opening onto a small balcony. There is no sign in the room identifying the centre’s location, but I worked out where I was by checking on Google Maps. There had been a few signs in the lobby when we arrived, but I had struggled to read them. The phone in my room just goes to a recorded message, saying I must call another number if I have COVID, which when called, goes to another recorded message.

The quarantine centre was thrown together last year. The walls are thin, and you can hear people moving about and talking. The man next door coughs himself to sleep, then coughs himself awake in order to hack and wheeze with varying intensity through the day. He is not my neighbour from the bus, for that man had a vigorous, resonant, strangled cough. This poor man is clearly old, and his coughing fits are punctuated with gasps, and end in a pulmonary whimper. The building itself is like a body with organs separated by thin membranes, blinking awake in the dark mornings with bright white eyes, murmuring, stirring through the short cold days, and then sleeping again. A heat generation system in the basement is its heartbeat.

I brought enough tinned fish, crackers, waxed cheeses, and mint tea to last me, so have cancelled the quarantine centre food, which like most airline food is tasteless. I was allowed one outside order, so I chose fruit, instant noodles and some apples. In ordinary life, time passes too swiftly, and I often fail to do all that I have set out to do in a day; in confinement, time slows and stretches, no matter what tasks I undertake to hasten it. These eight days of seclusion will bring my combined total of quarantine days in China to around 65 over the last two years, half of which were incurred through travelling in and out of Beijing on domestic business trips.

I will get out of this centre on Christmas afternoon to spend a further three days at home. The rules make little sense, as restrictions in most Chinese cities have been lifted with no more COVID testing. If people get sick they are expected, although not forced, to stay home. While the rest of China is free, we are confined because we have come from overseas. I spoke to the officials in my district, and they said I could go for walks once I am home. Some friends have suggested I join them for Christmas celebrations, but I will not do that. Technically, rules for returnees must be obeyed and officials in my suburb may get into trouble if I break them.

Never apologise

Over these last three COVID years, policymakers have struggled to balance public health measures with individual and public prosperity. Although the COVID rules initially saved lives, they were left in place too long until they cost lives, livelihoods, and eroded public trust — trust that will take the Chinese Government years to rebuild. After telling the population that Omicron may kill them in order to ensure obedience, the government reversed its position and abandoned most restrictions in the face of protests and alarming data showing that the economy was about to stall.

Rather than liberate the people to resume their lives, the shift has shocked them into an even deeper scepticism, as they wonder why the change has been so sudden, and why it contradicted advice given only days before. Many have stayed home, fearing the virus. Restaurants have opened but still largely remain empty. COVID testing is no longer required, but the streets of many Chinese cities are almost deserted.

The aptly titled ‘COVID tsunami’ is sweeping a COVID-naïve nation, causing widespread fear and illness, with many people suffering from serious fevers and putting hospitals under pressure, but not yet overwhelming the system as some forecast. In a country where there is no tradition of family doctors, people go straight to the hospital when they feel sick. As so many people have stockpiled flu medicines, it is almost impossible to find ibuprofen or paracetamol in pharmacies or online. My suitcase is lined with boxes of medicines purchased in London for my friends and colleagues.

As the present wave of illness passes, economic activity will recover, along with a degree of public trust. Travel will resume; foreigners will return, slowly, and then in steady streams, and Chinese businesspeople and tourists will again travel the globe.

Face

By the end of 2023, China will have become a key driver of the global economy once more. This will not be a return to normal, but rather the beginning of new era: one in which Chinese people will remember that their government made serious errors in trying to handle COVID, confining them too tightly for too long, and too proud to admit when they were wrong. It is common for politicians to mistake stubborn pride for strength, and it is a feature of power that those who wield it feel incapable of contrition. The Chinese middle class in particular is likely to be more questioning and less biddable than they were before COVID, and the Chinese Government will have to adapt to their demands, perhaps ensuring the people are better and more transparently governed.

White clad workers with light blue, synthetic overcoats are banging on the doors of my corridor as they leave lunch boxes outside each one. As if this activity had woken him, my neighbour begins coughing again. In 24 hours, I can leave for my south-facing, sun-filled apartment, looking toward the back of the Forbidden City.

*Mahon also spoke to interest.co.nz recently for an episode of the Of Interest podcast. You can listen to this here.


*David Mahon is the Executive Chairman of Beijing-based Mahon China Investment Management Limited, which was founded in 1985. This article is here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

43 Comments

A very interesting and well written piece, even if I think it’s too bullish - once again - on China’s prospects.

Up
2

The Covid-naive nation is NZ.  Hideous MIQ facilities, mask and vaccine mandates, forced vaccination through fear of losing your job.  Yet how many died without a co-morbidity.  Zero?  The true problem clogging the hospitals is the obese, diabetic (80% of all doctor visit's) people, addicted to their corporate produced pharmaceuticals.  It's the food, vaccine's, lockdown's, masks, mandates won't 'save' you.

Lifestyle choices rule (nutrition) for a quality of life and doctor's will not save you.

Up
13

You should head on up to the Leukemia ward at Starship and cheer all the kiddies up.

Up
12

Hey Fossil, if you get cancer will you go to the doctor?

Up
6

Fossil reckons if you eat some leafy greens and do some star jumps, cancer shouldnt be a worry, no doctor required.

Don't give in to fear.

Up
7

... you roll the odds in your favour if you follow sensible advice on diet , exercise & sleep  ... nevertheless , there are people in hospital through no apparent " fault " on their part  ...

Sh*t happens sometimes , even to very careful folks ...

Up
6

There would be hospital loads less cancer if we followed Fossil's advice.

"The life expectancy free of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer at age 50 was 23.7 years (95% confidence interval 22.6 to 24.7) for women who adopted no low risk lifestyle factors, in contrast to 34.4 years (33.1 to 35.5) for women who adopted four or five low risk factors."

https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.l6669

Up
2

Good read. Tobacco used to be the biggest cause of lost life-years. Now it is type2 diabetes. NZ has a tidal wave coming with the associated complications. It will break the health system which is currently badly cracked. You will need private healthcare.

 

Up
3

I think we're already there.

Up
3

Fossils carried this argument across a couple of discussions now and he's confusing the benefits of a healthy lifestyle with the efficacy of modern medical science in general, irrespective of individual own goals.

Up
0

Skip the MMR, Polio Sip and Chicken Pox vaccines.  Kids just need to drink bleach and have plenty of sunlight.  

Up
0

It is posts like this that make me wish I was illiterate.

Up
8

... agree 100 % .... Fossil's posts make me wish I was illegitimate  , too ...

Up
0

From my point of view, I think most of replies to this thread is lose the "Fossil Lover's" point...

Up
1

Recently in the news we learnt that New Zealand has something like 600,000 doses of covid vaccine that are getting to the end of their shelf life.  We also learnt that China is now desperately trying to get as much Vaccine as it can from the rest of the world.  We benefited when Spain kindly made some of theirs available to us early in the pandemic.  (In reality they had far greater need than us) You would think that we could pass this still active vaccine on to China in their time of desperate need.  Disappointingly mean spirited and selfish. For what? So we can throw it out?

Up
6

... apparently their " shelf life " is a conservative measure , they're still good for a long time ...

But you're right  , we have a mean spirited government  ... we should do the right thing ... same with our tiny support for Ukraine ... its embarrassing how badly Ardern has let us down

.... history will record us as being stingy miserly  gits .... 

Up
4

Mean spirited?  Surely generous at spending other peoples money.  Support for Ukraine - at least they knew which side to support. I wonder what they would do if China invaded Taiwan?  

Up
1

Charity starts at home Gummy, get the band rolling ...start a group...fund raise, or just keep whinging ...your choice..

Up
0

... that's BS ... and you know it ... the world is my home ... we should help out where we can , and until now , our O/S assistance has been embarrassingly pitiful  ..

It's not " whinging " , it's been pissed off that our leaders are making us look like dicks ...

Up
5

Strange I have not heard any one calling NZ dicks except some dicks in NZ?

Up
2

Who or where is this demographic or social group that cares about how much each government gives to Ukraine?

I'm not sure there is still active popular support for defending Ukraine "to the last Ukrainian"  or escalating the situation to WW3 and no one's going remember how much we gave when this is over. We could give more to overseas humanitarian crises but this one is not special to us just because the MSM tells us it is.

Up
2

Imagine writing this article in 2020. You'd have been cancelled, censored, and labelled an anti-vaxxer.

I'm glad everyone can now agree that zero-covid is nonsense. Shame it took so long.

Up
7

It's a basic, best practice pandemic response, and pandemics need time to play out.

This one's been super fast, thanks to modern science and moderately effective public policy. It's unlikely ever going to be perfectly timed and implemented, so we can all just complain on that basis.

Up
2

It's a basic, best practice pandemic response

What rubbish. Best practice would be protecting the most vulnerable, not trying to prevent anyone from ever getting sick. Invoking science doesn't make that strategy any more valid I'm afraid.

Up
8

- Contain the spread

- Evaluate the contagion

- Devise and implement treatment

That's a process that will take considerable time to play out, because you're also having to record and collate data.

Your approach involves significantly more risk and sounds great only with the benefit of hindsight.

Up
2

Except what you described there isn't what China is doing, and not what we did.

Our goal, like China's, was zero covid.

Up
7

Zero covid was what we coined our approach to contain the pandemic while medical science caught up. It was never promoted as a permanent measure.

Whole thing was what, 24 months or so?

Up
4

How long has China been doing it?

Have they promoted it as a permanent measure?

Up
1

This is straying considerably from your initial comment.

Up
0

No, not at all. We're all busy sitting around criticising others for doing the exact same thing we did 2 years ago. That is what I was getting at with my initial comment. Apologies if it wasn't clear enough.

I realise the argument is going to be "oh, but it's different now". The only difference is who's doing it.

Up
6

Your initial and successive comments read fairly clearly as if pandemic quarantine is nonsense to you. You even called it rubbish.

My argument is it's necessary, and is going to take time to play out for the aforementioned reasons.

Now you want to talk about China exclusively, ok. They're an authoritarian regime who aren't known for making the best informed decisions.

Up
3

I think if you dig just a little further, you'll find that Chebbo is not necessarily critical of the Covid response itself, but which political party was at the helm at the time.  While forgetting that a pandemic response is not managed by one single person i.e. Cindy, that we have a department called the Ministry of Health that I would imagine consults with industry experts to make an informed decision with limited information at the time.  

Up
1

IIRC the US CDC devised the basic playbook a long time ago, but yeah it's basic best practice and independent of a sitting government.

We can track mortality rates of covid fairly parallel with how well or poorly governments followed it.

Up
0

Putting politics aside, who would you rather have making decisions around pandemic response?  The Ministry of Health who has been established with the sole purpose of managing health related stuff (including pandemics), or Chubbo from Interest.co who has watched a few YouTube videos and is upset about having to wear a mask on a bus.  

Up
2

That is simply not true. The World Health Organization's own pandemic blueprint was to identify those at most risk and isolate them and/or support them, as much as possible, while the rest of the population gains herd immunity through vaccines (if available or effective) and natural immunity (from healthy people contracting the virus and surviving).

 

This was pandemic 101... until governments realized that their voting base (over 60 year olds) were the ones that would have to isolate at home for 2 years. The Govts worked out pretty quickly that baby boomers would not follow a directive to stay home, so they just shut down everything. 

Up
3

The death stats from Covid19 ( delta strain ? ) at the beginning clearly demonstrated who was vulnerable : the elderly ... the obese , diabetics ...

... after 2 years of turmoil , rolling lockdowns  , borders closed  , business failures  , red lights , Q code scanning , masking up , destroying economies with central banks QE programmes ... the statistics at the end replicated exactly those at the beginning ...

Why did we put ourselves through it all... why !

Up
2

There is a bit on twitter that Xi does not want foreign  help, thinks it would show weakness..... bit silly but most things about the CCP are.

Up
2

China to reopen borders, drop Covid quarantine from January 8

  • Local authorities will be stripped of the power to shut down entire communities from early next month
  • The decision is the last step in the country’s pivot to living with the virus

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3204601/china-reopen-bo…

Up
1

The media will overplay it to confirm how scary covid is. The only scary thing was to jab billions of people with a drug that was sketchy.

Up
3

China must be very safe then, as most of those old people suddenly dying, of  a "common cold", refused the Chinese Sinovac jab..... wait a minute...   

No one made anyone in China take any vax so its quite a good control group in the over 60-70s, being a significant part of 1.6 billion people.   

Meanwhile Covid-19 is so yesterday the CCP no longer bother counting these things.    I hear in 8 days Chinese tourists will be able to exit China and return to Queenstown.  They better bring their own bed linen and instant noodles as its hardly coping with domestic tourism. 

 

Up
2

  I hear in 8 days Chinese tourists will be able to exit China and return to Queenstown.

Who told you that the Chinese are ready to flock to NZ in their droves? The media? Cindy? It reminds me of the days when Kiwis thought buses of Chinese were going to be turning up with suitcases of money to buy their suburban houses for a king's ransom. 

Up
0

They will want to travel as much as we did when we unlocked, and NZ is considered one of the safest places in the world re covid.....

Up
0