Labour says, if elected to government in November's election, it will expand Apprenticeship Boost to two full years, extend it to more trades and introduce new grants and mentoring to help more people finish their apprentice training.
“Too many young New Zealanders are struggling to find good jobs while our country faces growing skills shortages,” Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said on Sunday. “Labour is committed to helping New Zealanders find good jobs and build the workforce of the future. That’s exactly what this policy delivers.”
Hipkins announced the policy in front of the party faithful, at their annual congress, saying: "National’s decision to cut, pause, delay or cancel projects has contributed to 20,000 jobs being lost in the construction industry since the last election."
"And many of those skilled workers have left the country. We urgently need to get Kiwis back to work. And to give our young people the chance to get into it."
Hipkins said Labour would fund the support and mentoring that helps people stay the course and finish their apprenticeships.
"Because every young New Zealander deserves a genuine choice to build their future here."
Asked by reporters after his speech why the Apprentice Boost announcement was the party’s headline policy at its congress, Hipkins said Labour was the party of workers.
"Apprenticeships are a really important way of how we get people into the trades. We see huge career opportunities for young New Zealanders moving into the trades, and we're really proud of what we achieved in government in that area. [There were] record numbers of people in apprenticeships, and we want to get apprenticeships growing again."
He said the expansion to the Apprentice Boost would be paid for out of future budget allowances.
‘We choose our future’
"In just 137 days, we go to the polls and we choose our future," Hipkins told the audience.
“We can choose better jobs, affordable healthcare, and household bills you can finally pay - a government that backs you to build your future here.”
“Or we can choose more of the same: more broken promises, more cuts, higher costs."
“We can choose a future where working hard actually means getting ahead," said Hipkins.
“Or a government that’s told our young people their best opportunities are overseas,” Hipkins said. “We can choose more secure work, better pay, and real help to ease the pressure."
“Or a Prime Minister who has given up on the major thing he promised to fix - the cost of living.”
“Above all, we can choose to stand together, to chart a new path that recognises the contributions everyone can make, and that rewards hard work. A government that backs every New Zealander to succeed,” Hipkins said.
"Christopher Luxon and his National Government are out of touch, and out of time."
The Kiwi dream
Hipkins said the choice people faced this year was not just between Labour and National.
“It is a choice between building our future here - or watching it built somewhere else.”
He said Labour had a "practical, funded plan" ready to start the day after the election.
"I won't pretend we can fix it all straight away. We'll focus on what matters most, and we'll deliver it."
Hipkins says the Kiwi dream has always been simple and powerful, “if you work hard, you can build a decent life.”
“A warm home. A secure job. Good schools for your kids. Healthcare when you need it,” he said.
“Under Labour, that dream won’t be reserved for a few, it will be delivered for everyone.”
49 Comments
It all starts when basic human needs become dreams...
Writers write, dreamers talk and politicians avoid any responsibility in either.case.
I wonder if there's any chance the Labour Party will share the detail of their "practical, funded plan" with us before the election.
Just like Jacinda delivered the dream did aye?
We are now heading towards default, even before Labour get in...
The ONLY way Labour can get in is with the Greens and possibly top, taxing and redistribution does now grow the pie... abandon hope all who enter
How is the pie grown?
Need more overseas investors.
(Sarc)
It's when I ask myself this question that PDK gets in my head, b@#$&d.
Growing the pie requires investment (new money)....it is credit expansion that circulates (velocity of)
The state funding training probably has more chance of 'growing the pie' than increasing the price of existing assets.
Brave policy to divert capital from tax avoiding land speculation into productive businesses.
“Under Labour, that dream won’t be reserved for a few, it will be delivered for everyone.”
May as well be a Tui ad. As long as no one is coming out and saying “Overvalued housing needs to be addressed and it will be top of our list” all else is just noise.
“Too many young New Zealanders are struggling to find good jobs while our country faces growing skills shortages"....""Apprenticeships are a really important way of how we get people into the trades. We see huge career opportunities for young New Zealanders moving into the trades"
"I like what I'm hearing Chipster. Tell me more about the what, how and when."
"we're really proud of what we achieved in government in that area"
Sigh.
Out of touch doesn’t even begin to describe!
Just saw a clip of a very scared looking Luxon say he wasn't paying attention to TOP and then quoted their policies in detail.
The more he does this the more oxygen they will get.
TOP over 5% means a change of Government.
Election could be over before it begins.
Got my vote. Waiting for the land tax. Specudebtors will finally pay tax.
There's so many people who don't really like any of the existing policies but feel they should vote.
TOP's gonna hoover up the swing votes from all sides. I can see them pushing 10%
Yes see TOP going very well this time and getting a number of seats.
Gecko will be Up The Toppings, this election.
Making speculand pay multiple LVTs is great.
A labour construct is going to pull votes from the right?
The Opportunity Party is increasingly looking like a Labour project to destroy the Green Party.
1. The General Manager of the party is Iain Lees-Galloway
2. His business partner is Toni Grace, Hipkins' partner
3. The number 3 candidate is Kayla Kingdom-Bedd, an author of the He Puapua report that Labour secretly adopted
4. She is the partner of James Shaw, the ousted leader from the Green Party
5. James Shaw is said to be doing a lot of the heavy lifting policy wise
6. There is at least one union linked candidate
7. The media luvvies are in on it.
Yes, I've seen this copied and pasted a few times now. The established parties appear to be getting worried.
Given top is is an established parties construct, why are established parties worried? It's not remotely like Ross Perot or Bob Jones setting up a party.
That highlights the incestuous nature of politics. No genuine new blood. Just the circulation of policy that got us to here in the first place.
A cynical facade of choice aided and abetted by the MSM.
It's been very interesting to observe the rise of TOP in the lead up to this election. People seem worries. How do I tell this? I'm seeing more and more posts like your list above profile, also others accusing the MSM of getting them popularity while not realising they have given mainly cover to the red and blue parties for a generation beforehand. People trying to slander them, bring scandal about them, so clearly they are ruffling a few feathers and those who stand to have to front up some tax $$$ appear to be using all influence they can to sputter TOP's chances.
the most hilarious part about all of it, is that no matter how loyal some seem to be to the major parties, none can refute that neither the current nor previous govt have had much to show for positive change for NZ, nor any semblance of fiscal realism nor honesty. When confronted with this with family and friends, I often get silence.
accusing the MSM of getting them popularity The MSM aren't even honest enough to tell us about the basics about the party and we have to rely on alternate to get a modicum of info into their background. It highlights how duplicitous the MSM are - rather than getting them popularity. Posting basic info is not slander, or scandal, nor a sign people are worried. Who is worried here? Top for the cat being out of the bag?
As for loyalty I agree with your second to last sentence. The covid policy debacle aptly demonstrated the current crop of parties from far left to fake right are for the dogs. I would relish an alternative rather than a rewashed labour mates project.
Seems interesting. But they still don't have an Epsom-style sweetheart deal like National gave to ACT.
But you never know.
You're dreamin' mate. TOP will be lucky to get 2%. Always will be a fringe party.
I've voted TOP the last two elections, mainly as I like the real change in policies proposed. None of this tweaking this adjusting that, needs a big overhaul. However that also makes me dubious they will actually make the 5%.
Likely people will go boo National creating all these problems, oh yes Labour will get our jobs back.
Re top
I am lucky I live rural so only a 0.5% tax but if you live in a family house in Auckland worth say $1.5 mil (not a mansion at all) you will be up 1.75% EVERY YEAR, sure there is a 10 year transition (likely to be interrupted by an election at year 4...)
thats 26k after tax or 36k ish before tax....
its going to be an interesting election
Indeed. But thats were the speculation is strongest and the tax avoidance. Those that can subdivided will be ok and spread the tax. Those that overpaid on interest only as seminar suckers... not so much.
Let them pay tax.
If the average price a FHBer pays in AKL is $685k that's an additional $11,986 they have to find after tax, or $230 a week
Are FHBers specu landlords?
seems a heavy punishment for those trying to buy there first home (Which is not exempted....)
Not sure any FHBer in AKL has ability to meet bank requirements if $11,986 is to be deducted from income to pay more tax
Now all this assumes that ToP even if part of a coalition would get to do any such policy (which they would not)
This would knock $200-$250 off a 700k house price immediately
The proposal is nutty and political suicide.
Only loser is the leverage monkey speculators. Ticket clippers wont care if price drops, they still get paid on sale... forced or otherwise.
Burn.
Not really, it just means people will think differently about AKL, and using property as an investment. Likely as land prices drop, o too would the tax, and a balance would be found.
Read the policy. The fhb'ers UBI pays for it. Big whoop.
Those over leveraged on multiple speculeverage houses (other peoples homes) sweating their tenants will indeed get hammered. Good job as they contribute nothing to NZ but export tenants productive effort to Aussie foreign bank owners. And give the gamblers tax free capital gains.
Let them pay tax.
It's hardly worth discussing as they're only going to get around 2% of the vote.
Last poll was 4.6%. Thats why its getting press noise. More noise...more votes.
Let them pay tax.
How many rentals do you have Zach?
Still well behind Greens, NZ First and ACT. We wont be paying that tax anytime soon.
That many huh...
5% equals 6 MPs and some brains for the left. Lets see what happens.
Yes, let's see what happens.
there are brains on the left?
Thanks for defining ‘irony’ for us.
but who pays for the UBI?
not those on super?
maybe the FHBers pay the tax to pay their tax?
Apparently those on super get UBI on top of super. Retirees will be rich. They can defer the LVT as well.
A lot of the retirees are already rich.
That is definitely news to me. I calculated we'd be worse off on only UBI plus some other investment income. If that's the case we'll be "wealthy"
"Those that can be subdivide will be OK and spread the tax." Up to a point. I have considered putting two double storey, maybe three storey on my section. No can do without getting resource consent from the Council and pay? for the pleasure. Section too small to subdivide without applying via a RC and that would cost for drawings. Cross lease potential which I don't personally like. Fortunately I can do about 80% of the RC drawings myself but others would have to employ an architect or or architectural draughtsman to provide resource consent drawings costing somewhere between $10k to $20k to do with no guaranteed outcome. Don't get me on about not be able to build closer than 3m from a road boundary and I have two of them. Also would require Council approval to build inside them. I regard quite a few of these rules revenue gathering by the Council.
Development does indeed cost money. More than most realise. Cost of construction is thru the roof to, because..... all the workers have to pay/rent somewhere to live as well. Due to speculation they ...over pay.
Kinda full circle reality for the over leveraged long on land. Banks dont care, they have been laughing all the way to the ..well... to the bank.
Billions and billions of laughs.
Their bottom lines that they would push in a coalition agreement are far less radical, and far more likely to come to fruition, yet the big policies like land tax and ubi get all the attention. Good to see the incumbents squirm I say
If you look down TOP's list, the great majority of the candidates seem to be professional bureaucrats, technocrats, activists, or politicians - the 'urban elite' that's typically the Green and Labour catchment, and make it feel like an economically progressive version of Labour and socially rational version of the Greens.
Chippy's budget response speech showed he's actually paid attention to what is affecting the average household right now (much more so than Luxon and Willis), but I don't have a lot faith he'll deliver anything to address it.
100%, he's been reading reddit
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.