sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

National pushes ahead on under 16 social media ban without NZ First or ACT, Labour's slogan, Opportunity in kingmaker's seat

Public Policy / news
National pushes ahead on under 16 social media ban without NZ First or ACT, Labour's slogan, Opportunity in kingmaker's seat
Erica Stanford and Christopher Luxon.
Erica Stanford and Christopher Luxon.

National is pushing ahead with its plan to ban social media for under 16-year-olds, with platforms facing fines of up to 10% of global revenue for breaking the rules.  

Social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat and Facebook would need to take “reasonable steps to check users are over the age of 16 by using a number of methods including; existing account information, facial age estimation, digital ID services and formal ID", Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced on Monday. 

Luxon said it would be a government bill that would be introduced to Parliament, but not progress to law this term. 

However, the Bill’s placement under a government umbrella was questioned after both coalition partners NZ First and ACT said they would not support the Bill.  

“The Government is not moving to ban under 16 from social media. The National Party is,” NZ First leader Winston Peters said.

“We have been concerned with proposed legislation and the direction and slippery slope that legislation like this will inevitably take our country."

He said they were having to tell a coalition partner how MMP works, “and this is not how it works on this occasion”.

“You've got two parties that aren't agreeing. But nevertheless, they're saying it's a government bill. No, it is not.”

Winston Peters - Anna Whyte.

 

While the Bill is only being introduced and will not be progressing through Parliament before November's election, National will still have to rely on Labour. 

Leader Chris Hipkins, who thought up until Luxon’s press conference National was intending to ask for Labour’s support this term, said Labour still wanted to “find a way forward.”

“I'm concerned about the harm that's being done to young people online generally," Hipkins said.

"There are many, many bigger and wider issues here as well. If we can find ways forward as Parliament to try and address some of those, social media being only one of them, our door’s open to those conversations.”

Labour's new slogan

Labour released its campaign slogan - 'Better Starts Now' on Monday, with Hipkins saying it "captures the spirit of our campaign."

"It’s a call to action, and a promise for better jobs, more affordable healthcare, warm, dry homes, and real action on the cost of living."

National campaign chairman Simeon Brown said the slogan, Better Starts Now, was "the closest thing to a confession we will ever get from Chris Hipkins, because with 10 weeks until the election, he had better start now."

"Christopher Luxon has spent months on the Building the Future Tour, listening to thousands of New Zealanders at public meetings in halls and community centres from one end of the country to the other. Meanwhile, Chris Hipkins has been nowhere to be seen."

Polls polls polls 

The latest RNZ Reid Research poll has the left bloc - with the addition of the Opportunity Party - with 61 seats, which is enough for form a government. Opportunity - which was polling at 5.3%, equal to six seats, tips the bloc over by one. 

While Opportunity still says it can work with National, Luxon has ruled out working with the party. 

Labour was on 32.2%, National on 29.1%, NZ First at 11.9%, the Greens on 10.2%, ACT at 7.7% and Te Pāti Māori was at 3%. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

14 Comments

erica standing next to chris is a bigger deal?

how recent is that photo?

 

Up
1

More virtue signaling that Luxon knows he'll never have to deliver because ACT & NZF have more commonsense & know its failed everywhere its been tried - also a Trojan horse for monitoring general population browsing activities 

 

Edit: perhaps some unforeseen consequences 

https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361024182/how-national-steamrolled-its-coalition-partners-social-media-ban-and-what-consequence-may-be

 

Up
0

monitor DNS  resolution and you know all, or just ip monitoring....   VPN or tor

meta data goes a long way

 

Up
0

I take it you don't have teenage kids 

Up
0

Now 50 & 47 yo. They were smart teenagers too, their parents raised them well.

Up
0

Even the good kids are on social media getting addicted. 

Food and phones are the two big addictions of our time and we don't even recognise it. If someone's addicted to booze or drugs we would probably try to help them, if you're addicted to food or phone we can't even say anything. You're just big boned or checking your phone. 

You can't even tell your kids not to eat too much these days. I tell them when their mum isn't listening that if they eat too much they will be big fatties. Very un PC though. 

If someone said "don't drink too much booze like your dad does" that would be fine, but if I replied with "and don't eat too much food like you must" or "dont be real boring looking at your phone all day like you do", that not so fine. 

Up
2

Bugger that. 

My kids and my grandkids can eat as much as they like. Encourage less processed especially sugar but otherwise eat away. Especially fats, brain food.

Up
3

France’s ban on social media for under 15s has been struck down by the Constitutional Council, the country’s equivalent of the UK Supreme Court, over privacy concerns.1

In its seven page ruling earlier this month the council said the ban was disproportionate and infringed freedom of expression.2

The ban, approved by parliament in July and championed by President Emmanuel Macron, would have made France the first European country and only the second in the world after Australia to impose such restrictions on social media.3

https://www.bmj.com/content/394/bmj-2026-100623

Up
1

France would revolt over anything to be fair. Just wait and see how their finances go when they cant afford their pension any longer due to taking up such a large proportion of govt expenditure. 

Up
0

The prospect of being required to hand over detailed personal information to social media companies for access is so deeply unattractive that it might drive away enough people to make the issue moot. 

Up
1

Aka, performative politics.  The Greens with their posturing.  The Maori Party with their hakas and no action.  Winston voting for the ferries when with Labour, against them when with National.  Paul Henry as the answer to anything.  Labour too scared, too useless to have any policy.  It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.

There definitely is a need to make the Social Media owners accountable.   But performative, nah, you are not earning your pay with this.

Up
1

These policies are only as useful as they are able to be enforced. Try telling the police that a company has been allowing an under 16 to use social media afterwards. Do you think you would get a satisfactory response or any meaningful action? It is failing in Australia already, as we all know it is too difficult to monitor and too easy to circumvent for mass social media conglomerates. 

Up
1

A quick chat with Lux's pal Donny will sort the issue. All Donny has to say is controlling US tech will be regarded as a trade issue and Lux will walk it back faster than you can say "gone by breakfast". 

Up
0

How low will Luxon's pet project push National's polling? 26%? 24%?

Up
0