sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Labour rules out increase in fuel excise tax if elected in November's election, government says it won't go ahead with 2027 raise

Public Policy / news
Labour rules out increase in fuel excise tax if elected in November's election, government says it won't go ahead with 2027 raise

Labour will not increase fuel excise for three years if elected, leader Chris Hipkins says, as the Coalition Government confirms the 2027 increase will not go ahead.

 Following Labour's announcement Finance Minister Nicola Willis said it was good to see Labour coming around to a position thae Government had "made quite clear for some time, ... for several months ... which is that we will not be increasing fuel tax on the 1st of January next year."

"We just need to formalise that decision."

However, two-days ago, Transport Minister Chris Bishop - who had signalled for months the increase was unlikely to go ahead - said it was an "outstanding issue about what we do with the 1st of January 2027 fuel tax increases, and when I've got a decision about that, I'll announce it."

Bishop said the Government were working through exactly what the consequences were of halting the increase.

"It has fiscal impacts, obviously. The world's a volatile place. Petrol prices bouncing around, and you know every day you wake up and turn on the news, and there's a new bit of news out of the Middle East," Bishop said.

"Any deferral or cancellation of a fuel tax increase - not announcing that's what we're doing, but I'm just saying - any decision around that has a fiscal impact, so we've got to work that through. We're responsible managers of the Crown books..."

Bishop said it needed to be done before the Pre-Election Economic and Fiscal Update on September 29. 

On Labour's three year promise, Willis said Hipkins "has a multi-billion-dollar gap between his stated revenue intentions and the taxes he has so far outlined."

Labour to 'hit pause immediately'

Hipkins on Tuesday said Labour would hit pause on the 2027 increase "immediately."

"Increasing fuel taxes in the middle of a cost of living crisis when fuel is going up because of international pressure would be an irresponsible thing for the government to do."

“Fuel is not a luxury," Hipkins said. "People need it to get to work, get their kids to school, run their businesses and get around their communities."

A question mark had been over the 2027 increase since March following the war in the Middle East.

In April, Bishop said it was unlikely to go ahead, but that there were a "range of things to do before we make that final decision."

“There are implications from delaying the increase to fuel tax by another year, it's not just new roads, it's existing road maintenance funding and public transport, for example, all of the things that that fuel taxes go towards."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

15 Comments

Let's see with what kind of user pays both parties will come up. It is either that or we have to deal with far more potholes and less new roads (of significance??).

Up
3

What happened to RUC replacing fuel excise tax?

Up
2

Creating a piece of plug in technology that will record distances while identifying when a vehicle is not on a road (that is, off-roading or on a racetrack etc.) while not spying on drivers and not costing thousands of dollars - all while being delivered and installed by 2027, might be unsurprisingly difficult to achieve in the time available.

Chris Bishop was SURE that something was available when asked a few months ago (his immense ignorance was likely missed by most people).

Up
0

Would have thought identifying when a diesel vehicle was off-roading was more of an issue than for petrol, yet RUC on diesel seems to work?

Up
0

Adjusted for Civil Construction Price Inflation, fuel tax per litre is the lowest in 20+ years.

https://www.datawrapper.de/_/8qgIp/?v=4

Then consider the average petrol vehicle is far more efficient than in the 90s. The per km charge for driving is buying the least gravel / asphalt / digger / grader / lollipop man time in generations.

Its remarkable that the roads haven't completely fallen to bits, and the only reason they haven't, and the build program continues, is because we are chucking billions in income tax into the roads. 

Up
5

and no one wants to pay tolls or pay more tax or pay RUCs on all vehicles

But we want better roads, new bridges etc etc

"Your dreaming mate" comes to mind

Up
4

Id expect to see councils start to close roads, or hand back to someone who's is often the sole user. 

Up
1

Heap of work. Public notification, open to environment court litigation, other hoops to jump through, and the council ultimately needs approval from the Minister of Lands.

Plus there isn't really much point, they can just shift it down the maintenance schedule. Doesn't cost anything to own a stip of land you spend zero dollars on. If the landowner gets annoyed enough they can just grade it themselves.

Up
0

Ok, thanks for the info. Was thinking about the old bridges on some of these roads as well 

Up
0

Doesn't cost anything to own a stip of land you spend zero dollars on. If the landowner gets annoyed enough they can just grade it themselves.

That depends. If those who are very rural live on paper roads, the council are obliged to act if a certain number of complaints come in around an issue. I've family in Taranaki in this situation who had 5km of ruts up to 30-50cm every winter to get up to their house, requiring a town car and a track vehicle 4x4, sometimes having to walk back if it got stuck. With a few well placed complaints, the council finally opened dialogue around remedying it. They came to an agreement of council dumping old asphalt (from resurfacing) at the base of their drive and they slowly spread it over a couple of years to solidify the road. Had they taken in further they could have pressured council to do more.

Up
1

Time to make westland, central otago, Queensland and Fiordland a special economic zone and charge for entry. Can't get into the bamff region without paying. Tourists are free riding, and at peak levels in this region. Give locals free entry. If fuel excise doesn't rise, can we pause on alcohol also? It's just driving higher drugs use. 

Up
2

So they'll be cancelling the $10b Puhoi to Te Hana (population 300) expressway?  Or getting the rest of the country to pay for it from general taxation?

You do not need fuel to get the kids to school.  Kids can walk, or ride a bike if high school is too far, or ride on the back of the parents bike if they are too little. An ebike uses $4 of electricity per year to run.

Something is wrong when the top selling vehicle remains the Ford Ranger, yet apparently we're too poor to pay for the roads to drive our massive vehicles on.

Top 5: Ranger, Rav4, Hilux, ModelY, Triton.  You have to go down to the Corolla in position 14 to find something efficient.  Back in the day Corolla was the top selling vehicle.

Up
2

Could be the 20% allowance for depreciation for company assets National opened up. Depreciate until it is free, then replace the fleet.

Up
2

Are you saying the tax payer is the one ultimately purchasing all these utes?

Up
0

It highlights that people are willing and able to pay a lot for transport. Choosing to have higher costs. Stated versus revealed preference. 

We can and should just charge a lot more in FED and RUC's and do a bunch of very boring pavement upgrades, culvert and bridge upgrades, slip mitigations etc.

Up
1