sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Labour says ‘good jobs are at the heart’ of its plan to address the cost of living as it promises to build more homes, fix school buildings and hospitals while creating jobs

Public Policy / news
Labour says ‘good jobs are at the heart’ of its plan to address the cost of living as it promises to build more homes, fix school buildings and hospitals while creating jobs
Prime Minister Chris Hipkins gives a speech in front of a Labour logo
Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Image source: Dan Brunskill

The Labour Party says if elected into government, it will build homes, improve schools and fix hospitals while creating jobs for New Zealanders.

On Thursday, Labour launched its Start work now policy, which focuses on schools, hospitals, social housing, creating work for local businesses and supporting tradies into work. If elected, the party says work would start within one year of taking office.

“This election is about the cost of living," its policy factsheet says. “The cost of living is not only about what you pay at the checkout or when you fill up the car. It is also about whether you have a good job and enough money coming in to cover the bills."

“That is why good jobs are at the heart of Labour’s plan to address the cost of living," the document says.

If elected, Labour planned to: 

  • Get Kāinga Ora to build more social housing
  • Provide “reliable” funding for community housing providers so they can plan ahead, “alongside a government guarantee that reduces borrowing costs and helps funding go further”
  • Provide nearly every school with funding to improve its buildings and grounds, with the party saying this would create work for local tradies. Labour wants work to begin on schools within 12 to 24 months if they’re elected
  • Direct Health New Zealand to finish repair projects already on its books and once that’s done, Labour will invest to fix more hospital buildings and essential systems

Alongside this proposal is the party’s apprenticeship boost announcement it made at its congress in June, and its Māori-led trades training policy launched in August. Labour also pledged in June to reduce the cost of finance for community housing providers by raising the Crown guarantee for Community Housing Funding Agency (CHFA) social bonds. 

'Fully funded, ready to start in a year'

"Labour has funded this plan and will use proven ways of getting the work under way. This plan will be funded from future operating and capital allowances," The Start work now factsheet says.

For the education package, Labour would allocate $450 million to improve the buildings and grounds of NZ schools - with its policy document saying this would be made up of $400 million in capital funding for state schools and $50 million in operating funding for the proprietors of integrated schools, allocated on a similar basis.

In terms of health, $200 million in capital funding would go towards what the party calls “the National Remediation Programme and the Small-Scale Remediation projects.”

“The housing package allocates $2.9 billion of capital for Kāinga Ora to build more state houses. It also allocates $760 million in operating funding to cover the additional Income-Related Rent Subsidy and operating costs for Kāinga Ora and Community Housing Providers,” the document says.

 

‘We can do all three while creating good jobs for Kiwis'

Pointing to unemployment being the highest it has been for more than a decade, Labour leader Chris Hipkins says his party will “build the infrastructure New Zealand needs, create jobs and ensure the benefits return to local businesses and communities.”

“Right now, homes need building, schools need improving and hospitals need fixing. We can do all three while creating good jobs for Kiwis,” he says.

“When the Government funds a building project, the benefits go well beyond the worksite. Builders hire tradies, tradies buy materials, suppliers get more orders, apprentices get hours and local businesses benefit from workers spending in their communities."

“Labour will use government investment to get essential work underway and give businesses the certainty they need to keep people in work,” Hipkins says.

Labour jobs and incomes spokesperson Ginny Andersen says unemployment under National is at an 11-year high. 

"We need to get Kiwis back to work. That means building homes, fixing schools and repairing hospitals, not sitting on our hands. New Zealand has a backlog of work that needs doing. Homes need building, schools need improving and hospitals need fixing,” Andersen says.

“Labour will get that work underway while creating opportunities for Kiwis to get back into work and businesses to win new contracts."

“This is about putting government investment to work – improving public infrastructure, supporting local businesses and giving the construction sector greater certainty.”

Read more about Labour's policy here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

13 Comments

Much as I dislike this government, I wouldn't trust Hipkins with my weekly shopping list. He would lose some, forget some and change the rest.

Up
10

Labour had its chance to build hospitals and schools when they borrowed $60 billion during COVID.

Up
7

According to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 and The Treasury, approximately half—or about $30 billion of the roughly $60 billion allocated through the COVID fund—was spent on programs not directly related to the pandemic.

= wasted. Other people's money given to Labours mates.

Up
6

Yes and we mustn't glaze over the disastrous timing to announce the so-called consolidation of all the DHB's into Health NZ. A monumental and ambitious transition that is still ongoing today, where DHB's still operate as they have done for the most part, despite the change in logo twice since. The wastage in this predates COVID and continues today. 

Up
2

Agree 100%. I work for Health NZ and I can't see any difference from the DBH era other than the senior management now being less transparent and less accountable.

Up
0

If the revenue from a capital gains tax is dedicated to funding free GP doctor visits will that be cancelled if the revenue does not materialise given that a relatively subdued property market is looking like lasting for quite a while yet. It seems to be all Labour can talk about perennially, is spending money but not provide any substantial or credible foundation as to what exactly is going to generate the funds to pay for it all. That in itself, answers itself, increased taxation and/or increased borrowing. After squandering $millions & millions when last in office, much of it unaccountable and most of it for nothing much tangible, are they now thinking that they want us all to let them have another go at it? For a start given the absolute failure, and farcically so, of fulfilling the Kiwi Build lavish promises, what are they saying here that offers any sort of new ability or improvement on that? 

Up
5

Do they all really think we are that dumb!!!

Believe all this, and the others aren’t far behind, and you believe in the tooth fairy, miracles and that $100 - $150 = A balanced budget

This must be the most depressing election I’ve ever seen - HELP

 

Up
5

How?...spending (money) does not equal capacity nor capability.

Like the 3 free GP visits where there is no method to provide the required capacity.

Up
4

Exactly. There is almost, to be polite about it, a naivety in play here. I wasn’t quite old enough to vote for Nash, but I had no hesitation in voting Labour right up until and including 1996.  That was the inherent  nature of my family.  Didn’t vote for Helen Clark but accepted that she knew what she was doing, it was the sleight of hand over income tax, that did that,  and until her retirement I voted for our Labour MP here because she was one of the best I have ever encountered. But honestly, in comparison with previous Labour caucuses, this lot are no better than a bunch of irresponsible, ill qualified spenders &  pretenders.

Up
2

The comments so far assess that the sky will fall in if Labour get voted in. To the contrary I think the claimed Labour spending and offered plans are very modest, constrained and entirely possible.

Contrast that with the present govts FAFO actions see https://www.interest.co.nz/public-policy/140397/central-government-pauses-local-council-reform-still-expects-changes-be-place including Stoltz statement that '“Communities will not tolerate ratepayer money being spent on unclear processes that are repeatedly reshaped after the work has been done. Before councils do more work, they need certainty the goal posts won’t be moved again."'

Up
0

 '“Communities will not tolerate ratepayer money being spent on unclear processes that are repeatedly reshaped after the work has been done. Before councils do more work, they need certainty the goal posts won’t be moved again."'

Councils themselves do that all the time, certainly in Wellington.

Up
3

They most certainly do. Unfailingly a feature of any organisation that is a law unto itself. There is no shortage of examples of staff, in local body government, seeing themselves as beyond any accountability or responsibility to either elected councillors or ratepayers as relative. For instance three independent reviews into the hierarchy of the executive in the Christchurch City Council has identified a cabal of exactly that, yet it remains. 

Up
3

I believe it was Thatcher who said - the trouble with socialists is that sooner or later they run out of other peoples' money.  

Take a look at the UK's current Labour Government, to a man and woman, lifelong public servants, ex councilors, think tank researchers, or union advisors.  Not one has any business experience, and it shows.  The result - a total mess, they cannot stop spending as they believe that the solution to all ills is more Government.  Spending is up, as are taxes, and borrowing.  Bond yields are well above 5% as a result, and matters looks set to get worse.

 

 

Up
2