Auckland Council resurrects retail bond offer after digesting court ruling suggesting it's liable for leaky commercial buildings

Auckland Council, which put a bond issue on ice in October after a court ruling suggested it had liability for leaky commercial properties, says it's again considering an offer of fixed-rate secured bonds to the public.

The council says it's seeking preliminary indications of interest and full details of the bond issue will be released when the offer opens next Monday, December 10. ANZ and BNZ have been appointed joint lead managers.

Back in October Auckland Council said it would seek up to NZ$175 million through a six-year, fixed-rate, secured retail bond offer. It had planned to price the bonds at a margin of 1.08% per annum over the six-year swap rate.

However, the offer was postponed after a court decision against the old North Shore City Council, now part of Auckland Council, in relation to the Spencer on Byron Hotel. The Supreme Court held that councils owe a duty of care to the owners of all buildings whether they be residential or commercial, with this duty to ensure those buildings comply with the building code.

"Until this decision, there has been some doubt as to whether or not the owner of a commercial building was entitled to sue a council for damages reflecting the cost of bringing the building up to standard. Auckland Council’s financial statements include provisions for potential future liabilities for residential properties with weathertightness issues, but not commercial properties," Auckland Council said in October.

Its investment statement for the planned October bond offer disclosed a NZ$417 million provision in its accounts for the likely costs to be incurred as a result of active, reported and unreported leaky homes claims. Because of the Supreme Court ruling, Auckland Council said it had decided to defer its bond offer, which it would re-launch once its staff had considered the implications of the court decision.

Today the council said the new bonds would form part of its overall borrowing programme to fund investment in the likes of electric trains, its proposed city rail link and opening up Auckland's waterfront. "Ratepayers and other retail investors can register their interest with one of the Joint Lead Managers or a financial advisor. A copy of the investment statement for the issue will be sent upon release," Auckland Council says.

Credit ratings agencies Moody’s and Standard & Poor's both recently affirmed their Auckland Council ratings at Aa2 and AA, respectively.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment or click on the "Register" link below a comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.


Ooooh - our very own Muni Bond, and for a Trainset!
Where do I sign?

Good Luck Aucklanders, you will be paying for this for the rest of your lives, and your children and grandchildren too.......And do you really beieve it will stop at 175 Million ???

Wow - interesting. Is Auckland CC heading for a crash? They have to build highways, and transport links because the city is inefficient without it, and when a city is inefficient so are businesses, job growth etc People value time and money more than anything else and in in a city where real estate prices force people to move to the perimeters what´s going to give? More rate increases? Clearly the Super City needs competition so that it´s able to offer tighter governance to ratepayers - monolopies are self serving and eventually come to a grinding halt when the punters say enough is enough. You have to wonder when that time will come.

Auckland City is a weird monopoly in that it has no control over the one thig that really matters for how it works as a city: its highways. Unless something drastic has happened the highways in the city are built, owned maintained and operated by central government (i.e. every single taxpayer in New Zealand). The obsession with the "trainset" looks a lot like Auckland City wanting to compete with government for the transport soul of Auckland.