sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Treasury reports budget deficit running NZ$199 million above forecasts as tax revenues lag expectations, but gap narrows; Surplus in 2014/15 still expected

Bonds
Treasury reports budget deficit running NZ$199 million above forecasts as tax revenues lag expectations, but gap narrows; Surplus in 2014/15 still expected

By Bernard Hickey

Weaker than expected GST and income tax receipts continued to drag the Government's budget into defict in the nine months to March, but Treasury is still confident of a surplus for 2014/15 because the economy is now growing even stronger than it forecast in December.

Treasury has reported the Government posted a NZ$1.7 billion operating balance deficit before gains and losses, which was NZ$199 million worse than forecast, largely because tax revenues were 1.8% or NZ$829 million less than expected.

However, the gap between the deficit and expectations has narrowed somewhat from last month and continued spending restraint helped reduce the size of the gap.

Core Crown tax revenue was NZ$44.5 billion in the latest nine month reporting period, up 6.3% from a year ago, but still 1.8% less than forecast in the pre-Christmas Half Yearly Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU). This was narrower than the 2.8% variance seen a month earlier.

"Updated tax revenue forecasts will be released as part of the Budget Economic and Fiscal Update on 15 May. Tax revenue outturns in the current fiscal year are not expected to impact on the forecast return to OBEGAL surplus for 2014/15 as the variance-against-forecasts are offset by a stronger outlook for the economy than had been anticipated at HYEFU," Treasury said in its monthly update.

Core Crown expenses were NZ$423 million lower than expected and net insurance expenses fell by NZ$151 million," Treasury said.

GST was NZ$264 million or 2.2% below forecasts with around half the variance because of stronger than expected earthquake‐related insurance refunds. 

"The remainder of the variance reflects some weakness in the macroeconomic drivers of  GST," Treasury said.

Income taxes were NZ$220 million or 1.2% below forecast, which Treasury said was timing related and expected to reverse out by the end of the year.

Other individuals’ tax receipts were NZ$163 million or 4.7% below forecast because "an earlier judgement about the relationship between receipts and revenue in the HYEFU forecast has not eventuated."

Customs and Excise duties were NZ$97 million or 3.1% below forecasts because an earlier increase in estimates was based on an increased that was a one-off rather than permanent increase.

Corporate taxes were NZ$73 million or 1.3% below forecast with most of the provisional tax timing differences from last month (NZ$372 million below forecast) having now reversed out, Treasury said.

Finance Minister Bill English said the 2014 Budget due next Thursday would show the Government remained on track for a small surplus in 2014/15 and increasing surpluses in following years.

"This will give us choices about repaying debt, investing a bit more in priority public services and, eventually, resuming contributions to the New Zealand Superannuation Fund," English said.

"But to meet this challenging target, we must remain focused on responsible fiscal policy and sensible economic policy that supports ongoing economic growth, more jobs and higher incomes," he said.

Political reaction

Labour Finance Spokesman David Parker said the weaker than expected figures showed the benefits of economic growth were not be shared fairly.

“The Household Labour Force Survey released this week shows wages are stagnating and unemployment remains stubbornly high. Bill English is busy claiming workers can expect significant wage increases but if their pay was growing, the Government’s tax take would not be so short of its target," Parker said.

Green co-leader Russel Norman said the Government would need smoke and mirrors to achieve its targeted surplus for 2014/15.

No chart with that title exists.

(Updated with more details, political reaction and chart)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

11 Comments

"Tax revenue, however, was 1.8% less than forecast (a narrowing from the 2.8% variance against forecast reported a month ago) reflected across most tax types and continuing the pattern of recent months," Treasury reported."

  Is this not Core Data?     Income Tax     =  down GST               =  down Corporate Tax = down     Rock Star Economy - where is it centred? 
Up
0

Yes, so just where is the business growth if corp tax is down?

I will add,

Un-employment steady at 6% where is business employing more rock stars then?

Wages increases? no where.

So some sectors might well be growing, but it looks like even more are still shrinking.  ie this just doesnt add up.

regards

 

Up
0

On a computer, flicking exchange rates and blinking eyes shut, oblivious.

A forecast can change in a nanosecond.

An economist is not aware of what goes on/off at trillions of bites/bytes per second.

 

 

Up
0

So the "forecast" was wrong and unrealistic expectations weren't met.  Maybe it doesn't mean anything more than they aren't very good at forecasting.

Up
0

I'm waiting for one of Waymads "Imagined Conversation" pieces.....bound to be brilliant on a Friday !

Up
0

This will fix it, yes no more gaps.

see below for a description in layman's terms

We see this as handy to combat:

tech coys (google and Apple)

runners of gobal supply chains (to and from) that invoice vehicle obligations away

and then some (users or royalities over operations, licencing and management feeing)

 

Under the new multinational business model (apples/google etc), foreign controlled entities are little more than branches of one global entity. Corporations tax law (both locally and with other countries with whom we share tax treaties) should be updated to reflect the new reality of these changes.

Corporate Tax law should recognise the distinction between traditional "body corporates" and subsidiaries of foreign controlled legal entities which, while masquerading as body corporates, are constructively no more than branches of the controlling parent company. Multinational subsidiaries might be taxed on the basis of how they actually conduct their operations, that is, as a branch of the parent entity rather than an independent local body corporate.

On a branch basis, local tax authorities (including Australia) could ignore royalties, service fees, cost mark ups and other structures (usually directed through tax havens) as being no more than internal transfers of cash. Tax deductions against local revenue should be no more than a pro rata share of the consolidated result. Such arrangements would likely restore Australia to the same corporate tax basis it enjoyed prior to the 1980s.

It would fix the budget deficit in a jiffy. Though, when it comes to a potential incursion by the taxman at its revenue line, Google is already half a step ahead because the bulk of revenues it makes from its Australian operations are actually booked in Singapore (this is still a problem).


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/comment-and-analysis/google-and-fairfax-playing-a-different-tax-game-20140509-37z0y.html#ixzz31AvX15VL

 

Up
0

Anyone see Steve Keens recent article (here)?  I hope some Labour politicians are getting their heads around it.  Using his Minsky modelling software he questions the very logic of running a government surplus.   To quote his article…

“Which would you prefer: a world in which monetary growth depends solely on asset price bubbles financed by private lending, or one in which monetary growth also comes from government spending on welfare and public infrastructure? It’s time we asked sensible questions about government spending, rather than mythical ones like that posed by politicians who mistakenly think that the government should operate like a business firm.”

Up
0

"The surplus is forecast at $372 million for 2014/15 and expected to grow to $3.5 billion in 2017/18". Surplus, surplus, surplus... it's all about the surplus. So what ever happened to Christchurch rebuild?!

Up
0

Debt Debt Debt, thats is what is driving the NZ economy as is in most countries. NZ houshold debt is up around six fold in 20 years, and is growing again, the only reason this has been possible is a decades long slide in interest rates. Debt has been growing at around 4% per annum. That outs strips growth of GDP, these are not sustainable numbers.

 

Up
0

As long as you pay the interest and the value of the asset doesnt drop, if you dont or it does drop, well you lose the lot.

regards

 

Up
0

Read the link to Steve Keen that Fatpat posted....

Ergo the Govn running a small deficit is actually good...to replace that with private debt would it seems be worse...

Also 4% debt is govn debt? or what? given we are in the worst recession since the Great Depression with un-employment at 6% and over-capacity its hardly surprising that the Govn revenue is down and we have to borrow.

Given our mad speculation of the way to wealth is property and selling it to the next fool...ho hum. Guess thats the free market in operation for you.

Interestingly if the Govn actually wanted to see our economy recover faster it should losen the purse strings a little.  For instance take the PPP crap they want to do and throw it out and fund it via 10 or 20 year bonds, cheap and effective.

Within the context of BAU of course.

 

regards

Up
0