sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Keyu Jin says Xi wants a smooth transition into modernity for China, cementing the Party's authority and ensuring his own legacy

Business
Keyu Jin says Xi wants a smooth transition into modernity for China, cementing the Party's authority and ensuring his own legacy

By Keyu Jin*

Most Western media have characterised the recent 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) as a pure power play, with President Xi Jinping entrenching his position.

But the accumulation of political capital in this case is a means to an end. For Xi, that end is a smooth transition into modernity that cements the CPC’s long-term authority and ensures his own legacy as modern China’s most significant leader.

Xi knows that if China is to continue to thrive in a fast-changing world, he will need to manage deftly a major social and economic transformation, while, even more important, improving state governance. And, in order to secure the long-term survival of China’s one-party system, he must reform state and Party institutions; indeed, political reform is, for Xi, a prerequisite for economic reform. (And yet, he will carefully avoid what he considers the mistakes of the last Soviet president, Mikhail Gorbachev.)

Xi’s motive in pursuing modernity is not, as many in the West have wrongly inferred, to establish China as a superpower on par with the United States; on the contrary, Xi views his current challenge and mission as being primarily domestic. He is motivated by the knowledge that success in this area will define his place in history. That, not the amount of authority he wields today, is his primary concern. Assuming otherwise sells Xi – and his political ingenuity – short.

Now firmly established as China’s most powerful leader since Deng Xiaoping, Xi can shape his legacy according to his own vision. Because his predecessor Hu Jintao lacked sufficient political capital to do likewise, China followed a largely passive path for a decade, pursuing conciliatory diplomacy (which enraged its citizens) and economically conservative strategies (which included suspending necessary reforms).

No one, however, should mistake Xi’s enhanced powers for a personal dictatorship. His choice of members for the Standing Committee of the Politburo, China’s highest authority, was an accommodation to the reality that there are limits to his power. Only half of the men named to the committee were his true confidantes.

The legacy that Xi seeks comprises three key components. The first is alleviation of growing social tensions. Beyond improving the provision of public goods, his promotion of the so-called China Dream of national rejuvenation has been aimed, in part, at encouraging people to seek fulfillment beyond material wealth.

Second, Xi wants to strengthen the CPC, not by force, but by reform. Over the last five years, Xi has led an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign, which has brought down one million Party officials, from low-ranking bureaucrats (known as “flies”) to the highest-level officials (“tigers”), throughout the country.

Such a large-scale campaign, as some observers have portrayed it, was not a political purge in disguise. Rather, Xi knew that widespread corruption was undermining the CPC’s legitimacy in the eyes of ordinary Chinese. Only by cleaning up the Party’s behavior could Xi reestablish its credibility.

Now, Xi is ready for Act II of his CPC revival: improving state governance. Xi is well aware that a case-by-case approach will not address the root causes of widespread corruption. For that, the entire system needs an overhaul. As he put it, “The Party needs to govern itself.”

The first step is to improve the legislative framework. For many years, the lack of accountability and transparency, and of clear decision-making processes, has impeded reform. Now, China needs institutionalized mechanisms for enforcing the rule of law – one aspect of Western political systems that Xi admires – among CPC officials, though the idea that the judiciary could be independent of the Party remains farfetched.

But even the best-designed system cannot work if there is a dearth of competent personnel to run it – a limitation highlighted by Xi’s push for economic reforms in his first term as president. That is why Xi is placing a strong emphasis on cultivating a new generation of highly educated, loyal, and, most important, incorruptible Party leaders. A key challenge here lies in stemming the migration of China’s top talent to the private sector.

The third component of Xi’s legacy is also the most important – and already effectively secured. At the 19th National Congress, CCP delegates agreed to add “Xi Jinping Thought” to the Party’s constitution, alongside “Mao Zedong Thought” and “Deng Xiaoping Theory.”

Now that Xi’s eponymous political ideology, which proposes an alternative to liberal democracy, is part of the school of thought around which the CPC coalesces, challenging Xi is tantamount to challenging the Party’s very belief system. In short, Xi has made himself virtually unassailable – his rare political skill elevating him to the status of secular deity.

The fact is that, as a leader, Xi has a lot going for him. He is well-educated and experienced in international affairs. He has weathered serious challenges and experienced firsthand the consequences of political and economic policies gone awry. He has a vast political network, thanks not only to his own deftness, but also to his family: he is the son of a comrade of Mao. And he now stands alongside Mao, as well as Deng, in modern China’s political pantheon.

But Xi is not Mao, and he will not govern China as Mao did. Instead, he will learn from Mao’s mistakes, so that he can lead China effectively into the next phase of its history – and secure the legacy that he so prizes.


Keyu Jin, a professor of economics at the London School of Economics, is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader and a member of the Richemont Group Advisory Board. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2017, published here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

24 Comments

History shows that secular deities are slowly then eventually overcome by grassroots movements, citizens awareness travel/international education (e.g. South Korea influence on tertiary students) and the growing underground movements.
https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/the-chinese-students-who-come-to-south-…
.
https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/chinas-thriving-underground-churches-in…

Up
0

Absolute power corrupts absolutely

Up
0

Challenging Xi is tantamount to challenging the Party’s very belief system
Xi has made himself virtually unassailable – his rare political skill elevating him to the status of secular deity

Sounds a bit like the Führerprinzip doesn't it?

This young lady seems very smitten. Well, I guess it could work, I'm just surprised that Interest.co.nz is acting as a propaganda outlet for China. It seems so contrary to what we say we stand for. It reminds me of the leftists before WW2 who were smitten with the Soviet Union and Uncle Joe.

Up
0

A majority of millennials would prefer to live in a socialist, communist or fascist nation rather than a capitalistic one, according to a new poll.

A rejection of Boomerism? China never had Boomers, they have survivors of the Cultural Revolution and the Red Guards instead.The race is now on to win the hearts and minds of the millennials. The groundwork has all been done. Who will win? This explains the rise of extreme elements in the West, left and right. Some millennials may think we can watch China closely and follow their lead perhaps.
It's a tricky situation. If the Boomers overreact they will only make socialism. communism and fascism more appealing to the little rascals.

Up
0

and what did you expect......

Up
0

Zachary, I think it runs deeper than merely a rejection of boomerism. There are growing numbers of people who actively hate boomers. Of course, it might all fizzle out, but if boomers maintain their rhetoric of "i'm all right jack, pull up the ladders" and accusing younger generations in the press of being spoiled, privileged, lazy, smashed avocados etc etc, then this is simply likely to fuel the generational divisions. And we all know which generations have time and energy on their side.

I've said over and over about the risks of growing wealth inequality, and high amongst those risks are rising youth dissatisfaction and changing political sentiment. That's not some folk story. It has happened over and over throughout history. If you pull up the ladder behind you, you risk a very angry and motivated younger generation turning against you and it can be very ugly.

Up
0

I'm wondering if the time has come for me to propose implementing the perfect democracy of a one party state with Zachary Smith as a secular deity.

Up
0

.....a secular deity in his own mind.

Up
0

China has shown us that this approach can be successful and is even endorsed by lovely professors at the London School of Economics and this web site.

Up
0

You mean it's just another experiment........

Endorsement does not mean it's a good idea and hindsight is always 20/20.

Up
0

I don't know, maybe make a comment about the article? I'm really interested in gauging other people's views on this. My comment was satirizing the gist of the article.

Up
0

While it is largely a propaganda piece and is an attempt to "soothe" Western fears she does make a couple of comments that are interesting. Firstly the comment about the Party changing - either the regime changes or there will be a regime change. With such a large and diverse country I think the Party is largely concerned about internal descent and their grip on power rather than world domination - they just don't have the ability (at present) to do that. The Soviet Union was concerned about projecting external power and ignored what was going on within it boarders. Secondly (and linked to the first comment) the PLA is largely an army of control rather than conquest - I believe the PLA would have great difficulty invading Taiwan - it just doesn't have the necessary equipment.

While the western media may portray this as some sort of dictatorship - that is just propaganda from the west. I think China is more inward focused rather than outward focused. I think it needs to be otherwise it will suffer the same fate as the Soviet Union - dissolution. Is this a good thing - don't know. I think both the east and west believe they have more control than they actually do - it's an illusion but I don't think that will stop them.

Up
0

Zachary LOLZ. Secular deities definitely seem to have an enduring appeal.

Up
0

Tend to agree, GN. Actually, there was an item about the decline of social cohesion and the possible rise of terrorism in New Zealand in the Herald yesterday (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11940303). One of the points made there was exactly to do with growing inequality and a feeling that the social contract is not worth subscribing to any more.

Up
0

China has just made it a crime to disrespect the National Anthem.

Up
0

Been doing a bit of reading up on Xi. It is likely that Xi has a negative view of the old Chinese communist ways as his father was purged from the party and sent to work in a factory when he was 10. When he was 15 his father was jailed and he was sent to the countryside to work which he absolutely loathed, he ran away to Beijing, got caught as a deserter and was sent to a work camp to dig ditches. Later he stated, And when the ideals of the Cultural Revolution could not be realized, it proved an illusion.

Xi is focused on making China a better place for the average person and rather interestingly for me specifically mentions making the environment more beautiful.

"Our people ... expect better education, more stable jobs, better income, more reliable social security, medical care of a higher standard, more comfortable living conditions, and a more beautiful environment."

Xi wants China to be great again and has developed the idea of a new "Chinese Dream". "This dream can be said to be the dream of a strong nation. And for the military, it is a dream of a strong military"

These don't appear to be empty words and the development of a strong, proud and effective military with Xi in total control is well underway. Check out this year's military parade with Xi in military uniform and clearly in command. I get the impression he has the total loyalty of the troops. Everyone seems to be raised up. These are not your ordinary people's liberation army soldiers, they are more reminiscent of Starship Troopers. Check it out, it's impressive:
https://youtu.be/0yIUAGMdog0
Gone are the marching girls and dress uniforms. This is 100% macho and gets a ZS endorsement of 100% of how a parade should look.

The existence of extensive corruption throughout the Chinese system has probably aided Xi. This is something that he can try to fix whilst at the same time clearing out the dead wood and his political enemies. I imagine if you investigate anyone deeply enough you can find something wrong. This information can be used to get rid of them if they are useless or enemies or make them more loyal if they are useful and capable. This has been like a mild night of the long knives in reality.

Xi believes in ruling with true noble aspirations and seeks to honour China's past. This is quite unlike old style Maoism which sought to destroy China's cultural legacy.

"He who rules by virtue is like the Pole Star,"
"It maintains its place, and the multitude of stars pay homage."

Xi appears to be combining the philosophies of Confucius and Han Fei. Han Fei is especially interesting as he was clearly aristocratic and hugely influential for China's first emperor. Xi clearly has aspirations of being like a noble emperor and a great figure. Not a bad thing if you are truly noble.

Xi understands China's historical nature and honours China's history.
China doesn't export revolution; second, China doesn't export hunger and poverty; third, China doesn't come and cause you headaches. What more is there to be said?

I'd have to say, in summary, that after doing quite a bit of reading that Xi has left me with a good impression. He is doing things that I would do. A strong, proud and modern army. Raising everyone up to be more noble instead of bringing everyone down like the old days. Honouring the past and the ancestors. Seeking to make the country and the lives of the people more beautiful. Stamping out petty corruption.

Xi is on his way to achieving his Chinese Dream. ZS rating overall 10/10.This should probably worry people if they are familiar with my political thoughts.

Up
0

Oh we are shaking in our boots, we are. Snigger.

Up
0

Really I'm just surprised there isn't more kvetching from the left about China's direction. The next generation may observe China and take a new direction far different to that of the West since the sixties which just seems to lead to sniggering, dissolution and suicide. They are currently fairly open to new or old ideas. They seem disillusioned with capitalism and are pondering another way, possibly a third way. The Boomers seemed to be akin to the Revolutionary Guards in their zeal to tear down the old institutions and bring about a cultural revolution in the West. Well that was the outcome anyway.

I believe Xi feels that every country should try to be fabulous in its own way. Xi said,

All countries should respect each other's sovereignty, dignity and territorial integrity; respect each other's development path and its social systems, and respect each other's core interests and major concerns... ...What we hope to create is a big family of harmonious coexistence.

This is quite different to multi-cultural globalism.

The main danger is that powerful forces may try to sabotage China's rise in order to stymie its hegemony in the region. Success can lead to an engineered war. The US may well try and stir up dissent in Islamic Western China, Hong Kong and Tibet.

Xi does seem to be race focused in a broad way:

Matters in Asia ultimately must be taken care of by Asians. Asia's problems ultimately must be resolved by Asians and Asia's security ultimately must be protected by Asians.

If I were to say something similar I would get a lot of flak. This is something the WW2 Japanese also said. I think Trump and I have a lot more in common with Xi than many Western people.

Up
0

Look, go live there if you admire it so much, the rest of us do not want a life spent marching in time.

Up
0

You are responding to little old me. Why haven't you criticized this article and Interest.co.nz for publishing it? This propaganda piece lauding a new direction that we would never allow in our own society apparently. Why aren't you calling this out?
Also, how can you talk for generation Z.? Yours is just a personal opinion as is mine.

Up
0

Your problem is that you imagine yourself to be the one calling the tune while the rest march joyfully in time, rather than be part of the mass marchers. I can do nothing about how China is going, I think what I think of authoritarian regimes is pretty clear, tbh.

Up
0

I personally am skeptical of the idea that China will not be imperialist at all, albeit potentially in ways different to those of previous turns at empire. Xi is not the last and eternal ruler, even if he has actually has little global hegemonic ambition.

Zach, on a related note (to Western economic trends vis-a-vis China) I reckon you'll enjoy this book. Am currently reading it, myself. We can always compare notes.

Up
0

RickStrauss, I will check that book out, looks good.
On Chinese imperialism I too am a little skeptical. I think China are likely to intervene if an Asian neighbour were indulging in violence against local Chinese like Indonesia has done in the past. They marched to the gates of Hanoi after the Vietnam war and then marched back home again. There has been very little trouble on that border since then even though the West claimed it was a Chinese defeat. They wont be too tolerant on Western intervention in the region. Chinese bombers are currently menacing Guam.

Up
0

How I read the latest developments in the Communist Party of China is that Xi identified a major problem and that was too much democracy within the party itself. Nothing was getting done as it should and there was too much infighting. Not many people have commented on how Xi seems to have torn up the old system of there being an internal election. The Politburo now has 15 members out of 25 that are Xi allies.

I will also make a bold prediction for the future. One day the Taiwanese will vote to rejoin China. A high speed rail bridge/tunnel will be built joining the island to the mainland.

Up
0