sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

High wages and sky-high living costs are pulling New Zealanders off the sidelines and into the workforce at record rates

Economy / analysis
High wages and sky-high living costs are pulling New Zealanders off the sidelines and into the workforce at record rates
Kim Kardashian says nobody wants to work anymore
Kim Kardashian and her family give an interview to Variety in 2022

About a year ago, reality TV star and beauty mogul Kim Kardashian went extremely viral for complaining that it “seems like nobody wants to work these days”. 

The infamous line was given during an interview with Variety magazine and caught fire in the midst of extremely tight labour markets around the world. 

In the US there was a lot of talk about ‘the Great Resignation’ as workers embraced flexible working arrangements during the pandemic or just straight up retired. 

Participation in the workforce did drop in the early years of the pandemic, but it's back with a vengeance. It was at a record high of 72.4% in June quarter data released on Wednesday. 

Some 10,000 New Zealanders, who were not previously interested in working, put up their hands to say they were now looking for a job. 

Not all of these people found work— which is why the unemployment rate crept up slightly—but it is certainly not true that nobody wants to work anymore. 

More people want to work than ever before in New Zealand’s history. But why? 

Brad Olsen, chief executive of Infometrics, said it was likely due to the combination of higher wages being on offer and the increased cost of living pushing people to seek more income. 

Many of those 10,000 new workers were people who had previously been caring for children, but were now wanting to work. 

“We don't know if it's because of the cost of living or because wage rates are now at a level where people think it is actually really worthwhile to go in,” he told Interest.co.nz

“But it's such a large change, I think it strongly implies there is an element of the cost of living that has shifted people's willingness and requirement to work”. 

Henry Russell, an economist at ANZ, said the record participation rate was likely linked to high consumer prices.  

“This suggests cost of living pressures continue to draw people into the workforce, but also that tight labour market conditions continue to enable this,” he wrote in a note. 

Worker arrivals

Migration has been part of this story as well. A large number of people from overseas have moved to New Zealand and are taking up jobs. 

In the June 2023 quarter, there were another 28,000 people employed which brought the total number of those with jobs up to 2.9 million. Much of this reflects people arriving at the border. 

But Olsen said inflation pressures were undoubtedly contributing to the record numbers of people participating in the labour force. 

“When you have sustained high wages, coupled with high levels of inflation hitting household budgets, people might think it is worthwhile to have the second parent, or whoever, take up some work — because any money they can bring in is going to help that household budget”. 

This might not mean full-time work, and it might be a part-time job taken up by a young person to pay a power bill or for groceries. 

A report by 1news found many school students were working 25 to 50 hours a week to help their families make ends meet. 

It’s a dark side of high participation rates that you don’t see in the data, and has negative effects on students' grades at school where success rates have been falling. 

Some overworked, some underutilised

Notably, the underutilization rate rose to 9.8%, from 9.1%, during the June quarter. It is still at a historically low level, but it has moved up sharply during the first half of 2023. 

Katrina Ell, a senior economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the largest group contributing to the higher underutilization rate was part-time workers that were available to work more hours than they were offered. 

Olsen said this likely included people looking for a few extra hours to cover a few extra costs.

The other factor boosting participation is the actual availability of jobs. People who persistently fail to find work tend to drop out of the labour force. 

However, a high level of vacancies can often pull these ‘discouraged workers’ back into the workforce, as better jobs are easier to get. 

Olsen said some of those in the looking-for-work category could drop back out of the labour force if unemployment begins to increase as has been forecast. 

“You do have job ad numbers in New Zealand that are declining at the moment and returning to more normal levels”. 

ANZ’s Russell said it was typical to see participation rates fall as fringe workers become discouraged and exit the workforce. 

“That hasn’t happened yet, suggesting that capacity constraints still linger,” he said in a note.

The unemployment rate did increase slightly in June, but it was not due to job losses. 

If you add together the 25,000 increase in the working age population and the 10,000 people who are suddenly keen for work, you find roughly 35,000 new workers. 

Of those, about 28,000 found employment but the other 6,000 didn’t. This pushed the unemployment rate up slightly. 

Olsen said this demonstrated how the unemployment rate could rise, as the Reserve Bank would like, without there being widespread job losses.

“As the population grows and there are more people looking for jobs, people are not able to find jobs as easily and some become unemployed”. 

“That is a different scenario than  businesses up and down the country, cutting staff and pushing them out the front door.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

95 Comments

complaining that it “seems like nobody wants to work these days”. 

"Wanting to" and "having to" are two different things.

Hard not to pick up on the level of worker malaise out there.

Up
7

Sounds like the Perfect Recipe for Inflation.

10% Interest Rates This Year, Guaranteed !

Up
14

Good thing you find being a broken record so indefinitely rewarding.

Don't need money, don't need fame, don't need no credit card for the 10% train

Up
5

Here you go Pa1nter. I have found some hope only a True Spruiker would lap up. Did you sponsor this article ?

"And get ready, because New Zealand is ever more likely to become a haven for climate refugees from all over the world. Some commentators are picking our population will rise to over 15 million from the pressure of climate refugees."

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/300940803/heres-why-h…

Just don't mention where our interest rates are going !

Up
14

I don't actually like that NZ has a good chance of being the world's life raft. In such a scenario, house prices will probably be pretty low down the chain of concern.

But it's probably something people should consider, outside where they think interest rates might go in 12 month periods.

Up
5

And Queenstown is the perfect template for what awaits us. A few, with a lot, and the subservient class unable to afford a room to live in at 30 to a hot-bed house, except those workers won't be on holiday, they'll be a seething mass of resentment and discontent.

That is what we are creating for ourselves.

Up
29

We became a seething mass of resentment and discontent as soon as we created material abundance and the idea everyone can be a winner.

People with little hope can often be happier, because without the illusion of choice they're more inclined to accept their lives for what they are.

But yeah, we'll probably turn into Elysium in the Sth Pacific first.

Up
9

by Pa1nter | 6th Aug 23, 8:42am - "People with little hope can often be happier"

LMAO! 🤣

Up
6

The prophet taught of this when he said ‘blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom of heaven’

Up
5

Those that Lose actually Win !

Up
2

Sheltered little world there poopy.

All you need is less.

Up
4

Have you finished editing your reply now? It was a stupid ignorant comment to make in the first place! 

Up
5

According to Pa1nter, the world would be a better place if we all gave up hope!

Up
4

Many people's lives would be more fulfilling if they removed themselves from the constant seeking of more, that's fairly well established.

You're stuck in a realm of needing people to tell you you're wonderful, or failing that, a pillock. It's free, and I'm sure you can find plenty of willing customers. Enjoy!

Up
9

Try to remain positive, and NEVER give up hope:) 

"The trouble with closed minded people is that their mouths are always open" - Anon

edit

Up
8

Bit of an oxymoron, and partly why many people are so miserable, but why not.

Keep longing, you won't get there!

Up
4

👌👍👍👍

Up
1

Investors fleeing the market in Aussie……. wonder why the market is going down in Queenstown is no brainer. Also Grant says this morning in TV 1 / economy going to deteriorate further … sure the smart kiwis can off load their burden coming spring I guess …. Good Luck

https://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/investment-properties-offloaded…

Up
1

Oh dear Ben. Why would you confuse Q'land with Q'town? Totally different economic setups. Q'town is gangbusters at present. Great fun. Maybe we can pick up a few Queensland RE bargains with our profits in QT over the next few months!

Up
0

The only people I know who relocated for a better climate left either Auckland or Wellington to move to Central Otago or Australia as the destination.

We love to make ourselves feel better by fantisising that millions will move here for our "climate", it's beyond parody that the inverse is more accurate.

Up
7

It's beautiful in Auckland today.

Here's a song about Auckland to raise your spirits:

Karl Sölve Steven - Tāmaki 5000

 

Up
2

That problem will be solved with a few earthquakes and volcanic eruptions...

Up
1

The Ks were never either. They just pissed me off with their incessant spruiking products to make millions more for their crappy marriages and families. The poor victim of a child with a name North West... 

Up
7

Now all they need is a whip, based on the way they dress 

 

Up
2

Some people say Kylie Jenner had a lot of help with her business career. Not true. She is a selfmade woman, just like her father.

Up
0

Our labour force participation rate is rising because more young mums are being forced back to the workforce faster on account of the cost of living crisis. Many Mums dump their kids with grandma a few days a week so they can work part time. Otherwise there is no food on the table. Gone are the days where Dads income can support a family. This article is cope.

Up
17

But they should be grateful for things like cheap flat screen TVs, smart phones, computers, uber eats.  Why back in my day we had none of that.

Up
1

Cheap smartphones... Where?

Up
2

Not that long ago, there was no such thing as retirement. You worked until you dropped, or you starved to death, and that still is the case in much of the World today. Lifespan was much shorter and social conflict much increased as the starving fought for whatever they could get. The rule of Law was accordingly harsh.

Looks like those days are creeping up on us again.

Up
5

Whe you say not that long ago when  was that? Predates me a bit, I'm interested.

Up
0

All time is relative. What we have today is an anomaly; a pin prick in the fabric of time. Go to most African countries today, or rural China etc and see what the concept of retirement is. It's non-existent. Just as it was in more developed parts of the world, i.e. New Zealand 100 years ago.

" the concept of ceasing to work in later life didn’t begin...until the 19th century."

https://workforce.com/news/the-history-of-retirement-benefits

Up
8

Pretty much. Retirement is more of a golden goodie pitched to wage and salary workers.

For most of the rest of life, people would make themselves useful in some way in the community until they ran out of batteries.

Up
6

But there are some pretty good retirement schemes still about!

Judges’ retirement nest egg – which allows judges to contribute to a superannuation fund that is then topped up by $7.50 for each dollar they contribute – is part of their healthy compensation package. In contrast, MPs receive $2.50 from the public purse for every $1 they put in.

Up
16

Surely one of the easiest jobs going? 

Show up, sit in a comfy chair while you listen to one of Harry Tam's cultural reports explaining how this time a hardened gangster is definitely going to stop mugging old ladies if he can just have another chance, hand out a sentence weaker than a can of flat Speights and then discount it further, then go home to your massive pay packet knowing that the taxpayer is giving you a whole heap of extra perks like a huge retirement nest egg. To top it all off, cry foul when the public get sick of your shenanigans and claim they are too dumb to understand. 

No wonder none of them want to rock the boat once they are, like 50 Cent once said, "in the club". 

 

Up
22

Superb 😭😭😂😂😂😭🤙

Up
2

It's very important that judges get that money. It enables them to feel empathy for those that come before them and thus not punish them too harshly as that would be hypocritical.

Up
1

B-b-b-but these are the top net tax contributors and wealthy that everyone is quick to jump to the defense of whenever we talk about wealth taxes.  

Up
2

How much could they bump the daily allowance to jury members if they were to cut judge's perks in half?

Up
0

by Audaxes | 5th Dec 21, 9:53am

As I noted further up the thread.

Who can afford to accept NZD wages as a form of payment for work rendered, when it is so debased the unit cost of shelter is ~$1,000,000 and it takes a few $millions or more to save $10,000 p.a. at current deposit interest rates? Oh, I nearly forgot, financial repression is rabid with inflation last reported at 4.9%

Has much changed?

Up
12

Chart of Average Weekly Income by family type before and after housing costs. End of April 2023.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_10pNgf8s19…

Up
1

Whoa, look at all those negatives after housing cost. 

Ofcourse, these are averages, so there will be those in the black too.  But what is funding these losses on average?  Asset sales, new mortgages and credit cards?

Up
2

What negatives?  The negative number is the cost of housing, not their income.  Every one of them is still well in the black, even the single beneficiary gets $421 a week and spends $199 on housing, leaving them $222 a week to spend. The welfare family on $63k a year only spends $369 a week on accommodation thanks to all the Govt accommodation benefits.  They are far better off than the average worker who doesnt get welfare benefits to pay their rent or mortgage.

Up
1

Too right. The mother of my children works 3 days a week and gets WFF and accommodation supplement. If she were to work fulltime she would lose those benefits and get less money. There really is no incentive to get a job at all.

Up
3

Yes, thanks - I misread it

Up
0

For clarity, that chart is the average income of BENEFICIARIES.  Not workers.  Yes, an unemployed person with a partner and two kids now earns more on a benefit ($63k a year) than HALF of all workers in NZ (median wage is $61k a year).  Now combine that with the massive increase in unemployed and single parent beneficiaries under Labour and you quickly realise why there is a shortage of workers.

https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-r…

Up
3

What's the alternative?

Up
0

Free up lots of land for housing development to let section prices fall. Implement the Japanese and Californian building codes to allow importation of a much more diverse range of building products lowering building costs etc. etc.

Get rid of this BS for starters. This is just the middle finger to new home buyers.

"Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency has come out against a proposed residential and business development near Cromwell.

The government agency said, in a plan change submission, it opposed the Parkburn proposal because of climate change concerns and the relatively isolated location of the development."

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/waka-kotahi-opposes-central-otago-housing…

Up
14

Its alongside an existing area of residential houses next to  a straight piece of road. Whats with these govt agencies, now turning into NIMBYs

Up
4

Ditch this nonsense.

The Rentier Economy is a Free Lunch

You’ve had, for the last – really since the 1980s, but even since World War 1 – this movement to prevent industrial economies from being low cost. But the objective of finance capitalism, contrary to what’s taught in the textbooks, is to make economies high cost, to raise the cost every year.

That actually is the explicit policy of the Federal Reserve in the United States. Turn over the central planning to the banking system to essentially inflate the price of housing, with government guaranteed mortgages, up to the point where buying a home is federally guaranteed up to absorbing 43% of the borrower’s income.

Well, you take that 43%, you take the wage withholding for social security and healthcare, you take the taxes; the domestic market shrinks and shrinks. And the finance capital strategy is exactly what it is in the United States today, in Europe. Shift all of the money away from the profits of industrial capital that are reinvested in making new means of production. To expand capital into a shrinking economy where the financial sector intrudes more and more into the economy of production and consumption and shrinks the economy. Hudson

Up
8

Leave nz. Or work remote for a higher income country.

Or just accept it like losers such as me.

Up
3

I mean what's the alternative for a young person starting out? I guess Rob's answer is best.

I got the impression that it simply wasn't worth it to work for a salary but I was wondering what else a young person could do to get money legitimately.

Up
1

Get good at something that's in short supply

Charge accordingly

Develop self reliance

Live under your means

Up
7

Sounds so banal. Can't we just have a UBI?

Up
4

Only Fans account.

Up
1

Or vote ACT and protest

Up
2

Hope fully thats sarc but I guess some cynicism

Am learning to see my life as valuable. My book I'm reading helps

Up
1

Cynicism is a good word for it.

I'm glad you are maintaining some positivity.  One thing that keeps me going is that space exploration is picking up speed again, after a big wait since Apollo finished in 72.  It's been a long wait for us space nerds.

Up
5

Good to see Act talking about something I have said for years - slashing the insanely bloated bureaucracy in Wellington:

https://www.thepost.co.nz/a/nz-news/350048401/act-would-tell-thousands-…

Up
12

Good thing ACT followed up on your lone, silent voice to slash bureaucracy. Hard to walk down the street these days without tripping over people demanding more forms to fill out, when will people see sense!

Up
4

I have seen the awful wastage up close, including when I did some contract work for a government agency several years ago.

Wouldn’t be good news for the Wellington economy and property market, and a pity for the people affected. But I have limited sympathy- we are all paying for this wasteful largesse, and they aren’t delivering frontline, critical social services.

Up
18

Seconded. I've done some contracting work into govt agencies (including some that ACT has specifically called out in that linked article). 

I've massively cut down on this type of work for two reasons:

1) I don't want to be dependent on it if we do get a government that rightfully starts wielding the axe. 

2) I actually feel guilty having anything to do with it, as the waste and largesse is so obscene. A man has to eat, but there are more honest ways of doing so.

There are some wonderfully talented, hard working people in the public service who provide great value to the taxpayer. But they are let down terribly by an ever-expanding blob of overpaid, underworked managers, advisers who are taking the proverbial. 

Up
14

Nailed it

Up
4

Most of those job cuts seem to be in areas that could reduce the wealth of the rich, like fair pay agreements, building and housing, etc. ACT want to keep the status quo of a small number of winners living in their nice neighbourhoods protected from the pesky poor people  

And of course light rail because ACT want Auckland to be as much like LA as possible. 

Up
3

Yeah, nah. You are being selective. The hit list is broad.

Note - while I agree with this, I am skeptical on Act’s wider objectives.

Up
1

Those industry transformation plans are complete jokes, not even worth the papers they're printed on.

Advanced manufacturing is defined as any manufacturing that employs modern technologies, processes and business practices. There are literally references to manufacturing of choco chip cookies, hummus and potato chips as being part of our advanced manufacturing economy.

Basically anything that's slightly more sophisticated than you replicating your granny's recipe in your kitchen is classed as advanced.

Up
4

Hundreds employed across MfE, MBIE, MHUD, Kainga Ora over the past 2-3 years to address the ‘housing crisis’, what to show for that huge expense?

Close to zilch…

Up
8

Who knows what their affect has been? Your just ranting.

What is the alternative? Stop trying, and give the landlords some cash to help them bid up some existing house prices?

Up
0

Here's an alternative if you want more house hire/train builders not bureaucrats or consultants and build the houses. All the bureaucrats place more bureaucracy in to building will be harder.

Its time we started doing something instead of planning to do something.

Up
2

The only really good decades the West had were the 50s and 60s. Since then it's been a gradual process of more work for less reward.

That's now in overdrive as we boomers retire and want 1m for each house (ok, 800k now), which keeps the cost of living way up for younger generations.

The tug of war I see now is immigration (wages down) versus demographic collapse (wages up).  How will the political class resolve the tug of war in the 20s and 30s?

Up
10

Good comment.

The 70s was the transition. Still lots of good things and times, but things were starting to go downhill. 

Up
6

The only really good decades the West had were the 50s and 60s. 

The West has generally had it pretty good for centuries, everyone else, not so much.

It was a time where people "felt" better, but that's in the shadow of a global war that killed 10s of millions.

Up
2

Nostalgia for what never was perhaps.

Many Chinese look back to the days when their parents were forced into the countryside. Never had to lock doors, fresh air, open countryside, community...

Up
0

Nostalgia, but there has also been real change. Back then an ordinary guy could buy a house in his 20s, she could take a decade off to produce a few kids, mortgage paid off in their 50s.  The numbers are different now, and the level of desperation much higher.

The first oil shock of 73 woke us up to the decay, and as HM says above, the transition to the unhappy grind of today for the young played out from the 70s.

In retrospect, the aspirations of western civilization peaked around 1969.

Up
7

Year of the Moon landing.

Up
2

Well that was pretty much the start of everything Fake wasn't it ? hold up breast implants came out a few years earlier than that.

Up
1

Back then most households only had one car, phone, TV. The house only had 2 or 3 bedrooms, no insulation, one pokey bathroom, small kitchen, small fridge, no dishwasher, maybe 5 electrical appliances in total. There weren’t many restaurants, cafes, etc and people rarely ate out. People very rarely went on overseas holidays. 
So in many ways life has got better (if you consider having more things is better), but yes house prices have got worse. Mainly due to stupidly low interest rates. 

Up
3

Early Boomers who launched their careers in the “go-go” years before about 1973 had generally more prosperous lives than those who got started in the subsequent inflationary/recession period.....With the Crisis itself placing new burdens on the lives of younger generations, Boomers will choose to retain their moral authority by arguing—uncharacteristically—to impose sacrifices on themselves for the sake of their community. This will seem less surprising in the context of their own families; most Boomers today are already providing generously, sometimes more generously than they can afford, for their own children and grandchildren. But it will seem more surprising when they do so in the context of the national community and support tax and benefit changes that hit their own ranks the hardest. But the logic will be inexorable. The young, acting on behalf of the community at a time of peril, will now have a much better claim on resources than they do. So Boomers will let go.

https://images.mauldineconomics.com/uploads/pdf/TFTF_Aug_05_2023-1.pdf

Up
1

You may very well think that...

Up
0

Real unemployment, those in receipt of income from MSD is 11.2% or 351,000.

Let's not be fooled by the sliced-and-diced numbers. 

Up
14

Excluding NZ super?

Up
2

Excluding NZ Super. A record 211,617 kids on welfare.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgtrTBkmG5si8l5aOueGJy…

 

Up
5

Remember when parents were responsible for their kids.

Up
3

Your point relates how?

Up
2

Remember when housing was affordable

Up
2

Haha nobody wants to work. That's why rentier and finance capitalism is so prominent, why everybody chases property and capital gains, the rise of social media influencers and content creators. Literally the reason for the existence of the Kardashians. Everybody wants the rewards of other people's work.

There are "experts" and motivational speakers out there promoting that "if you do what you love you'll never have to work another day in your life."

Only the peasants have to work.

Up
11

Kinda true though, most people lamenting their lot and trudging through their work day are generally rewarded less than people who shut up and box on.

General rule, obviously some people get exploited and some people work hard for not much.

Up
0

Well said.  Pretty much sums up why property is so popular in this country.  The lazy people's mindset, combined with very loose lending conditions and up until recently generous tax advantages made it possible for many simpletons to achieve.  

Hell, we even indirectly subsidize this lazy man's investment by giving the tenants tax credits.  It's genius, because then these "investors" point the finger back at the tenants for not being "net tax contributors".  If they'd just look in a mirror they'd see the number one reason for this staring back at them.  

Up
17

Scary thing is there are still 30 % of Kiwis that want labour to continue their great work!

You can leave NZ but with the NZD so low ... 

Up
3

Interesting article. I think the reason for high employment is predominantly to do with the fact real (inflation adjusted) wages have fallen. It just costs relatively less to hire right now than it did pre-pandemic.

When if or inflation is normalised I think you'll see unemployment being very high.

Up
1

Oh Kim Kardashian is a great barometer of the working class, well done

Up
1

Investors fleeing the market in Aussie……. wonder why the market is going down in Queenstown is no brainer. Also Grant says this morning in TV 1 / economy going to deteriorate further … sure the smart kiwis can off load their burden coming spring I guess …. Good Luck

https://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/investment-properties-offloaded…

Up
0

From that article:

National house prices have continued to recover overall in 2023, with July marking the seventh consecutive month of national home price growth, reversing most of the damage done in 2022.

Up
0

Does she believe being a coat hanger for silicon implants constitute work? 

Up
2