sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

ACT Party says bad news in the Pre Election Economic and Fiscal Update will require it to reduce its proposed tax cuts

Economy / news
ACT Party says bad news in the Pre Election Economic and Fiscal Update will require it to reduce its proposed tax cuts
[updated]
Act Party celebrates on election night 2020
The Act Party celebrates on election night 2020

The ACT Party says it will have to dial back its proposed tax cuts because the Government has left the economic cupboard bare.

So, ACT will come out with revised numbers next Tuesday. 

The Party's comments come after Treasury unveiled its Pre-Election Economic and Fiscal Update (PREFU).

 This showed falling tax revenue worsened the Government deficit to an unaudited but actual shortfall of $10 billion for the 2023 financial year, $3 billion worse than was forecast in the budget in May. It's predicted to slip further to $11.4 billion in the 2024 financial year. Core Crown expenses are forecast to rise, and the state will not be in surplus till 2027, when there will be a credit of $2.1 billion.

All this is is bad news for the ACT Party, which is changing its own plans as a result.

“Our alternative budget, more than anything else, will be fiscally responsible,” says its leader, David Seymour.

“We of course want to give tax relief but we now have to re-evaluate how much tax relief is going to be possible.”

Seymour says the PREFU is worse than than this year’s budget update, which is worse than last year’s budget update, so ACT is continually having to adjust its own plans.  

“I am almost certain that we will have to reduce tax by a lesser amount due to the additional expenditure that has happened.”

Seymour says the economy faces triple problems of needing to balance the Government budget more quickly, of getting on top of the current account deficit and of reducing the interest payments that are crippling the Government’s books. 

ACT has tax cut proposals on the record already, which include having just two bands, 17.5% and 28%. This and other economic programmes would shave $38 billion off government spending over four years.

But Seymour indicates these plans as well as yet-to-be revealed ideas are likely to be wound back because of the numbers revealed in PREFU.

“We are going to have to make sure that we can put forward a responsible, alternative plan that may involve changing the cuts we have previously promoted," he says.

"But it is also going to involve finding areas of wasteful spending that can be reduced.”

Seymour adds it will be very difficult to reduce state spending when the police for example are stretched to the limit now. 

“On the other hand, I look at the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) – these guys have gone from having 3,500 staff to having 5,500 staff,” he says.

“But it is very hard to find a single business person in New Zealand who thinks it is easier to do business thanks to MBIE growing by two-thirds.”

Seymour says the only reason that New Zealand is getting anywhere is that the Government is continuing to borrow as though New Zealand is still in Covid times.  He says the consequence of this is that the Government is spending more on its interest bill than it does on primary and secondary education.

A check by interest.co.nz showed the two figures are close, though schools still have an edge over institutions pocketing the interest bill.   

The PREFU says actual, though unaudited, interest payments by the Government on its loans more than doubled from $2.9 billion to $6.6 billion in the 2022 to 2023 year. But the equivalent for school spending in PREFU was $8.6 billion.  

Earlier, the Minister of Finance Grant Robertson, defended New Zealand economy, which he said is in a strong state, despite the PREFU numbers.

He says it got ticks of approval from credit rating agencies, and notes PREFU is not forecasting a recession.

“The New Zealand economy is holding its own in an uncertain global environment,” Robertson says.

He concedes the fate of inflation is hard for many people but there have been even worse problems overseas and the rate of inflation will fall, along with the Government deficit. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

18 Comments

We need a financially responsible government to lead NZ 

the (current) Government is spending more on its interest bill than it does on primary and secondary education

This is just totally unacceptable.

Up
13

Agreed

Up
0

No it's not - the article de-bunked that.

Up
1

Split hairs Kate why don't you? By 2026/27 it definitely will. And it's spending more on interest than Law and Order right now. This Government has been borrowing post Covid. For what? Where the hell has the money gone, and what outcomes have we seen for that spending?? And through their hopeless financial management, they have doomed any future Government, at least in the short term, to continue borrowing. We are borrowing to pay interest on the debt they have racked up. Bloody hell, if anyone doesn't think this update shows NZ is a blood bath shambles, they have rocks in their head.

Up
1

Well, we are happy to spend $20 billion a year on old people at the expense of yooung people, so why not.

Up
0

Alot of this young generation are not worth it anyway. Waay to lazy. It's because of kids that leave school to go on the benefit to play video games that we have to import so much labour from overseas. My wife's best friend's son, and my brother's partner's son. are perfect examples of this. All enabled by the parents but also the state itself. 

The whole welfare system needs complete reform, super is far too low and the eldery who depend on it are in real trouble, and unemployment not monitored nearly enough. Solo benefit - I know a single mum who while on the benefit has bought a brand new hybrid SUV, how does that work?

Up
0

No one wants a tax cut any way they want the Country fixed

We have keep going down hill sense the GSC.

A cynical con job of a tax cut is not the answer.

Up
5

Not true.  I want a tax cut.

Up
13

The right is not offering a tax cut but a cynical con job and a restarting of the housing  Ponzi.

Surely the average Kiwi can work that out.

Young Kiwis you will get pushed under the bus again.

Make a wise decision the housing Ponzi is just unwinding.

Up
5

And the left is offering borrowing to pay our interest bill, high inflation, wage-price spiral, crumbling education and crumbling law and order, a current account deficit that will not be fixed (no foreign investor will want to do business in NZ with Labour in Government) without borrowing or currency devaluation (see Sri Lanka) and a wrecked health system. Surely the average Kiwi can work that out. Young Kiwis, you are already under the bus, just waiting for it to back up over you again. The most inept Government in NZ history, with the two most hopeless leaders in NZ history.

Up
1

I don't want a tax cut per se, but wouldn't mind tax bracket indexation.  I'm sure a few $b could be found from cuts in the generous beneficiary scheme we have called Super, handed out like candy to the ilk who have left the country in the state that it is in.  

Up
6

I'd like the country fixed, first and foremost. But considering no politician or party seems capable of doing that, I may as well vote for a tax cut so I can at least have more fun fiddling along while Rome burns. 

Up
9

You can't fix gravity. 

Up
0

The ACT machine now looking for reverse gear. ''Sorry guys, we've been Robbo'd.''

Up
2

As Seymour indicates, the urgency of slashing the ultra bloated Wellington bureaucracy has heightened today. Wouldn’t want to be a ‘policy advisor’ in MBIE….nor someone with high mortgage debt in Wellington 

Up
9

We must focusing on growing our national wealth. 

Up
1

So r the middle muddled going to believe National can cut tax when spending is rising and lots of investment needed?

Up
1

ACT should seriously consider making the first income band (e.g., up to $15k) tax free. It would bring NZ into line with Australia, US, and UK; would be broadly consistent with ACT's ethos; and would be popular with a lot of young people. 

It's also a tax policy that makes a lot of sense, imo.

Up
4