sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Mixed US data; Moody's warns US again; Japan's service sector up; Taiwan exports orders rise; China adopts big monetary stimulus; RBA holds; UST 10yr 3.73%; gold up again and oil firm, NZ$1 = 63.3; TWI = 70.6

Economy / news
Mixed US data; Moody's warns US again; Japan's service sector up; Taiwan exports orders rise; China adopts big monetary stimulus; RBA holds; UST 10yr 3.73%; gold up again and oil firm, NZ$1 = 63.3; TWI = 70.6

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand with news of some major emergency moves in China to reinvigorate their economy.

But first, there was a good GDT Pulse auction result earlier this morning, although the reverse of what the futures markets had signaled. There was no gain in SMP prices, holding its recent higher levels. But the important WMP price rose +2.8% from the full auction a week ago and back to levels of a year ago.

This is a good backdrop to this morning's Fonterra 2023/24 results announcement.

The expansion of American retail sales at physical stores rose +4.1% last week from the same week a year ago. That is good but a slowing from the gains since August. A year ago they were rising +3.6%.

But the widely-watched Conference Board consumer sentiment survey for September has brought a hesitation, slipping to the lower end of the narrow range it has been in for the past two years. Worries about job security seems to be a key factor here, although we probably shouldn't make too much of a range-bound shift.

Election jitters have hit the Richmond Fed's factory survey covering the mid-Atlantic states, all "battle-ground states" where uncertainty of the outcomes is pronounced.

There was a very well supported US Treasury 2 year bond auction today, delivering a median yield of 3.47%. That is down from 3.83% at the equivalent event a month ago. In both more than US$100 bln in bids went unsatisfied.

And credit ratings agency Moody's has warned that a downgrade for the US Federal Government is a live possibility unless it tackles its growing deficits. This comes a year after it placed the AAA rating on 'negative outlook'. Clearly it is watching this with some unease.

Across the Pacific, Japan's business activity continues to rise, largely based on a service sector that is now expanding at its fastest pace since April. Factory activity isn't expanding however, according to this PMI survey.

Taiwanese export orders rose +9.1% in August from the same month a year ago, to a nine month high.

In China, "a leading Chinese economist" and politician has called for Beijing to launch a ¥10 tln stimulus package (NZ$2.2 tln) equivalent to 8% of Chinese GDP, to tide their economy over through the rest of 2024, as credit growth and domestic demand remain drained of energy. The economist calling for this is Liu Shijin (刘世锦), deputy-director of the China Development Research Fund and deputy-chair of the economics committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). He has been echoed by Yu Yongding.

Responding to the plea for a jolt, the Governor of the Chinese central bank said in a rare briefing that they will cut their reserve requirement ratio by 50 bps, and likely match that again before the end of 2024. Together, these will add ¥2 tln 2024 liquidity. .He also said that the seven-day repo rate will be reduced by 20 basis points to 1.5%. And there will be a -30 bps drop in their medium term lending facility. Mortgage rates will be dropped by -50 bps and the minimum deposit on a home purchase will be dropped to 15%. They did not specify exactly when these changes will go into effect however. More here.

Although these measures have more than a whiff of panic surrounding them, clearly President Xi has given his officials a rocket to act quickly to turn around an economy stuck in a rut. And equity markets responded with their own rocket.

And so did some components of the commodities market; copper, for example. We may see more commodity action today. But we should also keep in mind the program announced yesterday is very much less than what its own experts are calling for.

Yesterday, the RBA's policy review kept its rates unchanged in the face of higher than target inflation levels. It has been four years since they have had a rate cut. But inflation remains above target and is proving persistent so their room to move is limited.

The UST 10yr yield is now at just on 3.73% and down -2 bps from yesterday. The key 2-10 yield curve is up now +19 bps positive. Their 1-5 curve inversion is still inverted by -43 bps. And their 3 mth-10yr curve inversion is now at -95 bps. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 3.97% and down -5 bps. The China 10 year bond rate is at 2.06% and little-changed. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now just on 4.24% and also unchanged.

Wall Street is up +0.2% on the S&P500 and again touching its record high (set Thursday). Overnight European markets were mixed with rises of between +0.3% (London) and +1.3% (Paris). Yesterday Tokyo was up +0.6%. Hong Kong rose +4.1% on the stimulus announcements, and Shanghai did even better, up +4.2%. But Singapore fell -0.4%. The ASX200 finished its Tuesday session down -0.1% however, and the NZX50 ended down -0.8%. No China halo here yet.

The price of gold will start today at US$2650/oz and up +US$32 from yesterday to yet another new all-time high.

Oil prices have risen +US$1 to US$71.50/bbl in the US while the international Brent price is now just on US$75/bbl.

The Kiwi dollar starts today at 63.3 USc and up +½c from this time yesterday and its highest of the year and back to where it ended in 2023. Against the Aussie we are up +40 bps at 92 AUc. Against the euro we are up +30 bps at 56.7 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today at 70.6, and up +40 bps from yesterday and a three month high.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$63,216 and little-changed from this time yesterday. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been low at just under +/- 1.0%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

67 Comments

Why is the kiwi dollar going up when interest rates and the economy are on the way down?

Up
2

More of a USD deterioration, they dropped Fed rate 0.5%, mixed economic signals & election nerves. We are ~stable with AUD.

Up
13

It's not about the NZD going up, its about other currencies going down faster than the NZD, a bigger mess out there than we realise

Up
11

But it's all relative. A change in a fx rate is one going up and the other going down.

If we are going up vs all our trading partners, I don't know how you can say we are holding steady. Steady relative to what?

Up
0

NZD is priced relative to the USD, which had a 0.5% cut last week as they have a similar situation where inflation has eased and the economy stalling due tondirrent rate settings. 

Its helpful to realize that all currencies are priced in pairs and gains/falls reflect economic conditions relative to the other country/currency. 

Up
2

The market believes the NZ economy will improve as interest rates drop, unlike most commentators here. 

Up
3

No. The others above are right

Up
10

Why are we stable with the AUD when we are cutting and they are not?

Up
0

Because the work in the office directive is going to boost productivity and the economy.

Up
0

China - if the above were actioned, would that mean that supply of Chinese money goes up, CNY loses ground against other currencies, assets denominated in CNY gain?

Oh wait, the markets have already priced much of that in.

Hmmm

What is the "halo" referred to above, and how would that affect overseas markets? 

Up
0

"Is an economy based on the wealth effect generated by front-running the front-runners really that stable? Perhaps we'll find out sooner than the front-running multitude expects". (Rhetorical question from CH Smith)

Up
2

So the Economy Now Depends on Stocks Which Depend on Front-Running the Fed--And This Is Fine? (substack.com)

Best article I've read in a while on market structure vs behaviours. 

I think C H Smith conflates 2 things - the economy (which central banks responds to), versus the market (which use nobility money and/or are jacked up on debt to play the game of front running central banks before the DCA-ers limp in to squabble over the dregs.

It's almost like there's 3 tiers of society:

  1. the capital-class neofeudalists who hold capital and play the front runner of front runners anticipating central bank moves game
  2. the DCA who play the markets-rise-so-I'm-richer game with their savings only
  3. those who don't utilise capital markets at all, whose buying power is quickly being eroded by neofeudalist capitalists and the central banks that serve their agenda

Fascinating

Up
3

Time to cut the OCR by 0.5% to keep that Kiwi $ in check 😉

Up
3

Good idea. And do that at the same time as what the Aussies have in mind. "Negative gearing in Labor’s sights. The government has asked Treasury officials for expert advice on possible changes after years of dispute over billions of dollars in tax benefits."

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/negative-gearing-in-labor-s-sig…

Up
3

"Time has arrived for Capital Gains Tax, says chief executive of ANZ’s New Zealand operation....'“If someone had the courage to do it, I wouldn’t be jumping out of bed with joy,...' "

https://tinyurl.com/2yu37a7x

Up
4

It would be a great time to enstate a capital gains tax, concurrent with the dropping of interest rates.

Providing relief to those struggling to repay the mortgage on their primary dwelling (and allowing more capital to flow into productive businesses) does not have to result in speculative credit inflation that 'benefits' a few and cripples the rest

Up
5

What "productive businesses"?

Up
1

Good to see the banks softening the public to the idea of some sort of tax on housing (wealth).  I think, however, she has chosen the type of tax that is least offensive to the banks.

 

Personally, however, I prefer the idea of a land tax.  Hard to avoid, easy to implement.  CG tax on housing / land transactions would slow the selling of property and limit people's ability to move up the housing ladder.

Up
4

In the US, you used to pay tax on any gain, UNLESS you purchase a home of equal or higher value.  If you are over 65, you got a one-time only exemption (which allowed retirees to downsize).

Up
0

Who would have thunk - Yvil the doomer

Up
2

???

Up
0

Your response to a high NZ dollar is to drop interest rates which assumes that the high NZ dollar is a result of higher NZ interest rates. Assumptive that one is linked to the other ( the dollar has now dropped yet interest rates have not changed). A couple of weeks ago you complained that the economy was tanking and your solution - lower interest rates. Do I detect a pattern here. 

Up
0

Gold and to lesser extent silvers rise, seems unstoppable as the banks are losing control of its suppression. 
- Peoples trust in its strength as a store of value, is about to go mainstream soon surely?- which will push it on again.  USD $3000 not far away. 

Commodities - Bloomberg

A moments silence please, for the strident Anti Goldbug residents (yet Property Ponzi advocates) here........Winger and Painter,  who will be coughing up their property speculator flavoured cereal this morning. 
Property digging deeper in the dirt and negative equity for many thousands, all the while, the Prescious Metals getting even more "Preeeeacious" !

Up
10

Even I thought USD 3,000 seemed far fetched when I bought last year, doesn't seem that far away any more. 

Up
2

We are in alignment here!!  The hundreds of Aussie PM Miners will be having a great day!  I will watch on with VESTED INTEREST!

Up
3

Even I thought USD 3,000 seemed far fetched when I bought last year, doesn't seem that far away any more.

Sure you did Dr Y

    Up
    5

    No, no. They'd have bought a couple of kilos from Morris & Watson. Without doubt....

    Up
    0

    Gold and to lesser extent silvers rise, seems unstoppable as the banks are losing control of its suppression. 

    Silver has outperformed gold YTD and rocketed overnight. It's also up approx 150% since its near-term low in 2020. 

    Focus on the details. If you're going to moonlight as a born-again PM fanboy.

     

    Up
    0

    Silvers always slow to react to golds ascent.....but seem extra slow currently?  About to giddyup strongly I believe.

    Fanboy of the PMs and active investors in it for 25 years....just not so vocal on it, in this particular forum. 

    Up
    1

    Silvers always slow to react to golds ascent.....but seem extra slow currently?  About to giddyup strongly I believe.

    Fanboy of the PMs and active investors in it for 25 years....just not so vocal on it, in this particular forum. 

    But I just pointed out that you're wrong. Silver has far outperformed gold YTD, since 2020, and in the past 24 hours. 

    Up
    0

    Ok agree on the short term few years, silver done very well. I own the gold and silver miners. Fanboy of both here!
    We don't have to hate one and like the other.

    Surely you would understand the lag and catchup that is still due for silver, thats required to get back to same AU/AG correlation, it had in the ramping upto the 2010/2012 period?

    Up
    1

    Gold 38.71% yoy

    Silver 38.91% yoy

    According to Trading Economics website

    Not sure about your figures?

    Up
    2

    XAUUSD is up 28.88% YTD, not 38.71%.CFDs on Silver (US$ / OZ) is up 35.1% YTD. 

    Over P12M, silver wins by a nose. 

    Up
    0

    Sold my gold on Monday, will be interesting to see if I'm kicking myself in 6 months or celebrating.

    Up
    1

    Who did you sell it to and did they buy at spot price? Bought a pet rock a couple months ago, interested to know how the selling process will go.

    Up
    0

    The transaction/margin costs on trading the physical are very high.

    Unless their is a safe lower cost trade out there?

     

    Buying the ASX listed miners/profitable producers, is the best way to expose yourself to to PM'S imho. Fraction of a % trading cost.

    Up
    0

    The gains since then have already covered the premium and 5 years in a vault. The Gold- adjacent shares are certainly simpler but didn't have as good returns.

    Up
    0

    Well, you can't go broke taking a profit, but personally, I'm keeping mine, I think it has further upside.  Time will tell.

    Up
    1

    "If you want happiness at work, your best bet is to be a Baby Boomer working in banking and finance."

    https://www.odt.co.nz/business/ok-boomer-key-happiness-work

    Nailed it

    The greatest time to be alive was when the world was on a consumption orgy and you were supplying credit.

    Sadly, its a one time sugar hit.

    Up
    9

    About to leave a sour tase for those that refused to see what's coming - here, there and everywhere?

    "The federal government is considering changes to scale back negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions..."

    https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/labor-mulls-negative-gearing-chang…

    Up
    3

    Kamala Harris is running a Presidential campaign on significant tax relief to small businesses and low-wage workers. The loss of Federal gov revenue has to be offset with the promised increase in capital gains taxes on high earners and reversal of Trump's tax cuts for the rich.

    Up
    3

    SBF's partner in crime Caroline Ellison sentenced to 2 years in prison. Slap on wrist, and in many ways a reflection of the corrupt, duplicitous nature of the Democrats in its relationship with FTX and crypto in general. Shameful. 

    https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/24/business/caroline-ellison-sentencing…  

    Up
    2

    Not at all. She squealed and was duly rewarded. SBF got 25 years.

    Up
    3

    Not at all. She squealed and was duly rewarded. SBF got 25 years.

    That's a superficial understanding of the political machinations. Ratting out Sam is beside the point. Ellison's behavior at Alameda was complicit in the loss of customers' money. 

    SBF got off lightly as well. Compare his sentence to Madoff's 150 years for a vastly larger fraud. 

    Caroline Ellison gets 24 months Ross Ulbright double life sentence. Go figure. 

    Up
    3

    Maybe, but I do know that it's common in the US justice system to receive a vastly reduced sentence if the defedant provides significant information leading to prosecution of the top dog. It's nothing new and not surprising she got two years, assuming she spilled her guts. 25 years is basically his life over. What would you have liked to see? Death?

    You must also be aware that "the democrats" didn't decide her sentence?

    Up
    2

    You must also be aware that "the democrats" didn't decide her sentence?

    No they didn't. Nevertheless, FTX / Alameda / the BF family are all connected to the Dems in various ways. The SEC often with with SBF. Granted that Pocahontas Warren was a critic of FTX but she never received donations.  

    Up
    1

    All the FTX funds were recoverd..some in profit...so sentence seems about right.

    Up
    1

    All the FTX funds were recoverd..some in profit...so sentence seems about right.

    Partly correct. 98% of FTX's customers, particularly those with claims of $50,000 or less, are expected to receive about 118% of their original claims, effectively giving them back more than they initially lost, including accrued interest. They receive fiat, not their holdings. Many will be worse off compared to say Mt Gox customers who owned BTC.

    If I rob a bank and the funds are recovered, should I receive a lighter sentence?

    Up
    1

    Vote honest Don!

     

    Up
    0

    How do the democrats have an influence over the sentence? Separation of powers and all that...

    Up
    0
    Up
    0

    This is satire right?

    "At the 2020 Prime Minister’s Science Prize, Ardern said of the role: “Even I underestimated the centrality of [science] advice for me, in this time in office, and just how important it would become to us as a government.”"

    Up
    4

    Who needs science when you only answer to your God?

    Up
    9

    We're certainly not keen on paying our academics.

     

    Universities facing strike action offering pay rises of 2-3% - NZ Herald

     

    I'm glad to not be working in the university system anymore, watching my real income deteriorate over time.

    Up
    1

    One can't really expect any better from those fancy paper mills we call universities. This is a broader trend in NZ and much of the Anglosphere that values speculation over intellect.

    Meanwhile, third-world countries like China continue to outspend NZ in R&D as a % of GDP by a factor of 2x.

    Up
    4

    The Chinese used to do speculation well. 

    Up
    0

    They a lot of things well, not just speculation and the West is slowly waking up to that. Not a Sinophile at all, but I hate the blind "Western supremacy" rhetoric.

    Can China innovate and outcompete the US in their pitched battle for technological supremacy - In many critical technologies, yes (Link)

    And yes, China's impending real estate crash will likely take NZ's house of cards down with it (Aussie's too).

    Up
    3

    Not a Sinophile at all, but I hate the blind "Western supremacy" rhetoric.

    Good attitude. The West can learn much from China, yet we tend to think we need to teach China about how to run its society and economy.  

    Up
    1

    The Chinese have a complex money oriented economy. Reputedly with opportunities for political corruption.  The UK had something similar in the 2nd half of the 19th century with the railway barons having dozens of MPs 'in their pocket'. The Americans had troubles too - it was not just a straight line smooth economic growth from 4th July 1776 to today; for example Black Thursday October 24, 1929.  Maybe the west shouldn't preach or teach but the Chinese would be very dumb if they don't try to learn. They might avoid the mistakes others have made. 

    Up
    1

    The list of roles included chief science advisers at other agencies, which were not renewed when their contracts expired this year.

    Luxon said the decision to lose these positions wasn’t dismissive of evidence, but rather “a different way of thinking”. 

    Unbelievable ...

    Up
    5

    Has certain whiff of alternative-facts

    Up
    1

    No article on Fonterra payout update.

    23/24

    $7.83 payout

    $0.55 dividend

    $0.15 retained

    24/25

    Midpoint up to $9

    Well done Fonterra 

    Not houses so not real wealth 

    Up
    7

    gold seems more important ATM.

    Up
    2

    Good stuff. Farmers and co-ops once again rise to the occasion and rescuing the domestic economy.

    Fonterra alone brings in more than 1/4th of NZ's merchandise export revenue.

    Up
    7

    Take more than Fonterra (or RTO) to rescue this economy.

    Up
    1

    Maybe just in the nick of time. Lets see.

    Commenting on the increase of the non-performing loans ratio from 1.5% in March 2023 to 4% this year, Rabobank said clients across all industries in the sector have adjusted to an environment with lower commodity prices, higher interest rates and higher farm input costs.

    Up
    1

    When is Audaxes allowed off the Naughty Step?

    Up
    8