sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US data extends its weak run; eyes on US jobs report; Japan holds rate; Aussie trade balance average; container freight rates fall; UST 10yr at 4.23%; gold drops sharply and oil stays down; NZ$1 = 59 USc; TWI-5 = 67.4

Economy / news
US data extends its weak run; eyes on US jobs report; Japan holds rate; Aussie trade balance average; container freight rates fall; UST 10yr at 4.23%; gold drops sharply and oil stays down; NZ$1 = 59 USc; TWI-5 = 67.4
breakfast

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand, with news the gold price is tumbling today, ending its recent spectacular rise.

But first, American initial jobless claims rose to 223,600 last week, more than expected. There are now 1.907 mln people on these benefits, +153,000 more than at this time last year, a rose of +8.7%.

But job cuts announced in April came in less than you might have thought at 105,400, certainly less than for March. But they are +62% higher than year-ago levels.

The widely-watched ISM manufacturing PMI for April slipped into a deeper contraction than in March, although slightly less so than expected. Output shrank more sharply and prices rose faster. Meanwhile, new orders declined at a slower pace although new export orders fell steeply. This survey was quite a bit more negative than the S&P Global/Markit version we noted yesterday.

One sector that has lost much of its momentum is the US construction industry. It atrophied somewhat in March, again.

The expectation is that tomorrow's US non-farm payrolls report will deliver a rise of +130,000, about half the levels they had at the back end of 2024. But there may be downside risks to this estimate. A very weak result will put the Fed in a real bind, having to choose between rescuing jobs in a faltering economy, or pushing back on rising inflation. The last time they had serious stagflation was in the late 1970s, and then the Fed chose fighting inflation over preserving jobs and growth. It caused social unrest, but it beat inflation, and ended stagflation's curse - until now. But fifty years later, few people understand that curse and it's corrosive effects.

Across the Pacific, the Bank of Japan held its key interest rate steady yesterday as the new American tariff policy casts a shadow over the Japanese economy. The central bank kept its policy rate at 0.5% during its first board meeting since Washington announced a wave of "reciprocal" tariffs in early April. The yen fell. The BOJ also stood pat at its March meeting following a +25 bps hike in January.

And don't forget, China is on holiday, until Tuesday. So data releases there are sparse. It may be a good time for some of them to take a break; outbound export shipments to the US are reportedly down -50%. Despite that, there are signs the US is desperate to get trade talks going but Beijing is playing hard to engage.

Australia reported a merchandise trade surplus of +AU$10.8 bln in March. This was a good improvement from the relatively low +AU$8.4 bln in March 2024, but similar to the average March in the prior five years (+AU$10.6 bln). (Australia usually reports seasonally adjusted values, and are much lower than the actual values this year, for some reason.)

The Aussie federal election is in its final day now. Pundits seem to think the incumbent government will be returned but with a reduced majority, maybe even requiring a coalition partner. We will know soon enough.

Yesterday, the OECD released its 2024 update on taxing wages, essentially measuring the tax wedge. The tax wedge is essentially the difference between what an employer pays an employee after tax, and the total cost to the employer after all the labour-based taxes and fees are included. It is measuring how much governments collect from the labour force and is a measure of inefficiency. Bracket creep is once force making tax wedges higher. New Zealand always scores near the lowest tax wedge of the OECD countries. In 2022 our tax wedge was 20.1%, in 2022 it was 21.1% and last year it was 20.8%. So stable. In Australia it is 29.8%, in the UK 29.4% and the US is 30.1%. Japan is 32.6%, France 47.2% and Germany 47.9%. So tax wedges are a major issue in other countries.

Global container freight rates fell -3% last week from the prior week to be -23% lower than year ago levels. Bulk freight rates were little-changed.

The UST 10yr yield is now at 4.23%, up +5 bps from this time yesterday. The key 2-10 yield curve is now at +53 bps. Their 1-5 curve is still inverted by -12 bps. And their 3 mth-10yr curve is now inverted less, by -8 bps. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 4.22% and up +3 bps from yesterday. The China 10 year bond rate is unchanged at 1.62% due to their holiday. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is up +2 bps at 4.46%.

Wall Street is up +1.2% in Thursday trade on the S&P500. Overnight, European markets were all up but less. Yesterday Tokyo rose +1.1% in Thursday trade. Hong Kong and Shanghai were closed for their May Day holiday. Singapore was too. The ASX200 ended its Thursday up +0.2% but the NZX50 ended by surging +2.1%.

The price of gold will start today at US$3214/oz, and down -US$95 from yesterday.

Oil prices are holding lower at just on US$58.50/bbl in the US and the international Brent price is now just under US$61.50/bbl. These remain four year lows, down to level last seen in April 2021.

The Kiwi dollar is now at 59 USc, down -40 bps from yesterday at this time. Against the Aussie we are down -20 bps at 92.6 AUc. Against the euro we are little-changed at 52.3 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today just on 67.4 and down -10 bps.

The bitcoin price starts today up +2.8% from yesterday at US$96,810. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been modest at +/- 1.9%.

This briefing is taking a few days off for a short break. We will resume on Tuesday, May 5, 2025.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

25 Comments

Bitcoin seems to be a store of value in turbulent times...

Up
2

If there was a turbulence timeline

Which point on it do you think we're currently at

Up
5

Tulips for dinner tonight then?

Up
8

WRT Bitcoin, I think the skeptics need to think a little about when gold was first dug up and considered valuable I'd have assumed there would have been a lot of naysayers around thinking that it was a useless metal given other, harder ones made better weapons etc, but gold has managed to pass the test of ( a long) time as a store of wealth, over and above any other metal despite some being more scarce and others less so. So theoretically if the new generation decide that Bitcoin is going to be a virtual store of wealth then it will be as long as there's enough believers. Ironically from my perspective I'd probably trust the algorithm that runs the production of Bitcoin down towards zero (whereby limiting it's supply ) as a more rational process than assuming Central Banks around the world are completely rational, uncorrupted and consistent over time. Just look at the rapid departure of Adrian: hard to not think that was due to political interference. 

As to where the valuation of Bitcoin would be, well at any point in time the market is always correct, when S=D. 

Up
1

Excepting not all cultures valued it. Why did some and not others?

Up
0

Bitcoin seems to be a store of value in turbulent times...

You reckon? I think the price of the ol' rat poison is more related to global liquidity first. Of course that doesn't mean that BTC is not a SOV.  

Anyway, Ponzi vs gold vs BTC. Noticed something y'day:

Gold having its best run in years. Up 39% in past 12 months. Up 90% in 5 years. 

But let's look at the Ponzi using the share price of CBA as proxy. Up 47% in past 12 months. And a whopping 185% over past 5 years. 

What does this tell you?

Up
2

You spend a lot of time looking at arbitrary numbers going up or down?

Up
3

You spend a lot of time looking at arbitrary numbers going up or down?

How are these percentages arbitrary P? 

Up
0

The way you pick them.

Up
2

Are you suggesting that CBA is not a proxy for the Ponzi? Why? 

Up
0

I'm suggesting that often when you roll out statistics, you form a conclusion first, then try to find relevant figures to match.

You do the same thing when holding up experts to support a case. Rather than canvasing a range of information, you will look for outliers to support your preconceptions, and ignore a wider range of evidence. Sometimes an outlier may be more correct than consensus, but as an overall strategy it is fairly unreliable.

Traditionally known as confirmation bias.

Up
2

I'm wondering what to do now my KiwiSaver. Should I go more conservative or stay in growth?

The impression I got from the banks was that they did what they advise us not to do and that was they reorganised their portfolios in the wake of the Trump tariffs effectively locking in losses.

Did anyone else get this impression?

Up
1

It's a couple of months too late to switch to conservative without locking in losses.

 

Up
14

I don't consider the losses to be too significant. I'm still happy with it and KS is a small proportion of my portfolio anyway. I guess that's why I would rather the banks just kept things as they were and perhaps consider reshuffling things in a less turbulent period. I would have been more impressed if they had done this prior to the fall.

I'm not sure about this "locking in losses" thing. It seems more relevant if you are buying and selling largish amounts regularly. If it's just a fund that is receiving very minor monthly inputs it doesn't make much difference. Perhaps the best thing to do is inject a one off lump some to bring the balance back up to where it was. It's only around 5% down.

Up
1

I'm picking that progress on Ukraine and or tariffs and we will see a boost to markets - and the opportunity to switch out before it all turns to custard.

Up
3

The active fund managers have to show some kind of activity and portray wisdom to justify their fees. In general, this churn leads them to underperform passive funds.

Your first question is tricky - standard advice is to stay the course and ride the waves. This does depend on your risk tolerance - if you're already getting the jitters then are you at risk of selling at the bottom of a potential market correction? 

The main thing I've learned in this situation is that selling/switching to conservative is an easy decision. Switching back to aggressive is very difficult and many people get spooked out of the market for so long they miss out on the rebound.

Up
6

I'm not too jittery although close to retiring so you are likely right in that I would find it difficult to pull the trigger to go back from conservative to aggressive at a later time.

Up
1

Depending on the rest of your portfolio it wouldn't be crazy to move to something less aggressive. You're probably hoping to live another 2 or 3 decades though, in which case you'll still want quite a bit of growth stuff in there. 

Up
2

I am not nervous.  But if I was I would be careful about the 'Conservative' word.  Because it isn't "Cash".  It's often bonds which can move about in value.

In a managed fund, which includes Kiwisaver, I am happy to stay growth or aggressive because you will likely have other assets more stable in value.

Up
0

Someone likes bonds at the 'mo. "This means Buffett controls nearly one in every twenty dollars circulating in the US government bond market."

https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/54013/warren-buffet-accumulated-4-89…

Up
1

It's interesting watching investors agonize over bidding up 10 year treasuries as a save haven move but then grappling with the inflation unknowns accompanying the current US government. 

Up
2

LOL. According to CNN polls, appears that despite all the chaos, Kamala is seen as less capable than DJT as president and the Dems less capable in dealing with the U.S.' problems.

Seems to be an issue across the Anglosphere. Damned if you do. Damned if you don't.   

https://x.com/ForecasterEnten/status/1917946852596424948

Up
1

Media can't be criticised for not trying though. ZB/Red Radio/TVNZ/Interest - hold my Chardonnay.

"The MRC analyzed ABC’s "World News Tonight," "NBC Nightly News" and "CBS Evening News" from Jan. 20 through April 9 and found 899 stories that discussed President Trump or the Trump administration. The media watchdog group found that 92.2% of the coverage was negative compared to only 7.8% positive."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/abc-nbc-cbs-slap-trump-090041951.html

 

 

 

Up
2

Human nature isn't it, we repeat the bad stories much more more than we celebrate and share the good. Long may this mentality change

Up
0

Like him or loath him, NZ just got a bit less colourful

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/559715/businessman-and-politician-s…

 

Up
6