sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Reinsurance fears grow as council insurer's reinsurance lapses on Thursday. Reinsurance costs triple.

Reinsurance fears grow as council insurer's reinsurance lapses on Thursday. Reinsurance costs triple.

By Hannah Lynch

Government has been forced into another bail-out; this time as the main insurer for Christchurch City Council and Waimakariri District Council.

The local council's existing insurer Civic Assurance said Monday that as of Thursday it would not be reinstating its insurance with the earthquake ravaged regions.

CEO Tim Sole said those two councils would not likely qualify for insurance because of the devastation and costs related to the earthquakes.

"I hope that central government will become the new insurer for Christchurch," he said. 

A spokesman for Finance Minister Bill English said Monday that any subsequent damage to "essential infrastructure" in Christchurch and Waimakariri would be repaired with the associated costs picked up by the public.

English's spokesman said it was just "a question of where the balance of costs fall between ratepayers and taxpayers." He said Government was to a certain extent prepared to handle that possibility.

"There is already a provision for this kind of cost sharing in the Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act and the Government has said it will be mindful of Christchurch's reduced ability to pay.''

Civic Assurance, who supplies local government insurance, earlier informed all six local councils in Canterbury that they will not get new earthquake cover. 

Sole said he was confident four of the six councils (outside of Christchurch and Waimakariri) would find reinsurance elsewhere because they suffered relatively minor damage.

In the case of Christchurch and Waimakariri, Sole said that if a new insurer came on board it would be difficult to distinguish which claims belonged to Civic or the new insurer in the event of another major earthquake.

Effective Friday, all local councils will no longer be covered unless they find reinsurance.

This means the Government will have to pay if assets such as AMI Stadium, the Town Hall, the convention centre or council buildings suffer further damage.

The Christchurch City Council announced earlier this month that rates would be going up by 7.08% this year to help pay for damaged infrastructure.

The council is facing a budget deficit of NZ$73.8 million over the next three years and is proposing an additional rate of 1.76% to pay for this, over and above the 5.32% rate increase indicated before 22 February.

Christchurch Mayor Bob Parker said most of the NZ$2.5 billion of damage to city infrastructure caused by the quake will be covered by insurance and Government subsidies but the council would still be  faced with significant costs.

Labour Party leader Phil Goff said local governments should not be hung out to dry in this situation by central government.

“They’ve got to be able to get reinsurance, that means central government working very closely with local government to try to get a deal to get that reinsurance in place, and that’s what I imagine they’ll do,” Goff told journalists in Parliament on Monday afternoon.

It is estimated that the Christchurch earthquakes have so far cost reinsurers around NZ$3.5 billion.

New Zealand-based insurers currently buy reinsurance from international firms, including Munich Re, Swiss Re and from Bermuda-based businesses.

Reinsurance premiums were forecast prior to Christchurch's February 22 quake and that reality is now dawning.

Richard Trevethick, the managing director of reinsurance broking from Benfield New Zealand told the Dominion Post that premiums could increase by up to 50%. 

Those costs have already been reflected in premium increases for some homeowners and insurance policy holders. 

Insurance Council of New Zealand communications manager Brett Solvander refused to put a figure on how high insurance policy will rise after July 1st. However, he did say that if figures were too high people would go else where.  

Solvander confirmed that he is unaware of any reinsurers withdrawing from the New Zealand market, "they want to do business, without business they can't operate."

Rating agency Standard and Poor's, in a release issued late last week, suggested that reinsurers, while nervous, were still interested in the New Zealand market.

"At this time, we understand there has been no significant withdrawal of global reinsurers from New Zealand. Indeed, given the prospects for improved pricing, New Zealand's attractiveness to global reinsurers may actually increase. Nevertheless, it will be challenging for those small New Zealand-only (especially south island focused) insurers to source affordably priced reinsurance cover in the current environment," Standard and Poor's said. 

"New Zealand rate increases have and will be substantial for the current renewal season, effective July 1, 2011, with rates more than tripling in some cases for New Zealand-only placements, although less for joint Australian/New Zealand programs in the order of 50%", noted Standard & Poor's credit analyst Mark Legge.

AMI announced in a press release on June 8th that they had received strong support from international reinsurance companies. AIM has not yet released details of a its reinsurance cover which also expires on July 1st. AMI are yet to comment. 

*(Updates with comments from AMI, Finance Minister's office, Phil Goff and Civic Assurance CEO, and the Insurance Council of New Zealand).


We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


 Prohibitively expensive.

Under the climate change scenario – how much longer are NZcoastal properties and other NZproperties under threat insured. How much longer and (re)insurance companies are running out of money considering worldwide natural/ men made disasters ?

 ..and councils are still issue building consents for infrastructure/ commercial/ residential properties near sea level and commit crimes against the next generation.


The Government hasn't said it will insure the properties.  It has said that it will help, to a certain extent, with the rebuilding of essential infrastructure if there is further earthquake damage.

Given the position that local council assets in Canterbury are simply not insurable in the comemrcial market at this time  -   What else do you think the Government could have said?


Watching the news last night with the guy in the Red Zone that Tower wont reinsure, but will pay for his repairs, even though its marked for demolition - how many people are going to be in the situation where they cant get insurance? Who is going to rebuild there if they cant get insurance? If thats not a huge incentive to bail out I dont know what is.

Perhaps the governemnt will become the backstop insurer for Christchurch home owners as well. At some point you have to wonder, if the insurance companies and their rooms of statisticians think its too risky, why on earth is the government taking it over? Agree with you mist42nz!!


 "Rates could rise across New Zealand as councils deal with increased insurance bills in the wake of the Christchurch earthquakes, a local government leader claims.

Insurer Civic Assurance has told 46 councils it will not be able to renew their cover after it runs out on June 30.

Government was working with insurance companies, the Earthquake Commission and local government to find a permanent solution to the insurance issues",

Quick John...give Hu a call...betcha the Beijing boys will have an insurance company to provide the cover....


Wait till EQC requires a bailout.