Vero walks away from appeal of Commerce Commission decision to block Tower takeover as it sees 'significant litigation risk' and the deal outlining the proposed acquisition expires

Vero is giving up in its battle with the Commerce Commission to get the green light to take over Tower.

The wholly-owned subsidiary of Suncorp has announced it is walking away from its appeal of the competition watchdog’s July decision to decline its application to acquire Tower. 

Tower is still pushing on with the appeal, which will be heard in late January.

Vero’s move comes further to the Scheme Implementation Agreement it signed with Tower to buy all its shares, passing its end date and being terminated by Tower.

Asked by whether there were any other factors that prompted it to walk away from the appeal, a Vero spokesperson says: "Having now reviewed the full decline decision of the New Zealand Commerce Commission, while we were confident that we have a strong case, there was significant litigation risk to proceeding with an appeal.

"Because of this risk, we have decided to act in the best interests of our shareholders, and not take the appeal any further."

Asked whether any insights into Tower's financial results, to be released on November 14, had anything to do with Vero's decision, the spokesperson says no. 

While Tower has advised Vero it is willing to negotiate a new agreement, “which may result in changes to key terms”, the Vero spokesperson says "there are no immediate plans to renegotiate with Tower".

The company says it's "focused on maximising the value of its Tower shareholding".

Vero has a 19.99% blocking stake in Tower, which the Commerce Commission is investigating under section 47 of the Commerce Act.

Tower says negotiations around a new agreement could occur once the insurer completes its plans to raise more capital.

Details around this will be revealed in Tower's full year results.

Tower's share price has fallen on Vero's news. It sits at 78.5 cents (as at 12.45pm Tuesday). This time two years ago it was at $2.06. 

The New Zealand insurer has struggled to recover from the 2010/11 Canterbury earthquakes. 

While it last year proposed to ring-fence its problematic quake-related business, it has this year welcomed takeover bids from Vero and Canadian giant, Fairfax Financial Holdings. 

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment or click on the "Register" link below a comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.


Tower are in court again this week with yet another vexatious defense for a EQ claim on a hill home. I sat in the court for a bit and it was so obvious that Tower are using delaying tactics even in court.....trying to build a defense based on no facts and their usual bully tactics with key witnesses. Shameful. What must it have cost Tower to take it to this level when they could have settled in line with their contractual agreement years ago. These poor people have now lived in their badly damaged home for over 6 years with no certainty and at their age it is tragic that they have had to file action simply to get what they are clearly entitled to