Chairman of new financial markets regulator wants New Zealand to be seen as 'a good place to invest'

Chairman of new financial markets regulator wants New Zealand to be seen as 'a good place to invest'

Here's the FMA's statement on Bernard Whimp:

The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) has today issued a warning about unsolicited offers that may be made by Mr Bernard Whimp and entities associated with him. Shareholders are warned to treat any such offer with great caution and to seek advice from a registered financial adviser, lawyer, accountant, Community Law Centre or Citizen’s Advice Bureau.

FMA has today given notice to Mr Whimp, and a number of limited partnerships associated with him, that it will consider requiring them, and any person associated with them, to ensure any unsolicited offer they make contains a copy of the warning in a prominent position. Mr Whimp has three days to make submissions, which FMA will consider before making its decision on Friday 6 May.

This is the first use of powers under the Financial Markets Authority Act 2011.

Limited partnerships associated with Mr Whimp have previously made unsolicited offers to buy shares directly from shareholders at less than market price, or where the sellers have to wait for up to 10 years for payment.

“FMA issued this warning because it considers it is not in shareholders’ interests to accept such offers,” said FMA CEO Sean Hughes. “Any shareholder who receives such an offer needs further information to enable them to make an informed decision about whether to sell their shares. The warning provides that information.”

“FMA considers that a fair, efficient and transparent financial market requires investors to make fully informed decisions with the best information available to them.” The warning can be found at www.fma.govt.nz.

Background

FMA regulates New Zealand’s financial markets. Our main objective is to promote fair, efficient and transparent financial markets. To find out more about us and for help with investing, see www.fma.govt.nz. Under section 49 of the Financial Markets Authority Act 2011, if FMA has issued a warning, it may make an order that requires any offer documents of the type specified in the order to contain a copy of the warning in a prominent position, or be accompanied by a copy of the FMA warning (a warning disclosure order).

Before making a warning disclosure order, FMA must first: (a) have issued a warning about any matter relating to a relevant person;

(b) give the relevant person at least three working days written notice that FMA may make a warning disclosure order and the reasons why FMA is considering exercising that power;

(c) give the relevant person an opportunity to make written submissions and to be heard on the matter within that notice period; and

(d) have regard to whether exercising the power contributes to its function of promoting the confident and informed participation of businesses, investors and consumers in the financial markets.

A ‘relevant person’ includes a person who is or has engaged in conduct that involves dealings in securities. A person who does not comply with an order made by FMA under section 49 of the Financial Markets Authority Act 2011 commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of up to $300,000.

Read the FMA's earlier statement below and see a Double Shot Interview with CEO Sean Hughes here or above:

Restoring investor confidence in New Zealand's financial markets is the major goal of the new Financial Markets Authority which was formally established today.

FMA chairman, Simon Allen, said New Zealand's economic prospects depended on lifting international and domestic investor confidence in the country's capital markets.

"Broadening and deepening our financial markets to ensure local businesses have access to the capital they need to grow is our overriding objective," he said. "To achieve that investors have to regard New Zealand as a good place to invest."

"FMA's intent is to establish clearer and more consistent rules for market participants, improve market intelligence and surveillance, and be more visible and proactive in regulation and enforcement as well as raise the standards of financial advisers," said Mr Allen.

FMA is the new Crown entity that has taken over the functions of the Securities Commission and the Government Actuary, which have been disestablished, and consolidates other regulatory functions from the Ministry of Economic Development.

Mr Allen said both he, the new nine member and three associate member FMA Board and executive team led by Chief Executive Sean Hughes, were conscious of the enormous challenge they faced in achieving a turnaround in investor confidence in the current negative environment in which investors have suffered large losses in finance company and other company collapses in recent years combined with the fall out of the global financial crisis.

"We can and will set clearer rules for how markets and businesses should operate to a higher standard, and we will more consistently and strongly enforce those rules," he said. "However, New Zealand cannot regulate its way to improved standards of market behaviour, company performance and corporate governance."

"Ultimately, if New Zealand is to seriously lift its game, it requires all market participants including professional company directors running New Zealand businesses to take these new rules and responsibilities of conduct, governance and integrity very seriously."

"In that sense, we are all in this together, and I can't over-emphasise that enough," he added.

Chief Executive Sean Hughes said that FMA had new powers, new functions, a greater mandate and significantly increased budget compared to its predecessors.

"Over time investors can expect access to more timely and better quality information and higher standards of financial advice on which to make their investment decisions. And the market generally can expect FMA to act more quickly and efficiently in market surveillance, intervention and, where necessary, enforcement if the new rules are deliberately flouted."

Mr Hughes said a key FMA goal was to lift standards of corporate governance. Another priority was the previously announced review of the pipeline of existing and potential prosecutions and investigations inherited by FMA from the former Securities Commission.

(Update adds Whimp warning).

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

6 Comments

Yes they do Ivan, as they do with trustees and auditors. More detail here - http://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/52245/opinion-memo-govt-please-allow-f...

Keep them honest Ivan.

Thats funny, it appears that they do not know their own new rules.

These are investments.

My understanding is:

If the client explains anything about their personal circumstances

Registered financial advisers (RFAs) can't give advice on them unless the clients are "wholesale"

Unregistered lawyers and accountants can only give advice if it is "ïncidental" to other services

An Authorised Financial Adviser (AFA) must give a huge report at the cost of megabucks unless the client signs a heap of waivers.

It would be helpful if you could get the FMA to explain when the advice becomes "personal"

 

The president of the FMA announces his first act of vengeance will be to bare his teeth and go after the 9,999th on the "most wanted" list. I'm sure Hotchin, Hubbard, and their ilk and cronies, Accountants, Trustees and Auditors and so on won't be losing any sleep over that. The likes of Ivan won't be too comforted just yet. Just think Ivan, if you had $1m in idle money, right now, ready to invest, would you be feeling any better with "The Whimp" being attacked?

Well, I suppose it's something like making design improvements after the jetliner's already crashed -- it won't help the dead, but it does make it safer for everyone to fly in the future. At least it's something.

If the FMA really does their job, then they can clean up and increase future confidence. Assuming not too much cronyism and money in back pockets to overlook little transgressions. Removing Mr. Whimp's offers will have a positive effect on the general public's perception of investment as a safe activity.

Personally, I'll wait and see what the FMA does. Still feel more comfortable with a term deposit in the bank, even though it might not earn so much (especially after tax).

All the best to you, Ivan. Hope you get your justice.

Whimp's low-ball offers have netted him a $ 2 million profit in just months .......... And still the regulatory bodies do not make his practice illegal , but flap on wimpishly about " consulting your financial advisor " ........

... He legally gets access to all shareholders names and addresses , through the regisrtries ........ What about security and protection of the individual you ask , what about , indeed ............

The odds are that several of the many forms he sends out will be signed and returned by ill-informed investors , gullible saps ....... Whimp preys upon them , fleecing them of their munny ....... And it's still legal .............

......... It's pathetic really , the financial markets and the regulations in NZ , utterly pathetic .

Your access to our unique content is free - always has been. But ad revenues are diving so we need your direct support.

Become a supporter

Thanks, I'm already a supporter.