Allied Farmers may issue yet more shares to replace its soon to mature capital notes

Allied Farmers may issue yet more shares to replace its soon to mature capital notes

By Gareth Vaughan

Allied Farmers, which swamped its then shareholders' 37.7 million shares by issuing 1.91 billion to Hanover Finance debtholders in December 2009, may issue yet more shares to replace NZX-listed capital notes with a face value of NZ$12.6 million that are due to mature in November.

Included in the company's unaudited annual results release, dumped at 5.30pm on Monday evening, was a paragraph on the future of Allied Farmers' capital notes. The company said its directors would soon determine the "proposed course of action" for the capital notes which mature on November 15 this year.

Based on the capital notes trust deed, overseen by trustee Trustees Executors, the options open to the directors are renewing the capital notes for another five years, redeeming or purchasing all or a portion of the notes for cash, or converting them into Allied Farmers shares.

Given Allied Farmers' financially challenged position - it posted a NZ$43 million unaudited annual loss with its accounts showing an equity deficit of NZ$6.4 million - it doesn't appear to be in a position to redeem or buy the notes. That leaves the options of rolling the notes over, possibly at a lower interest rate than the current 9.6% per annum, or converting them into shares.

Ross O’Neill, Allied Farmers' now part time general counsel and company secretary, told interest.co.nz that everything the company currently wanted to say regarding the capital notes was included in Monday's results announcement.

According to the NZX website, none of the notes have traded for at least 30 days and their current price per NZ$100 is NZ$59.2.Priced at NZ$1 each, the notes were sold in minimum parcels of NZ$5,000 in 2007.

22 day covenant breach

Monday's announcement also noted there was a "short-term" breach of the capital note debt to equity ratio covenant (which is that Allied Farmers' external secured debt doesn't exceed 1.5 times equity) from June 30, which was remedied by a debt reduction almost a month later, on July 22.

"The only consequence is an additional 2% interest rate payable to the capital note holders for this 22 day period," Allied Farmers said.

Asked about the trust deed breach and when any decision on the notes' future might be revealed, Sean Roberts of Trustees Executors said Allied Farmers' NZX announcement had stated the breach had been rectified by a reduction in debt.

"If interest had not been paid we would have been in communication with the noteholders affected amongst other disclosures," Roberts said.

He added that the next interest payment is due on the maturity date of November 15.

"The Board has various options from this point, but noting that the Trust Deed requires various actions in the days prior to 15 November depending on the option they take," Roberts added, without elaborating.

Trustees Executors wrote to the Companies Office last year raising concerns about Allied Farmers' financial plight. At that point there were 521 capital noteholders.

Massive value destruction

The Allied Farmers-Hanover deal saw about 16,400 Hanover group investors issued 1.91 billion Allied Farmers shares valued at 20.7 cents each in exchange for their Hanover Finance, United Finance and Hanover Capital secured deposits, secured stock, subordinated notes and capital bonds in a deal with an attributed value of NZ$396.2 million. Allied Farmers shares yesterday closed at just 0.5c each leaving the  ompany with a market capitalisation of just NZ$10.2 million.

Allied Farmers says as of June 30, the total value of the Hanover group assets both realised since 2009 and still held is just NZ$93.6 million, that's NZ$302.6 million less than when Allied Farmers took them off Hanover owners Mark Hotchin and Eric Watson's hands.

Meanwhile, Allied Farmers also said on Monday that the completion of its audit in the next few weeks will confirm the number of additional shares that need to be issued under its bonus share mechanism approved by shareholders at the time of the December 2009 Hanover deal and an August 2010 share placement. This bonus share issue will dilute ex-Hanover debtholders' stakes.

"The cost of these additional shares has been fully provided in the accounts. In anticipation of the issue of the new shares, this provision has been capitalised and accordingly shareholders' funds have increased by the value of the shares to be issued, calculated at June 30," Allied Farmers said.

"This increase in shareholders' funds is intended to preserve the net tangible assets per share on issue."

Allied Farmers' unaudited annual accounts show a share allocation adjustment expense of NZ$2.5 million and provisions of NZ$1.4 million. They also record share capital of about NZ$135.6 million, up about NZ$4.5 million year-on-year.

A going concern?

Allied Farmers issued 3.7 million bonus shares on a one-for-10 ratio to its existing shareholders before the Hanover deal. It said if its audited results for the year to 30 June 2011 show Allied Farmers made a shortfall, whether realised or unrealised, on the NZ$396.2 million attributed value for the Hanover assets, then the bonus shares will convert to ordinary shares. The conversion will be calculated to enable Allied Farmers' shareholders aggregate shareholding to be increased to what it would have been immediately after the proposal as if the assets had been transferred at the ascribed value as at June 30 this year.

In Allied Farmers' audited accounts last year auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers said it wasn't sure whether the company could survive because it was unable to obtain sufficient audit evidence upon which to form an opinion on whether application of the "going concern" assumption remained appropriate.

This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers this morning. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

6 Comments

No comment from Rob Alloway?  I could do with a good laugh.

He left the building a while ago.

Note to the whole planet : -

...Unless you're a highly skilled laundromat operator , do not - under any circumstances - do not attempt to clean up Eric Watson's and Mark Hotchin's dirty laundry for them !

At 0.5c per share it may well actually cost you money to sell the shares after the Brokers commission.  

I wonder what the auditor is saying?

3 October 2011
NZX Market Supervision Announcement
Allied Farmers Limited (ALF)
Trading Halt of Securities

NZX Market Supervision advises that Allied Farmers Limited (ALF) have not issued to NZX an audited Annual Report for the year ending 30 June 2011, which under NZSX Listing Rule 10.5.1, was due to be issued to NZX on 30 September 2011.

Pursuant to the policy set out in Footnote 2 of Listing Rule 5.4.3, if an Issuer has not issued its Annual Report within 5 Business Days of the due date, quotation of that Issuer’s Securities will be suspended until the Issuer has issued its Annual Report.

If ALF does not provide its Annual Report by Market Close on 7 October 2011, NZX gives notice that trading in the above named securities will be suspended, effective from the commencement of trading 10 October 2011.

And here's what the company itself has to say today. I think we can ignore yesterday's date...

2 October 2011

2011 ANNUAL REPORT DELAY

Allied Farmers Limited (ALF) was required to release its Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2011 by 30 September 2011. The audited 30 June 2011 financial statements included in the Annual Report are required to take into account a number of matters that have occurred since the release of the preliminary unaudited financial results on 29 August 2011. One of those matters, which is expected to have a positive impact on the group, was intended to be completed prior to finalisation of the financial statements.

The Board believes there is a good prospect of that matter being completed in the next few days. Because that event, if concluded, is expected to have a significant impact on the financial statements and the calculation of the rights attached to the Bonus Securities and the Price Adjustment Rights under the placement completed in August 2010 which are dependent on the audited results, the Board considers it prudent to delay completion and disclosure of the Annual Report for a short period.

A further announcement will be made as soon as the relevant matter is concluded.