sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

McKinsey researchers find that the global economic centre of gravity is shifting to Asia faster than you may think

McKinsey researchers find that the global economic centre of gravity is shifting to Asia faster than you may think

By Jeongmin Seong and Jonathan Woetzel*

In the nineteenth century, the world was Europeanised. In the twentieth century, it was Americanised. Now, it is being Asianised – and much faster than you may think.

Asia’s rise has been swift. Home to more than half of the world’s population, the region has climbed from low- to middle-income status within a single generation. By 2040, it is likely to generate more than 50% of world GDP, and could account for nearly 40% of global consumption.

New McKinsey Global Institute research shows the extent to which the global center of gravity is shifting toward Asia. Today, the region has an increasing global share of trade, capital, people, knowledge, transport, culture, and resources. Of eight types of global cross-border flows, only waste is flowing in the opposite direction, reflecting the decision by China and other Asian countries to reduce imports of garbage from developed countries.

Asia now accounts for around one-third of global trade in goods, up from about a quarter ten years ago. Over roughly the same period, its share of global airline travelers has risen from 33% to 40%, and its share of capital flows has increased from 13% to 23%.

Those flows have fueled growth in Asia’s cities. The region is home to 21 of the world’s 30 largest, and four of the ten most visited. And some of Asia’s lesser-known cities are now also on investors’ radar. In Yangon, Myanmar’s commercial capital, greenfield foreign direct investment (FDI) in knowledge-intensive sectors totaled $2.6 billion in 2017, up from virtually zero in 2007.

Similarly, Bekasi, a smaller city near Jakarta, has emerged as the Detroit of Indonesia – the center of Indonesia’s automotive and motorcycle industry. Over the last decade, FDI in the city’s manufacturing industry has grown at an average rate of 29% per year. And Hyderabad – which generated over 1,400 patents in 2017 – is quickly catching up with India’s Silicon Valley, Bangalore.

But it’s not only external flows being channeled into Asia. Dynamic intraregional networks are also driving progress. Around 60% of Asian countries’ total trade in goods occurs within the region, facilitated by increasingly integrated Asian supply chains. Intraregional funding and investment flows are also increasing, with more than 70% of Asian startup funding coming from within the region. Flows of people – 74% of travel within Asia is undertaken by Asians – help to integrate the region as well.

What makes these flows work is Asia’s diversity. In fact, there are at least four “Asias,” each at a different stage of economic development, playing a unique role in the region’s global rise.

The first Asia comprises China, the region’s anchor economy, which provides a connectivity and innovation platform to its neighbors. In 2013-17, the country accounted for 35% of Asia’s total outward FDI, with about one-quarter of that investment going to other Asian economies. Reflecting its rapidly growing innovation capacity, China accounted for 44% of the world’s patent applications in 2017.

The second grouping – “Advanced Asia” – also provides technology and capital. With total outward FDI of $1 trillion, these countries accounted for 54% of total regional FDI outflows in 2013-17. South Korea alone provided 33% of all FDI flows to Vietnam. Japan accounted for 35% of Myanmar’s FDI inflows, and 17% of the Philippines’.

Then there is “Emerging Asia,” which comprises a relatively diverse group of small emerging economies that provide not only labor, but also growth potential, owing to rising productivity and consumption. These economies are deeply integrated with their regional neighbors: their average share of intraregional flows of goods, capital, and people is 79%, the highest of the four Asias.

By contrast, the fourth grouping – “Frontier Asia and India” – has the lowest average share of intraregional flows, amounting to just 31%. But this figure – which reflects historic ties to Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and the United States – is set to increase, as these economies, which historically were less integrated, forge closer bonds with their Asian neighbors. This group has a lot to offer, including a relatively young labor force that is capitalising on the growing Asian import market, and a growing middle class that can serve as a new market for regional exports.

The differences among the four Asias are complementary, making integration a powerful force for progress. For example, as one country’s labor force ages, a country with a younger population fills the gap. The median age of India’s population stood at 27 in 2015, compared to 37 in China and 48 in Japan and is expected to reach just 38 by 2050.

Likewise, when wages – and thus manufacturing costs – begin to rise in one country, an economy at an earlier stage of development takes over its low-cost manufacturing activities. From 2014 to 2017, when China’s share of all labor-intensive emerging-economy exports declined from 55% to 52%, Vietnam’s share increased by 2.2 percentage points and Cambodia’s by 0.4 percentage points.

For years, observers have breathlessly discussed Asia’s future potential. The future has arrived. We have entered the “Asian century,” as the author Parag Khanna puts it. There is no turning back.


Jonathan Woetzel is a McKinsey senior partner and a director of the McKinsey Global Institute. Jeongmin Seong is a senior fellow at the McKinsey Global Institute in Shanghai. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019, published here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

23 Comments

The asianised world may have arrived in the Pacific & American region but not much at all in Europe. I'm currently in Spain and there as few Asian people here as there are black African people in NZ

Up
0

They will rape and pillage across the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np4OwQaJItY&t=37s

Up
0

Yep, there isn't enough planet left for Asia to grow to 50% of GDP, they can only get that by acquiring it from those who have it now.

Up
0

Like the British Empire did?

Up
0

no, nothing like the British empire

Up
0

This can only be good news for NZ in terms of both exports and tourism.
To the US it is seen as a threat to economic superiority hence the trade wars.

Up
0

The world is being Asianised faster than we think, not just because of the weight of numbers, although that is important, but because most Asian populations have a shared sense of purpose. The west is wracked by culture wars and grievance. The good news hopefully, is that the handover of primacy may be bloodless.

Up
0

Calling Japanese "Asians" is like calling the British "Europeans."

Up
0

Well British are Europeans, just like the french or Bulgarians are, no different

Up
0

I don't get your point. Ethnically Japanese are Asian, and British are European.
Were you suggesting that Japan and Britain are not part of mainland Asia and Europe respectively ?

Up
0

Weld is incorrect on every conceivable level. Linguistically, genetically, historically. Just wrong. Wrong. Wrong. But "British" exceptionalism is massively envogue currently, so I am unsurprised to see that the comments has likes.

But I am compelled to offer some facts (i know, i know, so uncool right?).

Britain was populated and then depopulated over a millennia as the climate shifted between the Pleistocene, Last Glacial Maximum, Younger Dryas and Holocene and throughout this time, there was mostly a significant land bridge connecting Britain to mainland Europe. Britain was also populated (as was the rest of Europe, by Neanderthal). And then, just as in the rest of Europe, the population of Britain changed with each wave of global migration. The first enduring population of the UK was actually black skinned and light eyed. The waves of migration were first out of Africa, then Anatolian neolithic farmers, then all those populations were more or less wiped out and replaced by Eurasian Steppe tribes. Britain was the backwater, the last to take up new technologies and new populations. Especially after the Doggerland strip to mainland Europe was flooded leaving Britain a true Island.

But wait... did Britain stop being European? NOPE. Britain's genetic record shows that they share their majority DNA with the rest of Europe from different stages (especially a near extinction event during a period of rapid cooling when the remaining people trying to inhabit Europe camped out on the Iberian peninsula). After this, the British are the product of many waves of immigrants, who never stopped moving around Europe for resources and opportunity. The linguistic, technological, architectural and cultural landscape of Britain is as part of Europe, every new tech, every new cultural revolution. Beaker culture, La Tene culture (ALL SPREADING FROM EUROPE TO THE UK) then later, Romans, Anglo Saxons, Norse and Norman. And hence why the English language is a heady mix of scandinavian, germanic and latin based language and there is NOTHING left, absolutely NOTHING left of a "native" language from *before* the "Celtic" tribes (themselves originally also from mainland Europe and NOT native originally)... and even then those later "Celtic" tribes only left record of their own language in a few place names.... place names that can be traced linguistically as sharing root origins with the rest of the European tribes (and millennia before the concept of nation states would evolve).

When Julias Caesar first attempted to invade Britain, he found armed "Celtic" tribes on every coast, ready to repel him and his legions. How did they know exactly when the Roman's were due, I hear you ask? Because the bloody Celtic tribes were all Gaulish. Their brother and sister tribes on mainland Europe, had the same root language and culture, they helped each other.

Later still, once England is a nation, the royalty and aristocracy of the country, were intermarried with the rest of Europe. All European monarchies ever did was intermingle their bloodlines. The Georgians and indeed the Windsors are bloody German for f%$ksake.

Britain is every bit as European as Brussels but it's hilarious how ignorant some people are of any facts relating to this.

Up
0

And Maori are ethnically Pacific Islanders? (Are you even allowed to say that?)

Up
0

I don't think any Maori would deny that their cultural origins are shared with other Pacific islands but centuries of isolation did lead them to develop a more unique language and culture.

Britain was never, at any time isolated. There was a continuous wave of migration back and forth from Europe, a long with linguistic and cultural influence. Britain has as much in common with Mainland Europe as all the other European nations have to each other. Which is a lot.

We know that the British were trading mineral resources across Europe for millennia because we have found British tin in ancient artefacts all over Europe)! The British, French and Scandi's were all maritime cultures over the last millennium and getting from the British Isles to Mainland Europe is a helluva lot easier than getting from isolated NZ to another Pacific Island. And by the way the Franks, the tribe that gave the French their name, were actually from the Rhine Valley. All the European tribes were moving around during the Roman era because wars and plagues led to huge waves of migrations. There is far more that unites Europe than divides them, including being part of the Roman empire and then the Holy Roman Empire for a thousand years. The Maori have none of those experiences with other Pacific Islands.

Up
0

japanese dont seem to integrate with anybody very well,they dont emigrate as they dont need to,chinese dont allow immigration unless you are ethnic chinese.I find mckinsey global institute is a more interesting subject than asian integration,bit hard to work out their angle,maybe they are on the side of the angels but wikipedia says otherwise.

Up
0

Japanese integrate really well, once they leave Japan and go and live overseas. (At that point, they are no longer considered to be Japanese.)

Up
0

Europe and the West in general have been reconciled after two devastating world wars. It is not really a case in Asia. Many countries mentioned in this article have territorial disputes and other problems with China, and some of them could lead to military conflicts. China had huge influence in Asia until the defeat in the Opium War. The current state of Asia is also the result of a weak China in past 150 years. And China is now rising. Interesting times.

Up
0

What about Russia which also accounts for a large geographical portion of Asia, which may contain more resources, untapped yet ?

Up
0

Geography has become history.

But History is still being written in geography (resources ,mainly human, growth and potential wise).

Up
0

The 'four flavours' identified in the article may be OK as far as they go, but what is omitted is the Middle East, which is joined at the hip both culturally and geographically with India, Pakistan, Indonesia, the Phillipines etc via the Islamic arc of influence, and economically via OBOR. It is worth reading a now--perhaps-dated article by David Goldman in Asia Times, to begin to appreciate the wider context of the China/Russia/Israel nexus: he terms it the 'Pax Sinica'.

Nothing is nearly as neat as the McKinsey quadrants would have us believe.....

Up
0

You do realize that this article (the one cited in the link by Audaxes) is Iranian propaganda.
I realized this when I came to the bit that says Israel financially supports USA.
Israel of course is and has always been financially supported by the USA.

Up
0

The future is Asia, provided China doesn't get out of control.

Up
0

Yes, the Chinese were having a giant anniversary parade the other day with tv reports showing their new inter-continental missiles which can reach the United States and each missile packs 10 separate nuclear war-heads.
I thought the Chinese were better than that. It's Genghis Khan all over again.

Up
0