sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Monster money laundering settlements a cost of doing business for Too Big To Fail banks; Australia's 'Mortgage miracles' sub-prime mortgage scandal; 'China land prices may fall 80%,' says Xie; Dilbert

Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Monster money laundering settlements a cost of doing business for Too Big To Fail banks; Australia's 'Mortgage miracles' sub-prime mortgage scandal; 'China land prices may fall 80%,' says Xie; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 11.30 am today in association with NZ Mint.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #4 from Andy Xie about what's really happening in the Chinese economy. I hope someone in the New Zealand government reads it. Currently a Chinese rebound is New Zealand's Plan A. We might need a Plan B.

1. Just a cost of doing business - Another day, another big bank settlement.

Standard Chartered has just paid US$340 million to make allegations go away that it helped launder US$250 billion of Iranian money.

This follows regular settlements by banks over various misdemeanors that allowed them to make astonishingly high profits.

I just don't get it.

Anyone else who commits a crime can't just pay over a bunch of other people's money to make a crime go away and avoid punishment.

Why should banks? So the executives who committed the crimes get off and keep their bonuses from the wrong-doing while shareholders foot the bill. Although, the cynics would say, shareholders may view these settlements as just another cost of doing business to keep the profits flowing.

Here's Bloomberg with the details:

The settlement amount is the largest ever paid to an individual regulator as part of a money laundering accord. In June, ING Bank NV agreed to pay US$619 million to settle similar allegations. That sum was split evenly between a US$309.5 million payment to the federal government and an equal sum to the Manhattan District Attorney’s office.

And here's Reuters.

In the end, Lawsky's office won a settlement that was on par with fines paid by a handful of other banks that had improperly done business with sanctioned states such as Iran and Cuba. In 2010, Barclays Plc paid $298 million to settle a U.S. probe.

Lloyds Banking Group and Credit Suisse Group have previously agreed to pay settlements of US$350 million and US$536 million, respectively. ING Bank NV also paid a settlement. HSBC Holdings Plc currently is under investigation by U.S. law enforcement, according to bank regulatory filings.

2. Australia's sub-prime mortgage scandal - You couldn't make this stuff up. The woman behind Western Australia's mortgage broker of the year for 2007, Mortgage Miracles, has spilled the beans in an exposé on ABC's 7.30 report.

Kate Thompson, who is being prosecuted for fraud, explained how she inflated incomes and assets for 'low doc' loans. HT Leith at Macrobusiness

"I would get upfront commission, I would get a trailing commission. I was probably earning about $5 million a year. It was great. It was wonderful. But it was all a lie," she said. But she was not alone.

"Hook me up to a lie detector test and hook them up. I'll lay my evidence on the table. They will fail a lie detector test miserably. They are corrupt. They are protecting each other," Ms Thompson said.

Along with similar claims before a parliamentary inquiry in Canberra last week, her evidence has the potential to rock the finance industry.

"Through a series of emails from banks to brokers how to get their deals across the line, make the deal fit. They targeted older people, people on carers allowance, age pensions," Denise Brailey, from the Banking and Finance Consumers Support Association, told the inquiry. The evidence suggests that banks and other lenders tacitly encouraged mortgage brokers en masse to make up fictitious stories about customers so they could get loans and to falsify their income.

3. How to get a 5% mortgage - Campbell Hastie from mortgage broking outfit Go2Guys.co.nz writes here on his blog about how banks in New Zealand are making it easier for first home borrowers to buy a house without saving any money.

One lender we deal with has made a slight change so that your deposit can be a gift of 5%, no need to have saved it yourself. This opens the door to more first home buyers who may be saving but not getting far very fast. If mum and dad can help their kids out by writing a cheque then they’re away. I realise a willing benefactor with a fat enough bank account could be difficult to find, still the option is there. Gifted deposits are widely accepted but as you’re not demonstrating a record of savings yourself they always need to be big (like 20%) to give the bank the comfort it needs. So what’s significant about this change is that the requirement to demonstrate good behaviour has been watered down a little as a way to attract some of the demand that is obviously floating around from the first time punter.

Another lender we deal with has changed their affordability formula which is also interesting. I won’t bother you with the detail but basically they don’t require as much surplus income after outgoings as before. For some borrowers it could mean a big improvement in their ability to get on the ladder in the first place because a dollar of income will buy a bit more loan. For others it could mean the houses that were just out of reach are back on the radar.

4. What's really going on in China - Here's Andy Xie at MarketWatch explaining why he thinks land prices may fall 80% in most Chinese cities.

He says there's a risk China will try to devalue away the problem. Is New Zealand ready for that?

China’s land market will experience a dramatic adjustment ahead. In most cities, land prices may fall by 80%. The financial consequences will be severe. Most bank loans are backed up directly or indirectly by land. If land prices fall so much, the banking system would suffer a crippling level of bad loans.

Local governments increased their spending appetite during the heyday of land sales. They will have a difficult time adjusting to the new reality. Their struggle to source new revenues will be the main reason for social instability ahead.

The government may face the choice between devaluation and collapse of land prices. I still believe, as I did last year, that China won’t devalue. However, the temptation for decision-makers must be very high at some point. Devaluation essentially spreads the cost of a bubble bursting among people, which saves powerful vested interests.

In addition to the bubble bursting, the looming prospect of a declining population may trap China’s property market in a permanent bear market like in Japan. Three decades of one-child policy have laid the seeds for a dramatic decline in property demand. This force follows a period of dramatic overbuilding. The overhang of empty properties will haunt China’s economy for a decade or longer.

5. China's grey income - Andy Xie also writes this startling description of how wealth is generated in China. Are we in New Zealand so confident about the sources of income behind Chinese companies and individuals who buy assets here? Maurice Williamson is completely convinced about the legitimacy of Shanghai Pengxin in Alex Tarrant's story here.

The discussions over inequality are misconstrued as rich vs. poor, as in other countries. This is totally wrong. It should be about asset bubbles, excessive monetary growth, the excessively big government role in the economy and the resulting surging gray income.

There is a widely circulated view that Chinese people hate the rich. This is totally wrong, too. It is not about who is rich, but about how one becomes rich. Chinese people suspect that most riches in China are ill gotten. Unfortunately, this view is true. With widespread excess capacity, few entrepreneurs can get rich through normal market competition.

Many entrepreneurs have given up on gaining wealth from normal business activities. Instead, they rely on cultivating special relationships with government agencies or state-owned enterprises to gain special advantages. Or they use illicit means to gain bank credit for speculation.

Special favors from the government and speculation with other people’s money are the most important sources of wealth. It is for this reason that Chinese people view wealth unfavorably.

8. A threesome in Nanjing - Bill Bishop's Sinocism points out Caixin Online has gone in depth into the corruption around disgraced Chinese Railway Minister Liu Zhijun, including details of some nefarious activity in a five star hotel in Nanjing.

The cover story of this week’s Caixin goes deep into the corruption of former Raliways Minister Liu Zhijun. The first paragraph makes it sound like the police sent by Beijing to arrest him may have interrupted Liu in the middle of a threesome at a 5-star Nanjing hotel.

7. A Fannie Mae for Britain? - The FT.com reports the Tory/LibDem coalition government is considering a package of measures to boost house building in Britain, including removing requirements on private developers to build affordable housing and guaranteeing bonds for housing associations.

Under the Letwin plan, housing associations and private housebuilders would have to “sit around the table” and agree to work together on large sites.

Housing associations were able to borrow cheaply from banks before 2008, but have since seen a squeeze on their finances with many facing expensive refinancings. They are instead turning to the bond market, where they have raised over £3bn already this year.

Ministers believe that a state guarantee on such bonds would make them even cheaper, allowing housing associations to build affordable housing on private developers’ sites.

8. Land Tax in China? - Again HT to Bill Bishop for pointing out Credit Suisse research saying China has decided to introduce a Residential Property Tax to try to slow down its housing market. Yikes.

China has decided to extend the holding tax for commercial properties to investment purpose residential ones, to avoid legislation issues for implementing a new property tax. Several industry experts, including those that we brought to meet investors recently, believe that the property tax could cause China’s residential property prices to drop 40% or more. In our opinion, however, property tax is just one component of China’s property policies – it should not crash the property market and its upcoming implementation could actually signal a bottoming in China’s property sector.

We expect it to cool the sentiment in the near term for investment and speculation in the property market, but property tax by itself cannot solve the housing issue. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security’s proposal to double average wages in China within five years, if approved and implemented, should improve the affordability ratio significantly.

9. Couldn't resist - I enjoyed Mo Farah winning gold for Britain in the 5k and 10k on the track at the Olympics. Here's a tribute site called 'Mo running away from things', courtesty of Tumblr and our old friend Photoshop. Click here for more.

10. Totally Clarke and Dawe on the Olympics. John Clarke says Australia is a sailing nation and there might be some more government funding for Australia's swimming programme.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

27 Comments

Re #1 So the fine costs $340 million for laundering $250 billion.  That means that the US government only took 0.136 % of the transaction.  I am sure that they could have done a lot better. I bet the bank made vastly more than that.  What absolute fools the USA government are, because they have effectively said that you can break our laws, co-operate and collude with nations and criminals who would destroy us and our culture for only a very small fraction of the profit that you will make in doing so.  Idiots and even bigger idiots for putting a price on it all.  They should have lost their banking liscence and been barred from any transactions with the USA.

Up
0

Chris-M, I have not checked the others but in the case of HSBC, individual charges are being filed against  the gentleman ( name forgotten I posted it here a while back though) that headed up the laundering dept along with several others involved in the process.........no doubt the HSBC will want to fund their legal costs, which I'm sure will benifit the American Legal fraternity.  

Up
0

It has just been announced, http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/is-that-it-for-financial-crisis-cases/ that the SEC and DoJ, and FBI are closing their investigations into all the US merchant banks relating to the GFC. Not one prosecution. With 3 months to go to the presidential elections you shouldnt be surprised. But, as for the overseas non-US banks, they're fair game.

Up
0

0.136%, and they say tobin taxes are a bad idea?

hmmm

regards

Up
0

250 billion laundered

340 million fine

doors open at 8 a.m. Business as usual

and people wonder why the worlds economy is going if not already gone down the toilet.

Up
0

FYI a useful piece here from Ambrose on how the Great Recession is turning into a life sentence after 5 years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/94710…

here is no doubt that the three superpowers acting in concert can launch a mini-cycle of growth early next year - assuming they deliver on their rhetoric - but the twin headwinds of debt-leveraging and excess manufacturing plant across the globe cannot easily be conjured away.

The world remains in barely contained slump. Industrial output is still below earlier peaks in Germany (-2), US (-3), Canada (-8) France (-9), Sweden (-10), Britain (-11), Belgium (-12), Japan (-15), Hungary (-15) Italy (-17), Spain (-22), Greece (-27), according to St Louis Fed data. By that gauge this is proving more intractable than the Great Depression.

A study by Stephen Cecchetti at the Bank for International Settlements concludes that debt turns “bad” at roughly 85pc of GDP for public debt, 85pc for household debt, and 90pc corporate debt. If all three break the limit together, the system loses its shock absorbers.

“Debt is a two-edged sword. Used wisely and in moderation, it clearly improves welfare. Used imprudently and in excess, the result can be disaster,” he said.

Creditors and debtors may in theory offset each other, but what actually happens in a crunch is that borrowers cut back feverishly. Creditors do not offset the effect. The whole system spins downwards. It is debt’s fatal “asymmetry”, long overlooked by New Keynesian orthodoxy.

 

Up
0

This is a 20 or 30 year event....life sentence indeed...

regards

Up
0

And maybe China is not preparing to slash interest rates again

https://mninews.deutsche-boerse.com/content/china-pboc-paper-warns-risi…

BEIJING (MNI) - China's financial system is seeing increasing risks as a slowing economy leads to an increase in bad loans, the Financial News said in a front page editorial Tuesday.

"Risks within the financial system can be easily exposed as the external environment changes and domestic economy slows," said the newspaper, which is published by the People's Bank of China.

"Bank non-performing assets may increase further as economic growth slows," it warned.

The editorial follows comments Monday which appeared designed to cool speculation that the central bank is poised to cut the reserve requirement again following the release of disappointing economic data last week.

Up
0

FYI from WSJ on capital outflows from China to assets in the likes of US, Australia, Singapore (and no doubt NZ real estate)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100008723963904440427045775892533289197…

Investors and companies are increasingly pulling money out of China and its currency in a vote of concern over its growth prospects, a development that could hinder Beijing's efforts to spark a turnaround.

New data published by China's central bank Tuesday showed China's banks were net sellers of 3.8 billion yuan ($597 million) in foreign exchange in July, suggesting that China's exporters aren't converting their dollar earnings into yuan and some investors are taking funds out of the country.

China's banks have been sellers of dollars in five of the last 10 months, purchasing a paltry 145 billion yuan in foreign exchange over that combined period, considerably less than the 905 billion yuan that flowed into the country through the trade surplus.

That is a stark contrast with much of the past decade, when confidence in China's growth and hunger for yuan meant China's banks were buying up not just the entire trade surplus, but also considerable inflows of speculative capital, known as hot money. In the first 10 months of 2008, China's banks were net purchasers of 3.6 trillion yuan in foreign exchange.

Massive inflows of capital were a key factor behind China's runaway bank lending, rising asset prices and yuan appreciation. Now, money is flowing in the other direction, contributing to falling prices for everything from real estate to equities and China's currency.

Meanwhile, the outflows are contributing to high prices for luxury apartments in Hong Kong and bringing Chinese buyers into play in property markets as far flung as London, Singapore, and San Francisco.

Up
0

#5 It seems Western Media look negatively on Chinese wealth as in "how did they get their money to become rich ??" The negative undertone is unmistakeable. As in "Maurice Williamson is completely convinced..."

 

How does the Chinese Elite accumulate wealth any different from your earlier article about StanChart and other Bankers making millions out of illegal money laundering. (And admitting it too !!) Does the West not have businesses that makes money "questionably"?

 

Did we not see the Christchurch Elite shrink the City's limit inorder to keep porperty prices higher than it should be ?? Is this not "questionable"?  However I am also sure you would say this is "perfectly legal"

 

How different then is Chinese Investment (and their source of wealth) different from western Investment ? (other than their race and political inclination ?)

Up
0

7. A Fannie Mae for Britain? - The FT.com reports

 

And when it explodes they'll blame the bankers and forget it was all government policy.

Up
0

And how about this from Jeremy Grantham;

 

"We are badly informed; passionately prefer good news and easily evade unpleasant facts; our views are easily manipulated by vested interests; we are sometimes desperately inefficient; and we are apparently corruptible as heck."

Up
0

All true. Kiwi's are as corruptible and greedy as anyone but there just isn't the level of corporate money sloshing around in our small economy to make it widespread and smallness means by default more transparency. Again not deliberate but just a by-product of size. Ditto Denmark, Finland, Norway

 

I am always amazed at the respect and admiration people I know give to anyone with wealth, even when they know that wealth may have been generated by illegal or unethical means, a sort of "good on them" mentality.

Up
0

"We no longer have the attention span to deal with any twenty-first century crisis. We live in an economy that is immensely complex and we are completely at the mercy of the small group of people who understand it – who incidentally often happen to be the same people who built these wildly complex economic systems. We have to trust these people to do the right thing, but we can’t, because, well, they’re scum. Which is kind of a big problem, when you think about it.” - Matt Taibbi

Up
0

I'm surprised you guys aren't all over this. The attempted renegotiation and possible closure of Tiwai point has the potential to affect some of the most important factors facing NZ in the near future, including asset sales and the price of electricity (without Tiwai point all the generators are worth less and the price of electricity will plummet) long term energy security (with 15% more spare capacity plus falling consumption, will NZ need any more generation for decades) Will this lead to another pitch for Rio Tinto or new owner to buy Manapouri?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10826619

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10826095

Up
0

Anyone running 'book' on the nationality of a new owner?

 

 

Up
0

Assad is looking for a new home I believe  - he will be allowed in on our UN refugee quota for sure

Up
0

his cohorts were gleaming

 

in purple and gold

 

Byron knew a thing or two.

 

 

Up
0

#2

Bernard, i have no proof this really happened but i have my suspicion that it did happen this way.

Back before the GFC when things were booming in the USA mortgage brokers were signing up every man and their dog and it worked like this.

A mortgage broker would go to a person, any person, but usually poor people, and tell them that they could get them into their own home and got them to agree to a deal. The deal worked like this.

A person would find a house for sale, say for $150,000, and the broker would get them a mortgage for say, $180,000. The extra $30K would be the brokers commision, legal and other fees and the first twelve months of the persons mortgage repayments. This was a sub-prime mortgage ie high risk of defaul, but it was not going to happen for another twelve months because they had set aside the first 12 months payments.

As this was happenning with thousands of people all over America house prices soared, because of the demand from all these poor people, who can now get into their own home. Now, the house described above had soared from $150,000 to $200,000 therefore it was no longer a sub prime mortgage but a prime mortgage. Because the house was now worth more than the mortgage of $180,000.

When the 12 months are up, this person is evicted because the cannot pay their mortgage but no problem because the brokers have created demand and people are linning up to buy this house at $220,000. and so on.

Eventually in this pyromid scheme thousands default at the same time and we have the collapse.

 

That is how i believe it happened

Up
0

MikeB, there are lots of variables. I suggest see the following video clip on you tube which summarises well what set off the sub prime crisis and its consequences:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx_LWm6_6tA

Up
0

MikeB - now stand back a few paces, and ask what drove the need for the process.

 

The demand for growth, had outrun the planet's ability to underwrite, so we overshot in invisibles.

 

30% reduction in US house prices, 24% underwater.

 

The only diffo is that we haven't readjusted here.

 

yet.

Up
0

TASMAN SUES COMPETITORS IN INSULATION MARKET

 
Tasman Insulation New Zealand Limited (part of Fletcher Building Holdings Limited) has commenced High Court proceedings against Knauf Insulation, BuildForNextGen Ltd and Eco Insulation, over the launch of EARTHWOOL® insulation in New Zealand, which now competes with Tasman’s PINK BATTS product.

................

Knauf is much cheaper than Pink Batts . You can buy them on line by the masterbag and they are delivered by frieghtways. Frieght for 6 masterbags was abiout the same as hiring a trailor.

 

Fletchers claim Batts is copyrighted and that "earthwool" is decieving customers as it isn't sheeps wool; but neither is steelwool.

Up
0

The publicity from the legal proceeding my burn Fletchers even worse, well lets hope so anyway.

Up
0

Yes.....its re-cycled glass as well......I need some will take a look at the costs, I'd already determined Bunnings was cheaper than PM anyway....

regards

Up
0

Thanks, will look into their stuff....initial guestimate is that its about Bunnings price, certainly less than Pmakers...

regards

Up
0

#1 Akin to this is still the Libor matter. Slater and Gordon say they may have a class action claim up 10 Biillion against Barclays alone (imagine the potential USA & worldwide civil lawsuits). It is hard to even think of a defence as the bank(s) have already done a mea culpa, which really only leaves an argument over the quantum. We may see the entire equity of several of the worlds largest banks completely wiped out: would governments (they would have to act ex post facto and trans national, in concert.)  legislate to legalise the Libor rigging?

Ergophobia 

Up
0