sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: The madness of Portugal's austerity; The Bitcoin bubble; Where did the Internet's productivity miracle go?; Why QEternity will never be reversed; Dilbert

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: The madness of Portugal's austerity; The Bitcoin bubble; Where did the Internet's productivity miracle go?; Why QEternity will never be reversed; Dilbert
<a href="http://bit.ly/107VHl0">Five key reasons people buy gold and silver</a>

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 1 pm in association with NZ Mint.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must reads today are #6 on why the money printing oop north will never reversed. I have a coffee bet in the office that central banks will start cancelling the bonds they have bought by the end of 2019. Your views?

1. Here come the NIMBYs - A bunch of Auckland councillors revolted overnight at the drive by Len Brown and Penny Hulse to get the Auckland Unitary Plan in place by the end of the year.

They sent a letter to the government behind the back of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor to the government egging them on to delay the Unitary Plan by at least three years.

There seems to be an upswell of opposition by grumpy villa dwellers over the prospect of infill housing, apartment blocks and townhouses in their neigbourhoods.

There's no suggestion these NIMBYists want to stop the migration to Auckland.

That would hurt the ever upward spiral in house prices, which (of course) benefits (mostly old) landowners at the expense of the aspirational and landless (and young).

Here's the NZHerald version of the revolt and the NBR version.

Auckland-wide community meetings have sparked angry reactions to plans in a draft copy of the unitary plan for high-rise and in-fill housing in more than half of the urban area.

Meanwhile, St Heliers residents turned out in force last night to oppose more "concrete monstrosities" destroying the character of the seaside village.

Ms Hulse and senior planner Penny Pirrit were given a clear message that plans for 12.5m and 16.5m buildings were unacceptable.

2. Chinese money laundering in Hong Kong - Reuters reports only the small fry seem to get get caught. HT Gareth.

3. What about us too? - FT reports China and Australia have agreed to start exchanging yuan for Australian dollars directly.

4. Beware of economists peddling elegant models - So says physicist Mark Buchanan in this Bloomberg opinion piece.

If economists jettisoned elegance and got to work developing more realistic models, we might gain a better understanding of how crises happen, and learn how to anticipate similarly unstable episodes in the future. The theories won’t be pretty, and probably won’t show off any clever mathematics. But we ought to prefer ugly realism to beautiful fantasy.

5. The madness in Portugal - Over the weekend Portugal's Constitutional Court smacked down some government austerity measures for being unfair on civil servants. The European Union then threatened to pull Portugal's bailout, so Portugal announced big new cuts to social security and health.

Here's Italian economist Francesco Saraceno surveying the madness of austerity.

  • Austerity did not work. Portugal is in a recessionary cycle. The economy will shrink by 2.3 per cent this year, more than twice as much as the previous government forecast (and the slowdown of exports to the rest of the eurozone, is not helping).
  • Austerity is self defeating: the deficit-to-GDP ratio widened from 4.4 per cent in 2011 to 6.4 per cent last year, and is forecasted to be 5.5 per cent in 2013. Far above the target of 3 per cent that the government had agreed with the Troika. My guess is that it will be even larger than that.
  • The magic wand of confidence is not magic. The budgetary cuts did not boost private spending, and expectations remain gloomy. The Financial Times article cites the Portuguese daily Público writing “Portugal has entered a recessionary cycle. People have no reason to believe the future will be any better. The [adjustment] programme has failed and has to be changed.” So long for the confidence fairy…

6. Helicopter QE will never be reversed - That's what Ambrose Evans Pritchard is reporting in The Telegraph, citing a bunch of very serious people.

Lord Turner, head of the now defunct Financial Services Authority, made the point more delicately. "We must tell people that if necessary, QE will turn out to be permanent." The write-off should cover "previous fiscal deficits", the stock of public debt. It should be "post-facto monetary finance".

The policy is elastic, for Lord Turner went on to argue that central banks in the US, Japan and Europe should stand ready to finance current spending as well, if push comes to shove. At least the money would go straight into the veins of the economy, rather than leaking out into asset bubbles. Today's QE relies on pushing down borrowing costs. It is "creditism". That is a very blunt tool in a deleveraging bust when nobody wants to borrow.

Lord Turner says the current policy has become dangerous, yielding ever less returns, with ever worsening side-effects. It would be better for central banks to put the money into railways, bridges, clean energy, smart grids, or whatever does most to regenerate the economy.

7. Where did the Internet's producitivity miracle go? - John Cassidy writes at the New Yorker about the mirage of a productivity dividend from the rise of the Internet.

All the talk of “Web 2.0”—2004 was the year that Tim O’Reilly, a notable Silicon Valley booster, held a conference devoted to that topic—the technology optimists argued there was plenty of scope left for further gains. Broadband penetration was rising rapidly. Social networking was in its infancy, as was the mobile revolution. Once practically everybody was permanently online, with the entire resources of the Internet at their fingertips, surely productivity would take another quantum leap.

It didn’t happen!

Since the start of 2005, productivity growth has fallen all the way back to the levels seen before the Web was commercialized, and before smart phones were invented. During the eight years from 2005 to 2012, output per hour expanded at an annual rate of just 1.5 per cent—the same as it grew between 1973 and 1996. More recently, productivity growth has been lower still. In 2011, output per hour rose by a mere 0.6 per cent, according to the latest update from the Labor Department, and last year there was more of the same: an increase of just 0.7 per cent. In the last quarter of 2012, output per hour actually fell, at an annual rate of 1.9 per cent. Americans got less productive—or so the figures said.

8. It's a bubble - So says Felix Salmon of the amazing growth of Bitcoin's market value. The chart tells the story.

 

There are a couple of reasons why the bubble is sure to burst. The first is just that it’s a bubble, and any chart which looks like the one at the top of this post is bound to end in tears at some point. But there’s a deeper reason, too — which is that bitcoins are an uncomfortable combination of commodity and currency. The commodity value of bitcoins is rooted in their currency value, but the more of a commodity they become, the less useful they are as a currency.

Still, it’s worth taking a look behind the bitcoin bubble, because there are fascinating implications for anybody who cares about payments, or currencies, or trust.

9.  A fun bike ride - This is totally irrelevant but fun. HT @samfromwgtn

Brooklyn Brewery Mash - A trip through BK in 3000 photos from Paul Trillo on Vimeo.

10. Totally Jon Stewart on how legislation is made in America. Just plain ugly. In an hilarious way.

 

And Part 2...

(Updated with cartoons, corrects link to NBR article in #1)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

33 Comments

Auto-play videos = bad;

Also links for NZ and NBR for no 1. are the same.

Up
0

Shroom

Fair enough on autoplay. Didn't realise it would do that. Won't use Vimeos in future.

I have corrected the missing NBR link.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Are youse lot in NZ also getting a sign on the video link apologising for unavailabilty , but saying that at least you've got boomerangs & kangaroos ? ......

 

.... we lot here in Oz reckon that's mighty fine humour there ....

 

Yup , real cutting edge stuff ......... ahemmmmmmmm !

Up
0

Re 6. Amazing how long it has taken to work that one out. If my left pocket borrows from my right  pocket to pay off my loan from you, do you really care if my right pocket ever gets  repaid by my left pocket. Smoke and mirrors boys.

Up
0

Some peasants will recall our current govt mob borrowing loot so they could help pay for the bailouts in the EU ....or did you forget!.....it was a "request" from the IMF...darlings yes!....anyways it seems to me we may be approaching the point where surviving economies...such as this one....will be expected to fork out heaps more to bail out the gross failures....or has this been going on without our being informed!

Up
0

Yep we will be wooly...forking over that is....but remember the Govt giveth away what's yours , and the Govt taketh away  what's yours........and no " guarantee" they won't need some your personal deposit funds too...... 

Up
0

On #6 you've got a coffee bet that matures in 2019 on bond cancellations by Central Banks..?

 Boy you really put it there don't you just Bernard.......2019 to collect a coffee...? is the other party flying you to Brazil for it...?

I'm just picturing you running up to this person mid 2019 and saying loudly , ha ha ,  do you owe me a coffee or what...!

Of course if this person is normal he/ she would have well forgotten it causing you to detail the event and year it took place.

Yawning  uncontrollabley the other party responds , yeah yeah here you go knock yourself out.....

 Crikey Bernard...! that's nuts on the line stuff there.

Up
0

Christov

Yep. I'm a risky sort of guy. 

But not as risky as all those people betting on a bond market implosion when the central banks try to sell these bonds.

That cancellation decision, when it comes, is going to shock a few people.

Twill be a mighty satisfying coffee ;)

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

#3

Some time back i showed how our economy with global supply and local demand MUST lead to a common currency. This is the start of a common currency for this part of the word.

Direct trade in currency. Oh well we may as well combine our currencies, blah, blah.

 

Think. No way, we have learned from Europe. No we havent.

Up
0

#2

What about the tax havens.

Why is nobody talking about the two and a half million leaked files on money stashed in tax havens?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A long-term analysis of more than 2.5 million leaked e-mails and financial documents, conducted by several news organizations, has shed some rare light on the secretive network of tax havens and offshore accounts where a number of the world’s elite park their fortunes.

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists culled through 260 gigabytes of data — more than 2.5 million files, most of them e-mails — to produce the new report. The leaked data, originally stored on a single computer hard drive, “arrived in the mail” after the ICIJ published an expose on Australia’s Firepower scandal, but the group doesn’t specify where (or whom) it came from.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/04/05/offshore-world-2-5-million-leaked-files-reveal-stunning-extent-of-global-tax-havens/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Are there any Kiwi's on the list?

 

Up
0

Mike

I included it in Friday's Top 10 ;)

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Bernard, you mentioned about robots in the work place. I said the military and police will eventually be robots and that the 1% will be guarded by them.

 

Well it aint too far away

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/04/petman-dressed/

Pentagon’s Humanoid Disaster-Rescue Robot Is Dressed to Impress

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Up
0

#6

QEternity will continue and we will have hyper inflation.

The problem is the economy will remain slugish while the hyper inflation takes place in the investment world.

 

Global investments will soar, and soar as the investment markets gets swamped with everyones dollars.

Up
0

Re the Unitary Plan - existing home owners, 9 of 20 councillors and government against the plan - the longer they delay/prevent it the higher house prices go - the MP's and councillors are all into the property investment trough and in many cases are getting closer to retirement, so the longer they can delay anything that may see greater supply of housing the better off they are - prices up, rents up - all good for the vested interest eh!

Up
0

On the Unitary Plan; are the councillors who want to delay its effect by three years largely associated with the Nats? My understanding is that Christine Fletcher is, and assume the others to be. 

There will be NIMBYs everywhere; but make no mistake, its the Nats who clearly want to delay any action. No recent word from Nick Smith who seems to have rightly been hobbled. I understand his preference, and presumably that of the Nats, is to let anyone build what they want on farmland very distant from the City. I remain very sceptical that will ease price pressures closer to the city, and suspect as a ratepayer that I would end up having to pay for the roads, and infrastructure to connect it all; while abandoning any realistic thoughts of a workable public transport model being built.. 

I realise I can't have it both ways, and believe the Unitary Plan is a better approach to supplying a growing functioning city, even if some of my own NIMBY thoughts have to be compromised.

Up
0

"A ramshackle fishing boat carrying 66 suspected asylum seekers from Sri Lanka has arrived in Australia - carrying passengers holding a sign saying "We want to go to New Zealand". herald

Not silly are they...heading for the welfare state...knowing the socialists sooner or later will be in the Beehive...with boosted benefits for sure..think of the extended family rort...all those potential votes....Can any one see Shearer on board...lending a hand?

Up
0

Well you gotta see the funny side of it wooly.......at least Gillard can say to Key....no, no they're yours the sign said so, we'll um, process them for you right after we sort out their cricket potential .

I understand a couple of Chinese fishing  vessels helped point the way to New Zealand.....not..! ha ha ha ha. we send them to redneck country instead hee hee hee.

Up
0

The generational malcontent and resident pot stirrer slips it in the copy again, glad it didn't make your must read list there Bernard...... Do you ever get any urges when you see old people dithering about  in their purse at the Bank queue..? huh ...well do ya Bernard...?Do ya read the obituaries while listening to  "another one bites the dust " punching the air triumphantly...?......

The conversation...is important, the obsession is just plain unhealthy.

There seems to be an upswell of opposition by grumpy villa dwellers over the prospect of infill housing, apartment blocks and townhouses in their neigbourhoods.

There's no suggestion these NIMBYists want to stop the migration to Auckland.

 

That would hurt the ever upward spiral in house prices, which (of course) benefits (mostly old) landowners at the expense of the aspirational and landless (and young)

No mention of  migrant pressure on housing, no mention of foreign Capital  crushing local aspirations........unbalanced  piece Bernard...!   What's the journo's credo again...?,

Oh I don't need to know , but you might wanna look it up in the interests of interest.co. 

Up
0

a) Indirectly if Interest publishes along the lines of PDK's and my posts the readers wont come as they dont want bad news disturbing their little wolrd.  All they really want to hear is all will be well for 30 years so the mortgage payments will be fine, ditto retirement pension plans.
b) Their advertisers want to sell product, you only sell well into a happy market....
Personally I think I see a clear distinction between DavidC's ethos and outlook (bright and sunny) and BH's (suspect behind the clouds in the way its peeing down)......

regards
 

Up
0

Cheers Stevo...wasn't showing preference for ethos there, just pointing out poorly balanced copy, compounded with personal agenda on Bernard's part.

 For the most part i like his willingness to skew to the negative, I have a nephew exactly the same...what if...but then...look out...and so forth, nothing wrong in that , just screams not a risk taker and that's fine too.

 BTW if interest published your or PDK 's outlook.....well matey it does , and we are still here, and that's just fine too.

Up
0

Hullo Count : Got any special skills visas available at the immigration dept.  ? ....... we have a boatload of refugees , 65 of them , turned up in Geralton yesterday , from Sri Lanka , with a sign saying " NZ or bust "  ........

 

.... and they reckon they possess special skills which no one in New Zealand currently has ....

 

.They can play cricket !

Up
0

Hello GBH... yes , yes was just pointing that out earlier, although I thought the Aussies might have the good sense to pick the talent  prior to the transfer, just to uh...um...sure up that endless pool of Cricketing genius they have been sooooo accustomed to.

However we are in need of immigrants for the Phillipino's to make fun of...so they should do quite nicely. 

Up
0

Im curious about what you see  as  BH's personal agenda v DavidCs?

"outlook" yes and listen to some of the right/libertarian's complain!    Ive said before I write to clear my thoughts. and get them tested....in fire LOL.

 

regards

Up
0

Stevo, don't quite know how David C got into this at all ....just follow what I said not what you may think I'm saying.

It's ok with me Bernard's take on things, your take on things and so on , but the piece was barbed , inflammatory, unbalanced, and smacking of a very personal agenda to raise generational angst whenever wherever possible, conveniently omitting pertenant evidence to the issue being discussed...Demand for Housing .

 Blame,.... Steven, most all of his copy that involves Boomers, is looking to Blame in the most all encompassing way...to lay it at the feet of those who did no more than live and  develop under the rules and growth environment set by Administrations of the time.

Now if we are talking about our (the species) head on collision with it's own demands.....we all have a hand in it Steven...all....not so much a hand in it as a dick in it.....

Bernard must lay awake at night trying to reconcile growth positive with what is clearly staring us all in the face. 

Up
0

No mention of  migrant pressure on housing, no mention of foreign Capital  crushing local aspirations.

 

Ssshhhh....  Bernard has  hobby horse and wants to thrash it.

 

If he reflected on demand side pressures, which I have yet to see him do, he might get around to looking at the issues of unbalanced migration policy heavily favouring continued population growth and hence  driving the population ponzi or hot money.   But it would probably upset the bank advertisers on this site if any meaningful research was done into one of the factors driving house prices higher.  So I think he will continue to bash the older folk as they likely don't advertise or read much on this site.

Up
0

dp

Up
0

Guys I think you are being a little harsh on BH. I think he is just stating the obvious. If Aucklands city council plan is that housing demand is satisfied by building up more than out but local communities kill this by a thousand objections then the only possible outcome is house price rises.

 

He further notes that this benefits the objectors who own property and further the objectors do not propose solutions that might reduce housing demand like cutting immigration or foreignors buying NZ property. He rightly calls this selfish. As the objectors are only concerned about themselves not the wider community.

Up
0

The same can be aid of course for those with a particular political view point to push....

regards

Up
0

By the way Steven I have no problem with interest.co.nz publishing yours and PDK viewpoints. It is a strength of this website that it publishes and discusses such a broad range of views.

Up
0

It shows a jolly sporting attitude on Bernard's part ( not to mention a deep dark sense of horror humour ) that he happily allows those two personages to blog here ....

Up
0

Now you see Stevo....that was a veiled statement by you right there, did you mean me..? or iconoclast...or who....or was it David C, because if it was, I've certainly missed his direction,

I wouldn't  reinstall that polished turd Key if my life depended on it....the man is a self centered, self interested, prevaricator of unmatched proportion ..in my opinion.

Up
0

I think you are being a little harsh on BH

 

Actually, I think we are being pretty light on Bernard. He seems to be struggling with the concept that a static population might be a good thing for the aspirational set of people who want to own their own property.   And that the apparent need to build up and out would not be there if the population was static.

 

The less well off, particularly renters and lower income people, would benefit from the population ponzi being paused.

 

I've recently seen a landlord here put up the rent to someone on the DPB to "fair market rent" and suggest that they go to WINZ. Obviously to get the accomodation supplement raised so that the extra rent can be paid. Now, who exactly is paying for the accomodation supplement. And who is the ulitmate beneficiary?

 

By taking the demand pressure off there would be less ability for those landlords to jack their rents up as there would be less people bidding up the asking prices for rentals. And less demand on the public purse by way of the accomodation supplement.

 

 

Up
0

Cheers Brendon.....if , the copy read like yours.....it prolly wouldn't get a raise,  you missed my point however......the incidence of the homeowners being old is not relevant...so there is no point in Bernard repeatedly using it as some kind of plan by the collective old  to rob the future from the young......it is , an unintended consequence of what people have done under successive Administrations ....and will continue to do........unfortunately it's part of the human condition.

Up
0