sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Wednesday's Top 10: Why India's rupee is having its throat slit; Will peak people solve peak oil?; 'Just raise the wage share'; Contact's abandoned wind farm plan; The Daily Show and 'Business Harlem'; Dilbert

Wednesday's Top 10: Why India's rupee is having its throat slit; Will peak people solve peak oil?; 'Just raise the wage share'; Contact's abandoned wind farm plan; The Daily Show and 'Business Harlem'; Dilbert
This daily collection of links and comment was previously sponsored by NZ Mint. We'd welcome a new sponsor.

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at midday today.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #2 on the need to increase the wage share in developed economies such as the UK and US.

1. India's 'Black Friday' - Over the last six years we've seen financial crises break out in the strangest places and at the most unexpected times.

Who would have thought back in 2007 when everyone was patting everyone else on the back about the death of the recession and endlessly strong and low inflationary growth that we'd endure a series of crises breaking out in the likes of Iceland, Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain, California and Florida.

Now India and Indonesia are in crisis mode as their currencies slump. 

Foreign investors who piled their money into India and Indonesia during the emerging markets boom of the last four or five years are now worried about their current account deficit and foreign debt, particularly as many rush back to invest in America in the wake of the spike in bond yields.

Here's The Washington Post on India's 'Black Friday'. Maybe the New Zealand dollar needs its own haka. The rupee seems to share the throat-slitting gesture used in Kapo o Pango.

The currency has become a powerful metaphor for India’s rapidly sliding economy. The rupee has triggered countless jokes and political mudslinging, and like everything in India, it has generated astrological speculation, too.

Some superstitious Indians have blamed the slump on the new symbol for the rupee, which was unveiled last year. Experts on vastu shastra, an ancient Indian design practice similar to feng shui, say that the symbol debuted on a day inauspicious for the stars and that the horizontal line across the symbol appears to “slit the throat” of the currency.

Some economists, meanwhile, blame the rupee’s recent misfortune on plans by the U.S. Federal Reserve to begin scaling back its massive effort to stimulate the U.S. economy, which has tended to keep the dollar weak compared with other currencies.

2. 'Raise the wage share' - Academic Stewart Lansley writes in The Guardian about the problem of a low wage economy.

According to the still dominant economic orthodoxy, the shift from wages to profits should have boosted investment and productivity. Yet in both the UK and the US, booming profits have been associated with falling investment. This is because the sustained squeeze on wages has created a number of highly damaging economic distortions. It has sucked out demand and encouraged debt-fuelled consumption. Because labour is cheap, firms have less incentive to invest in training and become more productive, helping to turn the UK into an increasingly low value-added and low-skilled economy.

Instead of the boost to wealth and job-creating activity promised by economic theorists, the Anglo-Saxon economies have created a series of asset bubbles while allowing a boom in wealth-diverting schemes – from lucrative but unnecessary merger activity to private equity takeovers – that have squeezed the wage base, enriched the few and stifled productivity.

Even discussion of the 'distribution question' – how to divide the cake between wages and profits – has been dismissed as heresy by market theorists. "Of the tendencies that are harmful to sound economics, the most poisonous is to focus on questions of distribution" is how Robert E Lucas, the Chicago-based Nobel Laureate and the principal architect of the pro-market orthodoxy, put it in 2003.

Yet the evidence is overwhelming: an excessive imbalance between these key economic aggregates leads to fragile and unstable economies and will prevent sustainable recovery. To overcome this imbalance requires a new economic model that returns the wage share closer to its post-war level, with big firms devoting more of their profits to pay.

3. About over-population - This Slate piece has been around for a couple of months, but it's a nice in-depth look at long term global population trends and the likelihood of peak people around 2070. 

Maybe this is one way we start to deal with peak resources.

If the Germany of today is the rest of the world tomorrow, then the future is going to look a lot different than we thought. Instead of skyrocketing toward uncountable Malthusian multitudes, researchers at Austria’s International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis foresee the global population maxing out at 9 billion some time around 2070. On the bright side, the long-dreaded resource shortage may turn out not to be a problem at all. On the not-so-bright side, the demographic shift toward more retirees and fewer workers could throw the rest of the world into the kind of interminable economic stagnation that Japan is experiencing right now. And in the long term—on the order of centuries—we could be looking at the literal extinction of humanity.

That might sound like an outrageous claim, but it comes down to simple math. According to a2008 IIASA report, if the world stabilizes at a total fertility rate of 1.5—where Europe is today—then by 2200 the global population will fall to half of what it is today. By 2300, it’ll barely scratch 1 billion. (The authors of the report tell me that in the years since the initial publication, some details have changed—Europe’s population is falling faster than was previously anticipated, while Africa’s birthrate is declining more slowly—but the overall outlook is the same.) Extend the trend line, and within a few dozen generations you’re talking about a global population small enough to fit in a nursing home.

4. Double Oops - Archdaily reported the rather excitable developers of a skyscraper in Benidorm decided they would double the height of the fancy double-barreled structure pictured below. But they forgot to create bigger spaces for more powerful lifts, so the top half of the building can't be used. Update. Turned out this story was too good to be true, barcepundit reported. My apologies. 

5. When power demand flattens - Stuff reports Contact Energy announced yesterday it was dropping plans for a big new windfarm in the Waikato. 

6. Not so reliable - Marketwatch reports Chinese economic data may overstate Chinese GDP by around US$1 trillion or 8% to 12%.

"There is strong evidence indicating that the rate of real Chinese GDP growth, and ultimately total real GDP, may be significantly over stated," said Christopher Balding, associate professor at Peking University's HSBC Business School, and the report's author.

Through "significant and systematic irregularities", official estimates overstate China's true GDP by 8 to 12 percent, or $1 trillion, according to Balding.

7. What happens when interest rates rise - Economonitor reports US mortgage approvals have slumped since early May as long term interest rates have risen. Fixed mortgage rates in America are based on long term wholesale mortgage rates. 

Mortgage applications have been on a brutal decline that started in early May. For the week ending August 9, the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Composite Index dropped 4.7%, with the Refinance Index down 4% and the Purchase Index down 5%. It isn’t a fluke. Mortgage applications have plunged 50% from early May and have hit a level not seen since April 2011.

Average interest rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, at 4.56%, are nearly a full percentage point higher than in early May. These higher rates have been colliding with much higher home prices. Result: a dizzying jump in mortgage payments. Sticker shock for prospective buyers.

8. 'Strategic nepotism' - FT reports US authorities are investigating JP Morgan Chase for corruptly employing the children of China's leaders, often known as 'Princelings'.

What John Foley of Breaking Views dubs “strategic nepotism” is widespread in China: gaining contracts is a lot easier with the help of a well-connected official, or the son or daughter – or even cousin – of the right person.

Western banks hire the princeling class, although they are finding it harder than they used to as China develops its own private equity groups, and so do Chinese companies. It is taken for granted that this is how business gets done.

It’s an untested question as to whether such practices amount to a breach of the US Foreign and Corrupt Practices Act or the UK Bribery Act. Since no money changes hands, apart from a salary and bonus, it isn’t a clear-cut offence, but there is clearly something murky going on.

9. North Korea's P problem - WSJ reports some things just can't be kept out, even in the world's most repressive and cut off country.

This turns out to be an export industry that turned on its host... Mercantilism has a lot to answer for.

North Korea is experiencing a “drug epidemic,” according to a study published in the Spring 2013 edition of the journal North Korea Review.

“A New Face of North Korean Drug Use: Upsurge in Methamphetamine Abuse Across the Northern Areas of North Korea” explains how during the past several years meth production has gone from government-owned factories to privately run underground laboratories and “home kitchens.”

According to the report, it’s not the first time that a drug originally intended for export into China and beyond ended up flooding North Korea’s domestic market.

10. Totally The Daily Show on 'Frisky Business' in 'Business Harlem' (Wall St) Truly brilliant satire. 

(Updated with link to correct Spanish elevator story)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

31 Comments

#1

"Who would have thought back in 2007 when everyone was patting everyone else on the back about the death of the recession and endlessly strong and low inflationary growth that we'd endure a series of crises breaking out in the likes of Iceland, Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain, California and Florida."

 

There were some eg Steve Keen who know what the real deal is but were drowned out by the propaganda, ridiculed and dismissed as "gloomsters" by the pollyannas like Gummy Bear Hero around here.

 

Max Keiser is another straight shooter.  He describes today how:

"Mom and Pop investors taken out on a slab and their wealth burnt to a crisp by the high cathedral of fraud that is the New York Stock Exchange and its degenerate priests of high finance."

 

US mom and pop investors have poured $92 billion into Wall Street so far this year. The only other time they came any where near this amount was in 2007! LOL

 

They always come in at the top, and they always come in with borrowed money.

Up
0

Well said.....

regards

Up
0

#4. That article is pretty light, not anywhere near enough information to determine what has really happened there. Elevators are about flow, the higher you go the less capacity is required. So structurally it shouldn't have been a problem.  My guess is that the real story is closer to someone put a penthouse at the top where the elevator plant was supposed to go without the Architect knowning.

 

Edit: In the comment stream below the article there are claims the story is wrong.

 

Up
0

#3 - OK, I'll bite.

No way we support those theoretical numbers, they need fed, watered, sheltered, and kept from pandemic before the crest. A small matter of some shortages........

 

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120618-global-resources-stock-check

 

#5 - it's had them scratching their heads for some time, but demand has failed to track upwards, as they-all predicted.

 

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=nz&v=81

Up
0

If the Germany of today is the rest of the world tomorrow, then the future is going to look a lot different than we thought.

  .. and if the sky should fall we shall all collect larks.
Up
0

#5.   And when Rio Tinto stops sucking the Gubmint teat and - er - pulls away in 2017, and we all have 20% more sustainable generation capacity, I wonder what we'll do with it?  My bet: the Nissan Leaf will be the Tree by then, and we'll merrily car around, propelled by Excited Electrons, bought by the exports of our very own Miracle White Powder.

Sustainable Utopia!

 

#9.  Well, really, if You were stuck with a Great Dictator, and most of your country cousins have Grass Pie every weekday and Bark Pie on alternate Sundays, would not the odd vein-full of chemical propellant sound good?

 

And I must say, the fact that 'private' entrepreneurs have gone Breaking Bad, does not sound exactly like a Triumph of Central Planning....but perhaps no-one has mustered the courage to inform the GD of this fact.  He does seem to be a Tetchy fellow.

Up
0

glitch in theory.

Miracle white powder is powdered oil.

But the first part is do-able.Fellow round here is batch-building electric Rav-4's. It'll come.

Up
0

Of possible interest could be that  The Tesla S uses 0.237kwh per kilometre. At say 25 cents per kwh, that would amount to $6 to run 100 kilometres. And the Tesla is a sporty electric model. More frugal versions no doubt do somewhat better still. They both compare pretty well to my admittedly not very economic petrol car costing probably $20 in fuel for 100ks.

The electric car of course currently costs a premium; but presumably electric cars will get cheaper fairly quickly, and be made more readily available in NZ.

Up
0

Scalability of batteries is the problem. The car technology has been around for over 100 years.

 

http://inventors.about.com/od/estartinventions/a/History-Of-Electric-Vehicles.htm

 

I remember following one in the 1972 International Vintage Rally - towed it's own generator on a trailer..... Which brings us to the other problem for the Tesla - in the US, coal is the primary electricity generator. Interestingly, though, PV uptake world-wide has apparently increased by100% in the last year  - can't find the link but I trust the source. That is remarkable - what else is doing that?

Up
0

Most things about the electric car are great.  Problem does seem the be the battery.  Been 100 years and I don't think they are going to find a solution.

Electricity, even at our inflated prices in New Zealand, is amazingly cheap compared to petroleum.   Tiny.  Just a tiny cost.  Imagine how we would do as a country if we did not need to import oil because we had found a useful way to get that electrcity into a car.

Hydrogen as an energy store in a vehicle, combined in an adapted internal combustion engine has real promise.  Given the internal combustion engine has strength and adaptibility.  Think trucks and tractors, as well as small cars.   And essentially non polluting.

Hydrogen vehicles, using fuel cells, are available.  But the vehicles are eyewatering expensive.  

Apparently in the United States the hydrogen used in vehicles is 'cracked' out of natural gas.  Thats quite a bizarre way to do things.  And PDK sees an electrolysis process as bad.  Not sure why.  

Sources of electricity such as photovoltaic - or maybe wind - are the way.  Because that way we could use those variable supply to create storable hydrogen.

Imagine a carport with photovoltaic roof, where you park and fill up your car which has a hydrogen fueled internal combustion engine.  In the corner there is a fidge sized unit which converts the electricity into hydrogen.  All day creating the hydrogen and storing it.

Question is:  Just what is the make up of that unit.  ?

Might be an easier problem to solve than the battery one.

 

Up
0

KH - where to start?  Firstly, electricity isn't 'amazingly cheap' per kwh, compared to oil/petrol.

 

http://avt.inel.gov/pdf/fsev/costs.pdf

 

Second, the EROEI of solar/wind to hydrogen is terrible. As is hydrogen storage, and transport. Worse than those LPG cylinders - remember them?

 

You miss the point with 'the combustion engine'. It's already only 30-40% efficient, and you want to put through it something you've processed and then processed? EROEI, sorry

 

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2007/08/hydrogen-hype-49540

(read the coloured box, right-hand side)

 

Non-polluting? Only if you discount all the bulld/maintain/replace of the infrastructure, the virtual water, the..........   mind you, we discount too much now. I was at the 'Valuing Nature' conference in Wngtn recently - those were the most savvy of the middle class; and they were a long way from 'getting it'. They reminded me of F&B about 30 years ago. It's a problem irrespective of this issue,

 

I don't see it as 'bad', but I don't see it as efficient, and I don't see growth economics surviving on it.

Up
0

The problem being discussed is how to store energy, renewable energy at that. There is still no better solution that woodgas, but it means slowing down a bit.

Up
0

A bit? :)  We already use 40% of the photosynthesis on the planet, for our own purposes (I seem to remember)

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1310258?uid=3738776&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21102541390241

 

But what the heck, let's appropriate some more....     :)

Up
0

We spend an awful lot of energy pushing air and water, a needless waste really. I would suspect a large portion of that 40% is wasted to atmosphere as well. Making charcoal is common in the third world and that wastes 70% of the energy. But my point is more that in terms of a sustainable method of storing the energy from photosynthesis wood is the best kid on the block. It is a joke amongst gasification circles when people come up with all sorts of fanciful ideas on how to convert biomass to liquid fuel, why bother it is stored right there in the wood for you.

Up
0

"But my point is more that in terms of a sustainable method of storing the energy from photosynthesis wood is the best kid on the block."

 

Nice to be able to 100% agree with you on something Scarfie. The relationship between people and planet, as with people and people, can be sustained by the use of good wood.

(Although Mr F was booted out of bed this morning after a particularly potent gasification.)

 

 

Up
0

Sorry PDK.  But I used the calculator you provided and the km electricity cost come out about 6 cents.  Maybe a bit more.  Ties in with Stephen L's figure above.   But certainly less than than the 15 cents per km in my loverly new efficient vehicle.  And much more than my previous vehicle at a whole lot more than 20 cents.

We will disagree I am sure.  But I see those differences as amazingly cheap.

It's a different subject.  But that's calculated using current electricity prices.  Which in my view are overpriced by multiples.

As for the EROEI.  There is a hole in the logic chain on that one.  And in the article you cited as well.  

You won't agree.  And I won't do the perjorative that you 'don't get it' 

But simply put.  Yes there are 'inefficiencies'.  But these are everywhere.   Working on efficiency and EROEI as the criteria for all things just don't work.  If we did - there would be no point in eating breakfast -or lunch or dinner.

Up
0

Lots of day dreaming / wishful thinking in your piece...reality check time...

Hydrogen seems like fusion, its unlikely to ever be close to affordable if it ever works on the scale ie many hundreds of millions of cars we have now. eg A petrol Mits is about 19kNZ, MiEv 65kNZ, hyrdogen cell well I dont think you would get one for <200k.  I think you will find 20 years from now maybe 20% of ppl owning a car today. Like the 1920s, era of the Bentley for the rich and upper middle class.  The rest of us will be on public transport or self powered.

Electrolysis is a conversion process, with losses. So seperate it, you then have to get the hydrogen into the tank in a quantity thats usable, quite a challenge ie it lacks energy density. On each car port? doubt it. Not sure I want such a unit anywhere near my house. EVs, yes but their economics?  really not sure, there are a lot of Qs to answer....Ive not seen any good analysis yet.

Id tend to think bio-deisel is more interesting...in NZ.

regards

 

 

 

 

Up
0

And basically this is Contact confirming the industry view that Tiwai will start winding down in 2017. Possibly just the first of many generation projects to get shelved in the next few years.

Up
0

Um no, I think Meridian has already slowed or stopped 2 or 3?  For the last 4 years we have not used more power, before that we were using 2~4% more per year.  So with a static demand profile, commercially it makes no sense. So I doubt its significantly a Rio thing, but maybe that was the last nail.

Its a pity we dont look to retire fossil plant or build more resiliancy (spare), I think we'll pay a cost for that.

regards

 

 

Up
0

#3.  A shrinking population would be good for so many reasons.   The human race probably can support starflight in the future with much less than 100 million.  And the planet would thank us and our fewer descendents would have much more fun and will thank us as well.

And, what is the problem with a different demographic profile.  Without have to fund the enormous costs of growth, which quite frankly cripple us right now, we will have plenty of capacity to look after the extra oldies.

Up
0

Trouble is, it's already happening, but only in a part of the human race. Part of the human race is not replacing itself now, while another part continues to breed at a staggering rate. I do not see the future for the world looking like Germany at all

Up
0

And will increase, we should be more concerned than we are, as it will get into the food chain as it's leeching into the sea.

I suggest anyone who thinks putting nuclear power plants on earthquake prone land should take a wee look at this

Up
0

Quit fearmongering. A coal fired power station puts out more radiation than a nuclear one of the same capacity.

 

In terms of deaths per trillion kWh produced, coal comes in at 170,000 and nuclear 90 (including all "disasters").

 

Up
0

Wheres the housing shortage if almost 10% of Auckland dwellings are uninhabited?

Up
0

There is one a few houses up from us. Asian buyers spent $1.2 million on a brand new house over two years ago and it has never been lived in. The government should force the sale of these properties. 

Up
0

That is the exact thing that those of us who want restrictions on foreign ownership mean. I do not live in Auckland, when I am there I am fairly confined to one area, but occasionally I may have to go somewhere else for some reason or other. The last two occasions, some months ago now, were to Northcote and to Pakuranga. In the short time I spent there and the confined areas I was in, I saw a number of houses that displayed all the hallmarks of lack of occupancy

Up
0

ZZ: you should understand that the residents of Northcote and Pakuranga do not fit your profile of passionate globe-trotting followers of nz-cricket or nz-rugby

Up
0

From my experience they always leave the servants/tenants behind to take care of the property just in case an unfortunate, but nonetheless prolonged detention in a transit lounge transpires.

Up
0

On Japan and a declining population, I am always intrigued how that is presented as a disaster. There are 16 people per sq kilometre in NZ compared to 337 in Japan. I know which one I would prefer (although I did enjoy living in Tokyo for 3 months in 2000). Quite possibly the Japanese would be very happy with only say 100 million (or even the 81 million they had in 1950) compared to their current 125 million. I'm not even sure the transition will be all that painful. They already have very low unemployment. The high government debt is owed to Japanese- and presumably the older Japanese, who will leave that asset to their children, who then in theory can pay off the debt in taxes. Income per capita is pretty good.

As in NZ and everywhere there is some pain for small towns as urbanisation occurs. And getting old has its downsides no matter what I guess.

But if I was them I wouldn't worry all that much about too few babies until the population was closer to say 80 million, or even less.

Up
0

I believe a couple of shifts in attitudes will change this to a very positive thing. The first is that those who can continue to work, should, and regard it as a plus, work keeps you connected and your mind and body acitve, and ageism needs to be shown the door, pdq. You can't begrudge people a pension and discriminate against them in job market at the same time, surely.

Up
0

Updated to reflect the Spanish skyscraper story was wrong. My apologies. 

cheers

Bernard

Up
0