sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Wednesday's Top 10: Too big to fail and too big to manage; A rocket tax?; Complex systems and black swans; 2 mln Internet opinion analysts; Dilbert

Wednesday's Top 10: Too big to fail and too big to manage; A rocket tax?; Complex systems and black swans; 2 mln Internet opinion analysts; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 am today. As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #3 about negative externalities and a tax on satellite launches. I liked Gravity a lot. 

1.  Too big to fail - And too big to manage. That's the view of former ING CEO Jan Hommen in this FT interview on the big global banks. He should know.

The Dutch government had to bail out his bank.

He raises a good point about size and global-ness.

Sometimes really, really big companies are not good at managing risk.

Some might argue Fonterra faces the same challenge.

Here's a now contrite Mr Hommen:

“When you look at how big this company was, we were everywhere,” Mr Hommen said in an interview. “Running a global empire is not that simple. Running two global empires – one in banking, one in insurance – was even more difficult.”

2. A rocket tax? - Anyone who has seen Gravity (it has amazing pictures of space junk destroying things) and thinks about economics (which means me) will love this piece from Quartz about the prospects for a tax on rockets to fix the problem of space junk.

Earlier this year, a group of economists from Indiana-Purdue University, the US Federal Communications Commission, and the US Naval Academy tried to figure out how to limit the potential damage to a satellite industry that is responsible for everything from internet communications to GPS networks, and which was worth some $170 billion in 2012.

“Orbital debris is space pollution,” the authors wrote in their study. “Space debris, an externality generated by expended launch vehicles and damaged satellites, reduces the realized value of space activities by increasing the probability of damaging existing satellites or other space vehicles.”

The study found that commercial satellite firms launch more satellites than is “socially desirable,” and they use launch technology that is more likely to create debris “because they only compare individual marginal benefits and costs of their technology choice and fail to take into account social benefits and costs.” That puts space debris squarely into the category of a “negative externality,” much like regular Earth-bound pollution, where the costs are unfairly borne by a third party—in this case just about everyone else on Earth.

3. The new US$100 bill - FT reports today is a bad day for counterfeiters. Their favourite note has been changed to try to stop them in their tracks. The new US$100 bill has a 3D security ribbon and a new watermark, but it's still made of paper. When the note is tilted, images of bells and numeric 100s move side to side and up and down. The ribbon is woven into the note rather than printed.

Cool.

But our plastic money is cooler.

4. Peak soil - We've had peak everything else so we may as well have peak soil. Here's The Week on why nutrition is disappearing from food and what can be done about. They key is re-mineralisation. I grew up on a dairy farm in Galatea where there is a shortage of all sorts of nutrients such as cobalt and selenium because of the various volcanic soils around. We used to put out salt blocks for the cows.

Take phosphorus, for example. Vegetables and fruits grown in phosphorus-abundant soil have less starch and sugar, and feature higher concentrations of other important minerals and nutrients. Yet, the nutrient-rich produce looks the same as if it had been grown in phosphorus-deficient soil, making it difficult for consumers to rally behind the cause. Getting a critical mass of consumers is especially important because the cost of reintroducing a healthy supply of phosporus into just an acre of soil is about $10,000.

That's the crux of the problem for remineralization. While reintroducing phytonutrients and minerals into our soil would require a widespread commitment to invest more in our food, rallying the masses to get behind soil enhancement poses some unsurprising challenges. As David Montgomery, author of Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations says, "Unfortunately, saving dirt just isn't a very sexy issue."

5. Dr Evil and Austin Powers - This Microsoft video featuring Steve Ballmer as Dr Evil and Bill Gates as Austin Powers is fun in a retrospectively accurate way from the point of view of shareholders.

6. Black swans - This academic paper in 1996 from Richard Cook at University of Chicago on complex systems is accidentally prescient about the problems of complex systems and catastrophic failure uncovered during the Global Financial Crisis.

He was writing about power and computing networks, but could easily have been talking about the Global Financial System.

Complex systems possess potential for catastrophic failure. Human practitioners are nearly always in close physical and temporal proximity to these potential failures – disaster can occur at any time and in nearly any place. The potential for catastrophic outcome is a hallmark of complex systems. It is impossible to eliminate the potential for such catastrophic failure; the potential for such failure is always present by the system’s own nature.

7. Now there's a fun job - As an occasional moderator on Interest's comment sections, I found this BBC article about China's army of 2 million Internet content moderators profoundly depressing. It would have to be the world's worst job creation scheme.

Tang Xiaotao has been working as a monitor for less than six months, the report says, without revealing where he works.

"He sits in front of a PC every day, and opening up an application, he types in key words which are specified by clients.

"He then monitors negative opinions related to the clients, and gathers (them) and compile reports and send them to the clients," it says.

8. The story of Dread Pirate Roberts - The arrest of Ross William Ulbricht and the closure of Silk Road last week by the FBI is fascinatingly modern story about how the Internet works and how the Government will always get you in the end. Kim Dotcom should read this. Bitcoin enthusiasts should definitely read it. 

Ulbricht called himself Dread Pirate Roberts after the character in The Princess Bride. Ulbricht is not a great advertisement for libertarianism.

This Arstechnica piece is excellent. It unravels how the FBI found him.

Sure, you could buy meth, LSD, cannabis, heroin, and MDMA on the Silk Road, but the hidden website wasn't (just) about drugs. Silk Road was, said its owner, about freedom. In January 2012, as part of a "State of the Road Address" posted in the site's discussion forum, the Dread Pirate Roberts explained the site's goal: "To grow into a force to be reckoned with that can challenge the powers that be and at last give people the option to choose freedom over tyranny."

To that end, the Dread Pirate Roberts built the Silk Road marketplace in 2011 as a "hidden" service accessible only over the encrypted Tor network. To connect, users first had to install a Tor client and then visit a series of arcane site names (the most recent was silkroadfb5piz3r.onion), but the reward was a simple, effective marketplace to buy drugs from sellers all over the world using such Internet commerce staples as escrow accounts and buyer feedback. The product was shipped through the mail, direct from seller to buyer, keeping the Dread Pirate Roberts clean. The only link between him and the drugs was the money, and Roberts eventually took only the electronic currency called Bitcoin to make this hard to trace. He even ran a program called a "tumbler" to route incoming Bitcoin payments through a complicated series of dummy transactions, so as to make them infeasible to trace through the public Bitcoin blockchain. Out of each transaction, Roberts took a cut—8 to 15 percent, depending on the size of the sale.

This eventually earned Roberts a pirate's treasure. By 2013, Silk Road had nearly one million user accounts. In the 2.5 years the site operated, it facilitated 1.2 million transactions worth 9.5 million Bitcoins—or about $1.2 billion in total money exchanged. (Bitcoin values varied widely over this period.) Roberts picked up a cool $80 million in commissions.

9. How much wood can a woodchuck chuck? - Pimco's Bill Gross puts his finger on the big question in global markets right now. How high will interest rates rise before the highly leveraged nature of households and governments stops any recovery in its tracks? We're about to find out in New Zealand. It looks like America already has.

The critical question to ask in terms of the level and eventual upward guide path of the policy rate is how high a rate can a levered economy stand? How much wood can a woodchuck chuck? How high a rate can a homebuyer handle? No one really knows, but we’re beginning to find out. The increase of over 125 basis points in a 30-year mortgage over the past 6–12 months seems to have stopped housing starts and importantly mortgage refinancings in its tracks. It was the primary “financial condition” that Chairman Bernanke cited in his September press conference that shifted the “taper to a tinker to a chance” that maybe they might do something next time.

10. Totally Jon Stewart on 'Shutstorm' 2013. Good to see the Americans starting to pronounce words like we do in New Zealand. Who needs to pronounce thungs with a I when a U is just at good. 

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

22 Comments

WRT Power prices I see the Greenlabour boys are at it again, again saying they will reduce power prices through a central buying authority .

My View : Its never going to happen .

The Reason : No Government will allow the income stream from something it has a 51% share in to be destroyed. They need the money from these investments more than they will be willing to give it up on socialist ideological grounds

This type of politics by Greenlabour in dishonest , and creates false hope .

Up
0

They need the money from these investments more than they will be willing to give it up on socialist ideological grounds

 

Can you list some of the likely recipients of the transfer payments, beyond irrigation schemes, charter schools and America's Cup endeavours?

Up
0

Boatman,

Ironically the only economically rational reason for the National government to forego 49% of the future income stream from the power companies; is that they will happily see the income stream fall below the interest cost to the government- say 2-3% rather than their proposed dividend stream of 6-7% plus.

So assuming they also follow your mantra of never allowing that to happen, suggests they happily took from the whole of New Zealand what they were willing to give to a small minority.

Perhaps a Labour Greens NZ Frst coalition would be willing to give the economic benefits of the power companies back to all of NZ rather than a smallish minority.

Up
0

So ppl have said, now though there are votes in it.

regards

Up
0

Should we pretend surprise that economists would "discover" the solution to a problem is more tax?

Up
0

What exactly is your problem with their reasoning?  

 

 

Up
0

It was more the predictability of their co-called solution that was interesting.

 

Some of the problems with their thinking:

1.  The idea of a tax solution is to address externality.  But this problem arbuably doesn't have any external parties, only those members of the space club can be harmed by the debris hitting their own equipment.  There don't appear to be any innocent external parties paying any price.

 

2.  Tax is a national tool and the problem is international problem so the claimed "cure" is not practical in implementation.

 

3.  The study found that commercial satellite firms launch more satellites than is “socially desirable" .. -- they clearly have an undisclosed agenda.

Up
0

Thank you for the explanation. 

 

Can I extrapolate from your comments that you would be in favour of a market/property-rights based solution in which participants in the space market can sue each other for damage to their property? 

 

But that too would require a trans-national approach, and it would require the ability to identify exactly whose junk caused the damage, which I should imagine would be wellnigh impossible. 

 

Not sure what you think the undisclosed agenda is that is revealed by the comment about "socially desirable".   It's true of any activity that if more of the benefits than the costs accrue directly to the individuals undertaking the activity, then you will get more of that activity than is socially desirable - the costs are not being correctly weighed against the benefits.

 

 

 

 

Up
0

In the 18th century the French Committee for Public Safety decided it was socially desirable to guillotine, without trial, anyone they thought might be 'counter revolutionary'.

In the 19th century the Anarchists said it was socially desirable to murder heads of state and any one in established power, regardless of the innocent lives lost.

The the 20th century Stalin found it socially desirable to murder 20 million of his own citizens.

 

Social desirablity is a thin veil behind which governments hide their various greeds, corruptions, envies and murders.

Social desirability is a flag under which we sweep up ends to justify means.

Up
0

The fact that some people have abused a particular term (which is undoubtedly the case), does not mean that anybody who uses the term is abusing it.  The term "criminal" has been unjustly applied in many contexts, eg to homosexuals, intellectuals, non-Christians, but that does not mean that nobody, or no behaviour, can ever be fairly described as a criminal.

 

For an economist, "desirable" simply means that the benefits outweigh the costs; and adding the term "socially" recognises that some benefits, and costs, may accrue to people not directly involved in the activity.  

 

Certainly, in some cases the "cost" or the "benefit" of an activity is a matter of subjective judgement and difficult to translate into numerical/dollar terms.  But that doesn't seem to be the case in this particular instance, where both the costs and the benefits of putting machinery into space can be clearly quantified. 

Up
0

Excellent point.

How important does the truth become as soon as we attempt to examine any justice issue. At best I coud suggest there is possibility of an agenda but cannot know the truth either way and I could be completely wrong in my suspicion.

Up
0

Tax will go up IMHO...the Q is when...

regards

Up
0

The most interesting thing I found in the Dead Pirate Roberts saga is they found him, not by snooping every piece of internet traffic from their PRISM system but by old fashioned detective work.

I wonder what the return on investment for PRISM really is.

Up
0

Bernard , I don't think that our American friends will appreciate you referring to their shiny spanking new $US 100 Washington bill as a " negative externality " ....

 

.. a Freudian slip on your part ? .... a cracker one at that ...

Up
0

Ha.

I'm got a feeling I'm already under surveillance...

And you too...

If not by the Americans, then by the Chinese.

My only hope is to make them laugh with cartoons. 

cheers

Bernard

 

Up
0

I'm watching you two!....the GCSB pays big bucks to anyone informing on negative comments toward leading trade partners......I just dobbed myself in for a cool fifty bucks, yep that's $50 big ones...what a racket and easier than catching white butterflies at ten bucks a pop. 

Up
0

I'm watching you too ! .... $ 6.52 of that sweet $ 50 now belongs to the government of our fair land , girt by sea ...

 

... GST !

Up
0

Glenn Greenwald Full Interview on Snowden, NSA, GCHQ and Spying 

 

 

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36423.htm#idc-cover

Up
0

He comes across as quite a man of some integrity and competence.

Up
0

#2. Given modern day NZers predilection for large (and leaky), ostentatious houses, a Pittian window tax may be the go here?

Ergophobia 

Up
0

FYI updated with fresh Dilbert.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Good Point about Fonterra,  Bernard . Ever heard of HUBRIS ?

You would think that any business understands and manages the risks associated with their core business, unless they believe  they are bullet- proof.

If Fonterra made a mistake over say a foreign exchange futures contact , or a hedging contract , you could say it was okay because they were outside their core competency .

But to contaminate the milk in its own processing plant is unthinkable .

Its the HUBRIS and ARROGANCE  that goes with organisations like Lehman Bros, Enron Kodak, GM, IBM and Fonterra that sees them fall.

For that matter think  Roman, Greek, Ottoman, Persian, British and Portuguese Empires .

All either dont exist today or are a shadow of their former glory.

 

 

Up
0