Patrick Watson probes Janet Yellen’s bold statement on financial crises and makes a suggestion about what she might have really meant

By Patrick Watson*

Top central bankers choose their words carefully. They know sending the wrong signals can unleash havoc, and they’ll get blamed for it. More important, as masters in acrobatic flip-flopping and backpedaling, they rarely promise a specific outcome. 

So when a Fed official does say anything definitive, I pay attention - because it’s almost never an accident. 

Last week, I did a double take when I saw this Reuters headline: 

Fed's Yellen expects no new financial crisis in 'our lifetimes' 

That’s an unusually bold statement for any Fed leader, much less the chair. 

It sure would be nice if Yellen were right. We’d all go to our graves (hopefully not too soon) without ever having seen another financial crisis. 

Not so fast, though. Let’s see exactly what Yellen meant, and what it means for your investment strategy.

'We’re much safer'

Here is the Reuters lead: 

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said on Tuesday that she does not believe that there will be another financial crisis for at least as long as she lives, thanks largely to reforms of the banking system since the 2007-09 crash.

"Would I say there will never, ever be another financial crisis?" Yellen said at a question-and-answer event in London.  

"You know probably that would be going too far, but I do think we're much safer, and I hope that it will not be in our lifetimes and I don't believe it will be," she said. 

This was a head-scratcher to me. While it wasn’t a prepared text, Yellen would still never say anything like this by accident.

It seemed as if she wanted to say it and was looking for an opportunity to do so. We found out why the next day.

Banks pass the test 

Last Wednesday, the Fed released the second half of the results of its annual bank stress tests. All 34 top US banks passed - for the first time since the post-2008 crisis reforms took effect. 

In practical terms, that means the banks can distribute more capital to shareholders as dividends and stock buybacks. 

Which is weird when you think about it. The Fed says the banks are safe, so now they are free to make themselves less safe by reducing their capital buffers. The six largest banks got permission to distribute about $100 billion.

Naturally, bank shareholders had a ball, but whether it’s good for the system is another question. It means the next crisis bailout of those banks, if one happens, will be $100 billion larger. 

Oh, but wait. 

There won’t be another bailout! Because, remember, the Fed chief herself said there won’t be another crisis in our lifetimes.

It looks like Yellen’s answer to that question was a planned signal to the banks: Go ahead and pay those dividends. We’re off your backs now.

Spring cleaning 

As I said, it would be great if Yellen were right and we could avoid another financial crisis - but I’m not going to bet on it. 

In fact, her predecessor, Ben Bernanke, was becoming a laughing stock among professional investors during his time in office, because everyone agreed that he made the best contrarian indicator they’d ever seen.

If Bernanke said there was no housing bubble, better take your money out of mortgage-backed securities immediately. If Bernanke said the economy was stable, better watch out below for falling rocks. 

If Yellen is anything like Bernanke, her uncommonly daring statement could mean that we are getting closer to another stock market crash and recession. 

US markets already look shaky. Even if the banks are okay, many other things could trigger a crisis. 

One thing that scares me is the increasing concentration of gains in a handful of technology stocks. Some of those companies are legitimate champions, but they can’t carry the whole market higher. Problems in any of them could easily make it drop, though. 

Then there’s the Fed with its fixation on raising rates despite slow growth, which could easily set off a deflationary recession. Not good for growth stocks or real estate. 

To reduce our exposure to this particular house of cards, I’ve been looking outside the US for new investment opportunities. 

In my Yield Shark income investing service, subscribers are holding… 

A European transport stock that should benefit from changing trade flows and pays close to 6% in dividends.

An emerging-markets fund that filters out the high-risk, high-volatility players and holds only stable stocks poised for steady growth.

A global natural resources fund that generates option income from commodity-producing stocks around the world. 

I also look for ways to stay in the US with reduced risk. You can do this by moving up the capital structure to own preferred stocks, as well as quality-screened dividend payers from defensive sectors.

Watch those dollars 

In an ideal world, we wouldn’t have to worry about unstable banks. We wouldn’t have to deconstruct central bankers’ statements. We might not even have central banks.

Instead, to paraphrase Don Rumsfeld, we must trade the markets we have, not the ones we wish we had. 

Hiding in cash, or gold, or whatever you think is a safe haven, is probably not the best move either. This is no time to put all your money on one horse, no matter how safe it looks.

Far better to find stable, income-producing assets that align with the macro trends. It’s more work, but pays off in time.


*Patrick Watson is senior economic analyst at Mauldin Economics. This article is from a regular Mauldin Economics series called Connecting the Dots. It first appeared here and is used by with permission.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment or click on the "Register" link below a comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.


Hmmm ?

They are surely facing some challenging times ahead

I've seen it quite a bit on the personal finance sites where people roll over their underwater car loan into the next purchase. Over time the loan sizes are massive on worthless cars. The effect will vary depending on state law but there will be a lot of lenders out of pocket. Of course that means the purchasers of the securities will take a beating as the default rates soar.

She said in HER lifetime- Not wanting to be a bad omen, but I hear she's been unwell recently...

Maybe she is trying to convince herself that raising rates cannot possibly push the US economy over the edge, by triggering carmageddon as above (probably survivable) or peak oil (possibly not).

This lady, about the same age as Ms Yellen, does not agree.

Market Crash Coming – Insiders Run – Lynette Zang

That was a good interview video thanks. My gut instinct is that she is correct but then she reveals that she is marketing what her interview is promoting. Valuable metals and collectibles. I'm glad she also promoted real estate which is where I swing my opinion of true wealth. But real estate has limitations as well. Its not worth much in Syria at the moment and then there is Japan with a shrinking population where its also not a good investment strategy. In Japan wealth creation is very much based on your productivity, not a property ponzi scheme pushed with high population growth.

This is a great article! I share similar thoughts on this!

How much longer do people think the american stocks bull market will go before it ends? interested to hear others thoughts and rationale. I'm guessing once the increased rates start to seriously affect the majority of people refinancing, at a guess: 2 years??

I think if they take a serious setback in one of their wars or invasions then you will see your black swan event there and then. All bets are off if the shit hits the fan. At the moment the wars are helping their economy just in arms sales alone. Then there's the huge boost in national pride not to mention the plunder.

Does no one think it is strange that people have to decipher the words of a small elite group of people who's actions have a great impact on the people?

In the end what is the difference between these people and some priest who breaks turtle shells then reads the cracks?