sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Claire Dale says changes to KiwiSaver, global economic uncertainty and predictions house prices could drop by as much as 20% by 2030 all mean retirement is looking very different to how it once did

Personal Finance / opinion
Claire Dale says changes to KiwiSaver, global economic uncertainty and predictions house prices could drop by as much as 20% by 2030 all mean retirement is looking very different to how it once did
dale1
Source: MonthiraYodtiwong/Getty Images

By Claire Dale*

Changes to KiwiSaver, global economic uncertainty and predictions house prices could drop by as much as 20% by 2030 all mean retirement is looking very different to how it once did.

A retirement strategy based on the equity held in a house is no longer as reliable as it has been in the past. Home ownership in Aotearoa New Zealand fell from 75% in 1991 to 60% in 2023 and is projected to fall to 48% in 2048.

The average age of a first-home buyer has also risen to 36, meaning an increasing number of New Zealanders (13%) are paying off their mortgages after they reach retirement age.

The number of retirees renting is also on the rise. By 2048, 40% of them will rent, placing pressure on New Zealand’s housing stock.

KiwiSaver is unlikely to replace the traditional housing nest egg. New Zealanders have, on average, NZ$37,079 in their KiwiSaver accounts, with thousands of people reaching close to retirement age with less than $10,000 saved.

Investing at the price peak

The prospect of retirement looks bleakest for those currently aged between 35 and 49 years old. A recent report from credit agency Centrix found this group was struggling the most financially.

A big part of the problem is that house prices skyrocketed just as they became first-time home buyers. The average asking price for residential property rose by 60.3% over the past decade, from $556,931 at the beginning of 2015 to $892,579 at the end of 2024.

While incomes have also increased, they have not matched housing prices. In 2000, houses cost about five times the median household income. But by 2025, the median price had risen to 7.5 times the median household income.

Those who bought their first home around the peak in 2021 are likely to be hit hardest by the forecast drop in house values. According to data insight firm Cotality (formerly Corelogic), nominal prices are expected to pass their 2021 peak by mid-2029. But when adjusted for inflation, prices in mid-2030 would be a fifth below the peak.

Working into retirement

Older New Zealanders are also facing significant housing pressures.

According to a 2022 report from Treasury, over half of superannuitants still paying off mortgages spent more than 80% of their superannuation income on housing costs. Those who are mortgage-free are spending less than 20% of their super on housing.

Between 2019 and 2024, the percentage of overdue mortgages for the 50+ age groups ranged between 2% and 2.5%, compared to a range of 1% to 1.5% for all mortgages.

People between the age of 55 and 64 are likely to have purchased their homes in the late 1990s and early 2000s, so are less likely to be hurt by the 2021 peak and subsequent trough.

Despite this apparent advantage, only 38% of people between 55 and 64 are mortgage free.

KiwiSaver issues

The possibility of using accumulated KiwiSaver funds to clear a mortgage is also diminishing. As a result of the 2025 Budget changes to KiwiSaver, employee and employer contributions will rise from April 2026 to 3.5% and from April 2028 to 4%, offsetting the reduced annual government contribution.

The end of employer contributions matters particularly to the 24% of those aged over 65 years who are still in the workforce. A rule change in 2021 means employers are not required to make contributions or to deduct employee contributions, unless the employee continues to make KiwiSaver contributions.

But current global crises are affecting KiwiSaver returns. Uncertain and volatile markets, especially for actively managed funds, mean fund managers reallocate money to try to minimise losses. Not all their bets pay off.

By 2030, Stats NZ projects that approximately 265,000 people aged 65 and over will be in the workforce.

The Office for Seniors notes that although older workers have challenges finding and staying in paid work, a third of the workforce is aged over 50 and 50% of people aged 60 to 69 are employed.

Importantly, as the Retirement Commission research found, a third of people over 65 were not working by choice. An increasing number, who neither own their home nor have significant retirement savings, have to continue working past 65 because they need the money to eat and pay the bills.

As New Zealand’s population ages, and more seniors have to work to pay for the essentials, it’s clear retirement is going to look different. Betting on the value of a house to fund life after 65 is less certain than it used to be. More than ever, New Zealanders need to consider how they will live well in their later years.The Conversation


*Claire Dale, Research Fellow, the Pensions and Intergenerational Equity (PIE) research hub, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

If you purchased ages ago and your yield is good then no worries. If you over leveraged and topping up then... good luck.

Up
3

If you purchased ages ago and your yield is good then no worries.

Depends. What if your assumption is that the house does the savings and generates more income than your labor? (think of the narrative that the Ashley Church brigade like to promote). And under that assumption, you've been spending like a drunken sailor and don't have a pot to pis in? 

Up
1

It's curious that people aged 86 and over have an average KS balance of $174,842. There are only 362 of them. I guess they use KS as a handy managed fund that they can withdraw from anytime. The youngest of them would have been around 67 when KS started.

Up
2

The average age of a first-home buyer has also risen to 36, meaning an increasing number of New Zealanders (13%) are paying off their mortgages after they reach retirement age.

According to a recent report by the National Association of Realtors (US), the average age of homebuyers rose to 56 this year. This is seven years older than last year and the highest level since the NAR started tracking in 1981 - incidentally, the average age back then was 31. 

I guess you could use this comparison to spin the narrative of Aotearoa punching above its weight again.

https://www.nar.realtor/newsroom/first-time-home-buyers-shrink-to-histo…

Up
0

Average US first-home buyer age is currently 38.

Up
1

Up from an average of 29 in 1981 using the same data set.  

Where the Ponzi cheerleaders fall down is trying to understand changes when trying to fit narratives to data. 

Up
0

It is a nefarious, last ditched effort to reinflate the housing Ponzi.......sucking dry the KiwiSaver's of Kiwis.

Leave the KS in managed funds or safer deposit instruments and not allow it to be "bet the lot" on a dodgy and deflating Housing Ponzi scheme, as the REAs, Oneroof and Mortgage Brokers all display and encourage.

Up
5

It is a nefarious, last ditched effort to reinflate the housing Ponzi.......sucking dry the KiwiSaver's of Kiwis.

Not nearly as focused on preserving the Aussie Ponzi where they're throwing the kitchen sink. Some examples:

-  Allowing first-home buyers to use a limited portion of their superannuation toward buying or building their first home 

- First Home Owner Grant in Queensland. Up to $30,000 for eligible buyers signing a contract on a new home. 

- NSW First Home Guarantee allows people to buy a home with as little as 5% deposit (government guarantees up to 15% to avoid lenders mortgage insurance).

Up
1

I agree, Australia is single-mindedly the most property obsessed country on earth. There is no rational economic principle to sacred to abandon to prop it up. Where is Sydney in affordability stakes, 3rd behind Monaco and Hong Kong? That is egregious. The States are in on the act as well with stamp duty and land taxes.

One day the plates will stop spinning and then stand back.

Up
2

Approx 12% of NSW state revenue is from stamp duty alone. Property-related revenue forms roughly 30–35% of total NSW state-generated revenue.

 

Up
0

'New Zealanders have, on average, NZ$37,079 in their KiwiSaver accounts, with thousands of people reaching close to retirement age with less than $10,000 saved.'
So let's stop kidding ourselves that KiwiSaver is the answer.
We need to focus on NZ Superannuation as the core retirement pension for everyone.
But to have a chance of covering the cost of living for those renting or still paying a mortgage, NZ Super needs to be restored to the payout rates at its foundation: the net pension for a couple needs to be raised to 80% of the after-tax average income, with other rates raised in proportion.
That will require imposing a surtax regime on recipients' other income, to ensure an increased NZ Super goes in full to those who need it, but less to those who don't.

Up
0

$10k? That's not even a ski weekend.

Up
1