sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Inland Revenue vested with new powers to direct debit banks accounts for unpaid student loans, child support and working for families

Personal Finance
Inland Revenue vested with new powers to direct debit banks accounts for unpaid student loans, child support and working for families

Tax avoiders, student debt dodgers and parents behind on child support payments will see bank accounts with surplus balances direct debited under new legislative powers granted to the Inland Revenue department.

The new rules allow Inland Revenue to collect unpaid debt by instructing banks to take it directly from the bank accounts of individuals owing. Banks that do not comply with the orders face having their own accounts raided as a result or else prosecution.

The clamp down will also apply to recipients of Working for Families payments. Where an assessment of an overpayment has been made, joint accounts of either parent can be debited to ensure repayment is made. 

Any account, including a term deposit that hasn't yet matured, can potentially be accessed. Money will not be taken from accounts if it will have the effect of putting the account into overdraft however it there is evidence of money being transfered to avoid collection, that money can be seized in transit.

According to a tax summary issued outlining these new powers, Inland Revenue suggests this new hard ball approach to collection is a last resort to be exercised failing the exhaustion of all other methods.

"The decision to take any debt collection action, including the use of a deduction notice, is made only after consideration of all relevant information, including any previous communication between the department and the taxpayer, the amount and the age of the arrears and any known hardship or hardship likely to be experienced by the taxpayer."

Where the full amount owing can not be collected, banks will be instructed by make lump-sum withdrawals until the entire amount owing has been repaid to Inland Revenue. 

The direct debits can also be made to cover "daily interest which starts on the date of the deduction notice and ends on the day on which the amount required to be deducted has been deducted.'' A notification to that effect would be made in the "deduction notice'' in the first instance.

Banks themselves will be first in the firing line for failing to make the collection.

"If the deduction is not made by the bank, the amount required to be deducted is recoverable by Inland Revenue from the bank as if it were payable by that bank,'' the tax department states in the summary.

Any "deduction notice" issued from the end of April this year on-ward will be subject to bank withdrawals.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

"Tax avoiders, student debt dodgers and parents behind on child support payments will see bank accounts with surplus balances debited...." What a laugh! Do you really expect there to be a credit balance left in after the first dip into any surplus balance? Warehousing funds will just become another avoidance mechanism.

Up
0

I wonder how you judge "surplus", terribly sorry Mr Power company the Govn took away your money...

regards

 

Up
0

Since the wealthiest pay SFA tax thanks to clever accountants who know every rort going, SOMEBODY has to make up the shortfall.

Up
0

That is actually pretty scary stuff, but I think only in the short term. Not withstanding bank failures, it will burn the government in the long term as people realise the banks are a fraud and move back to cash. One extra reason to forego them.

Seems the Greeks have one over us there.

If people realised that every financial transaction they make could at sometime be collected and disected by authorities, under what ever guise they can conjur up at the time, and then used against them they might be more inclined to operate with cash.

Up
0

Unsure where we're going with this - it sounds like a major intrusion that any decent politician would prevent - really cannot see how this can be acceptable.

IRD able to raid your bank account - must be wrong. Even the banks should be objecting.

Up
0

Footnote: Ignorant me... The original legislation (Tax Admin Act 1994) looks like this has been 'acceptable practice'  for a long time... another lost cause., must be more trusting...

Up
0

don't know how joh key is going to make new zealand a haven for funds if the government has full access to those funds, under whatever pretence.

i agree though, and would go further to say communication mentioned is critical so that they don't start smashing down financial dominos.

President of Property

Up
0

IRD have always had he power to take money from bank accounts. This is only a tweek to those powers. Problem is no money/no productivity

 
Up
0

Please help: My brother borrowed a student loan for 10 years and would like to settle it.

But the interest is very dear....

Can he settle his loan  by  voluntary lump-sum payment and get some interest deducted or

is there any ways he can pay less?? Thx...

Up
0

Talk to the IRD. Your brother's loan will have been transfered to them. What they say, goes.

Up
0