sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Christchurch City can't 'impose' a higher standard for remediation than 34% of the NBS, court rules

Personal Finance
Christchurch City can't 'impose' a higher standard for remediation than 34% of the NBS, court rules

Content supplied by the Insurance Council

The Insurance Council has welcomed a Court of Appeal ruling upholding a High Court decision that the Christchurch City Council could not set a higher-than-minimum seismic strength standard for repair to earthquake damaged buildings.

The Court of Appeal today found in favour of the Insurance Council on both counts in a case involving the University of Canterbury’s claim to reinstate buildings to 67% of the New Building Standard (NBS).

“This ruling will bring a great deal of confidence to those involved in the Canterbury recovery programme as construction can now proceed with complete certainty about the minimum standards for building,” says ICNZ Chief Executive Tim Grafton.

The University of Canterbury appealed against the High Court decision but the finding of the Court of Appeal today found that the Christchurch City Council does not have the power to require work to a higher standard than 34% of the NBS.

The Christchurch City Council’s earlier decision could have slowed Christchurch's rebuild considerably through consenting delays and passing extra costs to building owners and their insurers, says Mr Grafton.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.