Over 34,000 homes expected to be built in the Pukekohe and Drury areas by 2050

Over 34,000 homes expected to be built in the Pukekohe and Drury areas by 2050
An artist's impression of what Drury's town centre could look like under the structure plan Auckland Council is looking at signing off tomorrow.

The Auckland Council is getting set to vote tomorrow (Tuesday) on approving two structure plans which could see over 34,000 homes built in the Drury and Pukekohe areas over the next 30 years.

The affected areas will cover about 1900 hectares of land immediately surrounding Drury-Opaheke and 1300 hectares surrounding Pukekohe-Paerata that have been zoned as future urban areas in the council's 2016 Auckland Unitary Plan.

The Auckland Council’s Planning Committee is expected to sign off the structure plans this week. A report to the committee says that they will allow up to 22,000 residential dwellings in the Drury-Opaheke area and a further 12,500 dwellings in the Pukekohe-Paerata area.

“The residential zones proposed would provide for a range of living types from larger sections around the fringe to more intensive dwellings such as town houses and apartments around proposed new centres and along public transport routes.”

Planning Committee chairman Chris Darby says getting the Drury-Opaheke and Pukekohe-Paerata structure plans to the point of sign off has involved a lot of work since 2017.

“It’s been a long process. But we’ve had some wonderful community engagement and feedback from the affected stakeholders and mana whenua,” Darby says. “These are future growth areas that were signalled in the Auckland Unitary Plan, so we’re not operating outside of what we’ve already planned for. And we’ve always identified Pukekohe as a satellite town along with Warkworth.”

According to the structure plans the population of Drury-Opaheke is expected to grow by 60,000 people over the next 30 years, while Pukekohe-Paerata’s population is projected to increase by about 34,000.

Both plans also include sites designated for light industry and retail development and the council reports say they are both expected to create more employment in the area. The council claims the development is expected to create 12,000 new jobs in Drury-Opaheke and 5000 new jobs in Pukekohe-Paerata.

Auckland’s growth challenge

The Drury Opāheke Structure Plan highlights the city’s future population growth projections and the need for more land to accommodate its residents.

“The Auckland Plan (2050) signals that over the next 30 years Auckland could grow by another 720,000 people to reach 2.4 million. To meet the challenges associated with population growth in Auckland, the Auckland Plan anticipates that land for an additional 313,000 dwellings and about 263,000 additional jobs will be needed to support this growth. Part of that growth will occur in southern Auckland.”

Both Drury-Opaheke and Pukekohe-Paerata are listed as part of Auckland’s southern growth area (also including Takanini) which is about 20 km south of the Auckland city centre and will account for 45% of the city’s future urban areas.

The Auckland Unitary Plan established a Rural Urban Boundary around Drury-Opaheke to create a limit on where future development could take place.

Protecting prime land

But Darby says it’s also important that the city’s future growth doesn’t impact on the elite and prime soils in the area, which he describes as the food basket of Auckland and is vital to the region’s horticultural industry.

“When we considered the Auckland Unitary Plan we were cognisant of that and we identified the need to protect those elite soils.”

He says while there’s always the risk that more land could be signed off in the future for development in the Pukekohe and Drury areas,  it wouldn’t be easy for developers to get approval if it is on prime horticultural land. 

“The RMA allows private developers to bring forward plan change proposals. But I think in this day and age I would not expect the council to ignore the importance of that land. And I would be gobsmacked if the Environment Court ignored the value of those soils.”

He says such plan changes would have to be heard by independent planning commissioners and then parties involved would have the right to appeal to the Environment Court.

Under the Auckland Transport Alignment Project (ATAP), which was announced by the Government and Auckland Council in April last year, the rail network will be electrified from Papakura to Pukekohe and the Southern Motorway will be widened between Papakura and Drury. Next year work will start on train services from Hamilton and Auckland, which involve electrifying the line through Pukekohe.

Darby says such growth has to include public transport in order to avoid simply adding more cars to Auckland's gridlock problem.

"In this climate change age that’s not something we can afford to carry on with. It has to be supported by public transport.”

Government's national policy statement

Meanwhile the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) and the Ministry for Primary Industry (MPI) are developing a national policy statement on highly productive land. A report by MfE and Statistics NZ released in April last year titled Our land, found a 10% increase in the total size of towns and cities between 1996 and 2012, and a 7% decrease in the amount of land being used for agricultural production between 2002 and 2016. 

A report to Auckland Council’s Rural Advisory Panel last week by planner Ryan Bradley says the city’s future urban zone within the Rural Urban Boundary covers some 10,095 hectares, and around 66% of the future urban zoned land is on elite or prime soils. The main areas affected are in Whenuapai, Kumeu-Huapai, Drury-Opaheke, Takanini and Pukekohe/Paerata.

The report says information it has provided to MPI shows that since 2012 there have been 1,302 residential sections created (118ha) around the existing town of Pukekohe. While a further 308 sites (33ha) have been granted resource consents but have not yet had titles created.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

14 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

They made mediocre attempt to protect horticulture land in all previous attempts, so what gives us any hope that this time it will be better?
Also the idea of electrifying the main line which has three separate electrical systems is wrong especially since a solution is round the corner with hydrogen fuel cell powered units. It will only be an interim step but may be OK short term only.

Basel,
Hydrogen is just a step to electricity. It is made by electricity, or fossil fuels, with about 35% efficiency. Much better to run electric trains with electricity on about 90% efficiency, rr boom boom.

Great. They could all work in ..Umm ahh...flipping houses to the next generation of population 'burst'.

34,000 houses - unless Phil Twyford is put in charge and in that case it would be 579.

Well that wouldn't be so bad then

OMG, that artist's impression is straight out of Le Corbu...and look how well That turned out....

To read Jeanneret is to be cornered by a religious fanatic threatening you with eternal hellfire unless you accept his doctrine in full. It is a very unpleasant experience.

And we have quite enough of these types around already, ta very much.

Good article, although Im not sure the picture represents Le Corbusier at all. He was more souless towers situated in parklands and motorways. Poor Brazilians taking him up on his offer to design their capital...

Good luck to all concerned with this - you'll need it.
Land is too pricey, construction is too pricey, and the location too far out for the price.
Who knows, maybe it will stack up in 5, or 10 years...

Or never

Not sure I like the idea of increasing the size of Pukekohe. But if they do.

They need fast trains from Pukekohe, I get a train from Surrey into Waterloo, 30 mins, its great.

They should have fast train into Britomart and from Pukekohe. Stopping at Drury, Papakura, Manukau and maybe one other stop then directly into Britomart. This will get people to use trains in those areas, make it a 30 min journey from Pukekohe.

Not sure if possible, but would definitely make me use trains if it were.

Skip the most dangerous stops...

Oh, this is bloody madness, clearly there is no thought to stopping mass immigration. And more land than is currently being used for growing will need to be laid aside if we are to persist with this nonsense of increasing the population so artificially.
Where is the water coming from, all the electricity needed to charge all the ev's, what about disposal of sewage and rubbish?
There is nothing wrong with maintaining a small population

What are we planning to export to support all these extra people, we are struggling as it is. It does not help that so much of our exporting enterprises are foreign owned. It doesn't help either that so many people and corporations here from the local bakery to Facebook avoid so much tax. We actually cannot afford a larger population

The planners of Auckland Council have decided that the hills around Papakura are not to be built in. The hills at Albany are not to be built in. The hills at Howick will not be built in. The hills at Greenhithe will not be further developed. The hills at Swanson will not be developed. Therefore Auckland Council have decided that thousands of houses are to be built in the hills around Pukekohe, because these hills are much further away and will cause people to have very long commutes.