sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Barfoot & Thompson's median selling price sets new record of $1.15m in October as real estate agency ends month with lowest number of residential properties available for sale at the end of October in at least 20 years

Property / news
Barfoot & Thompson's median selling price sets new record of $1.15m in October as real estate agency ends month with lowest number of residential properties available for sale at the end of October in at least 20 years
Barfoot and Thompson sign

Sales at Auckland's largest real estate agency continued to climb back towards normal level in October in spite of the continuing Covid-19 restrictions.

Barfoot & Thompson sold 814 residential properties in October, up 148, or 22%, from the 666 it sold in September.

However that was still 505, or 38%, shy of the 1319 properties it sold in October last year.

New listing numbers were much stronger with the agency receiving 2012 new listings in October. This was up by a whopping 106% from the 977 new listings received in September, and almost back to the 2119 new listings it received in October last year.

However the total amount of stock the agency had on its books at the end of October remained relatively low at 3041, down 23% compared to October last year.

That is the lowest number of residential properties Barfoot has had available for sale at the end of October in at least 20 years. That suggests supply of stock remains tight as we head towards the peak summer selling season.

Consequently it was not a surprise that selling prices remained firm in October, with both the average and median selling prices setting new records.

The average selling price was $1,188,946, which was marginally above the previous record of $1,183,602 set in July. The median selling price was $1,150,000, up $20,000 from the previous record of $1,130,000 set in August.

Of all the properties sold by Barfoot & Thompson in October, 71.3% sold at prices above $1 million.

"Given the constraints under which the market was operating, it was an outstanding month's trading," Barfoot & Thompson Managing Director Peter Thompson said.

The comment stream on this story is now closed.

  • You can have articles like this delivered directly to your inbox via our free Property Newsletter. We send it out 3-5 times a week with all of our property-related news, including auction results, interest rate movements and market commentary and analysis. To start receiving them, register (it's free) and when approved you can select any of our free email newsletters.  

Barfoot Auckland

Select chart tabs

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

53 Comments

Market re-pricing has began. Current owners with an iron fist and diamond hands will not sell until bidders offer a realistic price that reflects their properties' true underlying value.

The availability of properties for sale will depend on the bid-ask spreads. Real estate agents will be wise to inform potential buyers of the new dynamics affecting property valuations.

2022 to the moon.

🚀🚀🚀Be quick! 🚀🚀🚀

Up
9

Self-parody. Brilliant. 

Up
17

The reality is that the housing market is still striding ahead.

TTP

Up
7

Contributing to the increase in average and median prices was focus returning to higher-priced properties.

What's the general rule?

"(a) If prices are going to rise, buy the most expensive you can to get the maximum advantage. (b) If prices are going to fall, sell the most expensive you have to reduce your risk"

One of those two wisdoms is going to be right!

Up
7

That's a little straw man dichotomy.

Higher priced doesn't mean it's expensive.

Expensiveness is bounded by buying ability and is relative. Good sized plots may be higher priced but offers many more times it's value over smaller plots. I would say many higher priced properties are actually cheap compared to their future potential.

Up
3

Every new property owner has a reason why their new property is better than all the rest.

Up
0

Market re-pricing has begun. Current buyers with a bit of sense will not bid until owners accept a realistic price that reflects their properties true underlying value.

Up
6

Safe voyage on your journey.

Up
4

Cheers! Good luck to you too. Keep your chin up and remember if you need to start fresh you can always just sell your NZ property and hopefully its enough to buy a plane ticket to Australia. 

Up
3

Location location location

Up
2
Up
4

Sorry, I'm pretty new around here. Is this a satire account?

Up
5

Part satire, part senile.

Up
7

Yep, it's the one final hurrah before increasing mortgage rates kill the market next year.

Up
5

Is that now a final acceptance that rates are going to rise HM ? Those that predicted there was not a snowballs chance in hell that they would go up have gone very silent of late. What I do see is a possibility however is that after a steep rise they could very well use a further crash to all time lows to keep the economy going. Fact is we appear to be out of ammo trying to keep the current financial system afloat. 

Up
4

Never said they wouldn't rise. It's the extent of the OCR rise that I have questioned. I am still skeptical it will go above 1.5%, I think the economy will weaken quite a lot next year and demand will  be sucked out of the economy.

Up
6

You predictions go flatly against what swap markets themselves are clearly predicting. And what they are already predicting is an OCR with a peak closer to 3% than 2%.

Up
0

They are 'predictions' not prophecy. Market predictions have often been wrong, right?

I guess time will tell.

If the OCR goes to 3% NZ's economy would be decimated. That's the main reason I don't think it will happen. The market is underestimating the impacts.

Up
4

Two things to consider:

- Would it really be decimated?  Why?

- If it were decimated, is that a reason for it not to happen?  We have an inflation targeting central bank whose job it is to throttle the economy to control inflation.  The decimation would be engineered.

Up
0

Responses:

1. I think it would, don't you? Why do I think it would? - mainly because our domestic economy is so reliant on real estate, housing, construction and consumption. Demand in these sectors will be decimated if mortgage rates are 6 or 7%, and that decimation of demand will in turn decimate the economy. We would see significant job losses in: real estate, design services (broad category: including architecture, engineering, surveying, planning), construction, trades, finance, retail, hospo. And significant job losses hardly sets the scene for that other 'go to' for the NZ rockstar economy - high immigration. Why or how can you open immigration floodgates when unemployment is increasing significantly?   

2. The RBNZ's mandate is not *solely* about controlling inflation. Yes, it is it's central mandate, but remember it also has mandates around employment and financial stability, both of which could be significantly affected if the OCR went above 2%, let alone 3%. And do you really think the RBNZ is *truly* independent - I certainly don't! 

Up
4

The economy will slow down with rates at 3% but it wont be "decimated".  That's whole point, to throttle inflation being generated by an economy running too hot.  The alternative is crashing the economy, which is what runaway inflation will do.

Immigration policy has been decoupled from logic for a long time.  I don't expect that to change.

The RBNZ will pay as much lip service to those other secondary mandates as it did when rates went down.

Up
0

'Decimation' might be an over-statement, but not by much.

Fair enough, I like to see different opinions. 

Haven't changed my view though!

Up
0

Just because 10% of NZ paid too much on their houses in the last one year doesn't mean increasing interest rates will decimate the economy. It will certainly decimate them and. Most of the speculators.

So they need to reap what they show. Its the law of the nature. 

Up
4

That's simplistic.

How about existing mortgage holders who have owned for at least several years? You don't think significantly higher mortgage payments for those who re-finance will drag money out of the economy?

How about the massive residential development sector? You don't think significantly higher mortgage rates coupled with massive increases in construction costs will tip that sector and it's employment over? You think there will still be a lot of appetite for FHBs to pay 850K for a two bedroom shitbox at mortgage rates of 6% plus? 

And you don't think these things will flow on to other parts of the economy? For example to a tourism sector already on edge, without international tourists, let alone a shrinking domestic market? 

Up
5

It will bring the balance back into the economy. Existing home owners, before this ponzi scheme started over an year ago, did buy the properties at a rate of interest which was higher and they can service their loans. They didn't buy at extra inflated pieces too. So yes they will not be impacted and economy will have no issues.

Only the stupid and greedy ones who over leveraged themselves in the last year or so will have reap what they sow.

You seem very naive in what you know about economics. Are you one of those who bought in the last 18 months of ponzi schemes going on?

Up
4

Only the stupid and greedy ones who over leveraged themselves in the last year or so will have reap what they sow.

Not so, unfortunately. I think you forget what it was like late last year. At that point, we had had over a decade of governments of both stripes complaining about the housing crisis while in opposition but deliberately fanning the flames of it while in government. We'd had at least a decade of repeated predictions of house price falls that never eventuated. Toward the end of last year two things were clear: (1) house prices were a runaway train. (2) there was no reason whatsoever to expect the government would do anything other than make things worse for first home buyers. 

So I don't think FHBs who bought then were stupid and greedy. They had, at that point, been carrying the can for others' stupidity and greed for over a decade in the form of rapidly increasing rents. They faced a choice between continuing to rent at increasingly extortionate prices, or buying in what was clearly a rapidly rising market that they had every reason to believe the government would at the very least allow (if not encourage) to keep rapidly rising. And now it looks like they are going to carry the can - as most of them have been for their entire adult lives already - yet again for others' stupidity and greed when it comes to housing.  

Up
5

I'm not really going to bother to reply to your comment, as you are the one who is clearly naive.

Other than to say I bought two years ago, and the recent valuation I got is up 35% on purchase value, so I'm not worried at all. It would take an epic crash, which I don't think will happen, to put me in to a minor degree of negative equity.

I do worry about people who have bought in the last 9-12 months though, as I think a correction of 10-20% is a real possibility. But it's pretty unfair to call them 'greedy', especially if they are FHBs desperately trying to get on the property ladder in a world that says prices never fall. 

BTW, I've been calling a significant house price correction in 2022 for at least 1-2 years. 

Up
5

"666 it sold in September." - The devil is in the detail.

Orr has spoken, stop being naughty children and buying all the houses. Time to sit back and relax and wait for your winning lottery ticket to come through the mail in December in the form of your new RV.

Up
1

These are unusual times with Labour's lockdowns being a handbrake on the number of listings.

Up
0

Brock

. . . but seemingly possibly more importantly to the both the seller and potential buyer, not  the prices. 

Up
0

Number of house available for sale should not be headline but headline should be : HOUSE PRICE CONTINUE TO RISE TOUCHING NEW HEIGHT.

Misrepresenting though is a fact but is like half full or half empty.

 

Up
0

I think a better title would be, "House prices broke through its resistance level and is searching for a new high!"

Up
1

Yeah put all our millions in property because that's the only thing to do in NZ. There is no other industry anyway.

Keep buying from each other at inflated prices and think we are becoming a rich nation.

Let's import more uber drivers who will serve us until eternity and pay the rent on our investment properties.

We are a deluded bunch really. 

Up
4

No surprise, this was expected. The asking prices are insane to give an impression as if the seller is selling land on the moon.

Just want to see how low this current Govt. go to make this country not liveable for the average kiwi.

Now no action can save it, as you can't put life in a dead man.

Up
2

Ok, let people commit to their predictions and be accountable for them, let's see where we are this time next year!! I'll record them.

I say the OCR will be no higher than 1.75 this time next year (just being a tad more cautious, given inflation is up there)

Others? Come on, commit! 2.5%, 3%?

Up
2

Predicting where the OCR will be sounds like a fools game.  You have a little emperor in charge, who has been given a wide range of (sometimes conflicting) mandates (Inflation, Financial Stability, Maximum sustainable employment, and now a consideration for house prices?). 

Will inflation take precedence over maximum sustainable employment? Will financial stability mean not letting a bubble pop, or avoid it getting worse?  Trying to predict the outcome of the decisions of a small group of people with little to no accountability sounds like a fruitless exercise.

Up
2

Fair points!

But as a commentator I really respect, I would be interested on where you see things going, at his stage - with all the caveats you have provided above.

Are you more bearish like me, or more bullish like the vast majority here?

All those competing objectives you mention are the basis for why I don't think he will take the OCR very high (ie. 2% or higher)

Coupled with the fact that I don't buy that the RBNZ are truly 'independent'.  

Up
2

Right now all i can think of is the Keynes quote:  “The stock market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”

Nothing about the current "markets" makes a lot of sense, as the artificially low interest rates have distorted everything.  And that artificial pricing isn't going away.  Can they keep it up for another 6 months or 6 years?  I suspect no one knows for sure.

Up
0

1.25%

Up
0

2%

Up
0

NZ will be affected by what happens on the world scene orr will not be able to determine outcome of international pressures this is what has bought nz unstuck before.  The interest rates will be determined by international markets and events if they  climb in rates to 3% / 20% there is nothing orr can do but follow he is not the king he thinks he is . 

Up
1

Yeah, Evergrande etc, Zillow etc in the US, are the trends I follow, not the village news.  All our borrowed finance will go into housing, so the only relevant question is the quantity and price of available borrowing.

Up
0

(From Oz, but how different are we?)

This is truly insane. 20% of total outstanding mortgage debt at Westpac was written in 2021 It just goes to show how much demand was brought forward.

Up
1

When interest rates get back to normal, and more and more people are teleworking from alternative locations, the crying from the "last fool" community can totally be ignored. Remember that you did this to yourself.

Up
1

Interest rates at normal normal, old normal or new normal?

Up
0

Indeed, using words like "normal" without putting a figure to them leaves a ton of wriggle room,  put a number and a date on it Averageman. 

Up
0

What is crazy in all of this is the majority of (voting) kiwi's are comfortable with the housing situation. Or more accurately, not angered enough to vote in change. Until that sentiment changes, do we really expect any different outcomes? 

I for one put no blame on the sitting government. They floated the idea of a capital gains tax and almost all voters poo-poo'd it. 

Up
2

Fair point. Successive centrist governments, red and blue, have simply been a reflection of the majority of centrist kiwis who vote them in and who are very happy for the value of their houses to keep appreciating markedly, without thinking for a moment beyond their self interest in terms of what the downsides of that might be...

Up
1

Here's a little laugh for y'all ....... showing the property "bulls" just how much things have changed, even since March this year ..... I have deleted his name, as in all fairness, I asked an honest question and he had the respect to give me an honest answer ......

 

by Crazy Horse | 17th Mar 21, 9:06pm

XXXXXX .....as you have done very well out of property and are always "spot on" with your predictions and have ultimate foresight into all such matters, regarding residential property investment , where do you see, say Auckland prices in 5 years time (2026) ? .....honest question for you.

I look forward to your answer and thank you in advance.

CH

 

by XXXXXX | 18th Mar 21, 8:48am

Crazy horse - No one is ever spot on but a calculated estimate can be close. Following the property cycle that some on here ignore bla bla the Auckland market should peak at the end of 2024. Between now and then further rises in the 25-35% would be my pick.

 

I truly can't see this happening .......anyway best of luck to those that do. 

 

Up
0

People tend to only talk about the debt in the market.  All this borrowed money ends up in people's bank accounts.  They have created a huge amount of money looking for a place to go.

Up
0

Bitcoin's price has increased from $58k USD in March 2021 to $62k USD today, dipping to $35k in June. Since March your portfolio if BTC increased 8%. Not bad, but hugely variable. But if in property would have gone up 20% or so. Also hugely variable

 

 

Up
0

Delta or Delta v2 will spike again after Christmas seasons(if we open up), new restrictions will come into play, everything will be under pressure if the rates keep going up…

Up
2

They overestimated the effect of Covid-19 on the economy at the start.  I have a feeling they are about to underestimate the current damage and how quickly it can bounce back.  Higher interest rates will mean interesting times.

Up
0