sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Isaac Gross details how Victoria is biting an A$117 billion bullet and starting the long march of land tax reform

Property / opinion
Isaac Gross details how Victoria is biting an A$117 billion bullet and starting the long march of land tax reform
Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Melbourne

By Isaac Gross*

 

The Andrews government’s ninth budget is its toughest. The bill from Victoria’s COVID experience, as well as the state government’s ambitious infrastructure spending, has finally come due.

 

The pandemic has added more than $30 billion to the state’s total net debt, bringing the total to a whooping $117 billion. (New South Wales’s state debt, by comparison, is about $80 billion.)

 

Victoria’s floods in 2022 have added to the debt. But so too has the Andrews goverment’s borrowing for its $90 billion “Big Build”, encompassing projects from removing Melbourne’s level crossings, extending Melbourne’s underground rail network and building a suburban rail loop.

 

The state’s debt load was manageable when interest rates were low. But with borrowing rates now almost 4% and rising, interest payments are swallowing increasing amounts of the government’s budget. Interest payments on the debt are expected to be $5.5 billion in the 2023-24 financial year, rising to $8 billion by 2026-27.

 

There are only two ways to fix this: reduce spending or increase taxes. Andrews and his treasurer Tim Pallas have chosen to do a bit of both, with a ten-year plan to pay down the $30 billion COVID debt.

 

Edit media

 

Victorian Treasurer Tim Pallas announces the 2023-24 Victorian state budget at Parliament House on Tuesday, May 23 2023. Diego Fedele/AAP.

Less infrastructure spending, more taxes

 

The Victorian government has already announced it will delay several infrastructure projects. The Melbourne Airport rail link and the Geelong rail upgrade have been put on ice due to the federal government’s ongoing review of infrastructure projects. If they are delayed, as seems likely, they will lower the debt burden of the state.

 

This will be a shame for Melbourne’s frequent flyers, but is probably the right call. Infrastructure Australia says the construction sector is already at capacity on large infrastructure projects. This significantly increases the likelihood of cost and time blowouts. Infrastructure Australia expects the (recently widened) Tullamarine Freeway won’t reach capacity for at least another decade, so delaying the rail link is probably the best course of action.

 

To help pay down the debt, a suite of tax hikes has been implemented, primarily rises in payroll tax (falling predominantly on large businesses) and land tax (which is largely paid by landlords).

 

The measures are expected to raise more than $8 billion over the next four years, although they will be put in place for a decade.

 

Edit media

 

The 2023-2024 Victorian Budget papers. James Ross/AAP.

Reforming land tax

 

Beyond the immediate task of paying down debt, the Victorian government has taken on the task of land tax reform, proposing to eliminate stamp duty on all industrial and commercial land in favour of an annual land tax.

 

No changes affect residential land, at least for now. But this could change if the reform proves popular.

 

Land taxes are the most efficient, and hardest to dodge, form of taxation.

 

Taxes on labour, such as income tax, can discourage work. Taxes on company profits can discourage investment and lead businesses to set up shop elsewhere. Land cannot be moved, and taxing it does not discourage its use.

 

The biggest problem with replacing stamp duty with land tax is that it often takes a lot of time and money for a fair transition to occur. In the Australian Capital Territory, a transition that began in 2012 is taking 20 years. The Victorian government proposes doing it in ten years, with further details to be released later this year.

 

The next transaction to occur after July 2024 will still attract stamp duty, but transitions after that initial one will be shifted to an annual land tax model.

 

The Andrews government also has a plan to phase out taxes on business insurance over the next ten years.

 

This small, but highly inefficient, tax has long been criticised by economists as it has punished businesses that seek to mitigate risk by buying public liability or professional indemnity. Removing it, albeit slowly over the next decade, will help the Victorian economy grow over the coming years.

 

Budgets are all about choices. The Victorian government has no easy choices.

 

Faced with a mountain of debt, it has outlined a plan for paying down the debt with a mix of tax hikes and spending cuts. The job remains far from complete, but this budget is a decent first step to get Victoria’s finances back on track.

*Isaac Gross, Lecturer in Economics, Monash University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

11 Comments

Lots of debt costing more due to high interest rates. Sounds familiar. 

Up
3

Yep Ak council personified especially when the rail tunnel and central interceptor debt interest payments start cranking.

Up
2

"Land cannot be moved, and taxing it does not discourage its use...."

Well if the tax is high it may affect the finances of the owner to the extent that they may decide not to intensify housing on it. And it definitely would affect the choice people have when choosing which city to move to or move out of.

Up
2

"No changes affect residential land..."

The family home remains unaffected.

Up
1

The effect of high land values, and thus high nominal tax liabilities, is an incentive for more capital intensification. Not less.

If the current use cannot support afford the tax, it's a pretty good indication that the land is not being used to its full potential.

 

Up
7

Yep, so for some this means getting outta town quick smart!

Up
1

Which is a good thing if all the owner is doing is land-banking.

Up
1

Yes, high property taxes are a great way to reduce property prices and dissuade people from investing in property.  

Up
0

Not opposed to a land tax but local council requirements of minimum sub dividing size makes me say no to a land tax. I could put 2 small houses on my existing section if allowed to subdivide into 300m2 sections. It would also mean bull dozing the existing house. That would be my risk and cost, not one by the council.

Up
1

Luckily for all the states bar Queensland and Western Australia they are able to claim federal tax

. Cause Queensland and WA pay so much royalties from that dirty carbon burning industry called mining. But allows those climate change how dare they young people to earn the big bucks. The only two states that are in surplus. 

Up
1

This would’ve been political suicide if applied to residential land. And applying it to commercial land is a great way to increase cost of production, which will be passed on to consumers. 

Up
3