Opinion: Heartland Bank's credibility goes on the line as George Kerr takes a pound of property flesh

Opinion: Heartland Bank's credibility goes on the line as George Kerr takes a pound of property flesh

By Gareth Vaughan

As a young journalist writing about telecoms companies for sharemarket investors in London in the late 1990s I developed a theory. It wasn't fool proof but it usually panned out right.

Companies whose press releases set aside waffle and cut to the chase, tended to be the ones performing best. Of the companies I covered Nokia - at that time - was the best example of this. And those who tried to obfuscate the bad news, or used a lot of spin, were ones with problems. British Telecom was the best example of this.

Here in New Zealand in 2013 our newest bank, Heartland, recently issued a press release that reminded me a lot more of BT than Nokia.

Buried deep in a May 28 statement entitled 'Heartland Bank Releases Third Quarter Disclosure Statement' was this sentence; "If the outcome of that (non-core property) review is to change strategy, this may impact currently anticipated full year financial results."

I sensed this was a warning that Heartland's annual profit wouldn't now meet previous guidance of between $21 million and $24 million. But to be sure that this walked like a duck, talked like a duck, and actually was a duck, I contacted Heartland's management. Treasurer Craig Stephen ultimately responded as CEO Jeff Greenslade was apparently too busy to.

Stephen assured me on May 29 that Heartland's management remained comfortable with its previous profit guidance, saying; "We would comment if we felt there was going to be a departure either positively or negatively from those numbers so the absence of comment I think is telling,"

But by yesterday, just a week later, everything had changed. Heartland released the outcome of its non-core property review. The most relevant immediate point in Heartland's statement, on page three of three, was that its net profit after tax for the year to June 30 will be about $7 million. That's as much as $17 million, or 71%, down from Heartland's previous guidance. Ouch.

A $24 million hit

Yesterday's release outlines a $24 million hit. This stems from a "one-off" non-cash asset write-down of $18 million before tax, plus a pre-tax hit of $6 million from writing off the balance of an $11 million fee being paid to a unit of the George Kerr controlled Pyne Gould Corporation (PGC).

These charges stem from Heartland's efforts to close the book on troubled property loans and investment properties inherited from Marac Finance when the PGC owned finance company merged with building societies CBS Canterbury and Southern Cross Building Society to create Heartland in January 2011.

But the details of the deal raise questions as to whether the wheeling and dealing is conduct you'd want to see from the plain vanilla bank Greenslade says he wants Heartland to be. They also question the extent of influence Kerr, whose preference is for high risk, potentially high reward private equity style investments, has had - and may still have - over Heartland. Kerr was Heartland's biggest shareholder for a time prior to it gaining bank registration but is no longer a substantial shareholder, IE if he's still on the share register he hasn't had to disclose a holding of 5% or more.

When Heartland was created, with the aim of obtaining bank registration from the Reserve Bank, duly obtained in December last year, management of non-core property loans was outsourced to Real Estate Credit Limited (RECL), a unit of PGC. The plan was to exit these over five years - up to January 5, 2016, with RECL to compensate Heartland for loss on those assets up to a limit of $30 million.

Heartland says it had limited rights to early repayment of this $30 million, which is already fully utilised, with most of the payment not scheduled to be made until 2016. Prior to the latest announcement, Heartland had got $3.25 million, with a further $26.75 million due in 2016.

Would you like a bond & some property with that?

But instead, a deal has been struck whereby RECL will now "pre-pay" the $26.75 million. But there's a catch. This is no cash payment.

RECL will transfer "certain assets" to Heartland, including those charged to secure the payment. These include; a Westpac bond due January 2016 with a face value of $11 million, plus loans and property assets with a value equal to the balance of the maximum compensation amount. Heartland will now manage its non-core property portfolio, which had a $139 million book value as of March 31, in-house.

So that means Heartland remains exposed to any ups and downs of those investment properties and property loans it values at $139 million.

Meanwhile, terminating the RECL management agreement gives PGC a nice fillip via a one-off increase in net profit after tax of about $7.8 million, according to Kerr (pictured right).

PGC shunted $147 million worth of property loans from its then subsidiary Marac over to fellow subsidiary RECL in 2010 at the request of its building society merger partners. At the time PGC said this would reduce Marac's exposure to real estate loans because RECL would assume a risk of loss on loan realisation. It was also expected to improve the merged entity's chances of getting an investment grade credit rating. This transfer followed the 2009 move of $175 million of non-performing property loans to RECL from Marac.

Yesterday Kerr went on to say; "The exit from RECL is a clean end to the substantial and wide-ranging support provided by PGC in the rescue of Marac and creation of Heartland."

That may be. But what cast iron guarantee can Heartland provide that yesterday's hit from its non-core property holdings is a full and final one?

Heartland appears to believe this may indeed be a full and final hit saying it's confident its earnings will now normalise and no longer suffer from the poor performance of its non-core legacy property assets.

It has issued guidance for net profit after tax of between $34 million and $37 million for the year to June 30, 2014. Furthermore it's hinting that investors should still anticipate dividends, and says a share buy-back programme will be launched to manage capital, if deemed appropriate.

 Investors cheered these three pieces of news, pushing Heartland's share price up 5 cents, or 6%, to 84c giving it a market capitalisation of $326.5 million.

And the good news for Heartland didn't end there. Standard & Poor's announced Heartland's BBB- credit rating with a negative outlook was unchanged. A BBB- rating is S&P's lowest investment grade rating, something that was crucial for Heartland to obtain before it became a bank.

'Performing, accelerating & extend'

But Heartland still has the small matter of the non-core property portfolio to deal with. It says it has split the $139 million portfolio into three categories labelled "performing", "accelerating" and "extend". It says performing loans or assets will be held unless an attractive offer's received. The stuff classed as "acceleration" will be exited within 18 months. And the loans in the "extend" portfolio will be converted over time to real estate to be better positioned for sale and held for up to five years.

Although the amounts held in each asset class are "commercially sensitive" and Heartland won't disclose them, it does say it expects the majority of its non-core property assets to be "exited" over the next 18 months. This would leave it with just performing assets being held for sale, from which it doesn't expect any further write downs.

The plans to create a Heartland Bank, unveiled in June 2010, set out the ambition of a sharemarket listed bank doubling its $2.2 billion asset base within five years through growing lending to families, small businesses and the rural sector. As of March 31 Heartland held retail deposits worth $1.76 billion.

The property portfolio savaging Heartland's annual profit was never seen as a core part of the group's future. For the nine months to March this property caused Heartland's impaired asset expense to surge 30% to $7.9 million.

For the long-term credibility of Heartland, and in the interests of its depositors and shareholders, here's hoping any future property hits are much smaller. And that Heartland discloses them in a much more straight forward manner.

This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Good piece Gareth, top summary. As a rule of thumb anything Kerr has had involvement in generally comes with a red flag as far as I am concerned. Heartland have a way to go yet before I start thinking of them as a plain vanilla bank.

All of which begs the question - why did the apparently prudent RBNZ extend the welcome mat of bank registration to Heartland ?
 
There must be more to this tale? I heard it said prior to registration it would never happen - but I thought SCF would not qualify for an extension on it's government deposit guarantee.
 
But hey we have a different attitude to caring about the rights and needs of investors. Read more
 
New Zealand's fund management industry has been given a C-minus grade in a global report from consultancy Morningstar.
 
The rating ranked New Zealand in the bottom three of the 24 countries assessed, although it was an improvement on the two previous reports when this country ranked last with a D grade.
 
The best was the US and the worst was South Africa.
 
Law firm Chapman Tripp described the rating as "another clip around the ear for New Zealand"

SH. agreed,  there is more to this tale- like a connection with SCF?. The big Q is; is the RB just incompetent or .........?
 

Nice piece Gareth.
I'd love to know from Heartland what these assets actually are, but it never actually says. 
I also liked you hightlighted the 'extend' word in Heartland's definition of one class of those loans. The only thing missing was the suffix. "...and pretend'
cheers
Bernard

good piece, Gareth....i've got some short term deposits with them so i may not roll them over in a couple of months based on your comments.
in this investment environment we live in these days ; anything that looks vaguely suss is now stepped away from.
btw are christov and the gummy bear still lurking around on here...been along time since i looked...happy days

Rob, Christov is still around but unfortunately doesn't seem to be commenting as much as he has in the past. Haven't seen anything from GBH for some time, unfortunately. I think he's somewhere in Australia.

Heartland has issued this statement today:
Heartland New Zealand Limited (NZX: HNZ) has received notice from an Australian company Washington Securities Pty Limited (Washington) that it intends to make unsolicited offers to purchase HNZ shares from certain HNZ shareholders for $0.55 per share. Washington has also indicated it may make other offers to targeted groups of HNZ shareholders over the next six monthsThe price offered by Washington is substantially below current market value (which was $0.83 at the close of trading on Monday 17 June).
The sole director and shareholder of Washington is John Armour who has been involved in similar unsolicited offers to shareholders of other NZX-listed issuers.
There has been market pressure to put a stop to unsolicited offers. Despite views on the ethics of these unsolicited offers, regulation to date has stopped short of an outright banShould any shareholder receive an unsolicited offer, HNZ strongly recommends seeking independent financial advice and checking the current market price for HNZ shares at www.nzx.com/companies/HNZ.
For more information, shareholders are referred to the Financial Markets Authority article "Low Ball Offers - Guidance for Investors"This guidance can be found at http://www.fma.govt.nz/keep-updated/newsroom/articles/low-ball-offers-gu... guidance also includes a link to a list of Authorised Financial Advisers who shareholders can contact for further information or advice.
If you would like confirmation as to whether any other correspondence received is an official HNZ communication, or whether an offer to buy your shares has the support of your Board, you can contact HNZ's company secretary by email (Anna-Lisa.Strain@heartland.co.nz) or by phone (09 927 9151).

Did the management get distracted by this back door revaluation intrusion and forget to bid at today's NZDMO 6 mthTbill tender? - I would have thought the liquidity desks at NZ banks would be pushing to get short duration government debt on the books with all this taper talk going on. Or is NZ the new rate decompression target against US Treasury positions? Read on