sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

There was an air of buoyancy at this week's Auckland Ray White City Apartments auction, although the Barfoot auction was a bit quieter

Property
There was an air of buoyancy at this week's Auckland Ray White City Apartments auction, although the Barfoot auction was a bit quieter

There was an air of buoyancy at this week's Ray White City Apartments' auction, with nine Auckland CBD apartments put on the block and seven selling under the hammer.

The first apartment offered was in the Sugartree complex on Union St.

It was a 43 square metre, one bedroom unit with a 10 square metre balcony and had been scheduled for auction next week, but that was brought forward when a pre-auction offer of $510,000 was made, which had been accepted unless a higher bid was received at auction. So it was definitely going to be sold.

But when no higher bids were forthcoming it was sold for its pre-auction offer of $510,000.

There was also very competitive bidding for a unit in the Grand Chancellor complex at the bottom of Hobson St , which sold for $618,000. Meanwhile a studio unit in the Heritage Tower complex on Nelson St fetched $295,400.

The cheapest apartment sold was a 59 square metre leasehold unit in the Q City building on City Road which was leased to Housing NZ.

It sold for $92,000 (ground rent currently $6800 a year).

An apartment in the Nova En Scotia building overlooking Myers Park was passed in when the only bidder wouldn't increase his bid past $375,000 and there were no bids for an apartment in the Harbour Green building on Union St.

At Barfoot & Thompson's apartment auction earlier the same day, three properties were offered and one sold under the hammer.

The first property to go under the hammer was an office/warehouse building on Boston Rd in Grafton, which had been partially converted to include a four bedroom apartment and a separate two bedroom apartment.

There was good interest in this property and it sold under the hammer for $2.82 million.

The other two properties were a two bedroom sub-penthouse apartment in Pitt St, which had been advertised as a "short notice auction," and a two bedroom home unit in a street next to Eden Park.

There was only a single bidder for each of them and both were passed in.

The full results of both auctions with the prices achieved on the individual properties that sold and the details of those that didn't, are available on our Auction Results page.

You can receive all of our property articles automatically by subscribing to our free email Property Newsletter. This will deliver all of our property-related articles, including auction results and interest rate updates, directly to your in-box 3-5 times a week. We don't share your details with third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time. To subscribe just click on this link, scroll down to "Property email newsletter"and enter your email address.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

24 Comments

So much for the market receding, don't see any significant change in the values, wonder if its just been a temporary slow down

Up
0

It has always been expected that new LVR limits would only have an effect for a limited time.
Banks are still wanting to maintain market share, and so they each need to maintain credit growth at 8.7%.
Pumping easy credit to wide-eyed optimists has to continue, at least until the RBNZ provides further constraint.
Either the LVR limits will need to be adjusted down again, or the DTI limit will have to be introduced.

Up
0

Can't see the government wanting these introduced / changed in election year. No doubt though we need a DTI ratio simply to protect ourselves against all this cheap credit. So people have no self control over what they will spend, if the bank will lend it to them.

Up
0

Seems like it, house values actually hadn't dropped I reckon. People won't sell under government value unless they are forced. Interest rates are still low, strong NZ economy. Supply is coming in the urban areas that are affordable to New Zealanders. Hopefully next government cycle they do something about immigration policy then we're heading in the positive direction.

Up
0

But it is people at the margin (i.e. those that have to sell) that set the market price. Unfortunately all others are just along for the ride.

Up
0

TradeMe's Auckland property listing still increasing, now at 10698!

Up
0

Listings for Auckland City on trade me today are 2348.
11th March 2016 - listings for Auckland City on trade me were 1780.
Therefore there are +32% more listing this year than the exact same time, last year.

Up
0

I have been keeping a daily trend of both the listing on TM prop and Realestate.co just to compare since mid Feb. They are both up about 700 up in net listing in the last 21 days!
I think the pressure in the market is palpable at this point and might get really messy as least in the lower end.

Up
0

I don't think anyone knows what is going on - both sides are wishing and hoping......

Up
0

This is very much the case. Lots of listings and reduced sales numbers. Yet the growth of residential mortgage lending was almost business as usual in January. I'm waiting for more statistics to turn up.

Up
0

Many people are still in denial:

Barfoots Auctions this week -
Bays Area: 12 out of 25 lots sold = 48% success under the hammer
Manukau: 10 out of 38 lots sold = 26% success under the hammer

In 2015-16 success rates were consistently between 70-90% under the hammer.

Up
0

No 48% for the Bays Area is a really good result. We are aware that South Auckland needs some correcting. People can try auction and then go on to selling by negotiation. It really isn't a big deal, not the end of the world if it doesn't sell at auction. A really lazy way to sell. We haven't even got to the stage of having contracts that depend upon the buyer selling their own home first. Auctions are a hot market thing and with theses sorts of results I would rate the market as still warm.

Up
0

You, I or anyone else can’t possibly believe this comment. Incurring the extra fees and trouble of an auction and then having too turn around settle for sale by negotiation is only lazy for the agent… oh I see where you are coming from.

Up
0

Rubbish Zachery, 48% is not good for the Bays.

I used to go to the Barfoots auctions every Wednesday morning mid 2015 and they were consistently selling between 70-80% success rates under the hammer - and that was mid winter.
48% is not good when judged against selling success rates over recent years.

Ask people who have tried to borrow from a bank recently and you'll find out what's really going on...
....people are struggling to get finance, even for minor alterations.

Up
0

Most houses sold by negotiation in the good old days. Banks may be more willing to lend if we went back to sales contracts that depended on a buyer having an unconditional contract on his own house.
Auctions that sell 70-80% of their houses are indicative of a hot market. It can't stay that way forever. Considering the general attitude around here lately I still maintain that 48% sold is pretty good....

Up
0

Apartments will become more and more popular as they can be bought for around half the cost of a house.
Houses have priced themselves off the market.

Up
0

The problem with apartments is some are leasehold (which you avoid like the plague), and banks won't lend if they are less than 40m2. I've been following the apartment market in Welly CBD for a few months and you won't generally get a 1 bedroom 40m2 one for less than $250,000.

Up
0

48% is average. From what I gather some existing home-owners in the central areas are selling and moving outwards and the government is investing and expanding those areas. High listing will hit peak too and start decreasing. As that happens we expect to see house values increase again. That won't happen till there's a dip/crash in the market (it is due for one soon just like a woman's period lol) and that is likely to happen in this government cycle...

Up
0

incomprehensible and crass

Up
0

Oh well, I wasn't trying to offend. I was using an analogy and I assume most people that post here are males. We know how a woman is like when she is due for one! Just like the market is now, unpredictable, sensitive and better to stay out of it!

Up
0

Just determined to piss people off with your crass stupidity, arentcha?

Up
0

'I wasn't trying to offend. I was using an analogy and I assume most people that post here are males.'

... therefore you felt you could take a dig at women. Thanks, because that's what you did.
As a woman I'm mildly offended and certainly never expected to read it on this site,
but ultimately you're letting us all know you're a plonker.

Up
0

Hmm, using the natural cycles of life as reference is not stupid, it's wisdom and that's how we succeed in life.

Up
0

And by using those same human analogies we can all conclude you are a dick
President of Property

Up
0