sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Barfoot & Thompson's sales took a dip in June but remain ahead of last year - prices flat overall

Property
Barfoot & Thompson's sales took a dip in June but remain ahead of last year - prices flat overall

Barfoot & Thompson's sales for June suggest the Auckland housing market remained largely flat for the first month of winter.

The agency sold 903 residential properties last month compared to the 1027 it sold in May but ahead of the 855 it sold in June last year. However, it was well down on the numbers for June from 2012 to 2016 when they were generally around 1000 or more.

The average selling price edged up slightly to $928,842 compared to $918,465 in May but still below the peak of $968,570 set in March last year.

The median price headed in the opposite direction and dropped to $810,000 compared to $820,000 in May.

It was the third consecutive month that Barfoot's median selling price has fallen and it is now at its lowest point since July last year and well below its peak of $900,000 set in March last year.

"The sales data for June is a mix of up and down numbers, but overall sales, prices and availability remained stable," Barfoot & Thompson Managing Director Peter Thompson said.

"Market prices, which have marked time and came under no pressure to move in one direction or another since the beginning of the year, have entered the winter period in the same state." 

The figures also suggest that fewer people are deciding to sell, with Barfoot signing up 1210 new listings in June compared with 1455 in May and 1570 in June last year.

That was the lowest number of new listings Barfoots have signed up in the month of June since 2014.

However inventory levels - the total number of homes available for sale through the agency - remain healthy.

At the end of June Barfoots had 4267 residential properties available for sale, down from 4568 in May but almost unchanged from the 4297 it had in June last year.

So buyers should still have plenty of choice.

"It is a market environment that is likely to remain constant to the start of spring," Peter Thompson said.

Barfoot Auckland

Select chart tabs

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

58 Comments

See what Greg's done there. Got everyone arguing with the early morning article and then throw a curve ball at elevenses. Tricksey little Hobbitses.

However, Median price is still down another 10K in a month (so not what you'd call a safe bank account) and when the ban kicks on foreign money parkers, top end and overall average price is toast.

Up
0

I'll get in early and get the BS out of the way, before the tweakers arrive. "Auckland market holding up particularly well, blah blah, auction clearance rates rising, blah blah, early spring blah, blah, Capital Gains a commin' blah, blah."

MTP

Up
0

Has he had to go for a lie down?

Up
0

I'd have to check his GPS anklet. Normally at this time he is out rummaging through peoples rubbish bins for Aluminium. He has this theory that it is going to be worth more than Gold.

MTP

Up
0

He sees life through a bottle

Up
0

Lots of Kiwibuild aspirants will also hold out for that rather than jump into the market. Why would you buy a crap brick and tile unit for 700k when you could get a new townhouse for 600k? Lots of factors pulling the market down

Up
0

So Barfoot record median price was $900,000 in March 2017 and is now 10% lower in June 2018 at $810,000 - seems though that most sellers cannot accept this reality! A 10% decline is not flat - it is a significant drop.

Up
0

How could this decline happen ?
We have the best spruikers !

Up
0

Some of us predicted a circa 10% drop. Although now I tend to think that might be underdone. 15-20%?

Up
0

I've generally kept out of the forecasting malarkey but the headwinds just keep coming. The housing market hasn't capitulated in the face of the headwinds, so I can understand the commenters who keep cheering the markets resilience. I'm incredulous at the resilience.

For the housing market to not correct with all the factors now present requires a resilience not seen in any housing market anywhere else in the world, especially if the trade war shenanigans, economic slowdown and bank tightening continues.

Now I know many Kiwis do feel their market is utterly unique and will never correct because it *has* never corrected, and maybe they are right. Maybe Kiwis psychologically believe in the values of their houses so hard that nothing will ever convince them that they should let a house go for less than the value they have wedded themselves to psychologically, so they simply won't ever discount. But if nothing else changes, surely the market can't resist price depreciation much longer?

Obvs something may change, the trade war saga could evaporate, global growth could blossom, immigration could suddenly uptick, another quake could require a major spend... but as things currently stand? How can anyone still be bullish without actually just suffering some form of delusion?

Up
0

Hi Ginganinja.

Hopefully I can explain the resilience of the market thus far.

I married a New Zealander some years ago and over the years, interaction with her family and herself have provided me with a number of essential survival tips.

1. She has always been right on everything and stubbornly held a position to the bitter end, even if she has in fact been proven wrong by facts. 'I don't care is a common theme here'
2. She loves to fight, and a lost cause Is more fun than any cause so she'll happily engage in proactive losing of an argument. If she has to argue the earth is flat and the moon is made of cheese, she will engage vociferously.
3. She would rather tell me to sod off than admit I was right.
4. She has a very poor sense of direction and regularly goes the wrong way, routes that can add hours to the journey. When questioned, that was just the way that she wanted to go?

These are a few of the factors that I believe are ingrained from birth in Kiwis and arrive as a combination of stubborn ancestors who made the journey here (both white and maori) - you'd have to be pretty single minded to want to make the trip in the first place.

The only place where people are similarly stubborn is Scotland (and definitely Yorkshire). - Other similar attributes surrounding money mean that you would not want to be a waiter in any of these areas.

It will take a while for reality to hit home here.

Up
0

Nic, I don't understand why you rubbish your wife like that. You choose toi marry her

Up
0

Maybe you married into the wrong family for your higher intellect Nic?

Up
0

Maybe you should have married a Chinese rather than a European, Nic?

Up
0

DGZ, what behavioral attributes do you believe are unique to Chinese women?

Up
0
Up
0

DGZ ....WAAAAAAAAIT a minute!!!!!!! Is your obsession with RE just an extension of your epic crush on Linda Hill? Is this deep down all just some way to be closer to her? Maybe you hope she will notice your in depth appreciation of the Auckland property market and swipe right?

Up
0

Nic Johnson,

I married a Kiwi. He is a bonafide genius, massive IQ and has a truly beautiful brain. He doesn't love to fight, he is not particularly stubborn, he has a great sense of direction, has no problem with admitting he's wrong and will never fight to the bitter end. He's quite conflict adverse and would prefer to have a civil discussion to resolve matters. A row between us is an extremely rare occurrence and usually resolved before the sun goes down. I adore him and never met a British man his equal.

I know a great deal about my husbands ancestry, because some of them were notable clergy, artists and architects. The family have kept incredible records, which he and I have taken up, as part of the family tradition.

I have diaries from his Kiwi ancestors who made that treacherous journey, they noted how many died during the trip and reading about that harrowing experience leaves me in awe of their bravery. My reading is that many of those early settlers came to NZ because life was so bad in the UK for many, that they risked their lives for the hope of something better. That's not stubbornness, that's either desperation, tenacity or both.

I haven't noted any more stubbornness in Kiwis than in Brits, although if I was going to make any kind of generalisation it would be that Kiwis are more trusting (maybe a tad naive sometimes), friendlier, less snobby, quicker to offer help and kindness and less critical, questioning and cynical than Brits. The less critical, questioning and cynical bit has upsides and downsides, the downside being that I think Kiwis get taken advantage of by their systems, companies, governments and professionals more. Maybe. I also think Kiwis are more culturally homogeneous than Brits, but that's mostly just a population size thing and recent influxes of immigrants will undoubtedly change that.

Kiwis have never had a serious housing correction here. So that might be a major factor as why they don't think one is likely to happen. That's not a Kiwi thing, that's a human thing. We all underestimate risk, especially as risk associated with something that has never actually happened before.

I think Kiwis put faith in things, invest their time, money and beliefs and are therefore disinclined to imagine something terrible happening to that which they have put faith in. And on the whole, because the history of NZ has been collaboration, unity, community and hard work, that faith has been built on something real and worth treasuring. Sadly I think that reality has deteriorated and in real threat. So now that same faith that helped build community and the tenacious Kiwi spirit, might be a weakness going forward, exposing people to risk.

Up
0

'naïve' is probably a very accurate assessment.

Up
0

of you?

You didn't put much context in that statement. But I agree, you are naïve, but don't beat yourself up about it.

Up
0

Dic are you that annoying british kid that i was made to be friends with at primary school?

Up
0

just looking at that graph above the average for the last 12 months is below 0, prices are dropping in nominal and worse in real terms.

Up
0

Interesting, my eyes see the graph fluctuating from -5% to +5% over the last 12 months with the average roughly at 0%

Up
0

A flat market is okay , but market correction would be better

Up
0

Probably more significant that it is $30k down from June last year. The QV figures are significantly lagged - although there is more stability than I might have picked.

Up
0

This is only a segment of the Auckland market, The total REINZ numbers are more comprehensive.
However, the average graph shows that we are still making higher lows since July 17 ( the bottom of the market) ...

So Gerg can cheer as much as he likes and selectively and conveniently pick March 17 peak whenever it suits him( forgetting that so many things happened since then including the arrival of the CoLs).

But that does not change the fact that the market is resilient and is on a slow steady rise ... look at the YoY QV numbers in the main centres as an example !!

Up
0

B&T is one of the smallest sales segment for DGZ so I won't read too much into it.

Up
0

And who are the market leaders in your beloved DGZ? Amazing how B&T can capture 40+% of the Auckland market and be one of the smallest sellers in the Guzzle Zone.

Up
0

Hate to say it but I suspect DGZ is right here and BT is under represented. Ray White is probably more representative of DGZ, at least for anything under $5m.

Up
0

I don't know the numbers, but I'm sure he will tell us. I'd bet a Sir Ed that they are not one of the smallest as he has stated.

Up
0

Mrs T
Don’t be too harsh on the DublD
He’s not working with a full pack

Up
0

Exactly. Some people are really in denial.

Up
0

Yes but that hasnt been a recent development

So the data is relatively consistent meaning the median is now sitting at 810,000 pretty much at the same level as May 2016

Up
0

You keep talking about July 17 being the low point of the market - but it is only Barfoot and Thompson that has that as the low point - what measure are you using?

Up
0

Eco Bird doesn't know yet. Come July 2018, it will be whatever "One Roof" are using and best suits his narrative.

Up
0

REINZ total sales figures ( average and median) because they gather every thing that was sold in Auckland.
Not sales index, not weeks on market, not auction numbers
Actual sales - will be out soon for June

However, where ever you look they are almost the same trend

Up
0

Eco Bird, Barfoots is the biggest sales segment for Auckland. If Bayleys reported higher sales/prices would you be their cheerleader? Yes

Up
0

I expect a few people to jump on here spinning a small decline as a win.

Up
0

Hardly a fact, eh

Up
0

Are the number of comments indicating that the Auckland market has bottomed. Barfoots annualised sales rolling value has been declining steadily and consistently since October 2015,peaking at 11.6 billion. Although presently 3 billion lower,their annualised sales value has now increased month on month for the past 3 months,after its nadir in February.

Up
0

Fancy Cowpat using “nadir” you just can never judge a cow by its pat

Up
0

Too much silage ,impairing cognition.

Up
0

-New affordable homes gaining momentum
-Ban imminent including provisions against absentee residents
-Loss fencing
-Extension of the bright line test
-Chinese capital controls being maintained
-Money printing ending
-Sales volumes tanking
-Prices at best flat and worst decline
-Lots of noise about interest rates (but no real change there)
-Capital Gains tax very much on Tax Working Group radar
-Trade war starting (no happy ending...)

Reality starting to bite.

Up
0

Yes, I thought the absentee residents provision was rather skookim.

Up
0

Don't forget extension of brightline test

Up
0

Over the next couple of years if Auckland prices revert to their long-term trend, it will be around $750k average and $600-650k median.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/13WdjVA-HwoHip5hwYxvGuzge3jo1-Lns/view?…

Up
0

Potentally a 20-25% decline. Time will tell.

Up
0

And then back up 50-60% in 5 years, all markets have dips.

Up
0

How? Are wages going to double, or interest rates halve?

Up
0

Says your excellent technical analysis, based on lines that you drew with Paint on a screenshot?

Up
0

Bahaha.
You should be writing for Rodney Dickens based on that expert technical analysis.

Up
0

I mean if you go back over the past 12 years and work out the average median price over the 12 years then he's sort of right. I did this with April and got $600k.

Whether that's the correct way of doing these things I don't know.

Up
0

It is American In-depend-ants Day..

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

China is getting antsy too. In spike of what they used to Buy??.....in Awkland....things are not quite what they seem.

https://www.x-rates.com/graph/?from=CNY&to=NZD&amount=1000000

When in debt up to yer eyeballs...any rate rise, any tax take, any petroleum rise, any more House Debt, anymore swapsies....would be stupid, would it not.

Up
0

Maybe in-depend-PANTS day.

Up
0

Hey guys, have a look at this...suits all ages and FREE ADMISSION - DGMs or spruikers you are all welcome!! Come on put on your best French clothes, colours, berets and join in an action-packed family fun day.
http://events.stuff.co.nz/the-press/2018/remuera-bastille-day-festival/…

Up
0

3rd report to show prices being flat after REINZ & QV. Good to see some consistency between various reports

Up
0

Barfoot & Thompson are not working for the Seller / Vendor. They are working for the Purchaser / Buyer. They put fear into the Seller to make a quick sale under duress. They make the Seller feel that they have a problem??? Oh that well rehearsed phrase ... "the market says' .... come on, they don't even do research to justify the market in the area of the Seller???? I don't understand why people take Barfoot & Thompson word as the Bible???? Barfoot & Thompson are a business who report on there companies turnover and just like any other company they need to make a profit. Today there are many smaller Real Estate Company's who are not greedy for a quick sale and commission and who are just as good. Sellers do you own research and shop around for other Real Estate Agents.

Up
0

RE agents,whichever agency,work for their COMMISSION. Working for their client's interests - Vendor - is pure bullshit

Up
0