sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown and Minister for Auckland Simeon Brown are set for a contentious showdown over transport funding in New Zealand's biggest city

Public Policy / opinion
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown and Minister for Auckland Simeon Brown are set for a contentious showdown over transport funding in New Zealand's biggest city
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown

A big fight is brewing between the Minister for Auckland and the Mayor of Auckland over what roads will be built and how they will be paid for. 

National saw an easy win in promising to scrap the regional fuel tax, which adds 11.5 cents to Auckland petrol prices, during the general election campaign. 

It came at zero cost to their fiscal plan, voters are very sensitive to fuel prices, and played into their narrative about cutting taxes. Surely it helped them scoop up some votes! 

However, it flies in the face of the party’s values such as devolution and allowing local governments to call the shots about what happens in their own communities.

Auckland Council asked for the tax in 2018 when it was struggling to fund transport upgrades without breaching its debt ceiling. The city’s fiscal position has not improved since then.

Now, Mayor Wayne Brown has said the Government’s decision to get rid of that revenue stream, without having a replacement ready, will result in the cancellation of projects. 

He was elected on keeping rates as low as possible—while acknowledging they have to rise significantly—and doesn’t want to lift them further to cover the missing fuel tax money. 

Simeon Brown, the Minister of Transport and for Auckland, said he had told the Mayor to spend any remaining money on “projects which are of mutual priority to the Government and Auckland Council”. 

Wayne Brown, in his signature style, basically told the Minister for Auckland to go get stuffed. 

“We've got to decide … what goes in Auckland. This is my city, not theirs," he told Stuff

If the Government wants its priority projects completed, such as the Eastern Busway, and the completion of the City Rail Link, then it needs to give the Council tools to fund them. 

“The money’s got to come from somewhere, we can’t just magic it up,” Wayne Brown said. The shortfall will add up to about $1.2 billion over the next four years. 

Minister Simeon Brown said, in a speech on Friday, that he was committed to working with Auckland Council to deliver a transport network that was better value for money. 

“I look forward to having constructive conversations with Mayor Wayne Brown on these issues,” he said. 

Constructive: a word which here means “contentious and combative”.

Beehive versus the capital

Wellington city mayor, Tory Whanau, also described a recent meeting with Simeon Brown as being “constructive”. 

It's hard to imagine the evangelical, conservative minister and the permissive, leftist mayor finding huge amounts of common ground — but they seem to be making the best of it. 

Prior to the election, Whanau said it would be “deeply concerning” if Brown became Minister of Transport.

Once he had the role, he was key in cancelling most of Let’s Get Wellington Moving — a locally-designed transport project which the previous Government was co-funding.

Then last month, Brown publicly criticised Whanau for missing a deadline to provide him with information about Wellington’s water crisis. Constructive criticism, you might call it. 

Water management is another area where the Coalition Government has promised to scrap a Labour-era policy without first having a replacement ready. 

National’s alternative to Three Waters is still under development and the jury is out on whether the more localised model will actually achieve balance sheet separation. 

One more possible battle with local councils will be over National’s alternative to the medium density residential standards, which were intended to allow more dense housing in big cities. 

The Housing Minister has told city governments they have to zone for 30 years worth of growth “immediately” or else the central government will step in and do it for them.

That could turn into a big fight if local councils, who often oppose new housing, attempt to fudge their homework or defy the Government’s edict — as happened in Christchurch.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

64 Comments

2nd harbour crossing ruling out light rail, cycling, pedestrian.....what a clown show

Up
12

I'll back Mayor Brown - and reckon the vast majority of other Aucklanders will do the same.

I like his brand of commonsense and intelligence and the way he doesn't tolerate fools...... Sadly, there's no shortage of them in Wellington.

TTP

Up
9

The second harbour crossing is a joke. It costs every NZer about $10,000 each. I’m happy with the current one thanks. Just build a $1 billion walking, cycling, and light rail bridge and spend the other 55 billion elsewhere. 

Up
7

Wonder what the cost of the toll NAct will put on the existing harbour bridge?

Any punters out there?  It'll be a major money-spinning monopoly!

Up
2

the most common sense would be to go back to the original plan and build the tunnel under the harbour for the rail then convert the busway to rail as was the original plan before HC went for the cheapest option. if she had done that traffic congestion would reduce to levels the bridge can handle, cyclists can jump on the train to get across the harbour. the only thing they would also need to do is build bigger park and rides at the station which can also bring in more revenue for AT, they can build multistory car parks pretty cheap nowadays ( as long as the government or AT don't build them)

Up
1

Agree with everything apart from the park and ride multi-story car parks being cheap. They are somewhere between 60K to 80K per space. Very poor investment for what they achieve (basically 2 trips per day for one person on a weekday, less on a weekend). 

Up
2

Aucklands just one big sinkhole financially.....better value to be had developing the winterless north... Welcome to the FAR NORTH  LAND COMPANY.... no we are not affiliated with the East India Company....lol

Up
0

the auckland , hamilton tauranga triangle is the paymaster for most of NZ, the contribute over 42% of the government income yet they don't get that much back from central government because they use some of that money to help the regions 

Up
2

Yep a definite clown show.
Cancel everything then make the situation worse by more under funding.
Typical tories degrading infrastucture decade by decade then bitch labour or a left wing govt have to spend up large.
The Atlas network Right wing Govt playbook at work.

Up
14

..."left wing govt have to spend up large".... eg. $55M on consultants "studying" a kneejerk Harbour bridge cycle lane for a handful of moaning activists when it was obvious to everyone that a shuttlebus could have done the job...

Up
8

So why would you not build that into the next crossing..including pedestrian? You are sounding as smart as Simon..are you a shuttle bus driver perhaps?

Up
7

8 drivers at $100k p.a. each.  4 buses at $500k p.a. each.  $2.8m total.  Let's assume my numbers are way off, and it's $5m p.a. to run that service.

$785m divided by $5m = 157 years.  Sure, the time value of money comes into it but at what point does it need to be replaced?  

Up
3

The current bridge was built in 56...ummm now?

Up
1

And if you put all the single occupancy car drivers in a bus we wouldn't need a new bridge at all.

Up
8

Force car drivers into a bus and we’d have spare lanes for walking and cycling. 

Up
5

National is all about cars cars..., roads...and petrol..

Up
7

Didn’t they have a big part to play with CRL?

And what did Labour do in 6 years in power? Diddly squat 

I am no National apologist but let’s get real

Up
2

? Got EVs to 2% of the fleet  for a start.

Auckland Council got CRL across the line ...nand Auckland Taxpayer for the future 

Up
2

National reluctantly funded CRL after old Mayor Brown forced them into it, Gerry Brownlee pushed back at every point even in the face of overwhelming evidence. I think in the end some of the more cosmopolitan National colleagues said enough is enough, we need this thing let's just find it. Simon Bridges did put a big chunk into the Urban Cycleway Fund.

Labour did achieve quite a bit in Transport. Especially as the transport ship takes a while to turn when all it's been geared up to do is build motorways. A lot of the achievements were system change stuff that now National will try to reverse. Looks like their new consenting approach is going to be rapid approval for whatever a minister suggests gets built. 

Up
2

This is a fairly good summary of Labour's transport performance.

https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2023/10/17/looking-back-at-labours-t…

Up
3

I think the inter island ferries are a must do ...but I guess it will take one to sink (tragedy)  before thats on the table again... sometimes I wonder if we arent living in a 'crisis economy' permanently these days...lol 

Up
10

It's not the ferries that are the problem (std ro/ro ferries can be made available much quicker), it's the Left children still addicted to playing with their trainsets & specifying that special ferries must be built to carry them across the ditch...oh, why not make them a lot bigger so we can build unfunded & uncosted new terminals while we're spending millions of other peoples money

Up
3

Have you seen the current terminals?one decent earthquake or cyclone, and they are gone.let alone sea level rise.

Up
9

at the moment they have only one ferry that carries rail, not sure why they didn't just that again, have a dedicated rail ferry and the other two carries passengers trucks and cars. im sure it is a cheaper option to fund. the new ships are to big for the sound and will create all sorts of problems with wash etc 

Up
2

I'm coming to the conclusion that Simeon  really is an idiot.

 

Up
16

Simian?

Up
4

We have an ex-business banker looking after transport.  Could they not find anyone with any relevant formal experience in logistics, or even civil/construction?

Up
7

Well, Nzdan, how many in Parliament are anything but institutionalised career politicians who have never been involved in anything but academia, politics, big corporates or the public service? The dearth of practical experience is daunting.

Up
6

Most of them.  Bachelor of Arts degrees rank pretty highly, the current Finance Minister (Willis) has an English Literature Degree and a Post Grad in Journalism.  Many dropped out of high school jobs into politics.

But this article is about Simeon Brown and that's who I am talking about.   

Up
5

I think saying that Simeon was a banker is pushing it a little.

He graduated in 2016 and was elected in 2017.

The banker position he held is the sort of thing the National Party organises for their politicians so they can put in on their CV so they can claim "business" or "corporate" experience. 

Up
4

He's thick as two planks. He can't even see he's being set up to be the fall guy when Aucklanders clock that he's cancelled all their projects with no alternatives. 

Up
3

Same as Willis when she had a stint at Fonterra, courtesy Todd Muller.

Up
1

Admittedly I didn't dig much into it.  He was a "senior associate" at BNZ.  Sounds like someone has fluffed up his job description on Wiki, or as you say he did a 12 month stint prost grad all leveraged by politics.  

Up
0

And 2-3 years tops as a business banker?

 

Up
1

i formed that opinion when i saw him on the transport committee, he doesn't listen to what is being said by officials and i lost count of how many times and ways they tried to tell him the same thing. they were explaining to him what time of year they can make pot hole repairs and he couldn't understand why they could not repair them in 30 degree heat or typoon rain.so they have a 4 -5 month window each year to make lasting repairs especially if they need to fix the under the road problem to stop them reoccurring, his solution slap of hot mix in she be right 

 

Up
8

Like I said above. Thick as two planks. Spoken to a few people who went to uni with him. 

Up
2

A nation with first class desires and second class incomes.  Solution.  Spend time and energy fighting over that the other people should pay for it.

Up
2

For sure, Wellington should just drink bottled water.

Up
0

Not a problem for the mayor, as she is much not into water anyway, when it comes to drinking... 

Up
3

Yes she's the only politician that drinks...?

Up
5

Brown must be pissed, rates have to go up or services cut now....

Nat tax cuts are make believe the removal of public transport subsidies will cost me 1000s more then tax cut across family....

 

Up
6

That can't be, they promised nobody will be worst off with their tax cuts. 

Up
8

Long ago a certain local MP promised that nobody would be made worse off by the Canterbury eq’s. Then the direction of EQC &  Sthn Response put that notion into reverse, well and truly. Some of us will neither forget nor forgive that punitive doctrine.

Up
4

National are being exposed at a rate of knots that genuinely surprises me.  The only winners thus far are the tobacco industry and residential property investors. Everyone else is eating a big poo sandwich. 

Up
16

Everyone knew that when they voted. They just opted to wrap the poo in bread before eating.

Up
4

Many people didn't realise they would be eating a poo sandwich. They though the Labour cabbage soup was nasty so thought they'd vote for anything that was different. They're finding out quickly. 

Even the Devonport local rag editorial is having a pop at Simeon without directly mentioning him.

Up
2

You forgot the oil industry.

Up
6

And Shane's mates the Fishing industry

Up
6

Brown poo

Up
1

I agree with this Ak fuel tax cut. Why, because AT are just wasting this money on things like the suspension damaging/ fuel usage increasing speed bumps. Plus putting 30k signs on dead end roads that nobody goes 50ks on anyway and which will never have a cop monitoring speed on. Or the proposed B grade Lake Rd project which will not increase traffic lanes for cars. Which are required for access to the only Navy base NZ has.

The less wastage the better.

I hope that they will not get around the debt limit by doing a 3 waters trick or any other underhand tactics to take debt off the Councils books. Because the debt still is there and it would end up bigger than if normal prudent policies of living within your budget applied.

Up
6

I agree with it as well because lower income earners should be better off as higher value properties fill the void via rates increases 

Up
1

Agree...much higher rates for everyone..how dare they try and avoid that!

Up
3

Never let facts get in the way of a good National Party talking point.

Most of the $780m raised by the Auckland fuel tax has been allocated to the Eastern Busway ($272m) and new commuter train cars ($330m). Though some money has been spent on cycle and bus lanes, the funds have been spread across a large number of projects, even including the redevelopment of the Downtown ferry terminal.

https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/02/10/national-axes-critical-lifeline-for-a….

Up
1

And don't forget a large part of the "busway" is actually improving the road network for cars not busses.  E.g. the reeves rd flyover.

Up
1

Go Wayne! I bet he and Desley Simpson never thought they would end up on the wrong side of their blue friends. 
 

Once again Auckland ends up getting shafted by central government on immigration policy and transport funding. 

Up
6

I don't think Wayne has any political friends. Desley is in a bit of a pickle but she's already managed to secure loads of funding for cycling stuff through the GI to Tāmaki cycle links and Tāmaki drive seawall upgrade. None of the projects getting cut really impact her old rich constituency so she'll be OK with it. 

Up
1

I never liked Double Brown, it’s cheap and nasty. 

Up
3

National hated 3 waters supposedly because they wanted the local councils to run it. But when it comes to transport they are preventing the council having any say. At least 3 waters would have been run by an engineer that knows pipes not a moron politician. 

Up
7

Yes, the noisy public faction with respect to 3Waters was an excellent example of populist politics as most Mayors got on board against it. The two issues: iwi involvement in governance and the 'taking our assets' complaints.  All I could think about it during those debates was, for most (if not all) councils, their 3Waters "assets" were in fact their biggest liability. 

To get them off their balance sheets would have been the savior of local government - now it will be their demise unless this government pulls a rabbit out of a hat.

Up
6

 The Govt can borrow a lot cheaper than the councils can and that alone made it a worthwhile exercise. 

Up
4

No change really. Big city versus small country. Still.

Up
1

Wayne looks gnarly in the mayoral chains. :-)

I like he calls a spade a bloody shovel.

Up
1

Good luck with recycling the lets build another  stadium idea ...not sure where everyone will park , with  55k seats it seems somewhat short sighted but then again I guess you could always ... build another stadium....lol 

Up
1

Simeon Brown wants Auckland’s transport ‘back to basics’

https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/02/09/simeon-brown-wants-aucklands-transpor…

Ironically i can't think what's more basic than being able to walk or pedal around my neighbourhood, yet Simeon is intent on preventing people from doing that.

Up
1