sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Grant Robertson gets chance to define his legacy in his final speech to Parliament

Public Policy / news
Grant Robertson gets chance to define his legacy in his final speech to Parliament
gr
Grant Robertson by Ross Payne.

Veteran Labour politician and Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his final speech in Parliament Wednesday evening before leaving politics for a new job at Otago University. 

He has been in Parliament for 15 years, first winning Wellington Central in 2008, but his career stretches back to the fifth Labour Government as an advisor to Prime Minister Helen Clark.

Robertson twice put his hand up to lead the party while in opposition but was rejected both times. When a third opportunity arose in 2023, he no longer wanted it. 

By that time he had been Finance Minister for almost six years and Deputy Prime Minister from 2020, including during the most tumultuous economic and social crisis in decades. 

The fiscal response to the Covid-19 pandemic has overshadowed many of his other achievements, and may ultimately be the issue that defines his legacy. 

While many praise Robertson for taking decisive action to stave off what looked likely to be a new Great Depression, others believe he spent too much and wracked up too much debt. 

His big achievements outside of the Covid response included promoting a wellbeing approach to Government budgets and modernizing the Reserve Bank. 

But other work, such as reforming the tax system, solving the housing crisis, and boosting productivity, remains unfinished. 

Robertson’s colleagues have described him as being among NZ’s greatest finance ministers, while his opponents say he will go down in history as one of the worst.

His valedictory speech is an opportunity to define his legacy for himself. Watch below:

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

27 Comments

Good riddance. A politician who was style over substance. The definition of virtue signalling. 
Having said that, I think Nicola Willis will be even worse (in different ways)

Up
9

My god, if you are worried about virtue signalling have you taken a look at the lot who are currently in charge of the country?

Christopher Luxon 'this government is absolutely committed the countries carbon neutral 2050 targets.  now excuse me I need to go and pass some laws under urgency to stop our emissions going down.

Simeon Brown.  'safety on the transport system is an absolute priority for me, now excucse me please i need to go and pass some laws under urgency to increase speed limits and cut funding for road safety'

Up
1

Did I say the current mob are any good ? (Read my last line)

why do so many people here think being highly critical of one party means one adores the alternative???!!!

It’s a weird way of thinking, but seemingly common. Very binary

Up
5

The human mind is fairly dualistic, it's not very good at perceiving nuance, or shades of grey.

Up
2

While many praise Robertson for taking decisive action to stave off what looked likely to be a new Great Depression, others believe he spent too much and wracked up too much debt. 

His big achievements outside of the Covid response included promoting a wellbeing approach to Government budgets and modernizing the Reserve Bank. 

Lol "stave off what looked likely to be a new Great Depression"... "modernizing the Reserve Bank".. sounds like something Tova O'Brien would utter... just keep it simple... got his RBNZ appointee Orr to monetize all the wasteful crap spending with nothing to show for it, screwing all future/unborn NZers... reappointing Orr for 5 more years on an election year was the last middle finger to the country

Up
11

I wonder what the people of Mangere would say to Grant if he walked down the mainstreet and asked how their wellbeing was in 2024 compared to 2017

Up
4

We’re not too happy in Botany either. 
 

Great communicator, crap Minister of Finance.

Up
3

The thing is, he supposedly represented ‘the poor and downtrodden’

Up
3

All government spending is "monetised" by the Reserve Bank as that is one of its main functions. Every dollar that the government spends is created by the central bank and QE was nothing to do with fiscal spending it was a monetary procedure.

Up
0

I hope the doorknob hits him and his govt perks he takes with him on the way out. He leaves a legacy of plundering an emergency fund for virtue signalling projects for the govt of the day and persistently ignoring real data in the face of the public and blaming everything external to the failings of the economy. If there was a shred of humility at least we could have a shred of respect.

Up
10

Now Otago Uni students can see face-to-face the one whom they should thank for being forever renters 

Up
7

Just the guy to get the uni out of its pickle 

Up
2

and into a fryer

Up
0

Probably never see him

Its pretty bloody annoying that politicians now get shuffled off to university posts as well as diplomatic ones

Should be a mandatory stand down along with working for lobby firms 

Up
4

Here's what Paul Sheard said about that evil Govt debt that Grant increased:

It's not really debt. It's not something that has to be repaid. It's not something that's a burden on our grandchildren...

Paul was Vice Chairman and former Chief Economist at Standard & Poor's Global and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. His book 'The Power of Money' is a must read. 

Grant's mistake (imho) was not that he increased private sector wealth in NZ (aka increased NZ Govt debt), but that he didn't then take that cash back from where it gathered. The Labour Govt gave hundreds of thousands of people billions of brand new Govt dollars, but this money was quickly gathered up by the rentiers who own wage-sucking assets like rental properties, supermarkets, and wholesalers. The money was then saved by the wealthiest few in term deposits or spent on imported Teslas, shares, jetskis, holidays, and techy toys. If you want to know where 'the money' is now, take a look at overseas savings (held in Govt bonds), which have more than doubled over the last few years to a record $87bn.

With the right tax settings, Govt could have quickly gathered in (cancelled out) that COVID rescue spending and prevented the current account blow out. Then Grant could have said, 'well that worked folks, now let's do that again for infrastructure... we'll spend $50bn and get loads of stuff built, and tax it back from the people that end up gathering all the cash up from the extra spending. Spend $50bn, tax $50bn back - no change to debt, no change to private sector wealth.   

    

Up
12

Articulate as ever. Charitable, though

Up
4

Thanks - I thought Grant was largely ineffective by the way - although he made the right call to spend in 2020. A good mind and orator wasted thereafter sadly. His advisors in the Labour Party, Treasury (and RBNZ) are to blame in large part. Remember - senior Treasury officials are still in Ministers' ears arguing for fiscal tightness - as we plummet into recession. Crazy.   

Up
4

Unless.... They're not adverse to a recession.

Up
0

What I saw when working inside the government machinery was the opposite - ministers dictating the narrative to officials, their ‘useful idiots’; so not the way you portray it. But perhaps it *is* like that in terms of Treasury + Minister of Finance (which wasn’t the space I was working in)

Up
1

It is. Although Ministers of Finance tend to be chosen because of their risk aversion and tightness, so it is mutually reinforcing.

Up
0

Spend $50bn, tax $50bn back - no change to debt, no change to private sector wealth.   

Hang on. If you taxed all that spend back (extinguishing the money supply), what kind of impact would that have? Sounds like it could be massively deflationary to me. 

Up
0

Tax is only on a percentage of money though, if the government spends 50 billion and taxes back 50 billion, there's probably somewhere in the vicinity of 150 billion out there still.

Up
0

The money supply is expanded primarily through credit creation of private banks. That is called broad money. As debt is paid off, the money supply contracts. Incremental demand for debt keeps the money supply expanding. 

The ability of firms, h'holds and individuals to borrow is constrained by their financial resources. Taxing back from the private sector (extinguishing the money supply) means less ability to borrow, therefore deflation.  

Up
0

Not wanting to speak for him too much, I believe Jfoe is talking about the tendency for govt spending and stimulus to filter it's way through to a very small group of high net worth individuals.

This money usually gets converted into assets as stored wealth, arguably not benefitting the broader society/economy. So taxing this group is viewed as a way to retain (or increase) the fortunes of the wider economy - because the money being taxed, potentially isn't really part of the money supply.

Up
0

As someone who has received nary a cent in covid money..I am glad Grant didn't have the notion to claw money back via the  tax system.

If he decided to demand repayment from those that did I would have been ok with that..

 

Up
1

Never met the guy and I'm sure he is a nice enough person but my god, the egotistical self importance of these people is absolutely disgusting. He presided over one of the most horrific periods of financial miss management in NZ history, yet prances around like he should be showered with praise and accolades.

A perfect example of why the average NZ'er can in no way relate to our politicians, they live in an absoulte fantasy world removed from all reality and consequence.      

Up
8

Thanks for your service to NZ 

Looking back I can see how being minister of sport, deputy PM, MP for Wellington, focusing on various rights meant he was sidetracked from the most important job being minister of Finance. Jacinda couldn't see that or lacked the talent pool to draw from but it took a jolt and demotion from Chris H to put some reality to the situation. Labour ranks decimated now with most key leaders including former PM and 2 deputies leaving

Hopefully each one of us reading this - and MPs from all parties can contribute to making NZ a thriving place to live in again, for current and future generations

Up
0