sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Iran oil crisis: Timothy Welch argues New Zealand’s car dependence is now a strategic liability

Public Policy / opinion
Iran oil crisis: Timothy Welch argues New Zealand’s car dependence is now a strategic liability
cars
Getty Images.

By Timothy Welch*

The war in Iran and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz have sent oil prices past US$100 a barrel – and Kiwis flocking to fill up. Petrol just hit NZ$3 a litre and some stations have reported running dry.

In response to about 20% of the world’s oil supply being shut off in just a few days, the International Energy Agency announced its largest-ever coordinated reserve release of 400 million barrels. But analysts warn oil could reach US$150 a barrel if the strait stays closed.

For a country that imports every drop of its petrol, diesel and jet fuel, this is not only a problem, it’s a hard reminder New Zealand has failed to mitigate such strategic vulnerability.

Since Marsden Point stopped refining oil in 2022, New Zealand has imported all its refined fuel, mostly from South Korea and Singapore. Those refineries rely on crude oil shipped through the waters now blocked by Iranian drones.

The latest official fuel stocks update suggests roughly 52 days of total cover, with less than 33 days of petrol in the country. This buffer was only designed to smooth over short disruptions, not substitute for a prolonged supply crisis.

Motorists are already starting to hoard supplies, with petrol stations in Auckland already selling out of fuel cans. Some drivers may well be regretting not having bought an electric vehicle earlier.

Failure to electrify

New Zealand generates more than 85% of its electricity from renewable sources – rising to a record 96.4% in the last quarter of 2025. It has one of the cleanest and most oil-independent electricity systems in the world.

Yet transport, which consumes nearly 40% of all energy in the country, remains almost entirely chained to imported oil. Electricity provides just 0.5% of domestic transport energy. It didn’t have to be that way.

For all its imperfections, the Clean Car Discount scheme started in 2021 was shifting the needle. Over its life, the scheme put 192,000 rebates into the hands of New Zealanders buying cleaner vehicles.

The scheme cost $634 million, leaned on government grants to stay afloat, and had real affordability gaps. But it was doing one thing very well: bringing in more cars with less petrol dependence.

EV fleet growth exceeded 50% per year while the scheme operated. When the current government killed it at the end of 2023, that growth collapsed to under 10%. The government is now reportedly considering scrapping the Clean Car Standard, the remaining incentive for importing lower fossil fuel-consuming vehicles.

Unaffordable road projects

The reversal of alternatives to petrol goes further. The government withdrew funding for Auckland’s under-25 and children’s fares on public transport. The Transport Choices program, which funded walking, cycling and bus improvements across the country, was frozen and then effectively killed.

Planned light rail for Auckland was cancelled. And the walking and cycling component of a second Auckland Harbour crossing was stripped out, leaving only plans for more car lanes.

Nationally, walking and cycling improvements received roughly $391 million in the current National Land Transport Plan, about 1.7% of the fund, while state highway improvements got $6.18 billion.

Seventeen mega-highway projects – the Roads of National Significance – carry an estimated cost of between $44 billion and $56 billion, a figure that keeps climbing. Treasury has warned the National Land Transport Fund can cover just under half of the overall projected $120 billion investment pipeline.

Seven of the first eight of those highway projects did not have completed business cases when funding decisions were being made. In mid-February, the Infrastructure Commission called the program unaffordable. Ten days later, the US and Israel attacked Iran.

Never too late

Every decade brings an oil shock. Each time, New Zealand could have used the crisis to create policies and plans to wean itself off over-reliance on petrol. Instead, it has waited for prices to settle and gone back to building roads and buying petrol cars.

The country now owns 815 light vehicles for every 1,000 people, one of the highest rates in the world. Road transport emissions have grown 82% since 1990.

New Zealand still has a choice, however. It already powers lights, hospitals and factories with renewable electricity. It could have powered a diverse transport system the same way, and it still can.

Every bus electrified, every cycleway built, every train funded is a direct reduction in exposure to the next crisis. The question now is whether New Zealanders begin to treat their car dependence not as a lifestyle choice but as a strategic liability.The Conversation


*Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

Thanks for reminding me why I never vote for National. That makes this election's vote difficult. 

Up
5

That is one hell of a list of "achievements" for nact.

Up
3

Personally, I was never going to vote for the pro pollution party, or hangers on anyway, but it's always good to lay out why they are so hopelessly inadequate. It's not the 1950s anymore.

On the other hand, our "clean energy advantage" will soon disappear as our 40% of transport energy demand switches to electric and we pursue the yeasty ideology of exponential economic growthism. 

Up
2

Protest vote for TOP?

 

Social media tagline could be #slightlylesscrazythantheothers

Up
2

Yes, but those with leveraged "accidental" capital gain interests are never going to vote in the Land tax.

Up
0

All those dudes who trolled social media about how public transport, cycling, walking and EVs were a communist plot, better get off the couch and walk down to the gym to get in shape.

Up
3

Or just use the increased costs to suppress what ever tax your company used to contribute. Not as much as PIs used got away with, but it all helps.

Up
0

Hard to live without fossil fuel down on the farm… horses can help a bit for mustering but not feeding out large bales etc 

Up
4

Large bales weren't a thing before the 1980s. We survived. Perhaps everything just needs to get smaller again. There's a novel thought? 

Up
2

Tractors can be battery powered too

Up
2

Not sure the sort torque required to pull a large ag impliment could ever be supplied by battery. A small tractor with something light like a PTO sprayer, topper, or forks for lifting? Biodiesel is probably a better option?  

Up
0

Moving away from motorised personal transport would have greater uptake if we had effective public transport to replace it, as our cities have been shaped by generations of planning around cars, while social participation and even basic functions like getting groceries rely up upon personal mobility.

Living in Dunedin, the push for cycling and walking here is ageist in an ageing city, and doesn't acknowledge the reality of terrain, weather and the need to carry loads. The public transport system doesn't really go where people need it to as much of it still radial from the CBD that may well have outlived its usefulness, rather than connecting across nodes of activity.

Up
1