China manifests a striking paradox. It is among the world’s most dynamic technological powers, producing breakthroughs in AI, electric vehicles, and advanced manufacturing at an accelerating pace, yet economic growth continues to slow. The reason is no mystery. As the government’s latest Five-Year Plan (2026-30) recognizes, China is experiencing a structural transition, not a cyclical slowdown. The old model is giving way to a new one, which has yet to take hold.
This transition is about more than economics. It reflects a deeper objective: strategic autonomy. The question is no longer simply whether China can grow, but whether it can grow on its own terms. A system that depends heavily on external demand, foreign capital, or imported technology is inherently exposed – a reality that recent energy shocks have thrown into sharp relief. So, the 15th Five-Year Plan aims to reduce structural dependencies.
The investment-driven and export-led model that powered Chinese growth for decades was highly effective at scaling up supply, delivering extraordinary results through a time of rapid globalization, favorable demographics, surging urbanization, and a property boom. But it was inadequate at raising demand and welfare – and it has now reached its limits. While advanced-technology sectors are strategically vital, their macroeconomic weight is limited. High-end manufacturing, for example, accounted for roughly 6% of GDP last year and contributes relatively little to local-government revenues compared to the property sector it is meant to replace.
There is now only one engine capable of sustaining growth at the scale China requires: consumption. For a country that has managed to overcome powerful constraints to innovation – a record exemplified by Huawei’s resilience and the rise of leading AI players like DeepSeek – getting households to consume more might not seem like a difficult task. But given that under-consumption has long been embedded in the Chinese system, it might be the toughest challenge China has faced.
The gap between China’s current consumption levels and global norms implies trillions of dollars in unrealized demand. The divergence is particularly pronounced in services. Whereas China’s real consumption stands at roughly 50-80% of US levels – broadly consistent with a middle-income OECD economy – service consumption lags significantly behind, falling short of developed-economy levels by an estimated 15-20 percentage points.
The 15th Five-Year Plan marks the Chinese government’s most concerted effort yet to address this imbalance – though results will take time to emerge. At its core is a new doctrine: boosting domestic demand by investing in people.
Start with pensions. As it stands, social support in China is distributed unevenly, with rural pensions averaging only around $35 per month – less than 7% of urban retirees’ benefits. But rural pensions are set to rise to about $85 per month within three years, and to some $140 per month within five years. Some estimates suggest that this change alone could ultimately lift consumption by 5-10 percentage points of GDP.
But this is just a first step. Given the constraints on consumption – weak income expectations, high precautionary savings, and lingering balance-sheet pressures – persuading Chinese households to spend will depend less on delivering short-term stimulus than on improving the distribution of income, security, and opportunity across the economy. This is why China will have to shift the focus of its investments from physical capital to people.
Recognizing this, the 15th Five-Year Plan aims to expand the scope of free education and increase the number of years of compulsory school attendance, lower childcare costs, and scale up vocational training. Moreover, it sets the stage for reforms to the hukou (household registration) system that would more fully integrate migrant workers into urban welfare systems. And it will seek to unlock household wealth and stabilize living costs through rural land reform, improved public housing, and urban renewal initiatives.
For households to feel secure enough to spend on the necessary scale, opportunities for broader wealth accumulation are also essential. As of 2025, China’s stock-market capitalization stood at roughly CN¥100 trillion (US$14.5 trillion) – about 77% of GDP. That is well below the 100-120% ratio typical of mature markets.
Expanding China’s capital markets is not only a financial imperative, but also a structural and strategic one, as it is essential to reducing reliance on external capital. Capital markets channel savings into more productive sectors – particularly services and high-tech industries – and give households opportunities to invest their savings and participate in sustainable wealth creation. They are thus vital to enable a shift from property-based to financial wealth, and from investment-led growth to consumption-driven demand.
But, as the 15th Five-Year Plan also recognizes, expanding China’s capital markets will require deep institutional reforms to improve initial public offering systems, strengthen corporate governance, encourage dividends and buybacks, and mobilize “patient capital” from pension funds and insurers. Meanwhile, gradual financial opening and greater foreign participation will enhance market depth and integration.
It remains to be seen whether these policies will translate into meaningfully higher consumption in the near term. But they do represent a departure from previous five-year plans, which treated consumption as secondary to more traditional growth engines like investment and exports. This reflects changing external conditions, which have made reliance on others – for demand, technology, capital, or energy – synonymous with vulnerability.
At a time of intensifying geopolitical volatility and global fragmentation, China’s embrace of a consumption-led model is not only about rebalancing growth, but also about anchoring it more firmly at home. Strong domestic demand offers a degree of insulation from external shocks, and together with developed capital markets, it can go a long way toward strengthening autonomy.
In this sense, the trajectory is clear. China aims to recreate, in its own way, the conditions that some privileged economies have long enjoyed: the ability to grow from within.
Keyu Jin, Professor of Economics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, is the author of The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism (Viking, 2023). Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2026, published here with permission.
12 Comments
Ummm... just read Stephen Roache's piece which seems to be saying the exact opposite. Spin and sour grapes collide?
Both adhere to economics mantra (Roach said so when I challenged him - at least he replied).
So both are wrong.
There isn't enough remaining planet - China can become the biggest relative hegemony; but it cannot become bigger than the US was at its peak (properly measured, the US probably peaked somewhere in the '90s). Internal consumption growth has to be at the expense of less, somewhere else. Which is what the current stoush is about, deep down.
The key word is growth....China (and everyone else) should be seeking a solution that encompasses steady state or decline.
While I agree it sounds like being born into a caste system...
How so?
imagine a world were nothing grows, not house prices, companies, if you are born out side wealth you will never get there. Little chance of improvement, now life is not all about winning financially, , but its not great if you start very disadvantaged. That could already be said about current position!
sort of like how India was for a long long time
The caste system in India is an ancient, hierarchical social structure rooted in Hinduism, classifying society into four main varnas—Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras—plus the marginalized Dalits ("untouchables"). Although constitutionally prohibited and mitigated by affirmative action quotas, caste-based discrimination persists, particularly in rural areas, affecting social status and opportunity.
Conversely consider a world where rent extraction is impossible and success is a result of effort and cooperation.....such a world will by necessity struggle to support elites.
Sounds like successful communism? which may be needed for successful sustainability .
Who is going to be doing this consuming in a country with demographic collapse? Their demographic dividend has been slammed in to reverse as their workforce sharply contracts. NZ is busy subsidising pine trees on farmland to sell to Chinese geriatrics.
China has vast regions with fertility comparable to South Korea and this includes the most economically powerful regions. Shanghai recently had a fertility of just 0.61, meaning that 100 residents of reproductive age in Shanghai can expect just around eight grandchildren between them.
https://vividmaps.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/china-fertility-crisis…
"...for every person age 65 and older in China, there are about five working-age adults. By 2050, there will be fewer than two for every person age 65 and older"
Arbitary age 65. Reset that to 75 and the ratio of workers to pensioners changes to something more acceptable. Just change the way of thinking - not an age measured from birth but an age measured from average age at death. Commit to say ten years of pension and they become affordable without being an unreasonable burden on workers.
You are loading a lot on those eight grandchildren. A country is going to increase it's consumption and fund an extra ten years of pension while losing 3-12 million in population per year by 2050. Yeah, nah.
"In 2019, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences warned that the country’s basic pension fund could run out by 2035. The consequences could include widespread poverty and social unrest.
This has also created a vicious cycle. According to Bloomberg, tens of millions of young Chinese are now refusing to pay into the pension system. Many of those interviewed said they don’t believe they’ll ever see any payout when they retire and therefore see little point in contributing."
https://geographical.co.uk/news/chinas-looming-demographic-challenge-co…
Many may live longer but may not be able to find work after 65....
Look around your work ? how many 65's
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.