sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

National rules out proposed bed tax and bank tax in promise of no new taxes if the party's reelected in November's election

Public Policy / news
National rules out proposed bed tax and bank tax in promise of no new taxes if the party's reelected in November's election
National Party leader Christopher Luxon and deputy leader Nicola Willis speak to media.
National Party deputy leader Nicola Willis and leader Christopher Luxon pictured after National's annual conference. Image source: Mandy Te.

National has ruled out a bed tax and bank levy if re-elected next term.  

Finance spokesperson Nicola Willis said under National there would be no new taxes on the table.  

 “That includes no accommodation levy or bank tax," she said.  

“We determined there is no way to do an accommodation levy without increasing costs on Kiwis booking a weekend away, so we’ll look at how existing mechanisms could be used to support councils with the costs of tourism.” 

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon previously suggested the bed and bank levies could be explored in a second term. 

Auckland mayor Wayne Brown has long been advocating for Auckland to have a ‘bed night’ visitor levy. This levy would mean visitors to the city would pay a 2.5% to 3% levy when they stay in short-term accommodation. This would require a change in legislation. 

If legislation did change, Auckland Council suggests the ‘bed night’ levy would raise around $27 million annually to fund more major events and activities. 

The Reserve Bank recently released a prudential levy consultation paper, estimating the tax would raise $209 million over three years from deposit takers - including banks- insurers and financial markets infrastructure providers.  Plans for this tax were announced by Willis in May's budget.

Willis said no new taxes this election reflects “our disciplined economic management, focused on growing the economy, creating jobs, lifting wages and keeping taxes low.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

17 Comments

Makes sense to charge the people staying for the events rather than the ratepayer. Thanks National. 

Also they once called Labours yearly increase to fuel tax a new tax. So no increase to fuel tax next term? How will they pay for all the new roads they promised 

Up
2

Just an increase to existing taxes.

17.5% GST in 2027 and then up to 20% in 2028.

Up
1

RUCS for all vehicles is coming, they are pulling the old slight of hand on this one, and will be required to tax more post election regardless. 

Up
1

And aalso no ccongestion ccharges? No RUCs for cars? Any change to the tax ssystem must be bad? No user pays, pure ssocialism uunder nNational 

Up
1

Kinda sucks this kind of policy is remotely popular. People travel for all kinds of reasons, especially to the major centers like Auckland and Christchurch. Education, work, health / illness or death. 

For instance, making the extended family travelling up to visit a child in Starship pay for random unrelated events that Aucklanders wanted and didn't want to pay for is despicable.

Rentals of any tenure are already structurally disadvantaged with imputed rent not taxed. Fund your circuses though rates or something.

Up
0

Someone has to pay. If you charge rratepayers, mmaybe oonly 10% go to the events. Ifor you charge hhotel users, maybe 50% go to the events. Or charge a bit ffrom both, pprovably the most fair. 

Up
2

The specific is not the point....the opportunity to say 'no new taxes' however is...whether revenue sources are increased or not.

Branding writ large....and dont think too hard.

Up
4

Luxon has been harping on with the "party of low tax" as if it's an official slogan. Slight of hand really as we all know the burden is just shifted and it costs everybody in a different way

Up
2

There is a difference bbetween new taxes and more taxes. Nnationals idea that the ccurrent tax ssystem is peffect cwouldn't be more untrue, eexcept for those who benefit from it.  

Up
2

Pparkinson's?

Up
2

Yyes

Up
2

Taxes are about the only thing they've campaigned on. Don't they have anything else to talk about. 

Up
7

No new taxes = we have no policies.  Because they are on performance pay, they are also going to give back all their pay and benefits.  Achieve nothing, worth nothing.  

Up
4

We have a simple Tax system and should keep it this way.

A Bank levy is inappropriate as the major Australian Banks incorporated in NZ make an acceptable 12% (approx.) Return on Equity.  

They provide excellent money transmission and cyber security, leveraging the scale and quality of their Australian parents.  Only FOOLS (and .??) would tamper with this.

What is missing is a decent "Deposit Guarantee"  The big 4 banks offer AUD250K in Australia provide this.

Government and RBNZ should be mandating this as part of the Aussie Banks doing business here.

Up
1

Yes but the simplicity of tax the @$$# out of the productive and protect those that produce nothing is really not the simple tax system most people want.

Up
8

So, more of the same then.

 Because everything is going so swimmingly!    

Up
6

LOL.

Up
0