sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Data centres consume massive amounts of water – companies rarely tell the public exactly how much

Technology / analysis
Data centres consume massive amounts of water – companies rarely tell the public exactly how much
The Columbia River running through The Dalles, Oregon, supplies water to cool data centres. AP Photo/Andrew Selsky
The Columbia River running through The Dalles, Oregon, supplies water to cool data centres. AP Photo/Andrew Selsky

By Peyton McCauley & Melissa Scanlan*

As demand for artificial intelligence technology boosts construction and proposed construction of data centres around the world, those computers require not just electricity and land, but also a significant amount of water. Data centres use water directly, with cooling water pumped through pipes in and around the computer equipment. They also use water indirectly, through the water required to produce the electricity to power the facility. The amount of water used to produce electricity increases dramatically when the source is fossil fuels compared with solar or wind.

A 2024 report from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimated that in 2023, US data centres consumed 17 billion gallons (64 billion litres) of water directly through cooling, and projects that by 2028, those figures could double – or even quadruple. The same report estimated that in 2023, U.S. data centres consumed an additional 211 billion gallons (800 billion litres) of water indirectly through the electricity that powers them. But that is just an estimate in a fast-changing industry.

We are researchers in water law and policy based on the shores of Lake Michigan. Technology companies are eyeing the Great Lakes region to host data centres, including one proposed for Port Washington, Wisconsin, which could be one of the largest in the country. The Great Lakes region offers a relatively cool climate and an abundance of water, making the region an attractive location for hot and thirsty data centres.

The Great Lakes are an important, binational resource that more than 40 million people depend on for their drinking water and supports a US$6 trillion regional economy. Data centres compete with these existing uses and may deplete local groundwater aquifers.

Our analysis of public records, government documents and sustainability reports compiled by top data centre companies has found that technology companies don't always reveal how much water their data centres use. In a forthcoming Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal article, we walk through our methods and findings using these resources to uncover the water demands of data centres.

In general, corporate sustainability reports offered the most access and detail – including that in 2024, one data centre in Iowa consumed 1 billion (3.8 billion litres) gallons of water – enough to supply all of Iowa's residential water for five days.

The computer processors in data centres generate lots of heat while doing their work.

How do data centres use water?

The servers and routers in data centres work hard and generate a lot of heat. To cool them down, data centres use large amounts of water – in some cases over 25% of local community water supplies. In 2023, Google reported consuming over 6 billion gallons of water (nearly 23 billion litres) to cool all its data centres.

In some data centres, the water is used up in the cooling process. In an evaporative cooling system, pumps push cold water through pipes in the data centre. The cold water absorbs the heat produced by the data centre servers, turning into steam that is vented out of the facility. This system requires a constant supply of cold water.

In closed-loop cooling systems, the cooling process is similar, but rather than venting steam to the air, air-cooled chillers cool down the hot water. The cooled water is then recirculated to cool the facility again. This does not require constant addition of large volumes of water, but it uses a lot more energy to run the chillers. The actual numbers showing those differences, which likely vary by the facility, are not publicly available.

One key way to evaluate water use is the amount of water that is considered "consumed," meaning it is withdrawn from the local water supply and used up – for instance, evaporated as steam – and not returned to its source.

For information, we first looked to government data, such as that kept by municipal water systems, but the process of getting all the necessary data can be onerous and time-consuming, with some denying data access due to confidentiality concerns. So we turned to other sources to uncover data centre water use.

Sustainability reports provide insight

Many companies, especially those that prioritise sustainability, release publicly available reports about their environmental and sustainability practices, including water use. We focused on six top tech companies with data centres: Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Digital Realty and Equinix. Our findings revealed significant variability in both how much water the companies' data centres used, and how much specific information the companies' reports actually provided.

Sustainability reports offer a valuable glimpse into data centre water use. But because the reports are voluntary, different companies report different statistics in ways that make them hard to combine or compare. Importantly, these disclosures do not consistently include the indirect water consumption from their electricity use, which the Lawrence Berkeley Lab estimated was 12 times greater than the direct use for cooling in 2023. Our estimates highlighting specific water consumption reports are all related to cooling.

Amazon releases annual sustainability reports, but those documents do not disclose how much water the company uses. Microsoft provides data on its water demands for its overall operations, but does not break down water use for its data centres. Meta does that breakdown, but only in a companywide aggregate figure. Google provides individual figures for each data centre.

In general, the five companies we analysed that do disclose water usage show a general trend of increasing direct water use each year. Researchers attribute this trend to data centres.

A closer look at Google and Meta

To take a deeper look, we focused on Google and Meta, as they provide some of the most detailed reports of data centre water use.

Data centres make up significant proportions of both companies' water use. In 2023, Meta consumed 813 million gallons of water globally (3.1 billion litres) – 95% of which, 776 million gallons (2.9 billion litres), was used by data centres.

For Google, the picture is similar, but with higher numbers. In 2023, Google operations worldwide consumed 6.4 billion gallons of water (24.2 billion litres), with 95%, 6.1 billion gallons (23.1 billion litres), used by data centres.

Google reports that in 2024, the company's data centre in Council Bluffs, Iowa, consumed 1 billion gallons of water (3.8 billion litres), the most of any of its data centres.

The Google data centre using the least that year was in Pflugerville, Texas, which consumed 10,000 gallons (38,000 litres) – about as much as one Texas home would use in two months. That data centre is air-cooled, not water-cooled, and consumes significantly less water than the 1.5 million gallons (5.7 million litres) at an air-cooled Google data centre in Storey County, Nevada. Because Google's disclosures do not pair water consumption data with the size of centres, technology used or indirect water consumption from power, these are simply partial views, with the big picture obscured.

Given society's growing interest in AI, the data centre industry will likely continue its rapid expansion. But without a consistent and transparent way to track water consumption over time, the public and government officials will be making decisions about locations, regulations and sustainability without complete information on how these massive companies' hot and thirsty buildings will affect their communities and their environments.The Conversation


*Peyton McCauley, Water Policy Specialist, Sea Grant UW Water Science-Policy Fellow, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Melissa Scanlan, Professor and Director of the Center for Water Policy, School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

4 Comments

Nuts. Capitalism gone very, very wrong.

Up
1

How?

It looks like engineering issues coupled to poor planning and political incompetence.

Up
0

Water is scarce; very scare in many places. The general population did not demand AI expansion, instead it was foisted upon the masses by a race between elites and their respective governments.  Just like social media - are we better with it or without it?  A question never asked - and that's capitalism; it never asks 'for what purpose and at what cost' when there is profit to be made and/or weapons systems to be improved.  

https://ethicalgeo.org/the-cloud-is-drying-our-rivers-water-usage-of-ai…

 

 

Up
0

So who gets to make the value decisions: democratic processes where the market votes on an item's merits with its feet, or a self-perpetuating technocracy of "right thinking people" who get the say-so?

I believe Social Media is a dumpster fire at a toxic waste plant. But I also think that millions of people are using and enjoying them them by choice and control by some kind of central authority is dangerous as it sets up apparatus for the abuse of power while slowing our development to a crawl.

I also believe the misuse of AI will potentially make large portions of the web in to wasteland, but I'm not prepared to give up the abilities to, say: synthesise new medicines, automate engineering calculations, create precis of large pieces of legislation, make my tax-time simpler, or moderate all the awfully fallible judgements we humans make with a dispassionate point of view.

 

Up
0