sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

The global long term financial climate is changing to a 'hotter' environment where the cost of money will be higher. We review why and how it will affect us

Bonds / opinion
The global long term financial climate is changing to a 'hotter' environment where the cost of money will be higher. We review why and how it will affect us
hotter rates
Image sourced from Shutterstock.com

For humanity to slow, arrest or even roll back climate change, it will require the agreed effort of all of us.

But humans are a cynical lot. And inherently selfish. The chance of us all agreeing to change the way we live doesn't only seem impossible to even the most optimistic of us, we also need to battle the idea that it would be pointless unless the 'others', especially the other giant countries, agree to change as well. And given the capture of our economic system by the autocratic and rich, that seems even less likely.

So adaption is the only realistic path forward.

The same is true in the economic world, especially the world of "interest rates" (that is, the cost of money).

Unless the world's largest economies change the way they operate, there is little we can do other than watch how the impact of their collective stupidity washes over us.

That applies to the US, with huge structural deficits and a dominant capital base, China, with an unbalanced economic system that is likely to unbalance global trade, Japan, with its own huge, but internal imbalances) and the European Union, with its inability to agree on any meaningful reform to resuscitate its stand-still economic model.

The largest of those four economies is the US and by a substantial margin. And interestingly, it is the one most likely to action a change and tolerate the transition pain. None of the others have any show of making meaningful change on their own. But they would if the US changed.

But the US faces a fearsome trajectory and daunting challenges. True, it has impressive attributes, and being able to survive having a crooked President shows its resilience. But it isn't clear that this will be enough.

Over the last 26 years, a generation, the economic fundamentals of the US have deteriorated significantly and have got sharply worse in the Trump1 and Trump2 terms. Any recovery from here will need to take an epic mindset shift.

The change in economic climate needs to happen because they are in a generational move to significantly higher interest rates. Long term interest rates are how this risk is priced, and the prospects don't look good.

First, here is what the long bond benchmark is signaling.

The key takeaway from this chart is the fundamental turn up in long term interest rates, one that turned from early 2021.

And that is because of an equally clear deterioration in US public finances, jerked worse by them having Trump as a President.

The Congressional Budget Office projects a sharply worsening deficit than they had expected, which could see a deficit approaching 8% in 2027.

Famously, the net interest payments on the US national debt consumes about 17% of total annual federal spending, or roughly US$1 trillion per year), making it one of the largest and fastest-growing items in their federal budget.

Rising American benchmark interest rates are going to suppress asset valuations. The key pressure is on American housing where most mortgages are priced based on a 30 year rate. That has been high for a while based on the background forces and is likely only to rise from here.

There is no way these rates are going to shift in any direction other than following US long term interest rates. And it will take them a generation to undo the damage being wrecked at present - and that clock wouldn't start on that until they begin a recovery process. Which at this time seems very unlikely.

The obvious takeaway for New Zealand is that we won't be able to avoid any of the fallout. We are a net debtor nation who needs to borrow in international markets, and at a premium, no matter how solid our own financials are. So we are facing this higher-for-longer scenario for interest rates too.

All we have done in this review is look at what the giant US economy is likely to do to us. There could well be shocks also coming from China, Japan, the EU or even Australia. But even if there aren't, the US size in the global marketplace is enough to affect us a lot on its own.

At a fundamental level the implications here over the next 25 years or so are likely to be lower asset valuations, especially yield assets. That includes for real estate, both commercial and residential, many equities that are utilities that rely on their valuation based on dividends, bonds, and increasingly utilities like tech infrastructure (and that is because their current borrowings are all based on sky-high valuations). That debt is likely to become very risky. Remember the Dot Com boom and bust of the 1990s?

If you are an investor, would you accept yesterday's low returns knowing that the price of money is in a long term rising trend? I thought not. With that view, you aren't on your own. There is growing acceptance that the economic climate has changed to a 'hotter' future. We will all need to adapt, and hope that inflation control remains professional and effective.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

40 Comments

If you are an investor, would you accept yesterday's low returns knowing that the price of money is in a long term rising trend? 

We're in very strange times. Would have been nice to go all in on Kioxia Holdings 12 months ago and have banked the 2,400% return last week. 

Anyway I hope the Robinhood / Sharesies degenerates have been winning. 

I don't buy into the idea that we've been in an "even a monkey could make money in these markets" scenario. Plenty of equities are down 70%+ this year and past 12 months. Property funds haven't really performed. Most average investors are getting trounced while the "smart money" (includes insider trading) is making out like a bandit.   

Up
4

Great article... timely   8)

Up
2

Looks like interest rates are not going to be dropping.

Up
3

Everyone watching dollar-yen. And this is now about the FIMA program - the FIMA Repo Facility is a standing Federal Reserve backstop that lets eligible foreign central banks and international monetary authorities borrow U.S. dollars against U.S. Treasury securities they hold at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. FIMA stands for Foreign and International Monetary Authorities.

Changes must be made to the FIMA program that allow the unfettered money printing to manipulate the dollar-yen rate lower.

Some are betting it will happen and continue resumption of massive Fed balance sheet growth. There is a very clear linkage between the growth in the Fed’s balance sheet and the ol' rat poison. If those changes arise, I'm bullish on Bitcoin, physical gold, and gold miners.

Up
1

The US simply cannot afford higher interest rates, it is far, far too indebted.  They cannot grow out of their deficit, nor will the Americans accept austerity to reduce the deficit.  Defaulting is not an option either. This leaves only one option, FINANCIAL REPRESSION, which means the devaluation of their currency over the longer term by ever larger monetary expansion, or put in simple terms; the only option the US has, is to print its way out of trouble, at a scale much larger than anything we have seen so far.

Up
6

My sentiments with you there Dr Y. And about the AI boom, this is now a sovereign issue - U.S. vs China over who wears the pants in the industry. I don't think the U.S. can allow it to crash (even though I think it likely will). 

Up
0

You've described the playbook for Financial Repression, Yvil.

However, trying to print their way out of this self-inflicted debacle is tantamount to trying to fix the problem by repeating one of the mistakes that caused it in the first place.

Too much cheap money created this historic debt mountain. Pumping even more artificial liquidity into the system won't cure the disease, it will accelerate it.



For financial repression to work, the government must artificially cap interest rates while printing money.

But in a global market, the smart money will flee, especially now that we are seeing the beginning of the end of the fiat experiment, and as sovereign bond offerings and reserve portfolios become increasingly diverse.



Also, more and more sovereign players will be trying to sell their wares just as all classes of bond buyers, including CBs, hedge funds, and institutions, no longer want to own debt instruments - they will be wanting to move into assets that don't carry serious counterparty risk 



Investors will dump US Treasuries to try to minimise their losses both on real yields, and on their original capital investment.



This will send bond yields into orbit as a dwindling number of buyers, the vigilantes head for the hills, and all and sundry demand larger and larger risk premiums.



IMO, printing isn't a "way out of trouble" - all it will do is accelerate the terminal phase of the debt-doom-loop.

Up
10

Inflation occurs when money supply increases faster than the productivity of the people and the supply of goods and services they produce (ie too much money chasing goods/services that aren't increasing at the same rate).

If the US create more money as you suggest they will/should to print themselves out of this problem that they created by previously printing money......, they will create more inflation, and if they create more inflation then bond yields will go even higher which will make their interest expense on their debt even more impossible to pay, which will dig and even large financial hole for themselves.

We are getting to the point now where the short sighted financial decisions of the past 20 odd years (eg 2008 and 2020) are going to start biting everyone in the arse. As there are no good solutions to get out of the financial problems we face. 

Up
2

I recall seeing a video of Warren Buffet stating that the trajectory of US debt and interest costs will likely result in an increase in personal and company tax rates to maintain or decrease the deficit, if not sooner, then by absolute necessity, which explains his cash buildup.

Up
7

This is better from DC.

But:

'And it will take them a generation to undo the damage being wrecked at present'

it can't be, DC. There isn't enough planet left. China came late to the party, India too late. The rest of the 3rd world, got turned away at the gate. Entropy is trashing the US - the biggest hegemony the planet has ever, or will ever, see. In a last-ditch attempt to maintain, it is firing all its guns at once and ---- running out of logistics. 

I doubt globalisation survives the fallout, no country is self-sufficient, all - including NZ - are in unsustainable territory. Saving your digital proxy isn't the worry - not having anything to buy, is. There is an obvious answer. 

Up
4

You're a hard man PDK...accept the nod in the sprit it was given

Up
1

I'm betting DC isn't INTJ  :)

And he's had 20 years to do his homework, plus claims some form of status, one assumes. That implies an obligation. 

Reading the world through inflation, deflation, bond-betting, GDP - at this stage in the human trajectory - is through a glass darkly with eye part closed. 

Up
2

Proress is progress

Up
1

David, I accept a number of your conclusions however what do you mean by "adapt"? If you mean look other than at real estate as an investment - where else do we look?

Without better than market or inside knowledge shares have been like throwing darts at a board, only a very small circle in the middle for bullseye and a whole lot of mediocrity. While most of agriculture is going well I hold shares in a number of companies without dividend for years. Crypto is too volatile for those of us looking to protect our savings. Small to medium business ownership lately has more losers than winners. 

Look forward to your response. 

Up
2

If I may offer a suggestion to your question "where else to look" in relation to DC's assets which he states will be crushed by higher yields... Gold may be your answer.  It does not rely on any yield, it cannot be "printed" its supply cannot be significantly increased, it is recognised as money worldwide and has been so for centuries, and it cannot be "sanctionned".

Here is an interesting point.  The average house value in NZ has increased almost tenfold from 1985 to 2025, (roughly $80k in 1985 to roughly $800k in 2025) yet, it takes about the same amount of gold today to buy an average house as it did 40 years ago !!!  (about 140 ounces or 4.5 kgs).  You may want to consider that it is our $ which has devalued immensely, and I would predict that this trend is not about to stop, quite the contrary. Gold is your wealth preservation hedge.

Up
4

Can you leverage gold, and or get passive income from it like you can with property though? 

Up
0

Money could only be made from money, if the planet still supported growth. 

There are ups and downs in the graph, but globally it's headed down. 

So the underwrite is ebbing. 

Try and set yourself up to be as insulated as possible. Piling up proxy - it's all electronic digits, including crypto - is merely a forward bet with lengthening odds. 

Up
2

Not from REAL physical Gold WHH.  If you can leverage it, you're in the speculation realm.

Up
1

Precisely, and what good is leverage in tokens a situation where the value of your tokens is dropping, and the value of real goods and resources are rising.

Up
1

Sure you can buy futures contracts for 1000 ounces etc, paper money

not even gold will protect you from total collapse for that you need shelter land food energy security etc

 

 

 

Up
2

That's a great piece, well done and thank you DC !

Perhaps you could end with a hint of what asset, if any, you believe is most likely to preserve its value in the coming, higher interest rate years ?

Up
2

Bullets and Antibiotics.

Up
3

Assets that have minimal counterparty risk.



Especially those that have a proven record of being able to buy almost exactly the same bundle of goods and services, as they did 2000 years ago on the streets of Rome. 

Up
2

"There can be only one"

Up
0

IMO DC's article meticulously details the symptoms of our current economic decay - skyrocketing debt, soaring interest rates, and crumbling asset valuations, yet it misdiagnoses the disease. 

To conclude that we must simply "adapt" and trust that central banks will maintain "professional and effective" inflation control is an economic blind spot.

It is precisely the lack of genuine inflation control, combined with the structural flaws of the Western-centric fiat currency model, that created this debacle in the first place.

The Fiat Currency Illusion and Bond Market Collapse

The article treats inflation and rising interest rates as if they are unpredictable weather patterns. In reality, they are the mathematical certainty of a fiat currency system reaching its logical end game.

The Debt Trap: A fiat system requires exponential debt growth to function. When money is not backed by a physical asset, its value is continuously eroded by endless printing.

The Bond Crisis: Sovereign bond markets, once considered the bedrock of global finance, are facing a fundamental crisis of faith. Investors are waking up to the fact that major nations cannot, and will not, ever pay back their debts with the purchasing power of the original capital intact.

The Implosion: This is not a standard business cycle downturn; it is a structural collapse of trust in the purchasing power of paper currencies worldwide.

The Private Money Monopoly: Capital created as Debt, Not a Utility

The most glaring omission in this analysis is the mechanics of the Money Supply (MS). It ignores the central reality of modern banking: roughly 97% of our money supply is conjured up out of thin air by private commercial banks.

Unearned Rent: When a bank issues a mortgage or a business loan, it does not lend out other people's savings. It creates new digital money with a keystroke. The public is then forced to pay billions of dollars in interest (unearned rent) to private monopolies for the privilege of using our own medium of exchange.

Real vs. Financial Economy: This setup starves the real economy. It funnels wealth away from productivity, infrastructure, and lasting societal wealth, directing it instead into speculative asset bubbles.

The Public Banking Solution: Money should function as a public utility. If new capital was issued by the state for public infrastructure and productive enterprise, society would build genuine wealth without drowning in compounding, unpayable private debt.

New Zealand’s Reality: Shuffling Deckchairs on the Titanic

For a net debtor nation like New Zealand with massively debilitating NIIP liabilities per taxpayer, the suggestion to merely "hope and adapt" is simply just another recipe for systemic ruin.

Systemic Vulnerability: New Zealand did not just catch a cold from the US economy; our local financial system actively duplicates the exact same flawed model.

The Wrong Focus: Tweaking interest rate knobs and hoping central bankers act "professionally" does nothing to address our core vulnerability.

The Real Need: True adaptation requires moving past the illusion of fiat stability. It demands a fundamental restructuring of how capital is created, who profits from its creation, and how we measure real economic value.

Summary

Expecting the existing system to rescue us, to me, is like suggesting changing the font on the breakfast menu of the Titanic after we have already ploughed full steam ahead into an iceberg.

Up
4

Well listed - DC needs to read that slowly. 

Up
2

This comment, together with your earlier one "This is better from DC", sounds very condescending PDK.  It sounds as if you believe that only you know "THE TRUTH", and that you're above others who need to learn from you. 

Up
7

Great summary Colin.

How do you suggest the mere mortal of us, who cannot influence our country's financial and economic future, prepares him/herself for the upcoming chaos ?

Up
2

I believe you answered that question yourself earlier in this comment string,Yvil - in your reply to David Wills. 



And I firmly believe that we can influence our future, but only if we are willing to learn.



I'm going on 72, and my learning curve is steeper than it has been in my entire life.



Being an eternally addicted information sponge, I relish the fact that through amazing new technologies, I estimate that I can learn in 1 hour, what took me an estimated 50-100 hrs to  research in the Massey Uni library of the early 1970s .



Of one thing I am 100% certain - until we grasp the mechanism of modern day fiat money creation, we can never hope to understand the structural problems of the debt-based private monopoly status quo.



Iain Parker of Sovereign Credit NZ's work is a great place to begin, for anyone that wants to understand this process, its massive implications, and why it the basis of the monumental structural defect in our Western-centric monetary models.  



 https://www.facebook.com/groups/sovereigncredit.nz/ 

Up
2

Of one thing I am 100% certain - until we grasp the mechanism of modern day fiat money creation, we can never hope to understand the structural problems of the debt-based private monopoly status quo.

All the better to discuss this with friends, family, colleagues, acquaintances etc to educate them so they can have a more informed consideration on everything. I'd say 90% of those I talk to have no clue about it, and most still seem to think tax is collected then re-spent into the economy. It is always amusing when you see the moment people actually click that residential banks, whose sole motivation is profit, have a licence to lend money into existence then profit from the interest for it. Always a look of bewildement when they ask if that is legal etc, given the motivation behind it. 

Up
1

So does the bond market reliably act as a handbrake/red flag when fiscal policy is blatantly irresponsible ala Liz Truss?

I remember Trump saying the bond market had the yips back in the early days of tariffs. So why did the yips disappear shortly afterwards?

 

Up
1

Id suggest the bond markets are the original fear and greed index

Up
4

Oh yes, Bulls Hit.... "Miss Trust" the PM who had the shelf life of a lettuce, and the geography nous of a hamster when she served as the UK Foreign Minister.... much like Mr Trump when it comes down to it.



But the obvious difference is that the US still holds the remnants of its global reserve currency status, and that so-called exorbitant privilege that goes with the territory - IOWs, the remaining structural demand for dollars, combined with significant liquidity interventions - the handbrake didn't disappear, things were just lubricated with money printing.



That can't continue much longer now that the US public debt is about to break the $40 trillion sound barrier, which is waking up the bond vigilantes, and with the 30 year T-bonds trading at 5.27% last seen ... wait for it.... in 2007. That was when the US public debt was around $9 trillion. At that coupon rate it accounts for a 444% increase in the cost of servicing that debt.



In effect, investors are openly stating that they do not trust the long-term purchasing  power of the US dollar, and demand a premium for locking their money away for 3 decades... who could blame them... even at 3x that rate, in the fiat world, I would't go near the long end of the yield curve even with a 40 foot barge pole. 



 

Up
3

One issue that is often overlooked when talking about debt is household debt to GDP.  On this point NZ stands out, with household debt to GDP around 90%, up from 30% in 1990.  What is behind this huge rise?

Compared to other nations NZ is in a bad position.  In the US the ratio stands at about 70%, in the UK about 65%.  But both those nations have huge public debt, in the case of the UK 100% of GDP.

Contrast that with NZ which has public debt equal to around 50% of GDP.

It is as if: favourable public finances, wretched private finances, and visa versa.  

Back to my main point though - why the huge rise in NZ household debt over 1990-2000?

 

 

 

Up
1

"...why the huge rise in NZ household debt over 1990-2000?"

Do you mean 1990 - 2020?

House price inflation: because it was the main bank leveraged game in town to create (fiat) wealth. Also, after the 1987 crash people gave up on equity-markets & were told by the govt to ensure they could fund their own retirement. Then after the GFC, in the 2010s all that govt money printing was looking for assets to buy.

"Prices grew roughly 45% in the 1990s, accelerated by 107% in the 2000s, and surged another 113% in the 2010s."

https://share.google/aimode/NYyxif8w0uWsSUD5c

Then, along came 2021...

Up
4

Asset price inflation as KKNZ says. If the banks keep loaning mortgages at bigger and bigger values each time the same house is sold (for an example), then this is an ongoing increase in private debt.



In the 90's you could offset your personal income tax with losses from a rental property, and the cost of housing then after the '87 share market crash was so that you could rent a property out and the rent would cover mortgage, maintenance, rates etc and pay the mortgage off in 10 years approx. Therefore you'd minimise personal tax paid, pay down your own home faster, and could use the rent from the rental to pay your personal mortgage down even faster again at the expense of the rental mortgage. There were no healthy home standards then so landlords could do minimal upkeep as well vs today.

Up
4

Just read Ray Dalio - Why countries go broke

worth a read - it’s all happened before.

Up
2

I read his book 'The Changing World Order' after it came out (must have been circa 2022). 

You won't look at the US (and the USD) the same way after reading that book. 

People laugh at me when I tell the US is bankrupt and living on borrowed time and then glaze over in their eyes when I explain to them how/why. 

Up
3

https://youtu.be/OC1yu0L7jT4

watch this sums it up Very very gd

With U.S. 30-year borrowing costs hitting their highest level since 2007, the Treasury just asked the Federal Reserve to expand an emergency credit line days after buying yen. Go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://oxylabs.io/casualfinance for a free trial of Oxylabs. Up to 2,000 web scraping results for free. No credit card is required! Use my code CASUALFINANCE for 20% off ALL Oxylabs plans. The rate America pays to borrow for 30-years is at its highest level in 19-years, while the country that lends America more money than anyone else has already shown it will sell. If the largest holder of American debt has to sell it to survive, what happens to the price of everything else in that market? In this video, I'll break down: • What actually happens when the country that lends America the most money decides it needs to start selling • Why a currency collapsing on the other side of the world ends up in the rate America pays to borrow • Why Japan cannot just raise interest rates to fix their economy • What the largest rescue attempt in a country's history actually bought • The emergency system the United States is publicly asking to make bigger, for something that has not happened yet

Up
4

'the European Union, with its inability to agree on any meaningful reform to resuscitate its stand-still economic model'

I'm more positive about Europe. A multi country struggle within the bloc and with many trade, economic and political links to other Western and Asian countries imo Europe will more likely forge a rational pathway forward (with zig zags and retreats included) than non democratic countries (USA included).

The big picture of our trajectory is based in population , resources and environment, not in central banks, money supply, financial institutions, currency fluctuations, balance of trade, debt or any other indicators of the love of money.

I see the paper 'Update to Limits to Growth: Comparing the World3 Model With Empirical Data'  https://www.sustainable.soltechdesigns.com/BRANDERHORST-DOCUMENT-2020.p… as the most realistic assessment of our trajectory, and we could emphasize accelerating global warming under pollution (quote from the paper 'We used two proxies, CO2 and plastics.')

China won't go down imo. The people are tough and have experienced thousands of years of civilization including wars, floods and famine. Common sense tells me they will continue to trade with the Western world because their survival as a nation depends on it, and the Chinese people have much to offer, of what we need.

The USA imo is a basket case, so drunk on it's own self aggrandizing bs it can't see the wood for the trees., so likely decades of decline until well after I'm gone.

Up
2