Government's debt manager ends big fluctuations in value of bonds auctioned weekly; Treasurer hints trial of set limit of NZ$250 mln auctioned weekly likely to continue

Government's debt manager ends big fluctuations in value of bonds auctioned weekly; Treasurer hints trial of set limit of NZ$250 mln auctioned weekly likely to continue

By Gareth Vaughan

The Treasurer of the New Zealand Debt Management Office (NZDMO) has hinted the Treasury unit, which manages the government's debt, may continue indefinitely with a new policy of pre-setting the value of  bonds issued at each bond auction rather than the previous policy of seeking to meet market demand.

In a break from its past policy of sounding out market demand and striving to meet it, in the weekly auctions during the September quarter the NZDMO has been issuing a pre-set amount of NZ$250 million each time. This has ended the days of huge swings in the value of bonds sold by the government from week to week, which most recently peaked with highs of NZ$1 billion twice last year.

Brendon Doyle, the NZDMO's Treasurer who rejoined the NZDMO in March succeeding Philip Combes, told interest.co.nz a key reason for changing the policy was to encourage secondary market trading of government bonds. Doyle said when the NZDMO issued bonds based on demand, this limited the amount of secondary market trade.

"We've seen that fall gradually and we're wanting to encourage more volume to be transacted in the secondary market," Doyle said. "We think it's important there's good turnover in the secondary market to allow investors to come and to go as they need to."

If investors simply took part in the bond tenders, they didn't need to go through financial intermediaries to buy bonds.

"The second benefit is we're more consistent, transparent and even handed about the way we do things. We're not having to make decisions every week about how much gets done," added Doyle.

It was too early to tell whether secondary market activity had picked up, he said. Meanwhile, Doyle said he believed the new auction format selling the pre-arranged amount of NZ$250 million had been going well.

The latest one, last week, saw strong demand. Bids valued at NZ$455 million from 13 bidders were submitted for NZ$100 million worth of bonds maturing in April 2015. Ultimately, NZ$100 million worth were sold to five successful bidders at a weighted average successful yield of 2.64%. The 2015 bonds have a 6% coupon.

And NZ$521 million worth of bids from 20 bidders were submitted for NZ$150 million worth of bonds offered that are due to mature in April 2023. The NZ$150 million were sold to just one bidder, with a weighted average successful yield of 3.62%. The 2023 bonds have a 5.50% yield.

'Preferred method'

Doyle said from the NZDMO's perspective the new set limit tenders had gone "reasonably smoothly."

"The market still has to adjust to the change but from our perspective it has been going well and this is our preferred method," Doyle said.

The NZDMO would announce sometime late this month whether it'll continue with this new tendering method into the December quarter, added Doyle.

Christian Hawkesby, Harbour Asset Management head of fixed income, said he was a fan of the changes the NZDMO had made.

"We think having consistent sized tenders will create more volatility in yields which is good for nimble fund managers to take advantage of," Hawkesby said.

However he said some other market participants weren't so keen, noting that big offshore investors, when they swooped into the NZDMO tenders, sometimes wanted to buy NZ$200 million, NZ$300 million, or even NZ$500 million worth of bonds in one hit. The new auctions with a set limit would make it harder for them to do so. And Hawkesby suggested bond market dealers might prefer to see a half-way house from the NZDMO in the future whereby the size of the auctions was consistent but there was scope for changing the volume of bonds on the block "on the margin."

'Consistent supply needs consistent demand'

Westpac senior market strategist Imre Speizer said although consistency of supply was a good thing, it required relatively even demand, which wouldn't always be the case.

"You'll get periods where if demand has retreated, if they stick to their plan to issue that amount, then they'll have to issue it come what may and it will end up costing the DMO more money. Although if they take a long-term view, if they're willing to bear such costs thinking in the long run that helps develop the market better, it's probably the right approach," Speizer said.

Having a consistent issue amount was likely to be positive for secondary market trading, Speizer added, although there were no signs yet this had increased, but a "sea change" for trading activity would be having a significant increase in the value of bonds on issue from the current level of about NZ$61.6 billion.

Tenders so far this year have had their ups and downs. There was a mammoth NZ$900 million bond auction in April, and a failed auction the following month when only NZ$10 million of bids were received for NZ$100 million of the 2019 bonds offered. And in August the NZDMO said it would honour NZ$26 million worth of bids for bonds that were accidentally excluded from an auction.  May's budget set out that the NZDMO would issue bonds worth NZ$13.5 billion in the 2012/13 year.

Doyle joined the NZDMO from a role as managing director of Westpac's global capital markets business. Previously he had a nine-year stint at the NZDMO, including three years as head of portfolio management between 1999 and 2002.

This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers this morning. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.