sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Finance Minister signals bigger Budget deficit for 2014/15 in pre-Budget speech; says Treasury also sees smaller surplus for 2015/16 due to low inflation; says Govt won't slash spending in response

Bonds
Finance Minister signals bigger Budget deficit for 2014/15 in pre-Budget speech; says Treasury also sees smaller surplus for 2015/16 due to low inflation; says Govt won't slash spending in response

By Bernard Hickey

Finance Minister Bill English has used a Budget preview speech to signal a bigger than expected Budget deficit in the current 2014/15 year and a smaller surplus next year as lower inflation is expected to reduce the Government's revenue forecasts by NZ$4.5 billion over the next four years.

However, he said the Government did not plan to announce big new spending cuts and remained committed to income tax cuts before the 2017 election.

English said in a speech to the Wellington Employers' Chamber of Commerce that the Treasury now expected nominal GDP to be 1.5% lower over the next four years than was forecast in the May 2014 Budget, mainly because of lower inflation.

"That is about NZ$15 billion less and, to put that in context, that is more than half of the impact of the global financial crisis," English said.

"So these conditions are presenting some real challenges for the Government’s books because it’s the nominal economy that drives PAYE, company tax and GST receipts," he said, adding lower interest rates were also reducing tax receipts on bank deposits.

"In total, Treasury now expects the Government will collect NZ$4.5 billion less tax revenue over the next four years than it expected at the last Budget. The lower-than-expected revenue, as well as some quite significant non-cash items in the Government accounts, means getting back to OBEGAL surplus is more challenging," he said.

This is in line with English's recent comments downplaying the prospect of meeting the Government's four year old target of reaching an OBEGAL (Operating Balance Excluding Gains and Losses) surplus in the 2014/15 year.

In the December half year update, Treasury forecast an OBEGAL deficit of around NZ$570 million for the 2014/15 year, which was 0.2% of GDP, and forecast a similar sized surplus in the 2015/16 year.

"The Treasury is still finalising its forecasts for this year’s Budget, but it’s fair to say that both of those forecasts have deteriorated a little since the Half-Year Update," English said.

"So we expect the Budget to forecast a slightly bigger deficit for 2014/15 and to forecast a slightly smaller surplus for 2015/16," he said.

English said that progress to achieving surplus was slower than expected, but the Government was on a track to surplus and repaying debt.

"The surplus target is important. It has imposed a discipline on us and on government agencies to work hard on achieving value for money and providing new spending only where we can get better results," he said.

Prime Minister John Key said last month that the surplus target was "artificial" and the public would not want the Government to make "silly" cuts to spending to meet such a target.

"The factors that have reduced government revenue and therefore our surplus track are the same factors underpinning sustainable growth for households and businesses - low inflation and low interest rates," English said.

'Small deficit not a risk'

"A small deficit, should it eventuate this year, isn't a risk to the economy," English said.

"In fact, the downturn in revenue is due to positive economic conditions – strong growth but low inflation and low interest rates. And because we’re confident about the ongoing improvement in the Government’s finances, it won't constrain our decision making in the Budget," he said.

"We will not be pursuing cuts in services or income support in a knee-jerk response to lower tax revenue. Such measures would undermine the confidence of New Zealanders in the quality and effectiveness of public services. It would also undermine the excellent work done by so many public servants in recent years to improve public services."

English said that despite the downturn in revenue, the Government would stick with the NZ$1 billion annual operating allowances for Budgets 2015 and 2016.

"We’ve maintained welfare support, we’ve maintained and improved health and education, and we’re thinking ahead to the requirements of a growing economy and a better community through to 2020," he said.

"We won’t change that approach just to turn a small forecast deficit into a small forecast surplus. Other things matter more."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

21 Comments

talk about contradic yourselve
In fact, the downturn in revenue is due to positive economic conditions – strong growth but low inflation and low interest rates.
if you have strong growth should not the GST spend and tax take increase.
if you talk to the regions there is no growth, only growth is in auckland and christchurch which is winding down

Up
0

The growth also seems to be in some sectors, others seem to be doing poorly or actually shrinking.

The mega growth story is capital gains in some Auckland suburbs but that is I assume mostly un-taxed.

Up
0

Its growth plus inflation that's the real driver of tax revenue sharetrader - he's get getting plenty of the first by NZ standards, but none of the second, and that's whats hurting. Personallly, I'm more than happy to have good growth coupled with low inflation (the two rarely go hand in hand in NZ historically) and lower than otherwise interest rates. No salary rises of substance outside of a promotion or job change, but less need for it. We are in a good position compared with most, and substantial less debt and way smaller deficits.

Up
0

I dont agree here, he has some inflation in some areas like Council rates and electricity, sure. Since however there is no wage increases to speak of ppl have to spend less elsewhere, result almost zero inflation overall.

Up
0

Prime Minister John Key said last month that the surplus target was "artificial" and the public would not want the Government to make "silly" cuts to spending to meet such a target.

Yeah right!!

The Government concedes millions of dollars of taxpayer-funded loans taken out by a crown organisation to slash public health spending, probably won't be repaid on time.

Health Minister Jonathan Coleman said $13 million in cash advances, taken out by Health Benefits Limited (HBL) would be repaid when three major projects were implemented.

But the final deadline for the loan's repayment is March 31, and the beleaguered health cost-cutting scheme is due to be wound down by the end of June.

HBL was set up by former health minister Tony Ryall in 2010 to save DHBs $750 million over six years by establishing shared contracts for key hospital services.

On Thursday, Stuff revealed HBL was being investigated by the Auditor-General, and documents also showed the company feared being left insolvent if the Government did not grant two separate extensions and lend it more money, over and above the original loan Read more

I 'm sure this will go the same way.

The Government says it's transferring about 2,800 state houses in the Auckland suburbs of Glen Innes, Point England and Panmure to a company co-owned by the Government and Auckland Council to encourage regeneration of the Tamaki area in east Auckland.

At the same time ownership and management of the Housing New Zealand Corporation (HNZC) houses is transferred to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company (TRC), the Government's lending it $200 million of taxpayers' money to get on with things. Read more

Up
0

These guys will probably join the list

IRD overhaul likely to cost $1.3b to $1.9b

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/68190275/ird-overhaul-likely…

Up
0

I can take on the job and it will only cost the Taxpayers 5 billion and I promise most, most, most sincerely to have it completed by 2050.

Just send a cash advance of 1.03 billion to

Justdreaminginc-conz.
Hobbiton.
IQ001

Up
0

probably a better deal. Considering modern computing techniques and equipment, it seems odd that they can't impliment such a small scale (5million accounts) for the annual interest alone on that amount.

Up
0

Half or so of a billion dollars worth of incompetence and they shrug their shoulders!!!

Up
0

But don't forget SH....Bill has full faith in all the bureaucrats.....they've been working hard.....he made some very glowing comments......someones pulling the wool over!!!

Up
0

No, he has full faith in God and himself.

Up
0

god helps those who help themselves, and they've been helping themselves a lot

Up
0

One thing I notice more and more is the complete belief of the right that just wanting something "this way" isnt how it will be in the real world, its delusion to my mind. It isnt just the right, but also the "far" left also, ergo I tend to think that when ppl come up with things like this it pigeon holes them as a political extremist far from the centre.

Up
0

"if the Government did not grant two separate extensions and lend it more money,"

Again the government needs to stop doing that.
You want to give handouts plenty of exporters needing a hand, and they're useful. (declaration of interest: too late for me, but those left are going to need more than a quick hand ...out).

HBL contract for a service.
Just like SkyCasinos, no money fountain here.

Charge HBL for failing to fulfill the contract and either don't pay them at all, or charge them in court for damages involved in not finishing, and take the staff and directors to the cleaners...just like Fonterra is about to do to many of its suppliers if its not careful - no guarantees, no loopholes.

I believe 10% is the maximum allowed under law above contingencies, for a written quote/contract...

Up
0

Completely agree. This government keeps claiming to be business friendly and have some sort of background (share trader John) and yet keeps cocking up contracts and passing on more and more handouts to the types of Sky City, Hollywood, and now this contract after Novapay fiasco.

Up
0

agree with you on the Novapay. One look at the existing system and the company should have shown due diligence and told them to sort their system out first before trying to code it. The resulting mess lies sole on the contracting company there, damages and all - you don't promise to code what you can't understand. ever.

Up
0

It wasn't that long ago that he was claiming we would have a meaningful surplus. A one dollar bill surplus even.

Up
0

Could someone please explain to me just why low inflation is to blame?

Sounds to me like someone just plugged 5% "growth" into their excel spreadsheet but an actual of 3.5% the next 4 years of their model is f**ked.

Up
0

especially as the actual looks more like 1%.

The thing is a) if they are relying on having some inflation to break even, well that strikes me as nothing more than smoke and mirrors. b) they cant believe or didnt then believe that virtually no inflation was possible, that should be telling them and us their economics model is broken.

Up
0

GST and income tax - low/no wage and price inflation means less tax collected. If I recall during much of Michael Cullen's surplus years - wages were rising quite quickly and income tax collected benefitted greatly from bracket creep.

I suspect the subsequent proliferation of zero hour contracts has been a double whammy - folks not getting full time hours never get taxed at anything but the bottom rate - and in work tax credits paid to those folks increase as well.

Up
0

Also costs have risen dramatically. Profit is the gap between expenses and income and its got pretty small in my business over the last few years, thanks to compounding inflation over %8 and being export dependent.
So the tax I pay has fallen, I'm expecting new creative forms of tax as the government tries to avoid serious drastic cost cutting, however I don't think there are many options except smaller government..

Up
0