sign uplog in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Terry Baucher investigates whether the extra expenses and use of personal assets to work from home are deductible against your taxable income. As usual with tax, its complicated

Terry Baucher investigates whether the extra expenses and use of personal assets to work from home are deductible against your taxable income. As usual with tax, its complicated

We're in week three of the Lockdown, and although the Prime Minister has indicated there may be a possible shift to Level 3 from 22nd April, a majority of employees may still be required to work from home even after that shift.

Naturally, employees will be incurring expenses in carrying out their employment duties. And the question arises, can they claim a deduction for these expenses? And the short answer is no. The Income Tax Act specifically precludes a deduction for “An amount of expenditure or loss to the extent to which it is incurred in deriving income from employment. This rule is called the employment limitation.

This is a longstanding prohibition which has been in place since the mid-1990s. It was introduced as part of a simplification of tax return filing requirements. Instead, what is to happen is that the employer needs to reimburse employees for such expenditure. The employer will be given a deduction for the relevant expenditure and it will be treated as exempt income of the employee.

But what potentially could be deductible?  The Inland Revenue guidelines for businesses with home offices are equally applicable for employees working remotely.

These guidelines allow a deduction of 50% for the rental of a telephone line, if it is also a private line which is used for business. Obviously specific business calls would be deductible.  With regard to Internet costs this depends on the plan and the business proportion. How that is determined is a matter of some judgement. In addition to these costs, the business proportion of household expenses such as rates, power, rent or mortgage interest expense could be claimed.  

Generally, the business proportion is calculated as the area set aside for use as an office over the total area of the house. For example, if an employee has an office which is say, 10 square metres of a 100 square metre house, then the deductible proportion is 10%. 

There’s an alternative option of using a fixed rate as determined by Inland Revenue based on the average cost of utilities per square meter of housing for an average New Zealand household and applying it per square metre of the office area. 

For the 2018-19 income year the rate was $41.70 per square metre so in the example above the deduction would be $41.70 x 10 or $417.  It does not include the costs of mortgage interest rates or rent and rates.  These must be calculated based on the percentage of floor area used for business purposes.

All of the above is perhaps easy enough where a person has a dedicated office at home, but as no doubt is happening all over New Zealand right now, employees are working on kitchen tops, dinner tables and out of bedrooms. What happens in these instances?

As the area being used cannot be said to be entirely dedicated to office use, a full deduction based on these apportionments is probably not available. The area of the room used for non-business purposes for example a bed or other furniture should be excluded. Arguably the deduction would be time-limited (for example, if it was only in office use for 8 hours a day, then only one-third could be claimed). 

For the employer, they may be able to claim GST on the relevant proportion of GST expenditure claimed using the standard apportionment methodology, if the employee provides invoices.  At this point the employer is probably thinking this is getting needlessly complicated.

A more practical approach would be for the employer to simply pay a flat rate allowance to employees. This is allowable if the allowance is based on a “reasonable estimate”. 

The other potential issue is fringe benefit tax.  Theoretically, FBT applies on the private use of tools such as mobile phones and laptops.  Fortunately, there is an FBT exemption if the laptop or mobile phone is provided mainly for business use and the cost of those laptops and mobile phones is no more than $5,000 including GST.

All of the above represents a compliance nightmare for employee employers and possibly a target rich environment for Inland Revenue in a future date where it considers that the allowances paid, or deductions claimed for home office expenditure, have been excessive.  In this instance the employer will be liable for the PAYE which should have been deducted from the amount determined to be excessive/non-deductible.

In practical terms, Inland Revenue might simplify clarify a lot of issues for employers and employees alike by issuing a determination setting out a flat rate amount of expenditure it would consider acceptable.  An employer could pay above that amount but then PAYE would be applicable.

Of course, all of the above is somewhat hypothetical, if the employer has no cash flow to pay any such allowances.  I suspect that is the matter employers are most concerned about right now. In the meantime, let’s hope we can return to a new normality soon.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Who'd have thought accountany could be so interesting. On my personal experience with precisely this situation I think it underlines this country's penchant for making regulations willy nilly but never updating them to make sure they are fit for purpose as the society changes over the years. Working remotely is and has been a growing trend for decades and being fooled by your employer into providing all your own equipment at home is something that happens to many homebased employees, the employer get the benefits you get hardly any write offs etc in return. Unfair. Of course one could try and restructure as an independent contractor but you have to be wary of that too, if its even an option. Good points raised Terry. Be good to see some policy development in this area to make things a bit more equitable.

As a PAYE employee, someone raised the option of recovering home expenses in our business.

The response was because you are not incurring transport costs to get to work, you'll have to take it on the chin.

Any unsatisfactory response I thought, but hard to raise your concerns about this unless you are in the union, and the message comes through them.

Perhaps explains the value of unions?

Unions? In IT? Rare as rocking-horse poo.....

Sounds like a shitty employer, are they still incurring electricity costs with people working from home?

I had no issues putting in an expense claim from my employer.

Can you clarify this statement:
"The employer will be given a deduction for the relevant expenditure and it will be treated as exempt income of the employee."

My employer has been paying everyone $30/month as a specific internet access provision. Our company policy is on a snow day where the office is open, if you can't make it into the office you must work from home, and the $30/month payment is in line with that policy.

Does this mean the $30/month payment should actually be PAYE tax free for the employee? I believe we've been paying tax on it this whole time.

We had recently looked into this, from what we understood due to the payment going towards a service that gives you with a private benefit then it's correct to apply PAYE.


So what about a technical services employee whom needs their company vehicle at home for emergency call outs as they cannot base them selves at the office. The Vehicle is normally also available for private use as the office is not secure for storage or overnight parking. In this case the anomaly could be that the FBT is exempt. In a similar vein the vehicle is also required to be parked at the service techs home for after hours emergency call outs especially as the office is not located near the point of residence. We do pay the FBT of course as at present.

What we find interesting is why are teachers claims not allowed, yet they do a lot of work from home out of hrs, and store resources records etc.
And that they are working from home basically full time, and nothing about these claims.
Also of note: is teachers have been working over easter, preparing classes , meetings on line and none of these are included in salaries.

yea.. those same teachers who slave away over the 6-7 week xmas break preparing lessons for the new year. Yea right... give me a break.

Lots of professions work from home... very few get ~12 weeks annual leave.

Why call out the teachers?

Question: What about building a dedicated office in your home garden - away from the house to be used as a self-employed, full time, permanent work space. Is that build cost 100% deductible against the business? Can't find the answer anywhere and my accountant says there's nothing published on this from the IRD and we would need to request a decision from them (could take 9 months). Anyone have any knowledge about this?