sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Fletcher Building and SkyCity are 'working closely together to understand any impacts' from the supply of fire doors for the convention centre that could potentially be contaminated by asbestos

Business / news
Fletcher Building and SkyCity are 'working closely together to understand any impacts' from the supply of fire doors for the convention centre that could potentially be contaminated by asbestos
[updated]
nzicc-2025.jpg
Source: NZICC website

Fletcher Building [FBU] is investigating the possibility of asbestos contamination at the trouble-plagued New Zealand International Convention Centre (NZICC) in Auckland.

The centre, being built by Fletcher Building and originally intended for opening in 2019, has been subjected to numerous problems and delays with the most drastic of these being the fire that extensively damaged the central Auckland building in late 2019 when the project was already delayed. 

Operated by SkyCity Entertainment, the NZICC is currently slated to open in February 2026.

But Fletcher Building said in a statement to NZX on Thursday that it notes media reports in relation to the investigations by the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment and WorkSafe "into the potential asbestos contamination of certain fire doors supplied by Pacific Door Systems, the country’s largest fire door manufacturer, which is owned by the ASSA ABLOY Group".

"Fletcher Building’s project team for the New Zealand International Convention Centre has been made aware that this issue may involve fire doors supplied to the project by Pacific Door Systems," Fletcher Building said.

"They are undertaking investigations to confirm the extent of any issue."

The company said that surface testing undertaken to date had confirmed "no asbestos residue in occupied or public areas".

"...The current advice is that potentially impacted doors are safe in their current, installed state. SkyCity has been informed of the situation and we are working closely together to understand any impacts."

The statement gives no indication of when there will be a further update. Interest.co.nz sought further comment from the company and a Fletcher Building spokesperson responded that the investigation is "still in the early stages so at this point we don’t have anything to add other than what was in the statement earlier". 

"The site remains open though and work is continuing there."

A notice on the Pacific Doors Systems website says the asbestos issue has impacted a product known as ‘FRB board’ or ‘FRB core’, "which is manufactured by a third party outside of New Zealand". 

"FRB core is a product that PDS and other manufacturers in both Australia and New Zealand use in the manufacturing of certain Pyropanel fire-rated doors," the notice says.

"It is important to stress that FRB core and the Potentially Impacted PDS Fire Door Categories do not contain asbestos ‘by design’. Instead, this is a contamination event in relation to which an explanation and more information is being sought from the relevant third party manufacturer," the notice says.

Pacific Doors says while the scope of the contamination issue remains under investigation, "it will be prudent to handle any doors in the Potentially Impacted PDS Fire Door Categories as if they could contain asbestos, out of an abundance of caution".

It goes on to say the doors "should pose no risks while they remain ‘in situ’ with the FRB core fully encapsulated".

Fletcher Building recently reported a $419 million after-tax loss for the year to June 30, 2025.

The full-year loss compares with a $227 million loss in the 2024 year and comes after Fletcher Building had to digest $702 million worth of writedowns in the latest year, with $644 million of those relating to continuing operations of the business.

Itrecently officially put the 'for sale' signs on its problematic construction division and when announcing its full year results gave clear indications that the residential and development operations may be following the construction unit out of the door.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

Am I funding their losses (taxpayer)?

Up
0

I think I am (shareholder, luckily a very small holding).

Up
2

Are you also a (gambler) ?

Up
1

Was just wondering if the crown owns it. 

Up
0

Don't think they have any interest in it. Good chance you're funding their losses through your Kiwisaver though. 

Up
4

Its publicly-listed on the ASX and NZX

Up
0

Your fuing joking me! 

Why can't we do building well, any more in NZ?

The cursed construction!

 

Up
1

I think this was one of JK's deals. SkyCity got a bunch more pokie machines and we got a new convention centre to be open in time for the 2020 America's Cup and APEC 

Up
3

Bit of a beat up on Fletchers when this is a third party product they purchased. I mean they do a lot wrong, but this isn't on them

Up
1

Not necessarily. I wouldn't be surprised if these doors are were supplied by a Fletcher owned subsidiary. I see it's ASSA ABLOY, no tie to Fletchers.

Up
1

Market power breeds complacency and the Fletchers are reaping a tsunami of woe due to the fact....some may wish to describe it as bad luck.

Up
1

The asbestos law is over the top. Decramastic roof tiles installed around the 70's and maybe into the 80s can have asbestos but in minute quantities. Have to have the house bubble to remove them. The cost to do this out of proportion to the risk. If these doors have a minute quantity sealed within them then the risk is when a fire occurs and they fail after 4h? I think that's the time before a fire can transmit through them. 

Up
1

"The asbestos law is over the top."

Possibly....but then if your spouse dies cleaning up the site after the fire you may not agree. Its a bit like the silicosis risk from engineered stone, nobody considered the risk to begin with and people died and consequently the pendulum swung.

Up
1

All dust on a building site is harmful.
So now whatta ya gunna do?

Up
3

You are going to mitigate the risk or just let workers choke to death

Up
0

Some dusts are more harmful than others.

Up
1